Happy Days Are Here Again
You’re better off today than ever. You just don’t know it. Obama campaign official Stephanie Cutter has said that President Obama has created more jobs than Ronald Reagan. Cutter made this assertion at MSNBC’s Morning Joe:
“Well, I think that worker probably has a good understanding of what’s happened over the past four years in terms of the president coming in and seeing 800,000 jobs lost on the day that the president was being sworn in, and seeing the president moving pretty quickly to stem the losses, to turn the economy around. And over the past, you know, 27 months we’ve created 4.5 million private-sector jobs. That’s more jobs than in the Bush recovery (or) in the Reagan recovery.”
Set against this is are reports that the average middle class family has lost more than $4,000 in annual real income since Obama became President. Moreover, the middle class families kept losing income even after the President had announced a recovery.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That’s $4,019 in lost real income, a little less than a month’s income every year.
Unfair, you say, because Mr. Obama inherited a recession? Well, even if you start the analysis when the recession ended in June 2009, the numbers are dismal. Three years after the economy hit its trough, median household income is down $2,544, or nearly 5%.
But just be patient. ‘Help’ — something once reserved for the unfortunate and indigent is now on constant offer even to industries. They get assistance not just once, but all the time. Michael Barone notes that while General Motors is in worse shape today then before it received a bailout from the President, Obama is so encouraged by his success at GM that he’s going to apply the same formula on other industries. He said, “so now I want to say that what we did with the auto industry, we can do in manufacturing across America. Let’s make sure advanced, high-tech manufacturing jobs take root here, not in China. Let’s have them here in Colorado. And that means supporting investment here.” Barone asks:
Was he calling for a federal bailout of other American manufacturing companies? And what does he mean by “supporting investment”? White House reporters have not asked these obvious questions, for the good reason that the president, who has been attending fundraisers on an average of one every 60 hours, has had only one press conference in something like two months.
The most obvious answer to Barone’s rhetorical question is that Obama intends to use more tax dollars to pick winners and losers because it’s worked so well. Besides in the current context it is hardly possible to get ahead any more without ‘help’. This often takes the form of cheap college and home loans or government programs funded by deficit. But to keep those interest payments affordable it is necessary to make the middle class pay their fair share.
One way to do this is to reduce the return on their investments. “The Federal Reserve’s near zero interest-rate policy, aimed at stimulating the economy, has created bargains for borrowers refinancing a mortgage or buying a car. But the low rates are penalizing “savers” such as seniors and others on fixed incomes, forcing millions of middle-class Americans to reconsider how they will live when they retire, if they can retire at all.”
Combined with a volatile stock market, the rock bottom rates make you feel like “there’s nowhere to go” with your savings, said Nancy Nonini, whose Apple Valley company Retirement Education PLUS counsels companies on aging issues …
At 91, retired mechanic Glenn Summers does all his own yard work at his Bloomington home. He has kept most of his money in safe havens such as money market accounts for income to supplement his Social Security and pension. The nest egg used to generate $10,000 to $15,000 more than it does now.
Like many seniors interviewed for this story, Summers is loathe to complain about the losses. He gets by, he said, “but I don’t have any extra.”
Altogether, personal interest income in the U.S. totaled $986 billion last year — down about 25 percent from 2007, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. That’s $332 billion forgone.
Retirees feel the undertow, but so do baby boomers eyeing retirement. Folsom, for instance, had planned on returns of 5-7 percent on his investments. He had to scratch that out and work with 2-5 percent.
Spend, but don’t invest. Claim your benefits even if you don”t work. But as the formal economy sputters, the crony and underground economy is booming. If the US automotive industry’s daily survival depends on government ‘help’, banks worldwide are increasingly dependent on the sufferance of dark cash flows. Roberto Saviano, a journalist who has written books on organized crime has described the financial crisis as “a blessing for organized crime”. In an article in the New York Times Saviano argued that the only thing that was keeping banks up was mob money.
In 2009, Antonio Maria Costa, an Italian economist who then led the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, told the British newspaper The Observer that “in many instances, the money from drugs was the only liquid investment capital” available to some banks at the height of the crisis. “Interbank loans were funded by money that originated from the drugs trade and other illegal activities,” he said. “There were signs that some banks were rescued that way.” The United Nations estimated that $1.6 trillion was laundered globally in 2009, of which about $580 billion was related to drug trafficking and other forms of organized crime.
Maybe it is still true. It’s easy to see why the crooks do so well. They don’t pay income taxes and are largely unencumbered by regulation. The rules are for chumps. People on the inside track have special friends. Most importantly criminal syndicates provide a route to getting something done in a system increasingly paralyzed by red tape. There is now a kind of Prohibition in effect on legitimate economic activity. Play by the rules and get hit by the book. Under those circumstances the underground economy because the new speakeasy for all kinds of transactions. Saviano continues:
In Greece, as conventional bank lending has gotten tighter, more and more Greeks are relying on usurers. A variety of sources told Reuters last year that the illegal lending business in Greece involved between 5 billion and 10 billion euros each year. The loan-shark business has perhaps quadrupled since 2009 — some of the extortionists charge annualized interest rates starting at 60 percent. In Thessaloniki, the second largest city, the police broke up a criminal ring that was lending money at a weekly interest rate of 5 percent to 15 percent, with punishments for whoever didn’t pay up. According to the Greek Ministry of Finance, much of the illegal loan activity in Greece is connected to gangs from the Balkans and Eastern Europe.
In that kind of environment, continuous ‘help’ from a patron becomes a requirement for survival. General Motors and Chicago will no longer represent the exception; in the era of Hope and Change they become the rule. “So now I want to say that what we did with the auto industry, we can do in manufacturing across America.” It’s worked so well it’s already created more jobs than Ronald Reagan. Even the younger generation can hardly wait
Belmont Commenters
How to Publish on Amazon’s Kindle for $2.99
The Three Conjectures at Amazon Kindle for $1.99
Storming the Castle at Amazon Kindle for $3.99
No Way In at Amazon Kindle $8.95, print $9.99






I have thought that for a long time the political class was in general operating a continuing criminal enterprise. In that context, govt. is the problem rather than an answer and in my mind illegitimate. Illegitimate/corrupt govts. in the peoples eyes eventually lead to revolution as outlined in “The Idelogical origins of the American Revolution”. WE are there now to me, almost world wide. Let us pray that we don’t re-elect Barry.
It will have to get a lot, lot worse than it is now for a “Revolution” to spark, not saying people are better off now than they were 4 years ago (Have to be drink’n some mighty strong Kool Aide to say that) but there are still to many who are doing just fine, still taking their bi-annual vacations to the beach or out of country. Things are bad, they just have a lot further to go before people will take up arms and chance losing what they currently have… BH0 is gonna slip into a 2nd term with the massive help of MSM, its gonna be a 2000 squeaker but the Demoncrats are gonna pull it off, look to Crazy Uncle Joe being put out ta pasture and Hildabeast ridding into save all women everywhere from the Akin RNC… Best buy your ammo now its gonna be illegal in 2013… You can buy your Gun you just can’t have any bullets.
Several observations:
1) What about Ford? It did not get a bailout. It did get several billion dollars from the feds, but not the full-blown staggering bailout/virtual nationalization. Ford had been slated to get the same deal because it was in as “bad shape” as the other two companies, but Ford decided against it. The result? Depending on who you cite, they’e doing no worse or better that GM and Chrysler, and may have paid back the several billion that was lent them by the taxpayer.
2) Call me a sexist, but why are these two women — Stephanie Cutler and Debie Wasserman-Schultz — especially aggravating, even compared to Axelrod and Carney? What is with the stupefying “Baghdad Barbie” routine of these two harpies? I’ll bet Orwell would have loved to have included characters like them in 1984.
3) The criminal activity as a source of sure, real money for banking is very telling, isn’t it? I am one of the posters who would frequently chime in about how baffling it is that the Eurozone crisis “solutions” never ever include any mention of or suggestion for encouraging actual wealth creation.
So … every company will be run like GM and every city will look like Detroit?
Unfortunately I have little hope that Americans will actually vote competent people into office let alone individuals who may even know where to begin to fix the problems. In South Carolina, in the last Senate race, Alvin Greene got 28% of the vote against DeMint. That means over 330,000 people actually walked into the voting booth and voted for this guy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvin_Greene
The hatred by both parties for each other has gotten to the point where rational people don’t even look at candidates anymore. It’s straight party or nothing.
Back in ’08 I knew that Obama has connections to both Socialism and the Chicago Mob. I thought that his elevation was intended to cement the pipeline between the Mob and the Treasury. What I had not really grasped is that Socialism and the Mob are really only two sides of the same coin. As H. L. Mencken would have said, Americans voted for what they wanted, and they got it good and hard.
O/T—My latest and just published mystery THE DEAD ROOM is available today, Monday, 27 August, for FREE on Kindle to all Amazon Prime customers. Murder in a funeral home. Twin sisters who own a failing funeral home in Philadelphia take on a handsome new partner who is not who he claims to be. For those who wish to download and permanently own, for free, this day only, my mystery The Dead Room, I include a link to Amazon.
Thanks, Walt
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_2_13?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=the+dead+room+erickson&sprefix=the+dead+room%2Cstripbooks%2C225
How do you know these jokers are lying? Their lips are moving. Everything is fine if you’re part of the nomenklatura shopping at the special stores, legally stealing everything in sight. Can we survive another dance with these fools for 4 years? I don’t think so.
Look for “Flash Mob” voting! Done in the overwhelming Republican zones “of course…” that’ll throw a monkey (no pun intended) wrench into the works!
I suspect that the problems may be much deeper than Obama or even modern liberalism. The case can be made that democracy as a political system is failing or perhaps has already failed.
Left and Right will agree that the primary purpose of government, or more properly the State, is to protect individual rights, i.e. the freedom to do what you want so long as your acts do not materially infringe on the rights of others. The Left translation puts the focus on sexual liberty and the Right on economic liberty.
It sounds all well and good. I subscribed to the basic tenet for most of my life. So where does the Fail come from?
Liberty is the god that cannot be denied. The consensus is that you cannot have too much Liberty for the individual but the facts on the ground suggest that you can certainly have too much Liberty for the society. Sexual freedom, the daughter of Liberty, permits the annihilation of more than 1 million innocent human lives every year in the USA alone. The normalization of same-sex unions, easy divorce, and the embrace of sex as merely recreation make the traditional family unit suspect and undesirable. The net result is that the industrial democracies are literally committing suicide. The relatively few Italian children (for example) born going forward will not have cousins or even aunts and uncles within a couple generations.
Economic liberty has been industrialized. So long as GE buys boatloads of Chevy Volts and says nice things about this or any other administration it can get away with paying no taxes. Well connected John Corzine can steal a billion of customer funds and still rest easy that nothing bad comes his way. A guy who makes chicken sandwiches and questions the wisdom of the Public Good is attacked like an enemy of the State.
Liberty is corrupted. Maybe she was a false god after all.
An average of a $4000 loss in income?
I pride myself in being above average. My loss is more like $40,000 in yearly income and I’ll probably better that this year. I had no idea how good I was. If I can find an actual job I should ask for a raise.
I have a friend that says Liberty only works in the frame of Christian morality. If you will notice a platform of the French revolution, nee. socialism in all forms, is/was the purposeful destruction of Christianity in all of its forms. The subversion/destruction of religion and its substitution by earthness is how they subvert us. We allow it.
It’s Monday in Beautiful BC (British Columbia that is). I read W’s column, get depressed and beat my cornflakes to a pulp. Now they’ve lost their crunch! With apologies to Bob Dylan, to Walt and others who can wax poetic here’s my song:
Obama to the left of us
Biden to the right,
Here we are stuck in the middle with Chu.
Yes we’re stuck in the middle with Chu,
and I’m wondering what it is we should do.
Its so hard with the EPA in our face,
America losing itself is a disgrace.
Obama to the left of us
Biden to the right,
Here we are stuck in the middle with Chu.
Well, sounds like there is a market for an underground banking system which charges what would be normal rates in a functional, free society. If the goons were smart, they would not be charging exorbitant rates, and they would simply be able to take over the banking industry in Greece.
Under the table, of course. Because the thugs are willing to use violence, the formal bankers will not dare protest. And government officials will simply get their vigorish.
stevesmith – there’s a future for you in song writing, but you got to lay-off those corn flakes. There must be better ways to deal with the pent-up stress. Have you thought about dog sledding or something?
rwe @ 11: An average of a $4000 loss in income?
Indeed. STEM workers have been averaging a $4,000 loss in income about every three years for the past twenty. And that’s as a class. Our particular cohort aging out of the workforce, has probably lost about twice that fast, since 2001 at least. It’s exceedingly ugly. And for STEM workers, Romney wants to make it worse. Thanks, Mitt.
I’d DQ Mitt as anyone I could vote for in any normal election, but so far, I’m still and just barely able to vote for him against Obambus (tho being in California my vote means nothing anyway). Saw Jeb Bush on MTP yesterday, saying the same damn thing, btw.
Economy and country will still be in trouble even if R/R win and get both houses of Congress, cuz the real problems are globalization and banksters and stuff and they are real hard problems for ANYONE.
Josh – It’s exceedingly ugly. And for STEM workers, Romney wants to make it worse. Thanks, Mitt.
What means this? What is he planning?
Surely we will benefit from someone at the helm who can steer away from “everybody gets free stuff from the government”.
Back in the 1980′s there were some rough patches, and I remember there were a number of companies in the mid-Atlantic Seaboard states offering barter/exchange membership schemes. I didn’t sign up, so I don’t have any personal knowledge of how or whether they worked.
I think any company that tries do do a membership deal would be crushed by regulation and taxes, these days.
Marc, the fly in the ointment of which you speak will be the lack of the rule of law for everyone. Gresham’s law will allow the bad folks to just burn out or kill the law abiding.
First, you must have a plurality of virtuous people. We did at the inception of our colonies.
Second, you must have a significant portion of said virtuous people willing and able to use violence to remove those who are not virtuous.
Jim
stevesmith, #13:
Are you apologizing to Bob Dylan for confusing him with Stealer’s Wheel? The vocals in that song really do sound like him.
Team Obama is correct and truthful. President Reagan didn’t create any jobs — the jobs came from the private sector . . . (cue snare drum rim shot).
Peter @ 10, don’t you think that those problems you outline are the fruits of modern liberalism, precisely?
Liberty in the service of personal and relativistic, rather than overarching and objective, morality is license. That’s no freedom at all, just a version of being lost.
20. JPS
“stevesmith, #13:
Are you apologizing to Bob Dylan for confusing him with Stealer’s Wheel? The vocals in that song really do sound like him.”
You are correct – I should apologize to Stealer’s Wheel – my mistake. No excuse except to whine “I’m Canadian”.
The Fed holding 500 million shares of GM they paid $53/sh for, which trade at ~$20.50 today.
Only the Federal government is buying the Volt.
And neither GM or the Government has done a thing about GM’s underfunded pension plan.
So explain to me how Obozo views this as a success?
The guy is not so bright – can’t imagine anyone voting for him again! – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4nvhAZ0vr0
stevesmith:
“No excuse except to whine ‘I’m Canadian’.”
Well, own it, man! Where’s your pride? Go find a YouTube clip of Molson Golden’s “My Name Is Joe, and I Am Canadian!”
(Then for fun, follow it up with “Je m’appelle Guy, and I am NOT Canadian!” [mautadit tabernac esti].)
25. JPS
“I’m Canadian” is a private joke – can’t explain it here so should have left it alone.
26. stevesmith
25. JPS
I say explain it here even if you have to clean it up a little.
Ah, yup! I used to live in south Florida, which becomes south Canada from late November to early April.
Meanwhile, those who think ‘Willard’ Mitt Romney will end cronyism need to rethink things.
http://politicalgraveyard.com/bio/romano-roosa.html
That URL links to the Whos Who of American politics. Bookmark it so when it comes time to play ropes and trees, you will have a list to work off. Pay close attention to the spouses.
Remember that the Aunts have their own network and an agenda.
There will never be an end to cronyism, but a little pruning will boost the economy.
Haji can’t shoot.
Obama and friends are the ones who brought you Dodd Frank.
This disaster waiting to happen is potentially worse than Obamacare.
What the Fed and the Good folks in Congress who wrote this Leftist masterwork did was to raise the requirements for investors and going concerns to get a loan to a level that few can attain seen these days in the ObamaDepression. No loans, no new jobs – it’s just that simple.
But it gets worse. Much Worse.
Under Dodd Frank as it is becoming apparent, once you have a loan the banks aren’t done with you. They then want to apply “stress tests” to your operation while you are in business. If you don’t pass the stress tests – and these stress tests are not exactly easy to pass- the Banks then have the right to review your loan and pull it.
Wide swaths of the economy won’t pass those stress tests. Then what? It appears that there is a huge potential for a cascade of defaults, which of course under these stress tests would cause even more cascading defaults as the initial wave of defaults causes more defaults and so on.
Now a cynical man would say that this is exactly what Obama wants, because who will end up owning all these now going concerns?- the TBTF/ Government Agent Banks. A nice way of growing the market control of the economy back to government agents. Just like GM and Chrysler.
Gordon, #27:
I think stevesmith’s joke sailed over my head. But to read, “No excuse except to whine ‘I’m Canadian’” – not that I really thought he was whining or apologizing for it – reminded me of some very proud, in-your-face Canadians I used to work with, and a pair of commercials I hadn’t seen in ten years.
Around 2000, Molson Golden came out with a beer commercial in which a pleasant young Canadian fellow takes the stage, starts off by correcting some stereotypical American misimpressions and works himself into a patriotic fervor. It was a big hit in our lab. Also the commercial briefly made our national news, as some thin-skinned Americans objected to it: Canadians being mean to us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRI-A3vakVg
Around that time, a Toronto radio station re-imagined this commercial with a Quebecois man proudly setting himself apart from Anglophone Canadians and cussing in Quebecois slang.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TncdhLGjFTE
“The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic”
By George Lakoff and Elisabeth Wehling.
Debbie parrots the techniques in this book, the problem though is the book was written by an academic from Berkley who has never run for office and doesn’t understand the new paradigms in the media.
And as for all of you Romney bashers out there I hope you really enjoy the country if Obama and the left get the Supreme Court they want. FOAD.
Stealer’s Wheel = Gerry Rafferty
e @ 17: What means this? What is he planning?
Surely we will benefit from someone at the helm who can steer away from “everybody gets free stuff from the government”.
Well, let me say this about that. MITT wants capital to get free stuff from labor. If you want to put it that way. In particular, MY labor, STEM labor. There is this voodoo economic concept, in the WSJ today by our boy Jon Huntsman and held by Mitt in his 57 point plan and lobbied for regularly by WSJ, that lots of immigrants with advanced degrees means lots of prosperity for you and me. If I understand them correctly, we are supposed to believe that the immigrants will do all the work and pay all the taxes, and you and I and Mitt can go horseback riding and play golf. Now, there is not a chance in aitch eye double-hockeysticks that Mitt actually believes that, the truth of the matter (which may escape Huntsman and others, but no way it escapes Mitt) is that it may provide cheap labor in STEM positions, which they equate with higher profitability for management, stockholders, and society at large. None of which is likely the case. And ignores the fact that the heavy, destructive pressure that brings this issue to our attention is that the same work is done much, MUCH cheaper via outsourcing. IOW, Mitt & the Republican RINO class are ignoring the downsides of globalization 1010%, which means they will not even TRY to do anything which has any chance at all of actually improving our economy.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443855804577600892810188600.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion
So, you ask, won’t they at least avoid some of the destructive steps of the Obasmus Horde? Yeah, maybe, but if they do so only in favor of the very worst of vulture capital, then what happens is they make Obasmus look like he was correct after all, AND WHO NEEDS THAT?
Thanks for asking, have a nice day.
Money? It fell off a truck. I can get it for you wholesale.
Semi OT:
Saw “2016 Obama’s America.” Is it a game changer? No but the polite widespread reception does matter. The politics of personal destruction will rev up against D’Souza but at first the Left seems stunned or distracted.
27. Gordon
Here’s a partial explanation. I have somehow(?) been in awkward situations in Zigzag Oregon, Washington State, California, New Jersey, Italy, India, SE Asia, Hong Kong, the U.K. and even here in Canada. I have found that if I smile, shrug my shoulders and say “I’m Canadian” in English or some locally understood language, everyone goes “OK” and carries on with their day.
I forgot what TWANLOC means so I googled it. Since that is a Belmont Club acronym, I was directed to a Nov. 9, 2009 thread titled “The Devil You Know.”
When the history of blogging is written a few centuries from now, that thread will be included.
What ever happened to Lifeofthemind? The bouncer got Habu and Wiskey but I missed LOTM’s exit. Or did he do an anonymous.org and change nome’ de net?
JPS @ 30 – I still don’t get the joke aboot the beaver.
Josh @ 33 – My pleasure. Least I could do to help.
“We created 4.5 million private-sector jobs. That’s more jobs than in the Bush recovery (or) in the Reagan recovery.”
What!?! Are you freaking kidding me? Do the Administration and Democratic spokesholes really think we can’t do the math? From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
Reagan (Jan 1981 to June 1984)
Total Civilian Employment/Total Civilian Labor Force/Unemployed
Jan 1981
99,955,000/ 108,026,000/ 8,071,000 (7.5%)
June 1984
105,591,000/ 113,817,000/ 8,226,000 (7.2%)
Net Change in Total Employment
+5,636,000
% Growth of Labor Force
+5.1%
Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate
63.9% to 64.6%
Net Change in Participation Rate
+0.7%
GW Bush (Jan 2001 to June 2004)
Total Civilian Employment/Total Civilian Labor Force/Unemployed
Jan 2001
137,778,000/ 143,800,000/6,022,000 (4.2%)
June 2004
139,174,000/ 147,460,000/8,286,000 (5.6%)
Net Change in Total Employment
+1,396,000
% Growth of Labor Force
+2.5%
Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate
67.2% to 66.1%
Net Change in Participation Rate
-1.1%
Obama (Jan 2009 to June 2012)
Total Civilian Employment/Total Civilian Labor Force/Unemployed
Jan 2009
142,187,000/ 154,236,000/12,049,000 (7.8%)
June 2012
142,415,000/ 155,163,000/12,748,000 (8.2%)
Net Change in Total Employment
+228,000
% Growth of Labor Force
+0.6%
Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate
65.7% to 63.8%
Net Change in Participation Rate
-1.9%
So by what stretch of the imagination does 228,000 more people employed equal 4.5 million private sector jobs. By every measure against Reagan and GW Bush Obama comes up short, way short. Where are the millions of jobs created?? Greater job creation than during Reagan’s 1st term??? Since when is 228,000 more than 5.6 million?? Greater than GW Bush? I guess in alternate universe 228,000 jobs is more than nearly 1.4 million jobs. This Administration lies at breakfast, lunch and dinner every single day. And for good measure, Sunday brunch too.
What stands out is the growth of the workforce, or lack thereof. During Reagan’s recession/recovery the job growth was more than able to keep pace with the growing workforce. There is a reason he won reelection overwhelmingly. The recession/recovery under GW Bush couldn’t keep pace with the modest labor force growth even though nearly 1.4 million new jobs were created. Had the workforce growth rate been the same for him as it has been under Obama, the 2004 election wouldn’t have even been close as unemployment would have fallen to 5.5 million (3.8%) instead of increasing to 8.3 million (5.6%). So something is amiss with the figures for the current Administration. Based on labor participation rate Obama inherited the number of unemployed should be 16.4 million (11.5%), not 12.7 million (8.2%).
What should be sending up alarm bells is that the labor force growth rate for the first time isn’t keeping pace with the population growth (currently around 0.9% annually). The numbers from the BLS: From January 1981 to January 2009 the US labor force grew by 45 million, or a 41.7% increase. During this same time period the overall US population grew at a slower rate of 33.7%. So in effect we were creating jobs faster than workers (and you wonder why the illegals showed up). This translates into a 5.2% growth rate in the labor force every 3.5 years. The growth rate during GW Bush first term was an anemic 2.5%, but during his second term this increased to 4.2%. During the “It’s the Economy, Stupid!” recession of GWH Bush the growth rate was 4.1%. The reported 0.6% growth in US Labor Force during the Obama years is either laughable or warning flares should be going up because it is so low. Since we know this Administration lies breakfast, lunch and dinner chances are good that the books have been cooked. Just accounting for population growth the BLS figures are missing around 2.5 million workers. Which translates into a real unemployment rate of 9.7%, or over 15 million looking for work. And this Administration’s spokeshole is touting their record on job creation. Please!
Josh @ 33, can’t say that I follow all that, but my gut response is to say that the perfect is the enemy of the good.
I just want someone in charge who likes America and believes in something other than himself. Okay if we don’t have a Reagan. Not pointing the nose of the plane at the ground and chanting Allah Akbar or get Whitey or whatever would be a huge step in the right direction.
I must ask, what is the difference in the ratio between permanent jobs and temporary jobs between the two men?
I knew in my heart of hearts the president was right about this, what was needed was a person of lesser intellect to explain it to us.
Four years ago I had two cars and money in my savings account, now I don’t have a car and ride a bicycle because the car , a Chevy, blew up the mechanic said it was the ethanol leaking past the rings causing the oil pump to quit. The savings are gone trying to get the car fixed but the mechanic failed to repair it that took the savings.
There’s not enough to eat now and propane prices for heat are gonna be brutal this winter, I’ve heard the coal fired power plants are due to be closed or taxed out of existence so I expect I’ll lose my electricity too, that takes out the well pump.
Four years ago I was breaking even, now I am on the path to become as poor as a North Korean peasant.
No things are not better than before Obama.
‘such as seniors and others on fixed incomes, forcing millions of middle-class Americans to reconsider how they will live when they retire, if they can retire at all.’
Hmmm…making people spend less. That’s the overall effect of reduced interest rates, the opposite of what we’re usually told.
stoicheion @ 36:
No, that belongs to Subotai Bahadur. Get it right. Not this web site. I think he is ….. busy doing other things.
The bouncer and the derision of the newbies and mobys that populate this place these days drove most of the old readers/commenters underground. Some of us have read wretchard since pre-fallback days. So either up the quality here or …..
The ‘bot formerly known as …..
Re KWB’s comment (#5):
Alvin Greene, the black Democratic candidate for senator in South Carolina, got just over 28% of the votes in the general election.
The percentage of the South Carolina population that is black, according to the US Census 2010, is 28.1%.
They voted along racial lines. Just like they did for B.O.
Oh, his opponent in the Democratic primary, Vic Rawl, was a white man. See? simple tribal loyalty. (And probably some shenanigans as well, this being a Democratic race.) And tribal loyalty, if the honkies do it, is of course racist.