Get PJ Media on your Apple

PJM Lifestyle

Escaping The Village: Freedom And The Prisoner

One of PJ Lifestyle's most thoughtful commenters responds to yesterday's Pop Culture Debate prompt with a fantastic essay explaining the cult TV show's accomplishment.

by
Francis W. Porretto

Bio

July 15, 2014 - 9:00 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

Patrick McGoohan’s The Prisoner, a 17-part serial of which he was the star and one of the writers and directors, is one of the great cultural legacies of the late Sixties for several reasons:

  • Its portrayal of “The Village,” a synthesis of the ideal English seaside resort with the total-surveillance nightmare of Orwell’s 1984;
  • The varied and ingenious series of trials of his intellect, his ingenuity , and his integrity to which McGoohan’s unnamed protagonist was put;
  • The exceptional quality of the scripting and acting throughout;
  • The care put into retaining the key ambiguities, which was apparently one of McGoohan’s priorities.

Nothing quite brings home the uniqueness of the series as powerfully as that last point, which is heated to a rolling boil in Episodes 16 and 17, co-starring the immortal Leo McKern.

McGoohan once said that the key theme of The Prisoner is that “Freedom is a myth”:

Interviewer Warner Troyer: This is a kind of banal question I guess, but if you could leave one sentence or phrase or paragraph in the head of everyone who watched The Prisoner series – the whole series – one thing for them to carry around for a while when it was over, what would it be?

McGoohan: Be seeing you.

This was an invocation of The Village’s relentless surveillance of Number Six, for whom The Village was putatively created as a place of confinement and trial.

McGoohan’s perspective on freedom-as-myth partakes critically of the concept of purposeful self-command as the negation of freedom. This is underlined by contrast: through the condemnation, in the final episode, of Number 48 — “uncoordinated youth; rebelling against nothing it can define,” — and Number 2 (Leo McKern) — “an established member, turning upon and biting the hand that feeds him.”‘ For all revolts against control will be either thematic or unthematic. In the former case, the rebel defies an external locus of control; in the latter, there is none. The sole unaddressed alternative is internal control: self-command in obedience to values and priorities one enforces upon oneself.

In this regard, let us hearken back to episode 16, in which McKern’s Number Two strains to break Number Six’s will at long last, and pays dearly for it:

Number Two: Why did you resign?

Number Six: For peace.

Number Two: What peace?

Number Six: Peace of mind.

It seems that McGoohan, in couching the line that way, was emphasizing that the point of Number Six’s resistance was merely to reaffirm his will to resist: a rebellion against external control whose aim was solely to break that will. The theme is freedom and only freedom… but Number Six’s self-command, which he has asserted throughout and against which he will not rebel, remains in place.

All Comments   (3)
All Comments   (3)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
I don't wish to comment on the main topic, which I have never seen and do not intend to amend that fact. Your "about the author" made me laugh so loud it made my children come running. Keep writing. You've got your "writers' voice" you just need to find your wider audience. And you will good sir, you will.
10 weeks ago
10 weeks ago Link To Comment
(chuckle) Thank you, dear lady. I got so tired of seeing indie writers very much like me describe themselves as the Second Coming of William Faulkner and their books as masterpieces beyond measure that I decided to introduce a mild contrast.

(I'm tempted to conclude with "Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week. Try the veal," but being a Serious Artist, I shall of course refrain.)
10 weeks ago
10 weeks ago Link To Comment
I first saw The Prisoner as a 22 year-old and was fascinated. Nevertheless, the whole thing about why he resigned and why it was considered important enough to confine and endlessly interrogate him throughout the series began to bore. It would have made more sense if the reason for his confinement was that he simply knew too much and his stormy resignation made his loyalty suspect (I've read enough real-life spy memoirs to know that good guys often quit for "good" reasons). The REALLY big philosophical question to me became the matter of freedom and self-determination. I still wonder how many of us would freely choose to spend our lives in The Village, without the freedom to leave but also free of responsibility. At some point, we would all be happy to retire there.

My experience of Catholicism is confined to childhood. I never took it seriously. A Catholic childhood was just something you had to put up with for a few years if you were to the manner born.

Looking back, on the most simplistic level, I think Catholicism could sell itself a lot better, not by chasing trendy causes like the dying Old Line Protestantism, but by explaining to its votaries the practical usefulness and happiness of a life of discipline, good habits and "self-command" in the worldly here-and-now rather than in the exclusive hope that after we kick 'ol St. Pete might see fit to issue us wings, harp and celestial ass-crack hospital gown.
3 weeks ago
3 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All