Get PJ Media on your Apple

PJM Lifestyle

Let’s Talk About Sex

If Victor Hugo saw Lovelace he'd probably wonder why he spent so much time writing that novel.

Susan L.M. Goldberg


September 15, 2013 - 9:00 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page


I still haven’t seen the latest film version of Les Mis. The promos were enough for me; the shot of Fantine singing “I Dreamed a Dream” while choking back tears as her hair was being shaved from her head was a sickening image that haunted me for days. I will never watch Les Mis for the same reason I will never watch Schindler’s List: When you have a clear understanding of the horror you are confronting, the safety of the fourth wall isn’t enough to keep your insides from shaking loose in rage, horror and sorrow.

Anne Hathaway ended her Oscar acceptance speech with the statement: ”Here’s hoping that someday in the not too distant future the misfortunes of Fantine will only be found in stories and never in real life.” Yet, the Hollywood machine that made her a star has woven the pornographic exploitation of women into contemporary pop culture. In her criticism of the liberal reaction to Lovelace, feminist writer Megan Murphy observed,

“…the only thing that’s really changed since the 70s, when Deep Throat came out, is that porn has successfully woven it’s way into our everyday lives. It’s our fashion, our entertainment, our celebrity culture, it’s in the bars and at the parties we go to. That the foundation for our current reality was built, in part, on the abuse and exploitation of this one woman, Linda Lovelace, is not insignificant.

Linda Lovelace was called the poster girl for the sexual revolution, if that tells you anything about the sexual revolution… Women really got screwed on that one (pun acknowledged). Informed of our liberation, we became free to become the public, rather than just private, sexual playthings of men. What was different now that we were “liberated” was that we had to like it. We had to be turned on by our own objectification and enjoy whatever male culture deemed sexy. Our own “liberation” was used against us, to shame us into subordination — albeit with smiles on our faces, moaning and groaning in feigned ecstasy.”

Clinging to what Murphy has dubbed the “empowerment narrative” many liberal critics panned Lovelace as “pro-family, anti-porn” careful to note that today’s porn industry has resolved many of the problems of its preceding generation. Having covered the disturbing trend of male sexual domination in pop culture, both in HBO’s Girls and presidential-themed romance novels, I can’t help but agree with Murphy’s conclusion: the liberal media willingly turns a blind eye to the disturbing trend of female sexual abuse in pop culture.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (3)
All Comments   (3)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
I think there is more to the "rape" of Dinah than we can see from our modern vantage point. Why was she in a foreign city all alone? Why was her father not angry and willing to have her married, and he bitterly resented the brothers killings the men until his dying day? That is why in sermons you'll often hear Jacob condemned as a coward, since that is the easiest way for a modern to rationalize such a "rape". No, it wasn't a rape.

See "The Fate of Shechem, or the Politics of Sex" by Julian Pitt-Rivers if you want to read a plausible account of what likely happened. The only plausible account that makes sense of all the presented facts.

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Concern for kids--great, I can get behind that. Who couldn't? But I can generate zero sympathy for American women who whine about sexual objectification and then hold "slutwalks."
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Just going to make the observation that Larry Flynt and Gloria Steinem support the same candidates and same causes.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All