Final Thoughts on the Russian-American Spy Swap
The ten arrested Russian spies have arrived in Vienna, and shortly will be back in Moscow. Sentenced last night in New York, they gave their real Russian names, pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to time served — a few short days.
Never has a spy swap been orchestrated so quickly. In the era of the Cold War, there were plenty of swaps. The most famous was that of KGB Colonel Rudolf Abel for the U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers in 1962. Abel was the name he adopted, when he lived in Greenwich Village and Brooklyn, and posed as an artist. In all the swaps, Russian spies were exchanged after having already served real time in American prisons, and after they had been thoroughly interrogated.
Later, the Soviets exchanged political dissidents who were given freedom in exchange for their spies. The most famous was that of Natan Sharansky. Sharanksy and three low-level Western spies (Czech citizen Jaroslav Javorský and West German citizens Wolf-Georg Frohn and Dietrich Nistroy) were exchanged for Czech spies Karl Koecher and Hana Koecher held in the USA, Soviet spy Yevgeni Zemlyakov, Polish spy Jerzy Kaczmarek and GDR spy Detlef Scharfenorth (the latter three held in Western Germany) in 1986 on Glienicke Bridge.
Attorney General Eric Holder, in a statement for television and the press, readily admitted that what lay behind the exchange was not issues of national security, but the Obama administration’s concern for diplomatic relations with Vladimir Putin’s new Russia. As a New York Times story put it, “President Obama has made the ‘reset’ of Russian-American relations a top foreign policy priority, and the quiet collaboration over the spy scandal indicates that the Kremlin likewise values the warmer ties.”
The issue, however, is whether the results are equally beneficial to both the United States and Russia. Clearly, while our government is bending over backwards to play nice with Putin, the Russian government is up to its old ways in dealing with the United States, as the placement of these sleeper spies indicates.
Some commentators have argued that exchanging them makes sense, since they never got a chance to engage in actual espionage, and hence had been arrested only for money laundering and failing to register as a foreign agent of Russia. That argument misses the point.
These spies were meant not only to recruit others who would do the actual spying — hence the large sums of money in their homes obviously meant to be used to pay recruits — but also to try and obtain positions or placements where they could gain access to the kind of information that is not readily available in press stories or on Google.
The best example of this is the case of young Mikhail Semenko, who never adopted a false American name. Semenko came to America to study international relations and Asia studies at Seton Hall University in New Jersey. After graduating, he got a job with a travel agency called Travel All Russia, and moved with the firm to Arlington, Virginia. But Semenko was from the start an SVR agent, sent to the United States to move up the ladder and eventually gain a position from which he could be of use.
As a story in the London Telegraph reveals, Semenko tried to obtain jobs at both the liberal New America Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Both think tanks, as we know, are closely connected to the Obama administration. Had he been hired by either of them, Semenko would have been in a good position to eventually either get an actual job somewhere in the government — just as Soviet era spies did in the 1940s — or to have regular contact with administration figures who might have shared inside information with him as part other job activities. As the British newspaper explained, “Semenko attended numerous think tank events and was an assiduous networker even for a Washingtonian. … [H]e appeared determined to secure employment closer to the heart of the US government.”
Clearly, both the Russian and American governments hope that with the exchange a done deal, and the spies back in their native Russia, the arrests and the drama will quickly be forgotten. In another week, it will simply be yesterday’s news. Only time will tell whether years from now, we will suddenly learn that the ten were more successful than we imagined, and had recruited others who managed to do actual damage.






so what you are saying that years from now we may know what damage it was caused. so 10 years of brave FBI work on this was just discredited. the sad part is if they were caught when Bush was running the show it would all been praises..
I’m not a conspiracy theorist but I think this swap went off TOO quick. I think that the administration did not want information the Russian spies had leaked out because of involvement of someone in the Obama administration.
I think it is more likely that they were more interested in not embarassing the Russians than they were in finding out who these spies might have recruited.
Actually, these things do NOT happen overnight. The surveillance of the “spies” was on-going for months, even years. One of the main strategies in counter-intelligence work is to watch the known agents, not to capture them. If you eliminate a known agent, the enemy (Russia) will merely replace him/her with another UNKNOWN agent and you have to repeat your efforts.
Face it, the Obama regime is so far left that Russia looks conservative. As Savage24 wrote, if Russia wants to know anything about the USA, all they have to do is ask Obama.
DavidMac, you are very correct in stating that the Russians only have to ask Obama, and he will tell them what he needs to know.
Not only that, but the MSM never bothered to tell the American people about ALL the connections/sympathies that Obama has with the Russians. From his Commie mom, onto his Commie ‘Uncle’ Frank, to his Commie grandparents, and to all the known Commie sympathizers in his Chicago connections, how far a leap is it to suggest that Obama was NOT just trying to ‘reset’ the button?
We all need to think past our noses……
Bred, if there is not enough evidence in just the last 100 years of unfiltered history to convert you , sorry you have missed the bus. . Just ask yourself “Why has the administration dumped a continuous flow of waste logic into the media toilet to be flushed for public consumption”? The answer is simply that they are convinced of it’s continued effectiveness on voters in 2010. After all they swallowed the “moving forward change” venue in 2008 without ever noticing the putrid odor of it’s unfiltered historically documented failures. Otherwise why would they risk their reputations on the slop that they profess?
Your inclusion of a “someone” in the present administration reveals your meager information sources (or lack thereof) while a think tank of inexperienced ideologues fumble through everyday problems unable to find any viable remedies and nobody to blame. The only training these ideologues have is self taught politically correct administration for usurping more power at future tax payers demise. Take notice of how all whistle blowers are suppressed. Delays by stacked courts can be expected. If you don’t expect any wild cards to be played in November then they have succeeded again. By all means make plan “B”.
As the head of Canadian intelligence has just reported– unnamed members of their govrnment are foreign agents and are sprinkled throughout the country, as we find that young journalists may pretend to be on the right, but are really on the left, when we hear that a former congressman was an agent helping terrorists (isn’t that a bigger story?), this sensational spy story steps on other stories and turns our attention to familiar old themes with romantic characters that are quickly gone from our shore. That’s so we don’t think about the big problem– who is still here–what foreign agents are in our government,delivering our news, shaping opinions on blogs, teaching at universities, working in Hollywood. I feeling downright McCarthy-like.
“as we find that young journalists may pretend to be on the right, but are really on the left”
Mel, where did you hear about this?
Can you provide a reference(s) or a link(s)?
What if these russian spies knew Obama’s mother was an agent of the U.S.S.R.?
Yep. they had to scoot them out of the country before they could spill the beans on Pelosi.
Is pointed out that the swap went through too swiftly.
Why, though?
Several possible reasons come to mind:
(1) Obama is a KGB agent, and doesn’t want to be implicated as such, if serious interrogations of the Ten took place.
(2) Obama didn’t want secrets of KGB and Russia come out.
(3) The most likely is that nobody in the Left would want it be made publicized just how many of them are actually anti-american, or even working for the ComIntern …
One thing is certain—if Eric Holder comes out in open and says ‘it is not for security reasons, but merely for diplomatic reasons’, that particular reason disqualifies itself. Not once have these loonies told the truth about what they are doing, and why. Why would they start to do so now? Isn’t it better to be portrayed gullible and naive, rather than traitors?
It’s unlikely that anyone in the Obama regime are Russian spies (unregistered foreign agents). The Obama regime is ideologically far left anyway, so that they are probably more in tune politically with Russia than with their own USA.
Look at people like Van Jones who was an avowed communist. He didn’t “slip through the cracks”; he was selected BECAUSE he was a communist. The new head of ObamaCare has publically termed health care as “wealth redistibution”, not as “health care reform”.
Look, folks, you have a radical far left socialist in the White House. Politically, he can’t admit it because only about 20% of Americans believe socialism is a good idea. Sure, Obama says all the right things but WATCH WHAT HE DOES. Actions speak louder than words.
On the one hand, these apparent bunglers were quite capable of digging up a cached WMD and deploying it. On the other, we have twelve million persons illegally present and an open border. This situation is not blowing my skirt up.
I could understand why these spies would be here during the Bush years, but they would serve no purpose with Obama in office. If Putin wants to know anything, all he has to do is ask Obama and he will get it. Another thing if Holder says something, you can bet that it is means somethig else.
One under-covered aspect of the Russian spy saga in both the MSM and blogosphere is the fate of the spies’ US-born children. Despite being US citizens by birth, it seems that as part of the exchange deal struck by the Obama administration, at least some of them will be uprooted from the only country they’ve ever known and deported to Russia with their parents.
Setting aside for now the question of whether this was the right thing to do (keep in mind that the only viable alternative would have been permanently separating the children from their parents), this raises intriguing implications for the illegal immigration debate. In booting the US-born kids out of the country with their parents, has Obama unwittingly torpedoed the infamous “anchor baby” strategy employed by many illegal immigrants to stay in the US? If kids who are US citizens can now be deported along with their parents, does that not effectively render that strategy useless?
In booting the US-born kids out of the country with their parents, has Obama unwittingly torpedoed the infamous “anchor baby” strategy employed by many illegal immigrants to stay in the US?
“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”
Like Human Rights; which human, what rights!
It’s an interesting question but I doubt it will have much effect. The convicted spies are unlikely to appeal their deportation in the courts.
We won’t be able to keep these kids out if they ever decide to return as adults. However, it would be pretty stupid of the KGB(NVD? what’s it called now?) to use them as spies since they’d be immediately under suspicion.
That assumes anyone born in this country is a citizen, even if the parents are illegals. Sooner or later the Supreme Court will have to decide. For now, Obama just set a precedent.
I think this is a trick! Watch the coin in one hand, it holds your attention while the other hand is up to something else significant on the sly. My hope is that is a good thing that they are up to on the sly. However if I said what it was I might bow it. I don’t have any inside information; It’s just a strategy that I know of from an obscure science fiction.
If you go in for praying then pray that the trick is what I think and hope it is. Pray that it works spectacularly. Otherwise ask your self why old foes would be pretending hostility.
The only hint I can give is that if I’m right this game plan started before Barack Obama was even a presidential candidate.
The US received three real high ranking spies and one nuclear scientist. If the Russians were spying on us ~bad, bad Russians
~ then we were certainly spying on them ~good, good Americans
~ and more effectively
.
BTW What other countries is America spying on: Australia, Canada, Great Britain, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel? Jonathan Pollard has been sitting in his cell for 25 years with no chance of a swap.
The only reason that I can think of that required such speed was that someone here has something that they did not was in public records from a trial. White House ? DOJ? Other??
It must be a bit of a letdown for the Russian spies to discover that all of the expectations as a result of their training were false. There’ll be no dreadful torture or years of deprivation in a dungeon with starvation and beatings.
Perhaps their next assignments will be in places like Turkey or China or Libya where the niceties of civilization are not so prevalent. Maybe they’ll get relaxing desk jobs with no pressure or demands.
Ah well , everything is so good with Obama and Putin in command these days.
When Obama kicked US citizens out of the country, it’s called “compassion”. If Bush did it, it would have been called “fascism”.
The Obama regime’s Ministry of Propaganda (aka the Mainstream Media) is working overtime to convince the USA that Obama is just a kinder and gentler president than the evil war-mongering capitalist, G.W. Bush. Next year, when Obama makes the Bush tax cuts go away and adds new taxes to pay for ObamaCare, maybe some of the leftists will wake up, but with almost half of Americans not paying ANY federal income tax, I doubt it will make a difference.
Most Americans are in for a very bad time in the years to come.
Obama is a fool. Not only did the Ruskies take him to the cleaners on this one, but he got a handful of beans in return.
Pukin’ & Medhead are surely laughing their heads off at his stupidity & naivete. Gee, would I like to make a deal w/ O. The Iranians, North Koreans & Al Queda are certainly standing in line to see what they will get for giving O a dead potted plant.
What a laughingstock!
Russia and the rest of the hard-core socialist countries will play Obama like a violin. And Obama is more than willing to be played. His ideology is socialism and he sees nothing wrong with dminishing a capitalist economy and helping with the ascent of a socialist economy in the USA.
What we have just seen is a coverup of the tip of the iceberg. These agents were “moles,” but minor operatives in a much-larger, decades-old, targeted effort to undermine the institutions of our govenment “from within,” just as promised many years ago by then USSR premier, Nikita Khrushev.
In in eyes of those in charge of the USSR’s intelligence circles, Khrushev’s “comic tantrum” at the UN was a gigantic slip of the lip of cosmic proportions.
The communists of that time (and today) are dedicated partisans. They were (and are) long-range planners and are totally committed to the end results of those plans. Khrushev was simply speaking out the truth of a carefully structured, already-existing program to overcome their “enemies,” the western world and especially the US.
Did it startle you when the USSR suddenly collasped in 1989-1990? It should not if you understand the reality of global politics. Do you think that the dedicated “aparratchiks” of the assembled governments of the “former” USSR simply folded their tents and retreated under rocks when the Berlin Wall came down and the decades-old border-fences and mine-fields were dismantled? Do you believe these “true blue partisans” were so dis-heartend by events that they just “just turned tail and frightfully ran away”?
No such luck! Intensive and planned preparations were in place to burrow into both the “successor government” and the governments of what were proclaimed to be the freedom-loving governments of the nations of the free world.
Don’t believe this? Take a look at the aftermath of what happened in the “lynch-pin” of the former communist nation of “East Germany”:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,635486,00.html
Bottom line? 17,000 former Stasi agents (trained by the USSR’s KGB) were “discovered” working now in the government offices of the “new states of Germany.” These new states are the area that was formerly East Germany. Want to hazard a guess as to how many are now firmly entrenched as members of the “legal” political parties in the other “old states” of Germany’s present government?
Excerpt:
>Even more troubling, some of them appear to be employed by the police or in various national or state offices of criminal investigation. One was even rumored to be working as a bodyguard for Chancellor Angela Merkel although this was later denied by the agency responsible. And by the end of the week those numbers were coming under closer scrutiny with some researchers claiming they are too old to be reliable and that the issue was moot.<
Knowing these facts, is it a "fantasy" to speculate that similar infiltrations have not occured in the "new governments" of the other former USSR countries? .. or for that matter, in other member governments of the European Union?
So are we concerned that this same method of espionage has been used to influence the direction of the US? It should be. It is naive to think that if 17,000 former communist agents have infested "just" a small part of the government of Germany, only 12 like-minded agents have made it across the ocean to America in the last 3 dacades?
Are those in the Tea Party movement concerned at all that the US is being force-fed European-style socialism? If not, they should study the recent history of those "new socialists" in Europe. The "new" European Socialists are not our "grandfathers' socialists"! They are the "new European Socialists." They are the high-tech version "on steroids" of Khruschv's time.
So do we comfortably accept assurances that our current administration has "rooted out the moles" … and there is no furtheer need for increased viligance?
Should we rejoice that four of "our spies" are "coming home." I sense that they will not see a difference here "at home" between the our national environment and the nations to which they were assigned to work. And that's a pity!
Just curious… did you moderate out my earlier post>
As Arte Johnson from that great show Laugh In would say “Very interesting…but stupid! …
My question is what happened to their US assets?
Obviously PJ has yet to figure out that the executive branch is controlled by the terrorist.
The spy swap is the way the “traitor branch” prepares the public for the next terrorist tactic (Yes, delivered to every member of congress in 1989) and yes it comes from the “KGB handbook on manipulating ethnic masses” (1989) and it isn’t spouse swapping…
The redhead was a recruiter and Columbia is a great place to find recruits. Columbia is infested with Communist. They walk around with their Che Guevara tee shirts. The man was a racist butcher.
The good news is the FBI does not have to reveal sources and methods as Radosh pointed out. Also if the dissident freed is a genuine dissident then this is a good thing as it was in the Sharansky case in the 1980s. One may hope that US counterintelligence has noted the contacts of the 10 Russians and is now following them and that this fact, if it is a fact, stays secret so we have the advantage. The down side is the reset with Russia continues with the dangerous START treaty having one less obstacle to consent from the Senate and further lack of recognition that Russia remains an enemy of the US whose clients include other enemies of the US such as Syria, Venezuela and Iran. Also one might speculate about the status of the 3 other Russians released to the West. Are they plants? Will they now take up activities on behalf of Moscow and are they in fact more important than the 10 returned to Russia? For some useful basic information on Russia’s continued Soviet methods see The Perestroika Deception by Anatoliy Golitsyn and Spy Wars by Tennent Bagley and Edward Jay Epstein’s website.
Consider this story in the London Telegraph:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7883290/Anna-Chapmans-father-may-have-had-serious-Kremlin-connections.html
Then consider: Anna Chapman’s father, Vasily Kushchenko, used to work with Sergei Ivanov in Kenya. Ivanov was a friend of Putin.
Also in Kenya about that time: Barack Obama’s birth father, a communist under the KGB control. Before his death in a traffic accident he was trying to help organize a communist takeover of Kenya, with others. Could he have known Ivanov? Could Anna Chapman have known this if he did?
Recap Obama’s childhood: A communist mother, a communist birth father. A communist adopted father. Travel all around the world in Indonesia, Pakistan, etc, etc, and then raised in Hawaii (a known communist hotbed) by Communist grandparents. A communist mentor, Frank Davis, who was a member of CPUSA, a KGB-controlled organization. Many other communist associates all through his adult life, including communist Weather Underground members.
A campaign that received large sums of money (possibly hundreds of millions of dollars) from anonymous overseas donors.
And so on. Then consider how the KGB has long operated:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHgYPDvQFU8&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMZGGQ0ERk&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGfN3WRA0Vc&feature=player_embedded
And combine with recent reports that KGB spy networks didn’t go away at all when the Soviet Union collapsed, but actually expanded.
Is it really beyond consideration that Obama is himself a long-term, deep-cover mole for the Russian SVR?
Could somebody actually investigate this?
What would it cost to get the evidence from either a defector or greedy KGB type, if the proof exists?
He walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, but surely, the man is NOT a communist – after all, comrade Obama has insisted as much, and his word is most certainly the truth!
I think the Russkies are just employing the Cloward-Piven strategy to keep the FBI distracted and the FBI finally got tired of it.
Finally, someone vocalizes my concerns regarding the eerily hasty and smooth exchange that took place!
It is also important to note that in nearly every spy-exchange circumstance, it has been a one-to-one exchange.