Get PJ Media on your Apple

PJM Lifestyle

Bombshells and Baby Daddies: How Single Moms Are Destroying Kids and Society, Part 1

Any woman who decides to have a child without a husband is putting her baby at risk of poverty.

by
Megan Fox

Bio

September 25, 2013 - 10:30 am
Page 1 of 3  Next ->   View as Single Page

brynn

Former USC basketball star Brynn Cameron has just had baby number two out of wedlock with yet another sports star. Her first baby daddy was NFL quarterback Matt Leinart and the newest addition to her growing family is the child of the NBA’s Blake Griffin. Cameron is neither married nor in a relationship with either sperm-donor. (Rumor has it the stars of the NHL are competing with the pros of the PGA to see who will be next in line for PDA with the leggy blonde.)

While Cameron may not be struggling as a single mother because of her reported $15k a month child support paycheck (from baby daddy #1), the money alone will not protect her children from her stupid choice to raise them without a partner. Worse, Cameron’s lifestyle may seem attractive to her young fans, who will suffer far more harm than she if they follow in her ill-advised footsteps. Time and time again, statistics prove children raised in single-parent homes suffer compared to their peers in stable, married households. And yet, fauxminists still insist that single mothers are superior because they’re fighting the patriarchy… or something equally unintelligent.

In an essay titled “The Increase in Single Mothers is Actually a Good Thing,” Hugo Schwyzer claims that the rise in single motherhood is a result of women having babies with men they find inferior and thus not marriage material. Schwyzer uses an example of a woman whose “boyfriend was so dependent that she had to buy his cigarettes. Marrying him never entered her mind.”

Perhaps having sex with him should never have entered her mind.

Why are today’s women so stupid that they allow men they wouldn’t trust to run errands deposit their DNA inside of them? Perhaps it’s related to the lie from the progressive feminists that birth control works and there is such a thing as consequence-free sex. Here’s a secret: It doesn’t and there isn’t.

YouTube Preview Image

Any woman who decides to have a baby without a husband (not a baby daddy or a guy who visits on the weekend) needs to understand she is making the choice to put her baby and society at risk for the unforgivable disadvantages of poverty, teen pregnancy, sexual abuse, a life of crime, and incarceration and suicide. The first part of this series will deal with the crippling scourge of poverty.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
No, no! You don't get it. This is a life-style choice. All life-style choices are equal, none worse or better than another because worse or better are value judgments. It is the job of the government to ensure that whatever life-style I choose, I do not suffer any negative consequences from it because choice is good. We all want choice. Our government guarantees us the right to choose how we want to live our lives. If I want to live mine in such a way that I never have to pay for anything and I can get government to pay for my life-style, neither the government nor you can stop me . . . . Error! Error! Overload!
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
This is nothing new guys. It just used to be something that "those" people did. In 1965 when that well known right wing facist Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote his racist screed (sarc/off) about the effect of welfare on Black families 42% od Black children were born out of wedlock. Now it's 70+ and rising and the consequences are there for all to see. Exclude the Black numbers and the rate today is .... wait for it .... 42%. And rising. And the consequences will be the same. More important, as I have said before, I'm in my mid 70's, I don't have any grandchildren, and unless the boomers and their band of useless children can figure out a way to loot my retirement fund I'll have enough money to see me through to leaving the stage. Have a nice day. I'll be the guy with the best glass of wine on the table.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
We've been coaches, scout leaders, involved parents etc for almost 20 years now, and our experience is that children of single parents who turn out okay are raised by a parent Without. A. Life. The parent (most of them I do not know the situation that made them a single parent because the parent does not spend loads of time complaining about the other parent btw) does not have a social life, does not have hobbies, does not indulge himself or herself in any way. Every activity the parent gets involved with, is in volunteering for the child (coach, room parent, team mom or dad). I'm a mathematician so I know that the plural of anecdote is not data, but there are quite a few anecdotes we've seen. Other than these heroic parents, most kids of single moms (and dads) have serious problems.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (72)
All Comments   (72)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Brynn Cameron--pretty as she is, is nauseating. I feel sorry for her two kids who are deliberately condemned to life without a father. But she can be proud of her trophy children I guess.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Today's women, many of whom are educated and employed, are sleeping with bums, low-lifes and scuzz because they find these men "masculine." In other words, the compliant and metrosexual men they encounter on the job and in classrooms - men who quake in fear of a lawsuit or accusations of harassment -- are wimps. And so they mate with "bad-boys," even if that means being abused, abandoned or having to support them. Samuel Goldwyn said it best: "Women like bums." Why is any of this so hard to understand?
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Sorry. I know one too many women who ended up having to raise their children by their selves and they are adults now and thriving. One brush stroke does NOT define all situations. You should also not be making comments about motherhood if you aren't a parent. To the person suggesting the single parent doesn't have a life...you need to get out more. I know more women in corporate America who are divorced who are raising their kids and have a VERY active life. Generalizations get tiring!
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
...
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Uh wait what? Where are the statistics showing that birth-control, when used correctly, doesn't work? Not having done my own double-blind study of course, I can still tell you that I've had sex hundreds of times (not boasting. 99.999% of that's been in committed relationships), always used one or another form of protection, and never had even a spot of trouble. My experience is that when someone gets unintentionally pregnant, they'll always say they were careful, but if you press them on it, you'll eventually get them to admit they weren't.

There are any number of reasons why women should stop giving it up to shlubs, the top of the list being that men tend to achieve at exactly the level necessary to get laid. Still, lets not get carried away. Women get pregnant either because for one reason or another, they choose not to use protection, or because they're too ignorant to understand how it works.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
And that's your experience. Then there is my mother who was using two kinds of birth control when she managed to still get pregnant with me. It's not 100%. The only 100% way to make sure you do not get pregnant with a child who will lack a father is not to have sex outside of marriage. And that's the truth. Further, you don't know if there are underlying issues for why you haven't been pregnant yet. My sister used birth control for many years and then stopped to get pregnant only to find out they had a fertility problem. There's no telling why your birth control has been so effective.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Maybe you are right about that, but it just means that the existence of birth-control means the stupider you are, the more likely you are to get pregnant. Also, the stupider you are, the less likely you are to be able to support yourself and the baby.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Pardon me for stating the obvious. A woman who can get 15k for the support of a single child is not going to live in poverty, nor will her offspring. The only one who is at risk is the sperm donor. With female-dominated family law, a man runs huge risks giving out sperm either for money or for the kicks. The sperm donor can by held up for substantial money no matter what the original contract with the recipient stipulated. This happens because the child will grow up with rights, and these rights may have been violated by the agrrement between the two parties. So, a male has to be really stupid to be willing to open himself to potential blackmail and huge financial losses in exchange for the vanity of fathering children he does not want take care of.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
"I’m sure my detractors will say I am letting men off the hook by not addressing absent fathers, but the truth is this is a female-centered problem. Ladies, stop having sex with unsuitable men. Women have the power to turn this situation around simply by saying, “No.” If you truly believe it’s your body and your choice, then choose to be wise about the decisions you make with that body. Don’t get into the sack with anyone who isn’t 100% committed to you and having a family because sex leads to babies. Whether or not there is birth control involved, nature will eventually win! Don’t have sex with anyone who wouldn’t be a good father and husband. Problem solved."

ABSO. FRICKEN. LUTELY. RIGHT. No truer words were ever spoken.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Join the REAL world. There are no guarantees in which partner is going to be THE partner. If it were so simple...we would not be seeing so much chaos.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
It's exactly that simple. And the chaos is the result of your shades of grey world.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Real world solutions:

1. Marriage.
2. Eliminate no-fault divorce.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Feminism is about three words: "I, ME, MINE". What the baby wants or needs doesn't enter the picture until she can co-opt that for the court's interpretation of 'best interests of the child".

For feminists, kids are a lever to pry goodies and platitudes loose from state. Which is why, I think, that Idiot at NBC, Melissa Perry-hyphen-something is trying to steal that concept and subvert it even more for the state's purpose.

Feminists take the invasion of their body seriously, and, after considering the child as either an extension of 'their body', or a stowaway, to do with as they please, they're convinced someone owes them for the privilege of rent free time in that golden uterus of theirs. They're not going to be so silly as to surrender that property right to the child, nor share it with the father.

That's HER meal ticket / "get out of jail free card", and she's not giving it up. Its her validated parking for a higher class of victim-status with the Sisters of Perpetual Grievance, inc.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
I believe the analysis misses a key truth: the why.

All the talk about bad daddies and so forth is useless. If they knew it they chose not to act of not act on it, and further, they could have used abortion as an exit strategy which many do.

The issue is really about power. They choose worthless men, or at least ones that fit the frame simply because they have more leverage. It is, in this age of the victim, a good way to get more resources for your life.

Grimmer still, that child is completely in their power so their foibles and weaknesses have not self-correction from another party: they can do as they please with the kid. It is totally theirs, and we can see where that leads.

Lastly of course, the government will help you finance this life style choice, and your community will provide ideological and physical support.

27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Feminism may be partially to blame, but it was LBJ who found an effective way to break up families by paying women to have babies without getting married to increase the amount of their welfare checks. In 1965 when LBJ began building his Government Plantations in every urban center, the births to unwed mothers was 4% for whites and 24% for blacks. Today it is 29% for whites, 53% for Hispanics and an astounding 73% for blacks.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
but we as tax payers aren't supposed to be involved in this and just shut up and pay for these women--for the most part--that say they want control of their body but then want someone to pay for their choices.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
Darn right. Who the heck are you to question what they do with their bodies? If they decide to snuff the fetus, shut up. If they decide not to, pay up.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 Next View All