The PJ Tatler

Re: Lennon’s Reagan Revolution

I love this John Lennon story, though I wish he’d had the courage to come out of the closet. His assassin may have robbed us of more than a great musician. But am I crazy — I’ve always seen two major Beatles songs as very strong conservative statements, and counter-counter-cultural ones at that. “Taxman” is an obvious rip on the grasping leviathan state. “Declare the pennies on your eyes” hits estate taxes, while “You’re working for no one but me” speaks for itself. The entire song could describe the Club for Growth’s reason to exist. It’s even bipartisan, so the Tea Party could use it as a platform. And “Revolution,” arguably the gutsiest rock song of the 1960s, slams hippies for being wild-eyed dopes who don’t really understand what they’re demanding. The song even slams idolization of Mao — 12 years before the Chinese Communist Party officially blamed Mao for the brutalities of the Cultural Revolution, and when the left was enamored with him.

You say you’ll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it’s the institution
Well, you know
You better free you mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao
You ain’t going to make it with anyone anyhow

That’s a brilliant takedown, Lincolnesque its brevity and a million times more informed than anything political rockers like Green Day are capable of now. Yeah, the quartet has had their sillier moments too, like, well, Yoko, and “Imagine” is the most overrated song of the pop era in my opinion. But the Beatles have never been one dimensional on politics. It’s part of their mass appeal. And their most obvious successors, U2, have followed in the Beatles’ footsteps on this. Bono can be insufferable, but he can also reach across the aisle, and The Edge and drummer Larry Mullen tend to be pretty mainstream on the rare times they say anything political. Also like the Beatles, U2 aren’t really the best musicians in the world. They’re just incredibly creative with the skills they do have and the words they do put together.

 

Advertisement
Posted at 10:35 am on June 29th, 2011 by

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

8 Comments, 4 Threads

  1. 1. CA Girl

    God knows I love John Lennon, but to compare his soft-spoken “Revolution” to “anything political rockers like Green Day are capable of now” is just naive. Times have changed a lot since the wonderful, dreamy Sixties, when Lennon wrote that lovely song. In the forty years since, Green Day realizes you need to SHOUT — not whisper — your message. Just one example from “Holiday” delivers a stinging critique of our worst president:

    Sieg Heil to the president Gasman
    Bombs away is your punishment
    Pulverize the Eiffel towers
    Who criticize your government

    You need to listen to more Green Day before you disparage their ability to make vivid, vital political commentary.

    • Actually you’ve made my point. Green Day is predictable, very predictable, which among other things makes them boring (though I do like some of their songs, they have a good sound). They’re always shouting in the same direction, and pandering to their fan base. Revolution was a shout at the Beatles’ own hippie fans, challenging those fans’ assumptions. That took guts.

    • You’re betraying your slant here. Green Day hates America, their song “American Idiot,” makes that quite clear.

      So you’re holding out as a role model, a band which hates and mocks the country and system that made it possible for them to be wealthy.

      Boy that sure makes sense.

  2. 2. Steve

    Taxman was written by George Harrison. You think U2 measures up to the Beatles? The Eagles are more to my taste.

    • I like me some Eagles but I don’t think they ever were as dominant as the Beatles or U2 have been at times. But I could be wrong, I was a kid when the Eagles were in their heyday.

  3. 3. Mike

    Taxman was written by George Harrison, and I am not sure how much editorial control Lennon and/or McCartnely had over Harrison’s work that made it to release (maybe they said you get two songs, do whatever you want?), so it may be incorrect to ascribe the sentiments of that song to Lennon.

    • I did attribute both “Taxman” and “Revolution” to the Beatles generally in the post, fwiw. Point being, they weren’t as politically predictable as today’s one-note political rockers tend to be, and that’s part of their appeal. You can listen to the Beatles and not feel like you’re getting yelled at our lectured to by a leftwing Neanderthal.

  4. 4. Uncledave

    “You can listen to the Beatles and not feel like you’re getting yelled at our lectured to by a leftwing Neanderthal.”

    Bryan, your point is taken but by that standard I’d say the large majority of top selling rock/pop performers since the Beatles’ day (for the most part) clear that bar – at least with their recorded music, never mind their public statement. Examples:

    The Who (hey, “won’t get fooled again” was conservative!)
    Rolling Stones
    Clapton
    Led Zeppelin
    Beach Boys
    The Doors
    Boston
    The Kinks
    Van Halen
    Aerosmith
    CCR
    Journey
    Foreigner
    AC/DC
    Styx
    Chicago
    Kiss
    The Police