Dear friends (and others),
Yesterday, Holy Saturday, was a sodden mess, so it is doubly pleasant to report that Easter dawned bright and sunny here on the East coast of southern Connecticut. Signs of spring are abundant everywhere. Snow drops have come and gone, ditto crocuses and squill, and daffodils have arrived in glorious profusion. Buds and shoots are everywhere – - tulips are pushing their sharp, inquisitive heads towards heaven and the apple tree outside my study window has populated itself with thousands of tightly wrought green promises just waiting to blossom into a glory of white and pink. In short, as Gerard Manley Hopkins wrote in “God’s Grandeur,” one of his most magnificent poems, although “all is seared with trade; bleared, smeared with toil,” although “the soil is bare now,” yet “for all this nature is never spent.”
And though the last lights off the black West went
Oh, morning, at the brown brink eastward, springs—
I have loved Hopkins’s poem since I first read it in high school — the incantatory diction, haunting music, emotion compressed, distilled, stripped bare in language that trembles to contain all it seeks to impart (“there lives the dearest freshness deep down things”).
Easter, as I noted in a post marking the holiday last year, is the traditional time when the Catholic Church receives converts into the fold. I went back to read what I’d written last Easter and thought some readers might like to be reminded of what I had to say then:
All souls are equal in the sight of God, but here on earth some converts elicit particular attention. The announcement yesterday that Magdi Allam, the 55-year-old an Egyptian-born Italian journalist, had converted from his native Islam to Catholic Christianity, is a case in point. Apostasy from Islam is, as my fellow PJM blogger Michael Ledeen points out, punishable by death if you happen to be in one of the many atavistic bulwarks of barbarism that make the Religion of Peace an object of obloquy among civilized people.
[UPDATE: Robert Spencer shows that, as usual, I was being too generous to the Religion of Peace. As Spencer explains, "all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence agree that apostates must be executed. But don't take my word for it. Here's the great Sheikh Al-Qaradawi, who has been praised by John Esposito as a 'reformist':
That is why the Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-`ashriyyah, Al-Ja`fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed...]
This particular baptism is sure to arouse the ire of fanatical Muslims, but, as the blogger at Tigerhawk put it, kudos to the Pope for performing the service in public: “If the Roman church does not draw a line against Islamist intimidation, who will?”
Good question. While you ponder it, allow me to introduce a more meditative note. Last year at Easter, I posted this thought for the day about the mysterious subject of time; a few people have asked me about it, so I thought I would reproduce it on this chilly (but sunny) Easter morn:
“So long as no one asks me,” St. Augustine says, reflecting on the mystery of time in Confessions, “I know what it is. But as soon as I try to say what time is I am baffled”
Well, St. Augustine has many interesting things to say about time in Book XI of Confessions, and he is perhaps most interesting (if also least helpful) when he wonders whether time is somehow “an extension of the mind itself” – most interesting because it is clear that our experience of time is deeply implicated with the movements of our mind, that it differs radically from one moment, and one phase of life to the next. But St. Augustine’s suggestion is also not particularly helpful when it comes to one of life’s most awful facts: that time passes, sweeping all that is “contains” (right word?) before it.
In a used book shop somewhere a couple of years ago I picked up a book enticingly called Why Life Speeds Up as You Get Older. Published by Cambridge University Press, it’s by a Dutch psychologist called Douwe Draaisma, and it is full of interesting facts and speculations about (as the book’s subtitle puts it”) “how memory shapes our past.” (How indeed: “Memory,” Draasima quotes the Dutch aphorist Cees Nooteboom as saying, “is like a dog that lies down where it pleases.”)
Easter, whatever else it is, is a festival about time’s passing–taking that phrase in all the rich multiplicity implied in “passing.” (When time has passed, what is left?) Draasisma’s book presents lots of fascinating psychological case studies. Much briefer, yet unaccountably more poignant, is this little poem I discovered in one of John Julius Norwich’s Christmas Crackers. It is, he tells us, inscribed on the pendulum of a clock in a church in Kent.
When as a child I laughed and wept
Time crept.
When as a youth I dreamed and talked
Time walked.
When I became a full-grown man
Time ran.
And later as I older grew
Time flew.
Soon shall I find when traveling on
Time gone.
Will Christ have saved my soul by then?
Amen.An apposite question for this Easter morning!


















I find that there isn’t a formal way for me to prepare for a week as significant as Easter. So I do it in my own idiosyncratic way. However, all it takes is to dislodge myself from predictable, regimented, lowly perceptions of time, on which we operate at a daily basis. Norwich’s poetry does so much better with its unique meter and ‘reset’ rhythm. (How appropriate that it serves as an exception to the clock on which it is inscribed! A veritable disclaimer!)
The important thing to remind oneself about time as an artificial, man made construct, is that it does not give at all, or with any generosity whatsoever, the thing that Norwich poses oddly (that’s what poets do…) in the form of a question.
Its irrelevant, as far as time is concerned, whether one contemplates how perception of time might change (over time) or any ‘questions’ its raises: Norwich’s answer comes from his willingness to even ask the question in the first place; and that’s some mighty powerful punctuation that provides the answer.
Time is about as uncaring, and cold, as the willful feint hearts at Columbia University as the previous post reveals. If they are so almighty, if they are so willful, if there is no Columbus Day, why don’t they have the simple honesty, courage, and ethical principle to say there is no longer a Columbia University? As we knew it?
That seems in order: no columbus day, no columbia university either? eh? Mission accomplished: learning destroyed, learning ability destroyed as well. No point calling it Columbia University anymore, now is there?
Let’s see how long it takes the courageous time-sitters there to come up with that?
Or will it be that, since the idea originated outside the environs of the vaunted Columbia administrators bailiwick (myself, in this case), they are just too willful to consider it? And so they will just, you know, just sort of, uh, you know, move on…
you know.
Pathetic. Craven. And Sad. And certainly not for me to judge: Let’s just let time deal with them, in its inimical way.
My bad, it was Brown “university” what banned Columbus day, not Columbia “university”. same thing. I move around a little too fast sometimes though.
I’m in my 40′s, but I don’t recall ever encountering this Gerard Manley Hopkins poem, so I clicked on the Bartleby’s link.
It makes tears run down my cheeks.
Thank you, Roger, for the introduction.