You can be sure I won’t be seeing Dreamgirls again on New Year’s Eve. [I told you to stop reviewing. You'll never work in Hollywood again.-ed. Not with anyone connected with Dreamgirls.]
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.
In your review you blame the “studio development system”. It is interesting to note, however, that in most cases where film makers are given total artistic freedom independent of the “system”, the result is panned by the same critics who are always complaining about the “system”. An interesting recent case is “Lady in the Water”. Almost all the reviewers complained about the producer/director’s arrogance in ignoring all the warnings he was given by numerous studio executives, and going off on his own.
Good point, LTEC. These things cut both ways. In the case of Dreamgirls, however … a story that has been around a loooooong time … I suspect, from my own experiences, that the development people are in part responsible. Too much opportunity, etc. But of course I don’t know. That’s why I wrote “whatever the case”
I went to see “Dreamgirls” with low expectations, and so I had fun watching it. But I agree with you totally about the plot, the length, and absolutely about the music–inferior to the originals in every way.
But when I wrote my review of the movie, you’ll be happy to see (and hear) that I put the “Baby Love”–and the supremely superior Supremes–back in “Dreamgirls.” Follow the links to the videos and enjoy.
And a very Happy New Year to you all!
Happy New Year to Roger and his loved loves. How fun to have worked as a member of PJM this year. Onward and upward!!!
This year on the last day of the year Dreamgirls is in theaters. Last year on this date Rent and The Producers were in theaters. The year before on this date The Phantom of the Opera was in theaters. Why? The year before the year before the year before on this date Chicago was in theaters.
Whether Dreamgirls, the stage musical version of which debuted on Broadway over 25 years ago, makes money or not, movie versions of other stage musicals will probably turn up in December for at least a few more years and maybe even in January for another few after that. And then, some years from now, or maybe just a year from now, some guy will have an idea and will find someone with money to finance putting that idea on film and the result might just be something akin to Moulin Rouge! and its box office and then people with movie rights to material from another medium might get people with money to finance putting that material onto film because, just maybe, that might be what’ll get the public into the movie theaters.
…and so it goes.
I sure miss the annual Coen Brothers film.
A couple of days ago, I had a wonderful time watching “Singing in the Rain” on vhs, and now I think I’ll buy some more Donald OConnor movies.
And.. would you believe… not only is the original “Francis the Talking Mule” really good, BUT, there, in a tiny tiny role was… Tony Curtis!
Happy New Year, Roger.
Happy new year to you all.