Obamabots Launch…AttackWatch!
What a bunch of whiny babies.
Friend –
If you’re someone who cares about seeing a campaign focused on substance between now and November 2012, I need you to become a part of one of our most important teams.
It’s called AttackWatch.com, and it launches today.
Here’s the deal: We all remember the birth certificate smear, the GOP’s barrage of lies about the Affordable Care Act, and the string of other phony attacks on President Obama that we’ve seen over the past few years.
There are a lot of folks on the other side who are chomping at the bit to distort the President’s record. It’s not a question of if the next big lie will come, just when — and what we’re prepared to do about it.
AttackWatch.com is exactly what it sounds like: a resource that allows us to nip these attacks in the bud before they show up on the airwaves and in emails — and then fight back with the truth.
By signing up, you’ll be on the front lines — you’ll hear about false claims as soon as they come up, and we’ll count on you to spread the truth to your friends and personal networks and let us know about new smears whenever you hear them.
Will you sign up now to be a part of AttackWatch.com?
Yes, I want to be on the team that fights back.
Not right now, but I’ll donate $5 to fund the 2012 campaign and support this work.
That’s what this email is really about. Moolah.
I remember the smears from 2008 well, and I’m sure you do, too.
They didn’t just attack Barack Obama and Joe Biden. They went after everything this movement is built on, and everyone who supports it.
This time, they’re not just out to personally attack the President — they’re also out to mislead Americans about the record of accomplishments that he’s compiled. Just the other day, a Republican financier actually quoted Saddam Hussein in telling a group of millionaire donors that defeating President Obama will be “the mother of all wars.”
We’re launching AttackWatch.com today to make sure we’re ready for the attacks we know are coming — and armed with the ability to fight back quickly.
Sign up for AttackWatch.com now, and let’s get the facts out:
http://my.barackobama.com/Join-Attack-Watch
Thanks,
Messina
Jim Messina
Campaign Manager
Obama for America
The O-bots have taken their old White House snitcher program and grafted it onto the campaign.
Update: The twitter feed is fun. “If you see anything, report it fast and furiously!”








AttackWatch, huh? How ironic, given that the only strategy left for Obamalinsky is to go super negative and demonize his opponent in order to deflect attention from his own record of failure.
Will you sign up now to be a part of AttackWatch.com?
Yes, I want to be on the team that fights back.
Not right now, but I’ll donate $5 to fund the 2012 campaign and support this work.
where’s the link for “not only no, but hell no! you lying sacks of dog mess?
now that’s insulting to dog mess
Seems like we can run just about anything up this flag pole to see what the WH response is going to be. That way we’ll be able to tighten the noose on their “counterattack” before they can even make it. (Disclaimer: the use of the word noose is in no way intended, nor should it be construed to be racist. Furthermore, the word “counterattack” is just my definition of what a response would be called if the cause of that reponse is labeled an “attack” and is not intended to incite violence nor to be uncivil in any way.)
It may seem like Big Brother is watching, but really it’s Pa.
I say Pa because this effort is Pa-thetic.
The worst part of this? If you tried to point out to the Obamabots what their reaction would have been to Bush setting up the same thing they would deny the truth. They would have screamed and ranted and vowed eternal hatred for such a despicable thing.
In other words, they are hypocrites.
Hypocrites lead by a pathetic excuse for a wannabe leader.
And you can tweet @AttackWatch and tell ‘em I said so.
Is there some sort of code that could be put on a blog where any time a blog post is published, it gets cc’d to AttackWatch if it mentions Obama? Sort of an “I denounce myself” ex machina?
This is fear mongering. In history there have been many who send out or wait for information on their own people. This is a shade of a police state. Look to the History of Germany.
doesn’t get much more unAmerican than this….these people suck! Report this…go @#$% yourself and these snitch #%@ $%#@^@$ you have working for you!
Hmmm.
You guys aren’t thinking big enough. Now is the time to get a blogging account, put up some advertisement, make an attack on Obama and then report yourself.
Repeat as necessary.
I hear it rumored that Jackie O’s diary states that she thought the guy was a bit “twitchy” and “swishy” off camera.
I have a strong suspicion that swishy is accurate.
half the people on all Obama’s lists are just keeping an eye on him. I suggest we all Sign up just for laughs and to keep an eye on these jerks. I always wondered what it meant to be in the Hitler Youth Movement
“Will you sign up now to be a part of AttackWatch.com?”
No, but I will insult the Great Black Dope (and every other Democrat that ever crawled out from under a rock) 24/7, so you’ll have something to report on your website.
Will that help?
“Great Black Dope.”
That’ll get you on the list… ;D
Das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit wants YOU!
Sign up, tell your friends to do same, then report each other. Flood them with craps, crash their site. Should be fun. Or may be better to ask them to pay you a dollar for each snitch. That is the only way to make a buck in Obaconomy.
It’s pathetic, ludicrous, highly mockable, and the twitter feed is hilarious. After all the things I’ve this administration has pulled in the past 3 years, I’ve become desensitized– so I see it as a joke.
But I showed this to my father, who’s a Reagan Democrat, moderate fiscal conservative/ social liberal, gets all his news from MSM (likes Joe Scarborough), doesn’t read blogs, voted for Obama, not rabid about anything (and I think has long been somewhat taken aback by my contempt for & anger toward Obama). And his reaction– incredulous, sputtering outrage– has restored to me an un-jaded perspective on this. I remember the “Twilight Zone” feeling I often got, in the early days of the O administration, which has worn off by now, from shock after shock, outrage after outrage. I see this dazedness now in my father. The MSM-spell, Obama cocoon is forever shattered. The most politically moderate of men, was sputtering like Glenn Beck.
He literally could not believe this was real. Would not. I had to prove to him that “barackobama.com” was the offical website, and that indeed there it was, the announcement launching “attackwatch.com”. He finds it inconceivable, unbelievable, impossible, shocking– seriously, an impeachable offense– that the POTUS could do something like this: an assault, from the most powerful office in the world, on American citizens’ first amendment rights.
And he’s right. How is this not a case of the POTUS directly violating the First Amendment?
“a resource that allows us to nip these attacks in the bud before they show up on the airwaves and in emails>/i>”
From barackobama.com: “check out AttackWatch.com to help stop these attacks before they start.”
From the attackwatch.com website” we are to “REPORT”– to REPORT on fellow citizens, REPORT to the White House!– REPORT, among other info, the “attack type,” with a menu of choices: “TV interview, public statement, forwarded email, rumor, TV ad, video ad, radio ad, robocall, website/blog.”
This is beyond sinister, it’s absolutely un-American. And I, we, find it silly, because O has become such a weak, pathetic figure.
But he is the POTUS. This should be a big deal. My father’s reaction helped me see that. He thinks this is the end of Obama– that it’s so beyond the pale, we’ll see it criticized throughout the MSM, or it’ll be taken down immediately and “disappeared.” I’m not so sure about that. In that respect, I’m afraid, my father may still be too naive. And with Solyndra etc. in the news, this ridiculousness will be (perhaps rightly) overshadowed.
But it shouldn’t be just passed over, laughed at (though I agree, there should be MUCH laughter & mockery, thank you twitter), ignored with a shrug & roll of the eyes.
When the POTUS does something like this, it has to mean something. At the end of the day, despite everything O has done, this is still the USA, not a Twilight Zone/ Orwellian Dystopia… right?
Exactly right! I have hope that this new assault on our Constitutional freedoms can somehow be turned around and used against ObaMao (yes, lurking snitches, I said it). The hypocrisy of the Left has no limits.
What a bunch of whiners you are. For over 3 years and since I’ve heard of him. This man and his family have been smeared and lied about disgustingly. The right have been spreading lies one after another about this man, his idelogy, etc. And In the end, the fearful mass believed it. But as soon as a group wants to fight against it, you call them whiners. what a bunch of hypocrites.
I’m sorry to hear that the “fearful mass” believed it, wherever he may be. But please do elaborate on your accusation of hypocrisy. The complaints I see in here are asserting our right to free speech. We don’t want our free speech stifled regardless of who is in office. I doubt that you feel the same way.
Our current President has received exactly the same level of courtesy and respect the last one got.
And in the end, the fearful mass believed it…
…and elected him to the presidency of the United States!
Somehow, I don’t think what you said has the meaning you intended. And as for your fearful mass, please see a dermatologist.
Someday all of this will be subject to FOIA.
I, for one, will be interested to know what my Democrat “friends” were saying about me.
Hear that, Stazi?
because there’s nothing better for national unity than “turn in your neighbor”
“There are a lot of folks on the other side who are chomping at the bit to distort the President’s record.”
No, we’ll be happy to publicize his record just as it is.
By the way, that’s “champing at the bit” for those who learned English before it was dumbed down by the liberal teachers’ unions.
Chomp/chomping is an accepted variation of champ/champing – first used in 1581.
Not that I disagree with you about the liberal teacher’s unions, but “chomping at the bit” is a completely legitimate statement and a valid idiom. Now, if they had said “could care less” rather than “couldn’t care less” somewhere, loose the hounds!
willis;
They’re good at distorting distortions.
No wonder they’re so wacky.
“I could care less” is acceptable IF it is said in an ironic way, that is, as a question. “I could care less?????” Think of stereotypical jewish phrasing.
If said in a disgusted manner it should be “I couldn’t care less!”
I just reported the majority of all voters in Nev. D2 and NY D9. We must not let democracy work against the will of the unions….
“the GOP’s barrage of lies about the Affordable Care Act”
As I recall, those all turned out to be true, when the bill was finally read. Illegal aliens still get free care, gov’t panels will decide who is allowed to get what treatments, and millions have already lost the health insurance they had previously…
“There are a lot of folks on the other side who are chomping at the bit to distort the President’s record.”
It’s champing at the bit. I wouldn’t expect a donkey to know that … but the strong horse knows.
The person most responsible for smearing the President’s name and reputation through the mud is actually quite well-known and is doing this despicable stuff right under the noses of people who should be in a position to put a stop to it. The fact that they do NOTHING to save this presidency is irresponsible and shocking and all I can say in reaction to this is, WHY? A nefarious plot that is so easy to stop absolutely should be. If the left won’t put a stop to this conspiracy, perhaps others will out of patriotic sympathy. Here’s the address of the despicable perpetrator: it’s 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington DC.
Someone should start an Attack Watch site with a wrist Watch counting down Obama’s ONE TERM!
Jeez, where were you guys when people were saying that the 9/11 attacks were engineered by the Bush administration.
Let’s get real. All presidents are subject to vicious smears and slanted interpretations. Obama hasn’t been subject to any more than the usual. It goes with the job.
They never learn, do they?
Linked here:
Take Your Quisling “Attack Watch” Snitch Site and SHOVE IT!
I apologize if this ends up a double post, my internet has the hiccups.
I linked your post here:
Take Your Quisling “Attack Watch” Snitch Site and SHOVE IT!
The Obama regime never learns, do they?
Shouldn’t that email started with Comrades instead of Friends?
This is real? I thought it was snark!
Wow, a huge spying chain letter racket, way to go Obama. Ridiculous There’s even a smear right in the letter. That Saddam Hussein thing – so now I guess we’re all expected to believe republicans love Saddam Hussein just because one idiot quoted him.