They must have since Iranian prexy Mahmoud the Mad did not complain that the US was planning to kidnap him when he visited the university in New York, a considerably easier task, I would imagine, than trying to kidnap him in Baghdad…. but I’m no expert.
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.
Maybe his real sentiment is: Yankee go home (and take me with you).
Megalomaniacal would-be world leader who thinks he’s right all the time, and that people are out to get him…
Oh, wait, that’s Obama.
Scott
Maybe his real sentiment is …
At first glance one would not be faulted for speculating, as much as one can decipher Mahmoud’s intentions, that if Mahmoud is paranoid is perhaps because he knows he has a good reason. In witch case his paranoia might be called something else.
If one, as Mahmoud does, while making nukes, keeps calling for the destruction of a neighbor, there comes a point where a rational person (I know I’m stretching, it is Mahmoud we are talking about) might conclude that the threats will,,, eventually,,, fiiiinally be taken seriously.
I mean, it’s not hard to imagine Mahmoud in front of a mirror asking himself ‘how do you get away with it?’
Let’s just say that if he is guessing about getting kidnapped he has a perfect vantage point.
Oh, wait, that’s Obama.
Does Obama regular flip flops reflect his popular image, what has been called the white (keep reading, It’s not about Michelle) canvas, the neutral persona on whom people can project their personal histories and aspirations or what Obama has himself defined as the centerpiece of his message “change you can believe in”?
He’s gone back on the financing of his campaign, on NAFTA (twice I think) and the speculation is that because the surge he opposed has made his abandon Iraq position indefensible, he will go to Iraq and come back a changed man.
So far it appears Obama can do Clinton better than Clinton. Outmatching Hillary stands as exhibit 1
How many times must a man flip flop
before they call him a flim flam.