The Normal Way Godless Men Treat Women

Click here for Part 1

Advertisement

From Sunday at PJ Lifestyle, Susan L.M. Goldberg responded to my opening in this series with “Religion, Politics & Screaming at the Internet” and concluded thoughtfully:

Why aren’t these women loving these men the way they ought to be loving themselves, with respect and honor?

Perhaps that question is the answer to the many you pose about righteousness in America’s religious and political spheres. When we succumb to idols of any kind we become altruistic in our worship, disrespecting ourselves as much as those with whom we interact. Walter and I do agree on the concept that faith is, first and foremost, a relationship with God that is as mutually satisfying as a marriage. When we lose that context to religious, political, or pop culture opinion, we are forced to become ascetics, because no matter how hard you believe, nor how ardently you defend, you will never win the full favor, attention, or love of the idol you worship. It is a thing, an idea, a person so far removed from you that you are forced to be nothing more than its conquered slave. That is the way Ryan the Preacher treated Lisa, and she responded the way any slave would: “…all I wanted was to be wanted.”

An excerpt from page 23:

Dear Lisa and Susan,

I think among the many accomplishments of Finding Mr. Righteous is its portrayal of Chris the Atheist. The passage from page 23 above highlights a number of intertwined phenomena – a sadomasochistic sexual nature, atheist theology, an inability to control emotions, substance abuse, idolizing women’s bodies, and so often the critical piece at root, the lack of a father figure and the corresponding failure to grow up in a nuclear family. In another passage from the book Chris’s destructive tendencies are made more explicit as he discusses the self-inflicted scars on his arms.

Advertisement

Reading these passages reminded me of my own secular dating time during my undergraduate years – a period I don’t like to dredge out from the memory banks all that often because it’s just still too shameful and embarrassing. The experience from this passage isn’t that uncommon and it shouldn’t necessarily be understood as exclusively a men’s issue. (I certainly don’t believe that men are just innately violent.) It goes the other way too. I dated a number of secular, progressive, and feminist women in college who in some ways resembled Chris. Gender isn’t the issue — beliefs, ideology, and the experiences underlying them are what make people hurt one another.

Some of the women I dated would shift the foreplay into one disturbing realm or another, either incorporating pain and degradation into how they treated me or requesting I act that way toward them. Never was it just “for fun” or “to be kinky” or to “spice things up”– always behind these outward expressions some inner emotional wounds ached, unhealed by a spiritual practice.

Or rather, as it turns out, the sex and the pain was their substitute for a religion. Throughout the story of Chris we see one attempt after another to find something to distract from the unresolved demons inside him. The twin cocktail of sex and violence at the same time, heated up by alcohol and Dionysian emotion, is among the most effective throughout history for annihilating the pain of being an individual. There’s a name for this practice beyond just “atheism” and in my research I think Camille Paglia defines it best in her many books of essays, criticism, and literary analysis, summarized in the lead essay in Vamps and Tramps: A Pagan Theory of Sexuality. From page 45:

Advertisement

“Men who kill the women they love have reverted to Pagan cult. She whom a man cannot live without had become a goddess, an avatar of his half-divinized, half-demonized mother, a magic fountain of cosmic creativity.”

So the position I take: Chris was just being a normal, secular teenage boy, the way mother nature created him. This is just how nature operates…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GJ_Y2aEZak

The London Review of Books, via Buzzfeed:

‘Many scientists don’t like to talk about shark sex,’ Juliet Eilperin writes in her entertaining study of sharks and their world. ‘They worry it will only reinforce the popular perception that these creatures are brutish and unrelenting.’ In as far as we understand the subject – only a few species have been observed mating – the business is ‘very rough’. Larger male sharks have to bite or trap the females to keep them around during courtship; marine biologists can tell when a female has been mating because her skin will be raw or bleeding. The process is so violent that, come the mating season, female nurse sharks will stay in shallow water with their reproductive openings pressed firmly to the sea floor. Otherwise they risk falling prey to roaming bands of males who ‘will take turns inserting their claspers in her’ (the clasper is the shark version of a penis, found in a pair behind the pelvic fins). A litter of fifty pups will have anything from two to seven fathers. But the reproductive story gets rougher still. A number of shark species go in for oophagy, or uterine cannibalism. Sand tiger foetuses ‘eat each other in utero, acting out the harshest form of sibling rivalry imaginable’. Only two babies emerge, one from each of the mother shark’s uteruses: the survivors have eaten everything else. ‘A female sand tiger gives birth to a baby that’s already a metre long and an experienced killer,’ explains Demian Chapman, an expert on the subject.

Advertisement

An image from my review of Dennis Prager’s Still The Best Hope: Why The World Needs American Values to Triumph from 2 years ago:

From Dr. Richard Lewinsohn, page 271 of A History of Sexual Customs:

“In the 1820s, when the total population of Vienna was still under 400,000, the number of prostitutes was estimated at 20,000. This seems an enormous figure; it gives one prostitute for every seven or eight adult males of the population. But the loose women who gathered in Vienna worked, first and foremost, for the tourist trade which was very active.”

Pagan sexuality is natural sexuality — it’s do-whatever-you-feel-like, have sex in whatever combinations and variety you want.

And why not? If God does not exist and we’re only electrified dust flopping about on a floating rock spinning around a fusion furnace then why not live like Bill Clinton, visiting Jeffrey Epstein’s private island 5 times between 2002 and 2005?

Advertisement

What difference does it make when we’re all just mammals?

Camille Paglia, page 247 of Sex, Art, and American Culture:

“All of civilized life is a dance, a fiction. You must learn the steps without becoming enslaved by them. Sitting out the dance is not an option.”

The main takeaway that I’ve gotten from Paglia, supplemented by additional reading from books like A History of Sexual Customs and James C. Bennett and Michael Lotus’s America 3.0, is that throughout human history the Judeo-Christian conception of monogamous marriage is actually the “deviant,” unnatural way to live. History shows that the more “normal” way for both men and women to treat each other is the same way animals do in the wild — as disposable meat. Humans’ default setting is not to love just one person forever. When we do we are rising above our nature; do I go too far that Love itself is not natural?

Advertisement

And that’s largely why I’ve become so religious and “socially conservative” in recent years. The way to escape our broken human nature that drives us to hurt ourselves and others is to invoke a higher power. I pray and read the Bible in an effort to replace my own animal nature with Divine, transcendent nature. If there was some other way to escape the pain of idolatry than worshipping the God of the Bible then I haven’t found it yet.

Warmest regards,

David Swindle

P.S. Yes, one last thing: I do still find myself being embarrassed by the positions which I find myself advocating. Is there any product more uncool to try and sell than monogamy? Maybe Bible reading? Best wishes to you as you continue the efforts to get more people to discover your wonderful book, Lisa. More perspectives on the other men coming soon, it looks like Joe the Catholic is next in line…

 jesus thumbs up 2

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Advertisement
Advertisement