… I rather suspect it was always that way… but this WaPo tour d’horizon of the GOP’s dim Senate prospects seems all but Democratic cheerleading.
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.
Yep, I saw this article and its wish fulfillment aspects jump out. It’s probably a good summary of local political positions now but is ignorant of larger issues and presidential dynamics including who the candidates are per se. The Republicans have a lot of work to do but their leading candidates are so much more substantial in their broad real-life experiential backgrounds than any of the Democratic candidates. I think the Republicans have a very good chance based on this difference.
“The Republicans have a lot of work to do but their leading candidates are so much more substantial in their broad real-life experiential backgrounds than any of the Democratic candidates.”
The last United States senator to be elected president was John F. Kennedy—and he barely squeezed by Richard Nixon. Americans consider senators as essentially do nothing blow-hards. Governors and mayors of cities with populations of 8 1/2 million people actually have to earn a living. This is another strong reason why Rudy Giuliani has a strong edge over Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama.
The Washington Post is the house organ for the DNC. The LA Times does what it can to catch up but it is just no contest. The WaPo is the Democrats cheerleader.