Three American Professors: ‘Useful Idiots’ of the Tehran Regime
In 2001, Michael Walzer, the Princeton professor and editor of the social-democratic magazine Dissent, wrote a much discussed essay called “Can There Be a Decent Left?” He was ambiguous, but hopeful, and very critical of those on the Left who after 9/11 still saw the United States as the only real enemy of the world’s people. There have been since then scores of events that have proven that the only answer to Walzer is that there cannot be, since the raison d’etre of the Left is the opposition to democratic capitalism and to any exertion of American power in the world.
More proof came this weekend, as the internet is abuzz with a short video posted by MEMRI of a conference held in Tehran last February, but which only now is getting noticed. The video consists of interviews with three American professors who attended a solidarity conference arranged by the mullahs to publicize the Occupy Wall Street movement, the key event of the American left.
The professors identified in the video are Albert Vitale and John Hammond, who claim to be on the faculty of Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, and a sociologist from Fordham University’s Lincoln Center campus in New York, Heather Gautney. I was able to find Gautney on the faculty list of Fordham, but the name John Hammond does not come up at the Brooklyn College website. Vitale is a prof. of sociology and an elected member of the PSC, the AFL-CIO affiliated union that represents the faculty and is now led by a very left-wing leadership. (I originally used Memri’s wrong spelling of his name and have now corrected it.)
In a report that appeared on the Fox News website in March, Gautney is quoted as being pleased that the Iranians supported OWS. She said the conference “is quite a welcome development, and speaks to the Iranians’ affection for Americans despite all the political conflict.” She sounded like an advertisement for the existence of American “useful idiots” for the Iranian regime. It seemed not to occur to Professor Gautney that she was being used by the very regime that brutally suppresses its own dissidents and welcomes an alliance with the Western Left, which it woos as allies who oppose the United States of America.
Although Gautney told Fox’s reporter Mike Levine that at first she worried about the regime’s motive for allowing the meeting, her fears were put aside when she studied the conference’s agenda. She concluded that “it seemed like a very legitimate kind of project.” The government media reported the event and ran a story with the heading: “Experts: Occupy Wall Street likely to topple US administration.”
Evidently another OWS meeting two weeks earlier featured American religious leaders who told the Iranians that OWS “will redesign the world order.” One such religious leader attending was Imam Abdul Alim Musa from a Washington, D.C., mosque, who stated while in Iran that OWS activists “feel that all of us are part of the 90 percent” and thus oppose any government that “killed scientists, engineers, peaceful people,” referring to the assassination of Iranian scientists working on Iran’s nuclear development program. The imam also told them that OWS was “naturally against Zionism,” which was “the monster today.”
When told what the imam had to say two weeks before their own conference, Gautney seemed surprised, obviously believing that she was hosted by Iran because she was a self-proclaimed opponent of “inequality.” Hence, she felt that the imam was “a pawn in religious conflicts” of which OWS was not a part.
Why, I wonder, does Professor Gautney think Iran hosted her and the other American academics? Does she really think that the regime in Tehran is at all interested in addressing the social issue she is concerned with, except for their hope that it will weaken the U.S. internally? As far as Gautney (who seemed to be the only professor there willing to speak to an American reporter ) was concerned, the only issue was that of a “deeply unequal social and political system” in the United States. She saw her role in Iran as “representing the movement.”
When pressed about her own feelings on the regime in Iran, she claimed that she had “no education in Islamic history” and “no real understanding of the society,” and hence it would be “irresponsible” to say anything about the society she was in for the OWS solidarity event. Is she so stupid that she did not see the press reports when the Green movement was being suppressed and the regime was killing those brave enough to take part? Doesn’t she watch TV or read the American newspapers? Or is she so preoccupied with organizing OWS she is simply totally ignorant about anything else?
When reporter Levine challenged her and asked if she was free to speak her mind on any other subjects, she replied that she was only there to “give them real information about the [OWS] movement.” When asked why the Iranians didn’t want to share their views of their own government with her, she simply said they “have to toe a line there” and thus didn’t turn their “lens inward.” But Gautney then proceeded to do the regime a little favor, by noting her firm opposition to U.S. and world sanctions against Iran, which she claimed only hurt “the poor and middle-class people.”
She seemed to think, evidently, that sanctions undercut dissent within Iran, and made Iranians turn “against the West” and thus unify “the country.” Of course, she seemed unaware that by the time she was there, and even before tough sanctions were in place, the regime already was crushing dissent and making it impossible to exist.
The participation of these three academics in an event heralded by our enemies in Tehran should teach us a few lessons. First, the tyrants in Iran welcome and support OWS, which they see as a social movement that helps their goal of weakening the United States. Two, the academics who willingly went to Tehran are playing a small part in legitimizing one of the most brutal governments that now exist, one that openly threatens to destroy Israel and then the United States. Finally, they provide living proof that although Communism for the most part is dead, useful idiots of tyrannies that do still hold power and endanger all of us still exist.
These useful idiots are exemplified by the three American professors who represented OWS in Tehran.
Update:
At the Huffington Post, Sohrab Ahmari, an Iranian-American author and opponent of the regime in Tehran, has a first rate article about their trip. He also discovered an incredibly stupid piece by Heather Gautney about the trip, that she published of all places on CNN’s GPS website, the blog area of Fareed Zakaria’s program.






It’s a very fine line dividing a “useful idiot” in the eyes of her/his handlers in Teheran, and the morphing of her/him into a Fellow Traveler (Cold War term) edging towards another fine line towards treason.
It seems that too many of us Americans are being the “useful idiots” of the far left and their application of political correctness and human “rights” in this Election Campaign, which will be becoming narrower and more heated.
This sentence of Radosh’s. “The participation of these three academics in an event heralded by our enemies in Tehran should teach us a few lessons.” He ought to say that over and over again.
Enlarge this particular situation of these three Professors as indicators of a larger concerted effort on the part of our Muslim/Islamic enemy. What are these Professors going to be professing to their impressionable students upon their return?
As this Election Campaign proceeds we need to be very alert to the populist vote-seeking efforts of the Left disguised as Democrats gathering their faithful.
We Americans should be spending more time reviewing the Soviet tactics of subversive sleepers and their successful efforts to penetrate our civil systems. Review Alger Hiss..et.al. for starters. Our Muslim/Islamic enemies seem to me to be using many of those proven tactics.
We’ve only to look at Dearborn in Michigan and the dear nearness of Northern Virginia and the efforts of Saudi financed study groups at nearby Georgetown University….in the name of “ecumenism”. Study groups….indeed.
Compare the Communist tactics of those 1930′s through the 1980′s to the present.
Our attention spans now are simply too short, dangerously so.
>>the academics who willingly went to Tehran are playing a small part in legitimizing one of the most brutal governments that now exist
A small part indeed. This “conference” is so full of delusion that it strikes me as little more than the blind leading the blind.
Yes, these wars of words can lead to wars of weapons — perhaps they must. And if they must, let the useful idiots play their role. The United States will not lose the war of weapons. (It saddens me terribly to think of the suffering ordinary Iranian citizens will undergo as a result, but perhaps it’s the price they pay for producing such awful leadership. Or perhaps not. If not, well then it’s us or them and I pick us.)
Ron;
Hey Ron, you should know better.
Given your background years ago, associating with lefties and supporting their objectives, you are well aware that these “useful idiot” american professors in Tehran are not idiots at all; their goal, despite what they say, is the imposition of a tyrannical, despotic, communist dictatorship here in the USA (for starters) and around the world.
Recall the Port Huron meeting years ago in which one, or several of its participants INSISTED that the mass extermination of about 20 to 30 million AMERICAN CITIZENS would be necessary and JUSTIFIED for a communist dictatorship to be successfully imposed upon the American people. The individual(s) who made this statement were ALL AMERICAN BORN, IVY LEAGUE STUDENTS !!
These sorts of people are NOT idiots; they are just american versions of Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and Kim Jong and frankly, the world, certainly the USA, would be far better off if these sorts of vermin were eliminated, literally. For if they are not, we all certainly will, and they will start with the likes of you, Ron, because you are voice warning all of us what these people aim to achieve.
Of course, you call them useful idiots, but you know better than most that they are not idiots; they are determined, organized and aim to KILL ALL THOSE WHO OPPOSE THEM at their first opportunity to achieve their goal of mass terror, mass murder and the implementation of a Stalinist/Maoist/Pol Pot communist tyranny in the USA and everywhere.
Ron, tell it like it is. They WILL BE MASS MURDERERS at their first opportunity.
Read Kent Clizbe’s book, “Willing Accomplices”.
“Albert Vitae” looks like a pseudonym. ‘Vitae’ is a common Latin word with academic connections, but I’ve never seen it as a name. Is Albert’s middle name “Curriculum”?
Another example of a “Useful Idiot” was Jane Fonda. Most of us see her as a traitor. And that’s exactly how I view these, so-called professors.
As “dissident” Americans going to Tehran, the “professors” are following in the footsteps of David Duke.
The “professors” are truly in illustrious company.
what I am interested in is why hank Hanegraaf was there? I emailed CRI for an explanation but received none. Was he there as an apologist for religion/Christianity, or was he there because he agreed with the movement? Or? He has a lot of influence in the US and if he is a useful idiot as well, we should know.
Ron, you had me reading your analysis until you got to the baseless assertion that the Communist movement is essentially dead now. Do your research and discover that the Communist Party is behind the whole OWS bowel movement, if you will. They see the Obama administration as the enabling power to the great revolution they have waited over a century to see. These three people are OWS organizers? I will bet you a dollar against a dime that these same three professorial types are members of a Communist apparatchik right here in America. You have a Communist in your White House and you think Communism is pretty much dead? Be careful about your use of the “useful idiot” label.
Jim: Not the Communist Party USA re controlling the Occupy Movement, but its successor on the Left, the marxist Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). DSA was a merger of other leftist/marxist organizations from the 1970s including the New American Movement (ex CPers, SDSers, independent marxists, Democratic Socialists and old Socialist Party hacks).
Today, the DSA is the largest marxist organization (not necessarily a party like the CPUSA) in the US and it has a tremendous amount of former CPers, SDSers/ Weathermen, New Party, s few Trotskyites and anarchist-marxists in it. Obama got a lot of his Chicago support from them throughout his career.
I suggest that you go to http://www.keywiki.org and http://www.DiscoverTheNetwork.com websites for details on the overall movements and individual chapters of the Occupy Movement. You’ll see a “who’s who” for many of them, as well as their ideological orientations/organizations. This will help to explain how the DSA and its affiliates have literally taken over the main part of the OM, while individual marxists/communists have made themselves leaders of the smaller Occupy Movement cities and towns.
However, the guiding ideological force for the OC is Saul Alinsky and his thoughts, with a good backing by Marx, Engels, Stalin, Castro, and Chavez.
Call it “red”.
Color the “Teheran 3″ as “willing idiots” or hardcore anti-American marxists. Either could be correct. Both would be closer to the truth.
[There was a "Teheran 10" back in 1980 led by Ramsey Clark, Rev. John Adams, Don "Hanoi Lobby" Luce, and other marxists and America-haters, so this trio's trip is nothing new].
http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/sociology/faculty/john-hammond
Not Brooklyn, Hunter.
Once again we keep suggesting that being a communist on campus is not cause for concern but another example of diversity. Just like the progressive black caucus that Allen West identified as 80 communists. Well lets just call them what they are. Our country has spent more than 50 years fighting communists on the battlefield and now we are still fighting these bastards in the classrooms. Except now they are exalted tenured faculty members sucking off the US taxpayers and parents of the little drones who they now have in thought control classes. However lets tip toe around and speak in hushed tones for fear of possibly offending one of these scum bags and their defenders in the white house, congress and the lame stream media. It would be funny if it were not so pathetic. Call them out!!
Useful idiots? No, traitors.
Absolutely. Traitors.
I wonder if Professor Gautney has ever taken a class in modern propaganda in Marxist states, like the Soviet Union or even present-day Cuba? Maybe she can get low-interest student loan from our government to take one of those classes in her own school. She may actually learn something there. Evidently, she didn’t learn anything in Tehran.
There is a lot of upside to this.
OWS is an epic failure. They have attracted more reporters than protesters. The ‘movement’ is incoherent and poorly organized. They have marginalized themselves by associating with radical groups and by their appalling behavior at the ‘camps’.
This only weakens OWS. A group with any brains would have never allowed thier name to be associated with the Iranian government’s clumsy propoganda effort. Not going to net you anything back home. It is obvious that they were used although the clueless Professor Gautney can’t seem to figure that out.
It is also a good sign that Iran thinks that this pathetic bunch are somehow an effective political weapon which is going to bring down our government. If this is the best they can do then we should all feel confident that we are on the right course.
I hope that all Iranian weapons are as effective as OWS. News today is that Israel is now deploying the latest version of the Arrow long range anti-missile system specifically designed to intercept Iranian missiles. Also computer systems in the Iranian oil industry have caught some sort of virus.
Academics supporting a ruthless regime in Iran? Why not? Just about every dictator of every stripe Hitler, Stalin, Mao , Pol Pot , Mussolini, Castro all had support from academics in the west. This was noted by Paul Johnson in his book INTELLECTUALS.
They’re not idiots. They are getting paid by Iran.
Funny thing about idiots. They rarely do it for money. For them, it’s the principle. The idiot principle, true. But principle nonetheless.
Here in Canada, we have a native (Indian, First Nations, however you call them) firmly on board with Teheran, who are delighted.
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/nelson-enlists-iran-in-afn-bid-148224045.html
I was under the impression there are travel restrictions to Iran. Sounds like someone should be prosecuted for violation of said restrictions.