How Politically Correct Liberals Left a Muslim Gang Free to Rape British Girls
Nine men were jailed in Britain last week for raping and abusing dozens of girls aged as young as 13 over a period of several years in the northern town of Rochdale. The men plied the girls with drink and drugs before assaulting them, in a practice known by the appalling euphemism of “grooming.” One girl was raped by 20 men in one night; another had an abortion after becoming pregnant by one of her attackers. Police are trying to track down other victims of the gang, and are hunting up to 40 more suspects.
These would be horrific crimes under any circumstances. But the case had an added dimension that has provoked much controversy: All of the rapists were Muslims, and all of their victims were white. Predictably, racist groups such as the British National Party are trying to exploit the case, citing it as evidence that the sexual abuse of white women by Muslim men is widespread in Britain. Equally true to form, many liberals in the media, politics, the criminal justice system and others charged with guarding the flame of multiculturalism are falling over themselves to deny that “race” has anything to do with it.
Leading the campaign to persuade the public that there’s “nothing to see here” in terms of the identities of the rapists and their victims was the chief of the police force that investigated the case, who insisted it was “not a racial issue.” The mantra was taken up by the left-wing Guardian newspaper, a prominent Labour MP, and assorted left-wing bloggers, while the BBC — the taxpayer-funded propaganda arm of Britain’s liberal-left establishment — carried the message far and wide in its television and online reporting. The ability of sections of the media to produce lengthy reports without mentioning the word “Muslim” was something to behold; by way of contrast, try to imagine the same outlets reporting on a sex abuse scandal in the Catholic church and omitting the word “Catholic.”
Unfortunately, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the contrary. Out of 77 men convicted of similar “grooming” offences in recent years, 67 were Pakistani, while analysis of several cases has shown that 94 percent of perpetrators were, in the official terminology, “Asian.” And in every case, the victims have been overwhelmingly young white girls. While this doesn’t, as racist groups claim, mean the abuse of white girls by Muslim men is endemic, there is clearly a racial element to these crimes.
(The “Asian” race category encompasses a vast number of ethnicities and religions, from Indian Sikhs and Hindus to Filipino Christians. Not for the first time, Britain’s many and varied Asian communities have been angered to find themselves lumped together with Muslims in the coverage of horrific crimes.)
The race of the gang members themselves isn’t an issue, but their religion and associated cultural attitudes, and the racism that these foster, are. The fact that in this case, as in previous ones, the perpetrators were Muslims, and from parts of the world where extremist forms of that religion hold sway — eight of the Rochdale gang were of Pakistan origin and the ninth was an Afghan — has absolutely everything to do with the case, and it’s just one uncomfortable aspect that liberals don’t want to confront.
Another is the fact that politically correct attitudes to all things “racial” among the relevant authorities meant the victims’ ordeals went on for years longer than might have been the case. Many of the victims were from broken homes and under the supervision of social workers, but when they reported abuse to their carers, the police and prosecutors failed to act because, it’s claimed, they were “petrified of being called racist.”
There are also broader social issues arising from the case, and others like it, that liberals would prefer not to discuss; in particular how decades of liberal social polices on everything from immigration to welfare have helped to create the environments in which these crimes can be committed.
So what drives some Muslim men to commit these especially horrendous crimes against white girls? Well for a start there’s the issue of misogyny. No culture is innocent when it comes to the mistreatment of women, from casual sexism to domestic violence and rape; but across large parts of the Islamic world misogyny is enshrined in law, one example being that in some schools of jurisprudence the testimony of two or even four women is required to counter that of one man. Widely accepted interpretations of the law also permit men to have sex with “slave” women seized as war booty, which could provide a justification — albeit a warped and tenuous one — for British Muslim men who, while they might never dream of strapping on a suicide bomb vest, are deeply hostile to the values and culture of their host country.
Misogynistic cultural practices, such as veiling, the non-education of girls and female genital mutilation are also widespread in Islam. It doesn’t help that many western liberals who are normally champions of women’s right often choose to remain silent about these issues, or even try to defend them, as with Naomi Wolf and the burqa. In short, if a Muslim man is minded to rape or otherwise abuse a woman, he’ll have little trouble divining a legal or cultural justification for his actions.
But arguably the key factor in the Rochdale case and similar ones is the low opinion that Muslim men have of white British women, and in particular young working-class girls. Prevented from having sexual relations with girls in their own communities by family honor codes and religious strictures, they look to “inferior” white girls — particularly vulnerable teenagers — to satisfy their cravings, and in some cases consensual relationships degenerate into rape and abuse (the victims aren’t exclusively white girls though; groups representing British Sikhs and Hindus say their young women have also been targeted by Muslim men who boast about seducing “unbelievers”).
In the aftermath of one of the first “grooming” cases to attract national attention, the Labour MP and former Home Secretary Jack Straw, who represents a northern constituency with a large Muslim population, came under fire from sections of the media and the race relations industry for claiming that many Muslim men considered white women “easy meat.” But his view is supported by other Labour MPs in the party’s northern strongholds, where most “grooming” cases have occurred. By no stretch the imagination can they be described as racist bomb-throwers. (It’s important to distinguish the traditional left-of-center politics of Straw and his colleagues with the politically correct liberalism of officialdom and the media.)
You don’t have to take their word for it, however, because Muslim men who commit these crimes are happy to admit their contemptuous attitude towards white girls. One of the Rochdale gang summed up that attitude in court when he said: “You white people train them in sex and drinking, so when they come to us they are fully trained.”
One of most effective voices in articulating this misogynist/racist mindset among Pakistani Muslim men has been Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Muslim youth organization the Ramadhan Foundation, and himself a Pakistani. “They think that white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought,” Shafiq told the Daily Mail. In an opinion piece for the same paper he said the girl victims had been let down by “a system obsessed with the doctrine of political correctness, where anxieties about racism trump common sense and compassion.”
The judge who jailed the Rochdale gang got to the crux of the matter when he told the defendants that one of the factors that had led to the abuse was the fact that the victims “were not part of your community or religion.” And even some prominent liberals are prepared to admit the obvious: the chairman of Britain’s Equality and Human Rights Commission, a bastion of multiculturalist thinking and political correctness, said it would be “fatuous” to ignore the fact that the attackers were Muslim men and their victims white girls.
The racial/religious nature of these crimes are clear for most people to see. Yet not only have many liberals tried to ignore or downplay these issues; they’ve intimated that anyone who so much as tries to have a discussion about them is a racist. When the BBC reported in news bulletins that “some people” had raised the issue of race, reference was invariably made to “far-right” groups (their phrase, not mine; the organizations in question are simply racist, and there’s nothing right-wing about them) and footage of thuggish white men protesting outside the courtroom was shown. The implication was clear: If you are in the slightest bit uneasy with any aspect of this case, then you are on the same side as these racists.
Those of us who have genuine concerns about the scale of immigration into Britain and the attendant social problems it has created are well used to being called racist, but there are more important issues at stake here. Rape, pedophilia, and sexual abuse are not, of course, the sole preserve of Muslim men, but the reluctance of many in positions of authority and influence to acknowledge that there’s a particular problem with Muslim Pakistani men targeting white girls means the communities in which those men live are not being encouraged to tackle the problem.
Leaving aside liberals’ instinctive “sensitivity” toward other races and cultures, there are other reasons why it’s understandable that they don’t want to discuss the implications of the Rochdale case and others like it. While the blame for the attacks lies squarely with the perpetrators, they would not have been able to commit their crimes on the scale they did, if at all, had the necessary environment not been created by years of failed liberal policies on immigration, and by the breakdown in family life, particularly in working-class communities, caused by misguided thinking on education and welfare.
It was Tony Blair’s Labour government which, after coming to power in 1997, massively increased the pace of immigration to Britain, with many of the immigrants Muslims from Pakistan. At the same time, the emerging doctrine of multiculturalism signaled to those immigrants that they were under no obligation to embrace British values and customs — indeed, as British culture was no better than, and arguably inferior to, that of their own countries, they would be mad to do so. The result was that ghetto communities became established in large British cities, and also in smaller towns, particularly in the north of England, such as Rochdale.
During the same period, liberal social policies that encouraged welfare dependency and undermined family life were hollowing out the white working class communities from which the rape gangs draw their young victims. Add in the relentless sexualizing of youngsters — partly caused by their immersion in trashy celebrity culture, but also the result of liberal sex education polices that see Britain regularly at or near the top of “league tables” for teenage pregnancies, abortions and sexually transmitted diseases — and the damage was well and truly done. Scores of damaged and vulnerable young girls, failed by parents, teachers and others charged with their care, have been virtually served up to their tormentors on a plate.
Many of the politicians and opinion-formers responsible for those catastrophic policies remain profoundly out of touch with the white “underclass,” and oblivious to the consequences of their mistakes even as they pander to minorities of every ethnicity and religious stripe. It’s not much of an exaggeration to say that Britain’s liberal elites despise the country’s white working class in general almost as much as the rape gangs despise their young victims; no wonder they don’t want to talk about what’s happening.
But to judge from the reaction to the Rochdale case, and in particular the brave voices being raised within the communities from which the rapists came, there are signs that the problem of “grooming” may now start to be addressed. Sadly, for the perhaps hundreds of young girls who have been abused, and others who are still being exploited, vital years have been wasted.
Well, for one thing, we’ve got the same problem here only with Somalian males (also muslim) and the girls are as young as 11, not 13. Secondly, the BNP isn’t a racist party – they are nationalists. They are for all things British and dispise multicultualism. And they have a point. Why can’t England be English and France French? We have one race (human) with several ethnicities. White is one of those – a minority one on the planet at that. Why is it racist for white people to have a white community if that is their heritage and where they come from.
Liberals freely admitted they imported the “color” into their Kingdom to rub the noses of the Tory’s in it and to dilute their own Britishness. Nobody calls black people or any other color racist because they want to keep their comunitees homogenous. I’m pretty sick of white people always being at fault here.
I should have added that the BNP is nationalist rather than racist because they also want the Eastern Europeans and Russians gone. Not to mention the “travelers” (gypsies) and the Irish who’ve invaded them and decided that they are gypsies too. None of these people are any other color but white, but have proved an enormous nuisance.
You forgot to add “socialist”. The BNP are National Socialists.
Are they? So your saying they’re Nazi’s, right? How convenient is that?
I’m more an EDL supporter myself, but have generally found that if the Nazi finger starts to fly it’s usually a false flag. Socialist run the country after all.
From the BNP webite under Policies/Economics:
“We further believe that British industry, commerce, land and other economic and natural assets belong in the final analysis to the British nation and people.
To that end the BNP will restore our economy and land to British ownership and will take active steps to break up the socially, economically and politically damaging monopolies now being established by the supermarket giants.
Fully cognisant of the reality that economic growth is driven primarily by true free enterprise, a BNP government will seek to give British workers a stake in the success and prosperity of the enterprises whose profits their labour creates. Such schemes are the only guarantee of workers being motivated to ensure the success of their employers.”
That isn’t Socialism? Not International Socialism but National Socialism.
One of the things that bothers me about them is that they are decribed as a “far right” organization; but their roots are socialists. State control of economic activity and a massive welfare system (for native English only).
The BNP uses the rightful indignation of working class Brits over the their sellout by Labour and Tories as a recruiting tool. But ultimately to what end? Socialism will not solve Britain’s problems.
@Black Bart – The UK is already Socialist, but the fruit of their labors is going their invaders in the form of their welfare system.
As I said, I’m an EDL supporter (English Defense League) who the BBC paints as “racists” like the BNP. Again – I quibble with the racist term – they are nationalists who want the white immigrants gone as well as those of color. They want England to be English.
Again, calling people Nazi’s is a red flag to me. Those who call Nazi usually want the dialogue shut down.
We have an odd, hypocritical and ironic situation where anyone against this kinder and friendlier form of forced demi-ethnic cleansing is seen as guilty of being a racist simply by the act of pushing back. Were I to advocate importing 1 million Swedes into the West Bank and succeeded in finding a way to do it over the protests of the Palestinian Arabs but with the connivance of the Palestinian leadership, I’d find myself arrested by black helicopters and put in the docket in The Hague.
Whites are the only people in the world with a politically correct “Not welcome” sign hung out front and people in back actually begging them to please come. In England it’s the opposite.
Does Godwin’s Law apply when the people you are describing actually are National Socialists?
Desperate people flailing about for solutions to problems caused by venal politicians better be careful of whom they turn to; the cure may be worse than the disease.
I’m having a great deal of trouble figuring out why the fathers of these girls are not lynching these Muslim criminals on the spot. Are these parents completely without honor and conscience? If I had a child violated in such a manner I’d be killing these Islamic mongrels on the street. I guess Europe is in worse shape than we thought.
Not to worry,,, the USA is headed in the same direction,,, after all, vote against BHO, and you are a racist pig.
I don’t dislike him because of the color of his skin, I dislike him for his idiotic policies. I’m looking forward to the riots of November.
Fathers? There are no fathers. Britain has destroyed the family structure of “working communities.” Sound familiar?
Read about Separationism here: amnation.com/vfr/
Scroll down the homepage, and look on the right-side column for the search field.
I agree with your comments, lolly, every one of them.
…and the Irish who’ve invaded them and decided that they are gypsies too.
For a long, long time bout half the population of England has been one sort of Celt or other, nothing recent about that. I guess that’s not counting the Moslems, who sure have piled up there in the last few decades. Hell, Birmingham looks like Malmo now. Of course, Dearborn’s come a long way, too. A Moslem is a Moslem, including even a blue eyed blond Moslem from the Caucusus, as in Caucasian, as we saw in Beslan.
As for the rape, that reminds me of the alley gang rapes seen so frequently in Paris, or how the forcible rape dastistick in Norway grew by 30,000%, leading a big mouthed U of Oslo feminist professor to write that it was half the womens’ fault for dressing like slut. But, to me, the Cronulla story from Sidney takes the cake.
>>>>>>>“You white people train them in sex and drinking, so when they come to us they are fully trained.”
Theodore Dalrymple speaks of an ad for a social worker that deals with underage girls in the “sex trade” he had seen. The most important qualification? The social worker’s ability to “work unjudgmentally”, that is, to have no qualms about aiding and abetting child prostitution.
This “groomer” has a point: the social services in Britain DO in fact, indeed, train under-age girls to be prostitutes. Not so often as blatantly as in this case, but try and find a social worker in Britain who would tell the 14-year-old under their care that perhaps having sex with their boyfriend of half a week is wrong. No can do — judgmental again, you know.
There’s a difference between a blithe attitude of superiority over a race, culture or religion other than your own and having a case built in your mind like pieces of a puzzle that this is in fact correct. Political correctness says all issues concerning this are the former and the latter is never the case, no matter what, period, end of story.
In fact, in social terms, Islam is misogynistic from the ground up. Even in romance Muslims have an odd sense of love compared to the West that sees the opposite sex as a threat due to desire. Reality means nothing in the PC world. Egypt is having its presidential elections and by law none of them can be a woman. In a recent incident, when a TV reporter tried to question a salafi parliamentarian he told her to go home and put on a head scarf.
In Indonesia, groping backpacking females from the West is endemic. They are seen as whores and so touched, even in the open, in a way Indonesians would never touch their own women.
British culture has become, not only a suicide cult, but they have enshrined and institutionalized the concept in law and it pervades the media. TV and film in Britain are filled with tokenism. The country which once fanatically fought a cult that held the Wannsee Conference, sees no problem with enacting an identical imperative in terms of the philosophical space it occupies: fewer people of a race, or in other words, multiculturalism and diversity.
It’s one thing to have blithe immigration that happens to include people of color and to conspicuously wish for immigration of people of color. It is a sickness that is the flip side of, but part and parcel of, racism and bigotry – defining skin as having certain innate properties other skin does not and cannot ever have. Under this weird thesis, Britain can never fully express itself as a nation unless people of color are conspicuously present. Imagine if the Nazis had some weird thing where they actually conspired and forced Jews into Germany because they felt they had some innate powers no one else could bring to the table. This might make an interesting movie.
It certainly would’ve worked out better for Germany, especially for 6 million dead Jews, but deep in its heart, would’ve been a sickness. Just imagine the hapless surprise of a Jew in Germany in the ’30s forced to wear a yellow star only to have people in the street fawn over them and give them little gifts – annoying knocks on the door at 3 am with people holding flowers, their hats in their hands, urging the Jewish family to relocate to their neighborhood. In fact I can see a movie opening now with the caption, Berlin 1937. A loud knock is heard and a cry of “Mein gott, not again, please no.” And out come those damned flowers.
In actual reality, this goofy scenario may benefit a country in a “Marching Morons” analogue that in fact would only result in a larger overall population, unless of course you agree that Jews do have magic powers beyond a value system of hard work and discipline.
People of color don’t have magic powers: in this world there is only cultural success and failure. Tip one in the wrong or right way and this is reversed. Egypt clearly benefited from the influx of Greeks and Italians in the Victorian era up to Nasser, and just as clearly took a nosedive when Nasser seized their businesses and 75% left the country, to be followed not many years later by every Jew. Egypt has never recovered from this. Hell, they’ve never recovered from the year 640.
Let’s be Forrest Gumpish and say smart is as smart does – show it or stow it.
Far from magic, what most immigrants from the third world seem to bring to the western countries they immigrate to are the attitudes and cultural dispositions that have left their home country in a shambles. When there are enough of them in a given country, the culture and political life in that country will be altered, perhaps irrevocably but definitely for the worse.
I think it’s searchable, but the delta region in the US has a similar problem. I’ve run across articles on young girls degraded into prostitution after a brutal rape, followed by threats to their remaining family. It’s called the “Mississippi Method.” I’ve seen it in a few places. I don’t know that I’ve looked online.
I am so grieved that these young women have been so thoroughly betrayed by every person and institutional power in their lives. I pray that they find healing and wholeness.
I live in the Delta region of the US and I have NEVER heard of such a thing. I would certainly implore everyone to research this on her/his own. I fear people reading the above post will automatically believe it’s true,based solely on the antiquated idea of continued wholesale racism against black Americans.
My brother lives in New Orleans. His comment was that every woman he knows had been raped. His latest acquaintance had only had a one day visit to the hospital after her assault. His comment was that she’d gotten off lightly, and he didn’t see why she was complaining, since every woman he knew had been raped.
He’s single. Can’t figure out why no woman will marry him.
After he told me this, and his long-time friend, a policeman, told me about “The Mississippi Method”- a violent rape of a young, vulnerable girl, who is then terrorized into prostitution, I sort of keep an eye on the back pages of the papers. It’s sort of like keeping an eye on complaints about child-care facilities. They don’t necessarily make it into the papers as a pattern. They just show up as near-final paragraph throw-aways in other articles. It’s like asking homeless teens about their living situations. Amazing numbers camp in local parks. That’s never mentioned in articles about the homeless.
An example of institutionalizing the training of prostitutes:
My brother, working for the Health Servics of Dallas, frequently performed gynecological evaluations on underage (usually black) girls.
The ‘breeder’, an older male, was concerned. His ‘first girl’, (the one who hands out the beatings, he’s always the nice guy, that’s how pimps keep ‘em in line), his first girl complained: “We’ve been trying to breed this one for months and she ain’t taking. (We need to know if she can get pregnant so the breeder can collect her benefits.) Breeders keep a harem of such girls everyone lives off the combined proceeds.
Similar to Jewels in the Crown- the number of illegitimate children that one avoids paying child support for while collecting the welfare check.
Western socialism seems partly rooted in women spitting on women who are ‘below’ them, proving their love to their bad boy alphas.
That applies even to the dyke apparatchniks and militant gays who increasingly write the narrative in goverment and media. Followers of pedophile preists like Keynes and Kinsey- a ‘fertility’ (deviancy) cult.
‘Grooming’ indeed!
Forgot to mention that he was legally prevented from saying anything due to patient confidentiality. He was enraged, as he was an obedient military man and a Christian.
I wonder if Obamacare informatics will have a checkbox for this, with a searchable database? I think not.
‘Welfare voters’ are relatively few;
the power comes from welfare handlers.
They are unionized, and they vote.
For benefits, even the soft kind.
They also hire friends and family, perpetuating the nepotistic, corrupt system.
I just read that minority births outnumber ethnic European births herein the USA.
Seems the ethnic European has recently collectively ”decided” to allow itself to die off.
The question minorities should ask themselves is; how does our system of abusing the ”have”s work where we are all that is left?
Yeah – It would be interesting to see if they genuinly look inwards once they no longer have whitey to kick around anymore or if they’ll simply find another scapegoat. I’m thinking the latter.
It’s a feat of hyperbolic rhetoric, but Obama and his handlers seem to have no trouble blamming everything that has gone wrong on his watch on G.W.Bush, and especially, Dick Cheney.
How Politically Correct Marxists Make Supposedly Conservative Writers Bow Down To Their Thought Squelching Defamation And Totalitarian Group-Think :
“Predictably, racist groups such as the British National Party are trying to exploit the case…”
Predictable.
Even Roger Simon and Breitbart jump to the Marxist piper’s PC thought-control tune in their efforts to distance themselves from those crazy “Birthers”. Is Obama’s once and current literary agent a “Birthers”? Was Obama a “Birther” when he told his agent he was born in Kenya?
Don’t buy the framing of these evil seditious commie traitors.
I think we should be careful with labels either way because there ARE racist parties. It’s true that the left lables as racist anyone who opposes mass immigration or even just suggests there might be some problems for which whites may not be entirely to blame, but there are also real recists. So before deciding if this or that party is racist or wrongly labeled as such, we should do some research regarding its past and the past of its leaders. If you research a bit about Nick Griffin’s past you’ll find out he did indeed express neo-Nazi views in the past. I believe there are videos of him on Youtube that are pretty eye-opening, or at least there were a few years ago when I tried to figure the BNP out. There are many people who don’t know that because the BNP realize they have a chance in the current political atmosphere as long as they avoid anti-Semitic and racist remarks. But does that reflect a real and permanent change or just a makeover to look prettier for the voters?
Pnina – you make some good points, but I learned long ago that anything labeled “extreme right wing” in Europe means pretty much anything to the right of Pol Pot or not aligned with the Leftist framer’s subversive agenda.
The Left’s infiltration of every institution from the academy to media to the government is complete. They ruthlessly wield their propaganda weapon to bludgeon, marginalized, and impeach anyone not in lock step with them. This is a cancer as bad or worse than any slander they choose to heap on their enemies. I reject wholesale what they say. We should be very careful not to re-use and re-broadcast their poisonous labels and slanders!
Race would be a minor factor if it were not for multiculturalism and the welfare state. When the West declared that all cultures are morally equivalent, and decided to support large numbers of parasitical demographic groups on the dole without even attempting to assimilate them into the larger culture, that’s when the decline began. Immigrants to Western countries used to adopt the language and customs of the particular country they settled in, because they wanted to get ahead. Now, they no longer have to, and so they won’t.
Militant Islam, unfortunately, presents its own particular problems, and if we in the West don’t get a backbone and stand up to it, we’re doomed. The first step is to declare (rather loudly) that the primitive Arab culture that militant Islam represents is simply not an acceptable lifestyle in a 21st century society.
Cultural relativism should be fought against on the same ground and with the same weapons used to promote it. Say, for instance, that you show a black person some culture, we’ll call it Culture X, where blacks are slaves, like the US was in the past, and then you show them Culture Y where blacks and whites are equal before the law and where blacks can vote and even get elected president, like the US is today, and you demand from that black person to believe Culture X is just as good as Culture Y and declare that if he/she disagrees he/she is a racist – that would be both absurd and immoral. Similarly if you demand from a woman to believe the Saudi culture is just as good as the Dutch culture and declare that if she disagrees she’s a racist it would be almost as absurd and immoral. We’re talking about a culture where women are severely oppressed and have no choice in the matter – how can we demand from women to believe this is just as good as the freedom and equality enoyed by Dutch women? And how can we denounce a woman, or any person for that matter, as racist for believing freedom and equality are better than gender-based oppression? It’s immoral to denounce people for it.
By the standards of moral and cultural relativism you’d be a racist knuckle dragger for denouncing the Nazis. After all, according to the Nazi beliefs, myths and ethics it was perfectly justified to conquer Europe and to exterminate Jews, Roma and homosexuals – who are you to judge?
But just as the Saudis have their own value system so do we, and we don’t have to rape our judgement and conscience into believing that everything that is anathema to our ethics is just as good as everything we cherish. I don’t have to believe that arresting and even executing a hapless infidel who took the wrong turn and ended up in Mecca is just as good as not executing hapless infidels who took the wrong turn into Mecca. I just don’t have to believe that this is a good deed, and it’s absurd and immoral to demand of me, as an infidel and as a human being, to believe that it’s a good deed and denounce me as a racist if I don’t.
Britain.
Not America.
Who cares? Let the Brits rot in the hell of their own making. It’s their daughters anyway.
You should care because the same thing (with the same thought processes) is happening here.
You should care because Great Britian is our mother country. You should care because they are our friend and ally and have stuck by us in thick or thin when nobody else did.
Amen.
Er, can we still say that?
Seeing Great Britain laid low pains me considerably, despite never having set foot on that island before. If you read the great work “Albion’s Seed” you see how so many of the American folkways come directly from Britain, which is hardly surprising since it was the British who established this civilization as an outpost of their own.
Sadly, I don’t know if Britain can be saved at this point. When the structural framework of a house is so infested with termites, what can you do with it? Sappy sentimentalism will prevent doing what needs doing (and yes, by that I do absolutely mean rounding people up en masse and sending them back to Africa and the Middle East. Cry me a river). The USA is not very far behind in this suicide pact. The future of the Anglo-Celtic peoples realistically is probably with Australia and New Zealand more than it is with America or Britain.
When the came for the Britons I did nothing because I was not a Brit… We all know where this leads.
Didn’t this already happen in Sweden–Muslim men raping white Swedish women?
Why, yes, I believe it did.
Your British whores make good breeders! Praise be to Allah.
Would you say the same if the role was reversed?? I guess not….you would be in outrage. But as the world goes, what goes around comes around, maybe not today or tomorrow, but it will…your only creating your own downfall….
This story first came to light perhaps a week ago, and I linked to it in a comment about the BBC pandering to Muslims here at PJ. The story, form a UK newspaper, complained about the PC attitudes that prevented authorities from pursuing the case while, throughout, referring to the men as “Asians”. How ironic. Now, we see pols saying it isn’t racial, yet it was fear of accusations of racism that allowed it to go on. The same thing goes on here in the U.S. We now have the two white reporters attacked by black youths in Norfolk, the Wisconsin state fair incident a few months ago, etc. This politically correct leftie business is absolutely misguided.
And as far as racial nomenclature goes, that has been a real pet peeve for me. We’ve replaced ethnic terms with geographic ones. “Asian” is a race that includes multiple groups? Then it isn’t a race, is it? Neither is African (as in African-American) – as it included Egyptians and Saudis. I grow so tired of political correctness trumping factual correctness.
Know what the problem for decent people is? No one fears you. Not the politicans, not the media and now not the police. Until this dynamic changes, they will all do with you anything they please.
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/03/radio-silence-in-worms.html#more
On February 15, 2012, at 8:30 PM an unimaginably ferocious act was committed on a human being — a bestial, barbaric act. A 16-year-old girl was tormented, beaten and gang-raped in a parking garage in Worms. But that was not enough for her tormenters. They raped her with a bottle and then broke the bottle and jammed it into her, severing her intestine and slicing open her womb. She was found unconscious, severely wounded and unclothed. Only an emergency operation saved her.
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/05/18/how-politically-correct-liberals-left-a-muslim-gang-free-to-rape-british-girls/?singlepage=true
Seven men have so far been arrested on suspicion of gang raping a 29-year-old mother of two in Eksjö, in the south of Sweden.
”We have a good body of evidence,” said Christer Edlund of the local police to the daily Aftonbladet.
According to the paper, the police suspect that as many as eleven men may have been involved in the attack. They are not ruling out that there may be more arrests in the near future.
http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=40133
The brutal gang rape of a British woman by five Afghan refugees has sparked a massive protest against illegal immigrants in a Serbian spa town. The 38-year-old woman – who bravely managed to film the attack on her mobile phone – was repeatedly raped after befriending a group of Afghan men in a park in Banja Koviljaca. Despite handing the video footage to police, only one alleged attacker – identified by police only as Abdurashid D., 25 – has been arrested. Now local mothers have told police they are boycotting local schools from next week (nov 7) unless they clear out a local refugee centre containing more than 2,500 illegal immigrants which was built to hold just 120.
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/10/28/oslos-epidemic-of-rape/print
Oslo’s Epidemic of Rape
Posted By Bruce Bawer On October 28, 2011 @ 12:16 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 142 Comments
Back in May it was reported that every rape assault in the city of Oslo in the last five years had been committed by a person with a “non-Western” background – a Norwegian euphemism for Muslim. Now it turns out that there have already been twice as many rape assaults in Oslo so far this year as there were in all of 2010. At least one member of Parliament, André Oktay Dahl of the Conservative Party, calls the situation “critical” and is brave enough to acknowledge that many of the perpetrators come from cultures “with a reprehensible attitude toward women.”
………………………………………muslims -asylum seekers-are terrorizing and raping all over Europe-how can this be news?
THE GOVERNMENTS OF EUROPE ARE COMPLICIT IN THE DEGRADATION AND TERRORIZATION AND VIOLENT ASSAULTS AGAINST WOMEN, CHRISTIANS AND JEWS IN EUROPE.
You know a civilization is dead when they give up their women to the barbarians at the gate.
As Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch and several other articles in recent months have pointed out, in Islam sexual slavery of non-Muslim women is very permissible, indeed encouraged. A Muslim is not to have sexual relations with a woman who is married to someone else – except a slave girl: “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you” (4:24). (http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/03/former-dean-of-islamic-law-at-saudi-university-misunderstands-islam-says-islamic-law-permits-possess.html). These Muslims were simply acting according to their traditional and customary practices.
You are correct.
While I agree that the blame for the rapes rests solely with the perpetrators, the UK authorities have a duty to protect their citizenry from attack. Islamic doctrine being what it is, they should never have allowed any immigration of Muslims at all.
It’s long past time for the UK and the EU to face facts and to begin the process of repatriating the inhabitants of the hostile Muslim communities that live within their boundaries.
This is going on all the time in the UK. This just the tip of the iceberg.
What is really bothersome is that it is going all over Europe. Muslims are raping non Muslim girls and women in Norway and Sweden. In Malmo Sweden the Swedish government let refugee Muslim gangs drive out Jews from Malmo. They never raised a finger. WE need to be ready for this since it will be coming to America, if it isn’t already here.
Lock and Load!
What we have here is the intersection of two trends,the growing power of Islam and the decline of working class Britain. These girls have been abandoned by their fathers who have failed in the most important job of their lives. You only have to watch TV to see the degradation of the lives many of the young live in this country today.
The breakdown of family structure is an inevitable result of socialist welfare-state politics.
The Muslim MONSTERS stole the children’s innocence. They stole their youth. They stole their lives. The deep wounds the children carry will be for a lifetime. Their suffering at the hands of cruel, selfish Muslim predators, MONSTERS IN HUMAN GARB, will effect all of their future relationships.
DEATH SENTENCE FOR ALL KIDNAPPERS.
Terrible crimes have been committed against these innocent, DEFENSELESS non-Muslim female children by MUSLIMS. The media and government are despicable in calling the filthy, sick, disgusting predators – Asians. They are MUSLIMS and must be called MUSLIMS. These filth child molesters-rapists look upon non-Muslims as prey to be devoured. This belief system comes from the Koran.
The media and UK government constantly cover for Islam. I DESPISE everyone of the disgusting COWARDS – police, and others who knew, and did NOTHING. Britain’s children are offered up as a sacrifice to Islam – to selfish MONSTERS, sons of the devil. I despise all of you who are responsible who REFUSED to protect these lovely, innocent children. You have aided and abetted INHUMAN MONSTERS and God will judge you.
Amen. You are right, of course. These children have been offered up as sacrifices. Maybe these Muslim converts have it right. They have a choice between being “groomed” or converting to Islam and at least having some protection, at least if they’re a westerner. They don’t realize they too are making a pact with the devil, because once Sharia is in place, they’ll be no better off than a Saudi Arabian woman, but for now, they are safe.
Within years, it is projected Britain (and Europe) will become an Islamic nation, the majority population will be Muslim thanks to the BETRAYAL of the Left, who DELIBERATELY massively colonized Britain with Muslims. The BETRAYAL continues with the Tory Party who are deliberately importing even more Muslims than before .
The Koran commands Muslims to CONQUER ALL nations and subjugate intensely hated non-Muslims under barbaric Islamic sharia law where DEFENSELESS non-Muslims have NO human rights. This makes importing/colonizing Muslims into Britain (and other Western countries) an act of TREASON.
Huge slave trader, Mohammad, the founder of Islam, married a six year old child when he was in his fifties. Mohammad murdered/beheaded several hundred Jewish men because of the Jews great love for, and allegiance to our Glorious, Awesome Creator. The loyal Jews refused to follow another god and the new religion of Mohammad.
The Jews’ wives and children after watching horrible atrocities committed on their cherished, loved ones, were seized for slaves. Mohammad is regarded as the perfect man, and role model for devout Muslims who follow their religion.
Britain now has a new Freedom Party. It is like Geert Wilders Freedom Party in the Netherlands. http://britishfreedom.org/
British Freedom and the EDL have united. It is a grave matter of British survival.
As the post noted, it is NOT about race, it is about religion. These crimes are not being committed by Hindus or Christian Filipinos.
If these girls do not have the desire to exact a final revenge, nor do their fathers, then let it be. Maybe it is not as bad as the author would like to represent. Maybe the Muslims are just perceptive. Western society is a dying beast. Finish it.
Odds are, though, that those girls and their absent parents come from the same sort of licentious subculture that’s depicted in the movie “The Boat that Rocked” aka “Pirate Radio” (the North American version).