The Fish and Wildlife Service released its final recovery plan yesterday for the Mexican spotted owl, and the conclusion is that logging works.
The owl was listed as threatened on March 16, 1993, under the Endangered Species Act and is found in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah.
“The recommendations in this plan include management methods that will restore resiliency to SW Forests, making the forests more resistant to stand replacing fires, improving both human safety and owl habitat,” said Dr. Benjamin Tuggle, Southwest Regional Director for the Service.
“Combinations of mechanical and prescribed fire treatments may be used to minimize risk of high-severity fire effects while striving to maintain or improve habitat conditions for the owl and its prey,” Fish and Wildlife said. “These active forest management techniques will likely increase resistance to insects and disease, as well as enhanced productivity and vigor, which would help maintain populations of not only the owl, but its prey and other forest-dependent species. Landscape level forest restoration, opening up more forest to treatments as this plan does, should provide economic opportunity and jobs with increased wood products becoming available. Nothing in the plan says that any area is necessarily hands-off. This will be determined on a case by case basis.”
“Two decades ago, the Fish and Wildlife Service listed the Mexican Spotted Owl under the Endangered Species Act, effectively ending logging in New Mexico and putting thousands out of work here and across the nation,” said Rep. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.). “Now, we see that approach was wrong all along, and that the FWS was making decisions not rooted in sound science, but driven by politics, Washington lawyers, and extreme interest groups. In the Final Recovery Plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl, the FWS indicates that responsible thinning is actually good for owl populations!”
Pearce commended Tuggle for finding a “balanced solution” rooted not in Washington, but in his home state.
“While logging is often demonized as destructive clear-cutting, the reality is that even the FWS now recognizes the truth: smart logging is not only good for the economy, but is good for owl populations,” Pearce said. “I’ve always been against clear cutting, but I’m strongly in favor of the responsible logging that will keep forests healthy, replenish valuable underground aquifers, restore watersheds vital to New Mexico’s ecosystems and communities, cut down on forest fires and the cost of fighting them, allow the owl population to flourish, provide economic stability for small mountain communities, and bring good jobs and economic growth back to New Mexico.”
When the owl meets recovery criteria, the department will review again with consideration of taking the owl off the list.
The government estimates the recovery plan for the owl will cost $42 million over the next decade.
“The problem with this revised recovery plan is that it’s got nearly no strong protections for the owl and gives the U.S. Forest Service a pass on the thinning and logging. It’s fire hysteria rather than sound science,” said Bryan Bird of the Santa Fe-based group WildEarth Guardians.
Likewise, the zillions of poor little red squirrels lying dead upon Arizona’s Mount Graham.
/oh wait, that didn’t happen … uh … never mind.
Gee whiz, Batman, you mean to tell me selective logging and cleaning out the damn brush cuts down on raging forest fires? Really?
What morons. Growing up in the heavily forested mountains of western NC 50 years ago, we knew instinctively how to take care of our land. The US Forest Service knew how to do it as well, until the enviro-whackos got involved.
What do you expect from a bureaucracy? They tend to rely more on their computer projections and spreadsheets than actual file experience and observation.
Two examples from around here.
First off, when after a hurricane did damage in the area, they offered money to help repair things like fence lines. A number of people had taken itemized lists of repair costs. Turns out they had a computer program where they typed in the length of the damaged fence and it spit out an amount. A number of people had taken itemized lists of repair costs. The government number was much higher than what lists brought in, sometimes three times as high. Of course, they wouldn’t just pay the itemized list, the rules said it was their numbers or nothing.
Another example is that they refused to believe alligators were coming up the rivers from the Gulf Coast. Never mind that the people who lived there SAW the things with their own eyes, the computer said they weren’t there so officially they weren’t there. However, a survey was finally done and not only were they found in the lower swamps near the coast, they were there in number well above computer projections. The same survey also found them well up the rivers as well. Not sure if there have been any policy changes but I guess it will take somebody’s kid getting eaten to find out.
But to the point, well managed forest land is healthier than wild land. The only problem is the deer which which put it back out of balance with the appetites and vast numbers.