British Prime Minister David Cameron this morning delivered his heavily anticipated speech on the UK’s future relationship with the European Union. Mr Cameron pledged that, should his Conservative party be returned to power in the 2015 general election, he would seek to renegotiate the terms of Britain’s EU membership, before holding a referendum that would give the British people the choice of staying in the EU on the new terms, or leaving entirely.
It’s long past time the British people were given a say on the issue. When two-thirds of voters opted to remain in the European Economic Community, as it was then called, back in 1975, the relationship was purely a trading one, based on the European “single market” (that referendum was held by a Labour government, after Tory Prime Minister Edward Heath had taken Britain into the EEC in 1973 without consulting the electorate).
Since then the EU has expanded, appropriating more and more power from national parliaments, particularly in the areas of business regulation and economic policy. There’s also been a relentless drive, led by Germany and France, towards greater fiscal and political union – a process that accelerated with the creation of the European single currency a decade ago, and which has been given greater, rather than less, impetus by the economic turmoil currently engulfing the continent (the solution to every problem confronting Europe is, its citizens are frequently told, “more Europe”).
Reaction to the speech suggests that Cameron may, for now, have succeeded in uniting his party, which has for years been beset by quarrelling between supporters of the EU and “euroskeptics.” But in other respects he’s kicked the can down the road; today’s speech was short on specifics (exactly which powers Cameron would seek to repatriate, for example), and several questions remain unanswered; among them, whether Cameron would himself campaign to leave the EU were he not to get everything he wanted from negotiations.
Cameron’s most pressing concern, however, is to retain power in 2015, and preferably without being bound into a coalition with the left-of-center Liberal Democrats, as he has been for the past two-and-a-half years. To that end he needs to neutralize the threat posed by the UK Independence Party (UKIP), which has positioned itself to the right of the Tories on the related issues of Europe and immigration (in a little under a year from now a new wave of economic migrants, from Romania and Bulgaria, is due to descend on Britain, taking advantage of EU “freedom of movement” laws).
UKIP is reckoned to have cost the Tories around 20 parliamentary seats at the last general election, and its strong showing in recent special elections suggests it could be an even bigger threat in 2015. Cameron may today have done enough to win back much of the support he’s lost to UKIP, although its leaders are insisting that they’ll continue to campaign for a straightforward exit from the EU, and claim that Cameron will backtrack on his commitments if he’s re-elected.
Cameron’s announcement has also put the pro-EU Labour party on the back foot. Labour’s cynically opportunist leader, Ed Miliband, has for the last couple of years sought to exploit Tory divisions over Europe while refusing to outline his own party’s position. He has, however, said in the past that he’s against a referendum, and might now be forced into a humiliating U-turn in a bid to steal Cameron’s thunder.
European leaders, meanwhile, are desperate to head off any British renegotiation, fearing that other countries would follow suit – which would spell the end for their grandiose plans for “ever-closer union.” They’ve warned Britain that it cannot “cherry pick” the terms of its EU membership, and insist the UK must be “all in or all out.” A sign of their desperation is the fact that they’re citing President Obama’s eagerness for Britain to remain in the EU as some kind of deal-breaker.
For all their bluster, however, Europe needs Britain rather more than Britain needs Europe. The value of British exports to the eurozone is falling steadily, even as the UK increases trade with the rest of the world, and Europe sells rather more to Britain that it sells to Europe. It may turn out to be a matter of who blinks first.
There’s not much point in speculating on the details of the proposed negotiations, or the outcome of a referendum, before the 2015 election (as Ambrose Evans-Pritchard writes in the Telegraph, given the ongoing eurozone crisis it’s possible that a referendum on Britain’s future may not even be necessary). But if the UK’s modest recovery from recession continues (unemployment fell again today, while it continues to hit record highs in the eurozone), the Conservatives’ position as the only party offering the British people a say on Europe will put them in a strong position to win an outright majority.
Then the fun will really begin.






As if he’d really follow through with it if the Brits vote to leave….
He wouldn’t have a choice. The vote would be binding.
Keep in mind that while he said he would allow a referendum, there’s no guarantee that four years down the road he won’t pull the old “conditions have changed” rabbit out of his hat to avoid actually doing so.
Also, between now and then the EU Council in Brussels, which as Nigel Farage has often pointed out doesn’t have much respect for democracy in general and referendums in particular (see “Lisbon Treaty”), could very well pass a measure making such referendums either non-binding, or just illegal.
At which point they offer Cameron a few “concessions” as window-dressing, he says “it’s the best deal we could get”, and Britons are stuck. Leaving Cameron where he, personally, wants to be; still in No. 10, and still in the EU.
Like most politicians in Europe and its close environs, Cameron is what we term a “progressive” here in the States. One of the few things John Kerry ever said that actually makes sense is that “the entire spectrum of European politics would fit comfortably within the Democratic Party”- the far left of it, at that.
Cameron has repeatedly stated that the EU is the only way for the UK to go. He wants the UK to stay, seeing it as the only way for him and his coalition to retain power permanently. The fact that Obama is “advising” him to stay should be a flare-lit tip-off that Cameron has about as much enthusiasm for the referendum he’s “promised” as Obama has for the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
This is a ploy to get him past the election. Period. Nothing more. And taking a page from Obama’s playbook, this “promise” comes with a built-in expiration date, probably ten seconds after his opponent concedes the next time around.
Never assume a politician will act against what he perceives as his personal best interests. And never, ever assume that he is being truthful when he acts in a way contrary to his philosophy and track record.
You will spend your life being surprised and disappointed.
clear ether
eon
Yeah, the Tories have made this promise before, and the timing on this announcement makes it an election ploy.
But hopefully this snowballs though.
Just a political ploy to placate UKIP but most of the Brits don’t buy it. It is not the first time he promised this, btw.
Bingo. Promises, promises.
I sure hope it gains momentum and becomes a reality though.
Europe needn’t worry — Obama will opt to take Britain’s place.
Obama should get his own private country in Europe. Maybe they can give him some artificial island near Scandinavia or something. Then almost everyone will be happy. The Euros will be happy since they like Obama, Obama will happy since he could become president for life and run his new country as he pleases with virtually no opposition, Michelle will be happy since she would finally have a country she can be proud of, America will be happy since it could finally go back to being America, the Chinese will be happy since with America going back to being America they may have some chance of eventually getting a bit of their money back, and most of the rest of the world will be relieved. Putin, the Iranian mullahcracy, the Muslim Brotherhood and the ghost of Hugo Chavez might shed a few tears, but I can live with that.
Well said, I particularly like that “artificial island” aspect. The fact that Obama has no clothes won’t offend so many people.
Oh no, we don´t want them anyplace near here. Why not some place in Africa ? There he can rule and reform as he pleases. And the wife can finally be the queen she wants to be.
Smiling….OK, it seems then as if re-locating B. Hussein Obama and Michelle may be a problem…..but, since he bowed to that Saudi king, maybe they’ll take him in and put a burqa over Michelle….wonder how she’d like that….?
We Americans are witnessing a social revolution over here with a truly Orwellian [....yes,yes,....I know that term is over-used, but that's because our current social situation is "new think" and "new speak" being applied right under our noses.]thoroughness with all of these current emphases on “political correctness”. This is of course exacerbated in England with their Muslim infection so obviously metastasizing, and the same in continental Europe. Fragmentation seems to be the looming new reality.
So, this American can’t understand why, with all of the documented wars and economic conflicts and competitions over all of these many, many centuries…..that the English, as distinct from the Scots, Welsh, and Irish….keep this “unity with Europe” minuet going. Surely no one knows any better than they [collectively] that their ancient cultural differences are simply unbridgeable, “Chunnel” notwithstanding.
The terrible and apparently unrecognized lurking irony is that these multiplying Muslims on both sides of the Channel are the growing commonality and unifying trend. The English and the continentals will not put up any resistance at all against their infiltrating enemy. They miss this terrible point altogether.
The UKIP oppose Muslim mass immigration. If they’re ever elected there’s still hope for Britain.
“Europe needs Britain rather more than Britain needs Europe”
This is a big statement but you fail to present a convincing argument to back it up. Can you offer more than just an opinion?
UK – regulation without representation. We’re supposed to let the people vote on things? I thought they were just supposed to elect us?
Well, I have been an Anglospherist since 2008, and frankly I look forward to the Anglosphere trading more amongst itself.
Is the US willing to trade more with the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and Singapore, for starters.
I certainly hope so. Im a big fan of this as well.
A Chinese official just warned the Aussies not to ally with the Americans in any military confrontation between the 2. The Yellow Peril is alive and well.
If only. His pledge will be broken. He’ll be brow-beaten into submission.
Are theire any native Brits left in Breitain?