Infernal Iran; The Death Spiral Accelerates
Let’s start with economics. Here are three recent tweets:
- Updates on Iran’s economic situation: The price of bread has increased six-fold since subsidies slashed;
- Iran’s Energy Ministry: The price of electricity for households will soon be quadrupled;
- Bank Melli & Mellat have told AN (Ahmadinejad) if they don’t receive funds within 4 days, they’ll be bankrupt.
And here are some data on Ahmadinejad’s accomplishments from a Farsi web site:
- 47% under poverty line.
- 75% of all projects started remain unfinished&halted.
- Average inflation of 20%.
- Budget submitted one month late.
- Welfare under $20 aftr promising $70 during elections.
- Gov employees raises granted days before the election are now deduced in installments on paychecks.
- Failure to submit progress reports & answer to legal authorities for the past 4 years.
- No inflation-adjusting raises of Gov employees salaries & benefits.
So it shouldn’t surprise anyone that people are racing to the banks to get their rials and toumans out, and convert them to some harder currency. But the banks won’t give them all their money; withdrawals are limited to $15,000 per account, and there have been many angry scenes. The people know that the rulers are shipping out their own wealth, and they hear terrible rumors about the impending failure of major banks.
A Tweet: “Bank Melli security guard fires at people, injures old man”
This bespeaks a far broader malaise, a slow descent of the Iranian state into the inferno. As Ahmad Alavi, a thoughtful economist, put it, the state now faces a crisis of legitimacy. The people are acting on the basis of their experience, and, lacking reliable information and confidence, the only way they have to conserve their assets is to take it from the bank.
It is all part of Iran’s descent into Hell. Deutsche Welle tells the story of a man who died. His friends and family choose a tomb for him at the Behest-e-Zahra cemetery. It costs 25 million toumans, payable in cash. There’s more than enough money in the family account to cover it, but the bank will only give 2 million in cash. Friends raise another 3 million, and the poor soul is buried in a tomb one-fifth of what the family desired.
And what do the mullahs do? They yell about epiphenomena.
A Tweet: “Shariatmadari (who runs Kayhan, a daily linked to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei) attacks head of Central Bank for extending deadline 2 take banknotes w/ slogan out of circulation.”
In case you don’t get the reference, the Greens–who are demonstrating a sense of humor unique in modern revolutionary history–have been writing anti-regime slogans on the banknotes. So the regime, which can’t take a joke, ordered all such money removed.
But the regime fears its people, and thrashes vainly to prevent them from maintaining contact with the free world. Khamenei issued a fatwa on January 24th “reiterating the religious ban on buying satellite dishes and viewing broadcasts via them.”
This is how to earn the contempt of the people. Indeed, it’s how to earn the contempt of your own children. It now emerges that the son of Ali Larijani, former chief negotiator with the infidels and now speaker of Parliament, was arrested during the last wave of demonstrations, and only released the next day when the security forces discovered who he was. As a friend of mine put it, the leaders have to chain their children at home when anti-regime confrontations start.
As the regime loses its grip, fractures are appearing in the ranks of the security forces, Khamenei and Ahmadinejad’s line of defense against the revolutionary surge. Fox News tells us that twenty to thirty percent of the national police–under the control of the Revolutionary Guards–have been dismissed (we’re talking about a thousand to fifteen hundred cops out of a total of some five thousand) and replaced by men from outside the major cities. The replacements work for lower wages, and, at least at the outset, are less afflicted by the moral crisis that has led many police to refuse to attack demonstrators, or even join them.
Meanwhile, new labor organizations, as for example the steel workers’ union in Isfahan, are springing up to demand workers’ pay. These developments are documented in the elegantly named Flying Carpet Institute blog.
Slowly, relentlessly, the regime is dying. But it is taking a lot of good people with it. The recent rise in violence in Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan can be tracked back to Tehran. Western intelligence services are aware that Khamenei has given the Revolutionary Guards carte blanche to kill as many infidels as possible, wherever they have the opportunity. And within Iran, they are hanging their children. Listen to my brave friend, Potkin Azarmehr, tell the awful story of a boy executed for a crime he could not have committed (he was actually in prison when the event occurred).
The State Department condemned the recent executions, which is to its credit. But there will be many more hangings and stonings, of Kurds, of Baha’i, of random dissidents. It’s time to put this evil regime out of its misery. Help the Iranian people win their freedom, and thereby change the world. Is there no leader in the West who will do it?
UPDATE: Turns out they kill babies too. in utero.






“Help the Iranian people win their freedom, and thereby change the world. Is there no leader in the West who will do it?”
Not Barack Obama. I can promise you that.
It certainly is looking like the middle of the end.
What a hellish horror. I can’t even imagine living that nightmarish existence. Those people must be in perpetual flight/fight mode.
When you have Members of Parliament, like the one I am saddled with, too busy making plans for the Winter Olympics to do anything for Iran, and they are taking their cues from the Office of the Prime Minister, you can be sure that Canada will not be one of the countries to aid the Iranian people at this time.
It is too easy to look good for the earthquake victims of Haiti to be bothered with this.
At least I cannot be held accountable for saddling Canada with the federal government it has, for I did not mark
my ballot in the last federal election.
Many have expressed suspicion that the freedom fighters, once in power, would be just as aggressive, just as America-Israel hating, and continue with nuclear war plans.
While we don’t know much about the real nature of the Iranian people, other than that the city-dwellers are highly educated — and we’ve been exposed to so many videos of rallies with throngs joyously shouting “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” …
I find it hard to believe that people who are fighting so bravely and valiantly for their freedom — and who are horrified by the hypocrisy of their religious leaders — and who want a secularized government –
would, once in power, continue on the warpath — the deathpath — the poverty-path.
Obama’s abandonment of their plight surely has left a bitter taste in the mouths of many (Iranians AND Americans) and it’s now less likely that they would become our “friends”
but
depending on whether the leaders they can bring to power later are loyal to the people — or betray them –
I would bet that the people will want peace …
They could become the vanguard of the salvation of the world’s “war” and “terrorism” problems — as it’s the Mullah’s that are actually behind the vast majority of current violence and subversion everywhere.
The Iranian people are to be admired and encouraged and helped in any way possible to free themselves from their oppressive and illegal government.
What I take away is this: it takes lots of money,lots of brainpower, planning, and a long term stable environment to produce anything as complicated as a nuclear weapon.
These things look to be in shorter and shorter supply in Iran.
So, the faster the Iranians go bat**** and claw each others’ eyes out, the lower the chances they will get nukes to hand out to Jihadis.
Intervene in Iran, directly or indirectly? Not no, hell no! Time for the Great Satan to sit back for once, light up a see-gar and let nature take its course.
And did you hear Obama mention any of this during the State of the Union the other day? Did you hear anything about the clear and present danger Iran poses to the rest of the world, let alone Western nations? I suppose Obama really can’t be bothered with something as “trivial” as a nation like Iran that is trying to bring down the entire Middle East in flames. This is the precise time we should be paying attention to Iran. Dictatorial regimes are at their most dangerous when they are about to fall simply because they are so unpredictable. The mullahs may do some really strange things in order to retain in power. Many dictators try to find an outside enemy for the population to rally against so as to deflect attention away from domestic problems. This could happen right now in Iran. If I were living in Israel right now, I’d be very worried. Until the mullahs are finally thrown out on the ash-heap of history, there will be no peace in the Middle East, let alone in Iran.
When Ferdinand Marcos faced a popular uprising that threatened his presidency, he ordered his air force into the sky above the presidential palace. The order was countered by U.S. military ground controllers who told Filipino pilots to land immediately at the nearest U.S. base or risk being shot out of the air.
When the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, officers of the regular Iraqi Army were contacted by cell phone and told to keep their troops in the barracks or risk destruction from the air. The tactic worked. Only the Republican Guard attempted to enter the fray. Iraq’s elite troops were destroyed before they made it to the battlefield.
We have precedents, you see. A bold leader of conviction and vision would take advantage of the current situation in Iran. I fear Mr. Simon is correct; that man is not Barack Obama.
Delia, after the behavior of our government at the SOTU and the Republican meeting, do you somehow think that we are not living in a nightmarish existence?
Roger L. Simon:
What, you have no faith in Teh Light Bringer, Teh Won, Teh One We Have Been have been waiting for? Why he’s kept his promises. Unemployment is less than 8%, GM and Chrysler are booming and profitable, Gitmo is closed, …
… oh, wait!
Presentiments of the future of the USA.
And BTW, isn’t this just another cylce of the same old Persian revolt, terror, renew, revolt, terror, renew . . . ?
With regard to your latest update, the killing of in utero babies at least assures them the alliance of the Democrat Party in the United States. Add to that the endorsement of Osama Bin Laden for Al Gore’s Ponzi scheme and the United States could be envisioned as the refuge of last resort for the Mullahs.
the west will not help. they have had time and opportunity.
thanks to you we are at least getting to know a little of what is happening.
5. David W. Lincoln:
At least I cannot be held accountable for saddling Canada with the federal government it has, for I did not mark
my ballot in the last federal election.
do you seriously think the the liberal party or the NDP party would do anything ?
the Tories even with their problems are head and shoulders above the opposition in every regard.
Is there anything that the Free World can do to help Iran? Is there a leader who can rise to the challenge and in some objective manner speed the process? Is there a goal of a religously inspired government that coherently fits in the Western perspectives of freedom? Clearly all the answers to these questions is NO. Can we turn sand into gold . . . thus it becomes evident that the only route of involvement is NONE. Will the situation in Iran get better if any country, an I mean any country interfers . . . NO. The only rational approach to Iran is minmization of collateral damage. The Good Neighbors of Iran can only act in isolation to prevent the radicalizm from invading. There is NO leader that can help them . . . the people of Iran are their own helpers. When the nuclear capability is achieved by Iran . . . which it will be achieved . . . the pervasive and total distruction of the radical will first occur within their own world. They will use the bomb as means of control of the Islamic world, their Brothers will be the target, for to interfer now would distract the radical Islamic extremist to a an external enemy . . . why interfer when they are their own worst enemy.
Let me see.
Well, Obama hugs chavez,
chavez hugs ahmadinejad
therefore
…
therefore the mullahs are pretty sure that nothing bad will come to them from the communist administration now in power in America.
Anyway, the internationalist subversives must be in full panic by now:
if Iran falls (that is, in normal terms, if it becomes FREE), Lebanon and Syria will change completely, Hamas will be choked, the talebans in Afghanistan will lose half of their help, Pakistan could start pushing really hard on the other side.
Half of the effort to choke the West (Israel first of all) would crumble in a few weeks.
Not a good perspective for the ahmadinejad huggers (direct and indirect hugs).
Godspeed Freedom !
For Iran, what’s needed is nothing less than a ‘French Resistance’ sort of response to the Mullahs–complete with sabotage, assassinations and all the rest that goes with it. This means explosives, weapons, long range sniper rifles, and the people who will train others to wield them. In other words, it’s very very nasty business.
The evil that the lone and usually unarmed protesters in Tehran are up against demands that level of response. We are morally required to resist evil on this scale, evil so depraved and demented. No more empty words, meaningless diplomatic protests from various western capitals or pointless UN resolutions.
The Iranian people know there leaders are criminal psychopaths. Iran has not been perusing the best interests it’s people. No one knows that better than the people of Iran.
Now is the time to act. Diplomatic and Economic isolation. Covert disruption of government computers and communications. Shows of solidarity with the people of Iran. Obama will do none of it.
I wish George Bush would do an interview with an Iranian TV in LA. Giving encouragement to the people.
Carpet-bomb the country with care packages
consisting of satellite datalinks, video
cameras, and Wi-Fi walkie-talkies.
Win the Information War.
“An FDR-style bank run….”
Oh, yes, those FDR bank runs. And don’t forget those FDRvilles where so many of the unemployed made their homes.
22. Ruebacca: “I wish George Bush would do an interview with an Iranian TV in LA. Giving encouragement to the people.”
Yes, I think George H.W. Bush should encourage the Iranian people to rise and take arms against the mullahs.
Latest word is that during the Bush Admin Nancy Pelosi called up the White House and told them that they just better had NOT think about providing covert support to the opposition in Iran.
At that time the Repubs were still in control of the House (or at least as much as they were going to be). But they still yielded to the dragon lady’s threat.
This is being used an example as why Pelosi only had to object to waterboarding (which she was briefed on, despite her denials) if she wanted it stopped. No one seems to be pointing out that the Dems have been rooting for the Mad Mullahs of Iran since Carter.
What a lost opportunity! Elections have consequences. Except in Iran.
RWE: fascinating story. I’d love to have a link, if you’ve got one.
Its been at least 10 years now that there have been breathless reports of the impending collapse of iran’s government. I suppose at some point, these predictions will come true.
I wish there were some way we could help as individuals. Does anybody know of something? Someplace we could express moral support, if nothing more?
It’s easy to help Iranian dissidents – US can start smuggling AK-47s across the Iran-Iraq border.
Anyway, here are a few of my articles on the situation in Iran – from June 2009. Seems like everything I wrote back then is still operational. It was not difficult for me to come to these conclusions – I lived through the anti-communist revolution in the USSR in 1991, the communist putch in 1993, I am well-read in communist and anti-communist propaganda, and I befriended Iranians. I guess I am the expert!
Using Lenin’s theory of revolution in case of Iran.
http://hyphenatedamericans.blogspot.com/2009/06/revolution-in-iran-quoting-lenin.html
Can Iranians win?
http://hyphenatedamericans.blogspot.com/2009/06/can-iranians-win.html
What Iranian dissidents and American patriots should do.
http://hyphenatedamericans.blogspot.com/2009/06/what-iranian-dissidents-and-american.html
Balitmore?
Crickets.
Obama’s fate is the same as Chavez and Ahmadinejad’s, he has already linked himself to them, there will be no escape for the One. The One talks big, lies all the time, but he will get his due. If he was really smart he would expose himself and take the consequences, his secrets aren’t really secrets anymore. He should just admit he is not qualified and leave but he won’t he’ll fight till he’s impeached for one of many crimes (he took an oath remember) or he’s voted out but he will be the most disgraced person American politics has ever seen.
My bet for Chavez and Ahmadinejad is that they will end up like Hitler and Mussolini, suicide or hanging and they will have earned it by the time it happens just like Hitler and Mussolini. May God have mercy on the Iranians and Venezuelans that they won’t have to suffer anymore and just get it over with quickly. We in the USA apparently have not suffered enough yet, there are still a significant number of union members and other organizations like government workers that still don’t get who the real enemy is. That will change.
Obama lives in a more civilized country he’ll just be driven into seclusion forever, he won’t get Bill Clintons speaking fees and will probably change his name again. After this is over no one is going want to hear from Bill or Hillary anymore either.
The desperate big government idealogs still have a few cards to play but theirs is a losing hand. No one gets to live on lies and other peoples money forever, that is just reality.
Michael #31:
The item was reported today on Fox News Channel. I think this came out of a new book but I am not sure.
Again, it was used as an example why Pelosi could have not only objected to waterboarding but stopped it (you will recall hat she claimed she was not briefed and then claimed the CIA lied that she had been). But I thought it was absolute dynamite in its own right.
Now, as to what a covert operation to help the Iranian oposition consisted of – just money, or something more active – I would sure like to know.
It is quite distressing to me to hear so many people, even the likes of Fred Thompson, say that rise of the Iranian opposition was a bolt from the blue. Excuse me? The Bush Plan? The invasion of Iraq and the destabilization of the despotic regimes in the region? That was a bolt from the blue?
Well, gee, I found it. Washington Post, of all places, on 28 Jan 2010:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/28/AR2010012803564.html
#25 RWE:
This story was about US aid to Iraqi groups, not Iranian ones.
To the Iranian people: I am so sorry for your suffering and so embarrassed by our President’s complete lack of any public support of your plight.
Know that the hearts of hundreds of millions of Americans are with you and you are in our prayers. Our President will be gone in 34 months time and our government can not remove candidates from the ballot. Maybe soon we can again be close friends.
changing focus to ecogangbanging a la son of laden is a choice
Political discontent and economic misery exist in both Zimbabwe and Cuba, yet their repressive dictatorial regimes live on. Their brutal use of force, and the fact that the world cares little to stop it, guarantees their survival.
Similarly, the mullahs bludgeon their own people, and note how few come to their rescue. The Iranian protestors have proven their bravery, but in the end, it’s those with the guns that get to govern. Unless they attain the force to back up their cause, they will not succeed.
The international community must help. Words of support can morally uplift the protesters, knowing they are not alone in their struggle. More importantly, covert aid and intelligence could help them better organize, and perhaps convince some in the higher echelons of the Iranian military/clergy to defect. Private guarantees of international backing could improve the chances of some defections.
We cannot intervene directly, but we can become facilitators, aiding the revolution to take shape, and to attain the critical force to guarantee its success. Without our aid, the revolt could very well fizzle. And even if it does succeed, the Iranians will not forget our indifference at this, their time of need.
We must support the protesters, overtly in spirit, and covertly in materials. Reagan did just that when the Solidarity movement took shape in Poland. It’s a shame that neither Obama nor his teleprompter have been able to do the same for the Iranians.
The economic stuff sounds a lot like California.
#18 is right. They have about a 1300 years of catching up to do so we might as well take the long view and let them work it out. In the meantime we should protect ourselves and our allies as best we can without intervening directly. Besides, if we have the notion that it is our job to make all countries of the world respect individual rights and freedoms, shouldn’t we start here at home?
@Michael Ledeen
re: RWE’s
Likely that is a misattribution of her intervention into a CIA plan “…to provide money to moderate political parties in Iraq ahead of scheduled elections, in an effort to counter Iran, which was funneling millions to extremist elements.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/28/AR2010012803564.html
Hope that helps.
Those that want to spend another trillion or two on another war. Those that want to spend money on health care for Americans and American Elderly, the Veterans and the Poor. So far those on the wrong side of history have been winning… We need to figure out what our values and our principles really are dont we? Hopefully, Americans will get a clue.
Your protests are for naught. Obama will indeed intervene in Iran is a big way. It may take a while, but it will be big.
He will do it just before November 2011, when his campaign will be headed for defeat.
He will do the same for jobs as the 2010 Congressional elections approach. He has saved the shovel-ready projects to begin about now and extend until the elections.
Obama is a very good politician!
They can continue to comfort themselves with ‘death the America’ rallys. That makes everyting better.
During the American Revolution, the French did not insert themselves into the war unilaterally. The assistance of the French was specifically requested by a small, but powerful faction of Colonials. Should there be a request from a faction of Iranians, I doubt that our Dear Leader would have the wisdom and fortitude to grant such a request. Obama’s revolution is all about destruction of liberty and American Exceptionalism. He has neither the time nor the inclination to involve the U.S. in the Iranian Revolution.
Mr. Ledeen, all of the economic indicators you reference logically point to a government that is draining off every possible resource in favor of a Manhattan-Project-like effort. What could that be, I wonder?
The obvious answer is Iran’s own Manhattan Project. They must be excruciatingly close to achieving a working nuke and are gambling (literally) everything for a successful nuclear test that they somehow think will save their regime.
Ironically, if they only knew just how incredibly stupid the POTUS is right now, they would offer him a public relations victory by announcing that they were taking Obama at his word and would work with the U.S. et al to solve the nuclear stand-off in return for massive amounts of foreign aid (which the regime could then use to buy off opponents and prop up their economy). All the while, of course, the regime could continue its most secret progress on nukes, confident that Obama wants nothing more than to be placated and told that he is succeeding, even where reality says otherwise.
Joseph (#24): “Yes, I think George H.W. Bush should encourage the Iranian people to rise and take arms against the mullahs.”
Heh. A sad heh.
Hyphenated American (#28): “It’s easy to help Iranian dissidents – US can start smuggling AK-47s across the Iran-Iraq border.”
Or to put it in other words, the US should be nice and ship some AK-47s back across the border. It would be the neighborly thing to do.
Poor Citizen (#42):
Back in the Thirties, people exactly like you who were on the right side of history, with the correct values and principles, won. Since then, the rest of us have indeed gotten a clue.
“the Greens–who are demonstrating a sense of humor unique in modern revolutionary history–have been writing anti-regime slogans on the banknotes. So the regime, which can’t take a joke, ordered all such money removed.”
I’m not entirely convinced about the sense of humor, but they couldn’t have hoped for better straight men.
Regarding the Pelosi incident (which was indeed about Iraq, not Iran, sorry RWE), I don’t know her motivations. She might have had a point in that a US effort to fund moderate Iraqi parties could have, if discovered, blown up in our face. But. If as a result, extremist parties funded by Iran had won, is anyone confident that she and her allies wouldn’t have used that as an indictment of Bush’s policies? (That last sentence can be used as an example of understatement.)
Upon considering my last comment re Pelosi, I am slightly chagrined at my use of hypotheticals. Iranian meddling did indeed lead to the victory of Iran-oriented parties (though not the most extreme ones). And Pelosi et al, after tying Bush’s hands, did indeed use that to bash the war effort.
Not that I mean to question Pelosi’s motivations, for I am certain she is an honourable woman, but how conveeenient…
Cuba and Zimbabwe are economic train wrecks but the regimes are still in control because there is no middle class that the regimes rely on. Iran however has a large section of businessmen that are in control of the guns, the Guard. The worse things get economically the less support the IRGC will have for the regime, they have a multibillion-dollar business empire at stake. Sooner or later they will turn on Ahmadinejad and Khamenei.
can anyone here tell me what the Bush administration did for eight years to help the Iranian people?
Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind. It is very sad to watch this happen to the people of Iran. Their parents sowed an evil seed by putting the Mullahs in charge and now the Mullahs punish anyone who does not agree with their twisted way. The West has been cursed and mocked, burned and spit on by Iran so many times I am not sure the West will help. Obama will do nothing because he is in league with the Mullahs, being a secret Muslim himself, and not one that relishes freedom for others. This is sad, I fear there will be much blood shed before the Mullahs are finally removed by their own people. I told my Iranian friend 30 years ago that the Mullahs would rule for 25 years before the people get fed up and kick them out. It has been more than 25 years but I see the smoke beginning to rise.
“…writing anti-regime slogans on bank-notes.”
HMMM…
I wonder if it could work here? May I offer…?
“Obama money; soon to be monopoly money”
“1.3 Trillion of these ain’t small change!”
“I’m on my way to pay the interest on the debt.”
“Obamacare sux!”
“How’s that hope and change working for ya?”
“Didn’t you used to have a job?”
“If you could find three of my brothers you could get a cup of coffee.”
“Teleprompter Of The US – TOTUS!”
“GM = Government Motors”
…and the list goes on!
17. john avecedo:
5. David W. Lincoln:
At least I cannot be held accountable for saddling Canada with the federal government it has, for I did not mark
my ballot in the last federal election.
do you seriously think the the liberal party or the NDP party would do anything ?
the Tories even with their problems are head and shoulders above the opposition in every regard.
That means about as much as what is the tallest building in Oxbow, Saskatchewan which is the home of Theoren Fleury.
Sorry, but as long as it is easier to find hen’s teeth, or lips on chickens, than it is
for Ottawa to move ahead of Washington – doing
the right thing, instead of what Washington wants, will be, at best, wishful thinking.
In the Jerusalem Post, there was a story which was picked up by http://www.worldthreats.com about the Dutch parliament voting to add the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps to the list of terrorist organizations kept by the EU. Ottawa did nothing, and has done nothing to match the Dutch.
David (#55):
Durban 2?
In the late 70′s and early 80′s Poland was undergoing a similar revolution. Ron Reagan, in the early 80′s, proudly allied the US with the revolutionaries of that country.
And it was a combination of the Catholic Church, the US, the West, plus one brave worker – Lech Walesa – to bring about the Freedom Revolution.
Oh, to have brave, courageous leaders who actually believe in the liberation, freedom and dignity of the individual.
Remember Neda!
Hmm interesting.Here an article that is claiming the exact opposite
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/60801
February 11 cant come soon enough.And ill be right there to smack it in imadinnerjackets face too.Iranians need leaderless resistance now.Its only a matter of time before they get the mullahs responsible for the false “islamic state” they have imposed on them.
Time to start destabilizing these dictatorial tyrants through the power of word.Question their so called “authority”.
56. Bob:
David (#55):
Durban 2?
Officially – No.
Truthfully – It sure looks that way.
Why have the Dutch taken the lead in labeling
the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist group? This, I don’t get.
RE #52 mr:
“can anyone here tell me what the Bush administration did for eight years to help the Iranian people?”
Aside from establishing Democracy on two bordering countries Bush did absolutely nothing for the Iranian people. However given how hard Iran has fought to prevent those countries from succeeding I would guess that the Mullahs recognized how significant those occurrences were. A lot of conservatives had a lot of criticism for a lot of what Bush did and didn’t do. For instance his lack of fiscal responsibility and inability to secure our ports and borders as well as doing nothing to help the Iranian opposition or the Iranian and Syrian Kurds. That does nothing whatsoever to absolve Obama of his inaction though.