Get PJ Media on your Apple

PJM Lifestyle

Child Marriage Comes to Australia

The horrific crime is endorsed by nothing less than the example of Muhammad himself.

by
Robert Spencer

Bio

October 14, 2013 - 2:00 pm
Page 1 of 3  Next ->   View as Single Page

shutterstock_128997503

The girl’s Muslim parents forced her into the marriage when she was fourteen. Her mother tried to put a good face on a bad situation, enticing the girl with a picture of marriage as a never-ending party: her husband, she said, would treat the girl to ice cream and lollipops and take her to movies and amusement parks. Reality turned out to be a bit different: her husband imprisoned her inside their home and forced her to watch violent videos featuring jihad attacks against soldiers from Western countries. He also raped her and beat her frequently.

The girl went to her father for help. But her father, as she recounted later, was completely unsympathetic, telling her: “So what if he raped you? So what if he bashed you? The only way you can come back to me is in a coffin.”

This didn’t happen in Pakistan, or Egypt, or Indonesia. This girl suffered in comfortable suburban Australia, where Western society failed her as thoroughly as did Islamic society: she went to a teacher and explained what was happening, but despite laws requiring teachers to report such incidents, nothing was done.

Perhaps the teacher was afraid that if she reported the girl’s husband, she’d be accused of “bigotry” and “hate.” The forces promoting multiculturalism are as strong and deeply entrenched in Australia as they are in Europe and the United States. But inevitably, the multiculturalist acceptance of all things Islamic and stigmatization of any and all opposition to Islamic law as “racist” and “bigoted” are going to come into conflict with core Western principles of human rights and human dignity. This Muslim teenager’s teacher apparently accepted child marriage and spousal abuse as the price of eschewing “Islamophobia.”

Last week I wrote that Western countries were soon “going to have to make a choice as to whether they’re going to affirm the human dignity of women and maintain the illegality of polygamy, or whether they’re going to allow them to become mere possessions and playthings, denizens of de facto harems.” The same choice is coming regarding child marriage. Australian society, along with European and American society as well, is before too long going to have to choose between protecting the rights of women and thus fighting against child marriage, or allowing it in the interests of marching together with Sharia adherents into the brave new multicultural future.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
Said it before and will say it again:

Satan LOVES Islam -- it denigrates, demeans, and demoralizes all humans who embrace it. He LOVES that.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
You can have women's liberation or Islam but not both.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Thank you, Mr. Spencer, for your dedication to stand against this atrocity. Islam is a religion of absurdity and repulsion because the book that Muslims adhere to is a manual for violence and murder. I will continue to speak out whenever I have the opportunity to do so and am grateful to know that others, like yourself and Pamela Geller, are on the front lines defending young girls, and boys, for the sake of decency.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (54)
All Comments   (54)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
To paraphrase Glenn Reynolds our elites welcome our new Muslim overlords.

At least they will at first...after all, they're CHRISTIANS!

Ironically, as a older Orthodox man I can arguably expect more respect from Muslims than our current elites based on history although modern practice seems to indicate otherwise. Meanwhile those who thought me and mine were their greatest threat to their libertine lifestyles ain't seen nothing yet.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
That should be "they're not CHRISTIANS"
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
This is just another affirmation that muslim males [not Muslim Men] are not able to court and win the affection of an adult female. As a result they want a mate that they can bully and dominate. When we leave Afghanistan we ought to give each Muslim Woman a handgun and a full clip just to make things interesting.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
when feminism first reared its ugly head in the courts/family law (early 70's?) there was not a word spoken in protest. now the average 'forever' in marriage is what, 2 - 3 years, w/ 80% of divorces now filed for by women? songs like 'she got the gold mine and he got the shaft' are all over the place for good reason. but it didn't stop there. up until quite recently have adult women been allowed to rape minor children w/o consequences. donahue had a show (90's) on this very subject and wound up scolding his audience about aggressively taking up for these horrible women. today we have an epidemic of woman teacher/child crimes where they still typically only get a slap on the wrist. the judge said in court that mary laturno was 'too pretty to go to jail', until she went back multiple times. remember? false accusations against men for rape, d.v. and child molestation are routinely used by lawyers/women to get a better judgment in divorce cases. no worries, little to no punishment involved for women. men's lives are destroyed just by the accusation, and their faces plastered everywhere.

point being, progressives (feminists) long ago assaulted our laws and were allowed, even encouraged, to destroy the man/woman bonds of marriage. giving one party special privileges is supposed to be a no-no under our system of laws. there aren't to be any special people, or groups. remember 'equality before the law'? a precept of our laws established by our forefathers. once the 'precepts of law' (fairness, equality, truth, etc.) were breached, we were done as a just society. there can be no justice w/o ALL the precepts in ALL of our laws. that's u.s. law 101.

so now we have everyone here (and elsewhere) attacking polygamy, sharia law, child brides and so forth as being evil and invading/changing our way of life. in case nobody noticed, our way of life was destroyed when lawyers in robes started deciding what happens to our families. it quietly became the divorce industry, quickly followed by the abortion industry, and the prison industry, and so forth. lawyers loved it all. whatever feminists wanted in the early 70's was given, to basically take from one group (men), and give to others (women, lawyers, jailers, and on and on right down the long, long list). then affirmative action hit and almost every perceived victims group gets special treatment 'before the law'.

looks to me that what is going on now is just the worm turning. one evil is morphing into something just as ugly and destructive as what feminists were first allowed (by the courts) to inflict on us back when.

odd how our 'president' (w/ a suspect law degree) supports both opposite causes (feminism/sharia) by word and by action. progressives have strange bedfellows for sure.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
A barbaric religion stuck in the Dark Ages. Any grown man who would rape a child of either sex should be castrated with a dull spoon. Children are unable to give consent in the eyes of the law, therefor sex with minors is rape.

The accusation below that Orthodox Jews sanction pedophilia IMHO is based on inaccurate translations and ignorance.

It is incumbent upon any civilized society to have certain standards of behavior. Marriage between one man and one woman has over the ages proven to be the most conducive to a healthy society and healthy environment for children. Moral relativism does not change that fact nor in my mind does it legitimize other arrangements. Until dictionaries began succumbing to pressure from the radical homosexual community the very definition of marriage was a union between man and woman.

I support personal liberty to a point. Beyond that point lies chaos.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
You echo the wisdom of Paul who routinely tried to warn his disciples on the differences between liberty and license.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Teachers and other public employees in positions of power must be required to form the first line of defense against cultural invasion. If they cannot accomplish that task, they must be fired or replace by someone who can. This has to be non-negotiable.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
It reminds me of the Talmudic Jewish beliefs that it's ok to have sex with children. (Obviously Normal Torah Jews don't believe this, but the Talmudic Jewish beliefs are very specific in supporting this.)

http://www.henrymakow.com/does_talmud_condone_pedophilia.html

There is a HUGE HUGE HUGE HUGE HUGE Difference between Gays "CONSENSUAL" actions with one another, versus taking control over a child, raping them, manipulating them, having sex with them which is Pedophilia, and then trying to justify it with culture or Religion. Same with Polygamy, as long as it is Consensual for multiple wives, it's not anybody's place to tell others they cannot live that lifestyle. Any subversion of a person's Free Will is the issue, not people making life choices. People need to stop legislating judgment on one another, and start asking whether a person's rights to do as they please are being honored. That is truly all that matters, True Freedom for the people.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
You're kidding right? That's simply the most silly comment I've read on this sight ever. Your anti-semitism is thinly veiled.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Jeesh! Nice casual Jew bashing there. Why not use the actual Talmud or an expert on Talmudic Tanakh as your reference instead of a professional anti-Zionist like Henry Makow? I'm not even Jewish and I've heard that guy drone on about how Muslims should have their 57 apartheid states but the Jews should have no homeland at all. They'll give a Ph.d. to anyone now, apparently.

On the issue of sex with children in Jusaism - sex outside of marriage is strictly forbidden in the Jewish religion and the age of marriage, though differing according to national norms is at its earliest 13 for males and 12 for females. No marriage can take place unless the female does so willingly. Websites that state that Jusiasm allows pediphelia are almost always Muslim and if not, are anti-Zionists. (and Muslims themselves DO allow pedophelia - and even sex with your newly dead wife, according to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt - go figure!)
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
pure fiction and purely libelous very popular with Muslims
your source? a jewhater site replete with conspiracy trutherisms

no cigar
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Said it before and will say it again:

Satan LOVES Islam -- it denigrates, demeans, and demoralizes all humans who embrace it. He LOVES that.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Register Democrat, espouse multiculturalism, submit to Islam >>> Test drive your very own 9 year old wife.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I fully expect to hear soon that the Jews took slaves and forced them to build the pyramids. I live in NY and already I have heard on several occasions that Jews flew the planes into the World Trade Center and that 900 Jews didn't go to work there that day. Does Islam do ANYTHING but murder and lie?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The Imams ranted about how 9-11 was a set up by Bush and the Jews, etc. Then, the next rant of Friday prayers they praised the Magnificent 19. How can they reconcile these two positions? Muslim = crazy.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Yes: it encourages child rape and clitorectomies.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
You can have women's liberation or Islam but not both.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Put another way, you can have liberty or you can have Sharia, but not both.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"Last week I wrote that Western countries were soon “going to have to make a choice as to whether they’re going to affirm the human dignity of women and maintain the illegality of polygamy"

We have already surrendered that ground. When we decided that homosexuals can marry, we said that there are no rules at all.

For now, we pretend that we just moved the line a bit. What we really did, and what the intent was, was to destroy the line completely.

All you libertarians and Rockefeller/Goldwater Republicans who support homosexual "marriage" are on the wrong side of child "marriage", too. You may not know it yet, but you are.

Watch.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"When we decided that homosexuals can marry, we said that there are no rules at all."

Agree.

The Gay community doesn't know it yet, but their "victory" has opened the door not just to practices such as "multiple partner contracts" or "polygamy" but LEGAL child "marriage", LEGAL domestic slavery, LEGAL prostitution (for ANY age), and who-knows what other horrors of degradation the human race can think up.

It's only a matter of time before we will see these forms of "domestic arrangement" legally protected within this nation.

For those who scoff now - time will tell. Remember reading this comment when you look back 40 years from now and wonder how the world changed so much.


1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
For the short-sighted fools who didn't get it at the time: no one in political power gives two carps if gay people marry. Get it through your head. What they do care about is legalizing Islam and forcing through the Shariah. Legalizing gay marriage was the foot in the door. Domestic partnerships are the same - they opened the door for multiple partner marriages - Muslim marriages.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"The Gay community doesn't know it yet"

Yes they do. I saw the hapless Gary Bauer (remember him?) on a talk show years ago, discussing this issue. On the other side were a half dozen activists, and (of course) Gary was on his own. At one point he made this very point, that once the natural definition was destroyed, there were no limits. He asked them if they had thought of that, and if they supported polygamy, etc., Poor naive Gary thought that would stop them. Not even a little bit. They just said "Of COURSE we support that!", and Mr. Bauer was completely flummoxed.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
By the way, this was some 20 years ago or more. If I remember correctly, it was on Donahue. It was before Bauer's Presidential run, anyway.

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
You're talking apples & oranges here, IMO. Marriage equality in the context of a union of two consenting adults hardly compares to the barbaric practice of treating women as chattel & forcing children into marriage. I would never, ever approve of the concept that US officials should ever undermine our laws in favor of sharia laws. I would never, ever approve of marital arrangements between demented, misogynistic bedouins & underage girls.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Gays are on record saying that the best thing to happen to a 14 adolescent gay is a relationship with an older man. How far is marriage behind that?

I am sure Mormon groups that split from the mainsteam Mormonism, Muslims, feminists and the LGBT lobby will band together long enough to take down the society so each can remake society in their own image.

It sounds like you stand with them wittingly or unwittingly.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"Gays are on record saying that the best thing to happen to a 14 adolescent gay is a relationship with an older man."

Link?

That sounds like sentiments of NAMBLA, a rather fringe, demented group that hardly represents the views of the gay community in general.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The Vagina Monologues says it for lesbians...a whole section is about the wonders of being introduced to lesbian love as a teenager by an older woman. To the point that a woman who described the same scenario with a man would be called a rape victim.

For the gay male side, I'd look into fights in the late 80s/early 90s as gay activists cleaned up for the coming fights and see who was excluded more often: the local leather community or NAMBLA and those who chased teenaged boys.

I'll give you a hit, in the communities I had contact with the leather men weren't considered something that people wanted to risk the suburbanites seeing.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Oh, please. That's like asking for a link proving that Nancy Pelosi says stupid things.

The quotes are legion.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
In whose world, yours perhaps? Your analogy just doesn't work.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"Never, ever" ?

10 years ago, many used exactly the same phrase when asked if same-sex unions could ever be called "marriage".

This whole shift in our cultural "norm" is what's known as "the slippery slope", bobbcat.

You will probably live longer than I (I'm in my 50's), so you'll get to see the inevitable outcome of the changes we're seeing just the beginning of now.

Hate to sound irritating, but remember your comment and my response 40-50 years from now and smile when you recall how I ended this comment :

"Told you."
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"You will probably live longer than I (I'm in my 50's),"

This year is my 60th.

Only time will tell whether or not the gay marriage issue will translate into that proverbial slippery slope but this is the way I look at it. Gays have been in our midst since the dawn of time. We discovered years ago that pressuring them to stay in the closet was akin to discrimination against people according to race. Remember all the dire predictions that were associated with people marrying those of another race? Too many people are aware that discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation is just as unreasonable as that of doing so based on skin color. Our society is accustomed to the 2-person union between consenting adults. Gay marriage falls within that concept. Again, time will tell but I don't anticipate many of the dire predictions. There are reasons for societal decadence that have nothing at all to do with the issue of gay marriage. Whether or not we go down that "slippery slope" is associated with those, not that of the acceptance of marriage equality. I am far more disturbed by these skanky women who deliberately impregnate themselves by rock stars, actors & professional ball players who then allow boyfriends to beat up (& at times kill) their progeny than what will be the next state to legalize gay marriage.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I will always be against people who perform UNNATURAL acts upon each other. To put your Di2k in someone's ar8se and call it Love is very Demented.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"We discovered years ago that pressuring them to stay in the closet was akin to discrimination against people according to race."

No, we didn't "discover" that, as if it were a fact.

We, or rather, some of you, DECIDED that, flying in the face of the biological, psychological, sociological, and historical evidence of the harm it does.

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Sure, & that is why the American Psychological Association removed homosexuality from its list of mental disorders some years back. It's apparent that you don't know too many gay individuals or you would not make such blanket statements.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
When they remove pedophilia, the campaign for which is already ramped up, will you say that proves it isn't a problem as well?

And when that happens won't that mean we shouldn't deny them marriage in the same way?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All