The Halo 4 Case for Greatness
Like many others, last Tuesday I picked up a copy of Halo 4 before going to oust our president. I immediately noticed that the game raises some interesting questions.
First: the meaning of greatness. Some context: The genetically-engineered super soldier and protagonist Master Chief is the last of his kind. And he, of course, saved the galaxy from the theocratic — shades of Al-Qaeda? — Covenant, a group of alien races that serve as the series’ primary villains.
A character in the game questions this. He certainly likes to kill, the character asks. Doesn’t that make him a sociopath?
The doctor who created him dismisses the claim. The Chief is a good man, she says. Look at his accomplishments.
Fans of the game will know that Master Chief stopped at nothing to defend humanity. He cares not for himself. He nearly died. And when we last saw him, he sat frozen in a ship, forever caught in the eternal drift of space.
Second: bioethics. As mentioned, characters begin to question the purpose of the SPARTAN program that created Master Chief. They’re right to do so: the leaders of the program stole children from their parents and replaced them with clones. They altered their DNA to make them perfect. And they fitted them with incredibly advanced armor. The kicker: all of the other SPARTAN soldiers died. Master Chief survived. Does human nature, then, even burst through the attempts of the technocrats and authoritarians who wish to play with it? These questions will likely be further explored as this new trilogy progresses.
We live in uncertain, turbulent times. Our president won re-election, and now he’ll attempt to complete the fundamental transformation of the United States, the dream of progressives since Woodrow Wilson.
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
Video games have become a more intelligent form of art that movies, books or music in the 21st Century.
This is an interesting comment and deserves further fleshing out. Technology is changing the way we tell stories. In watching the Christopher Reeves Superman II I observed they spent the first third of the story retelling the first movie, correctly at that time thinking their audience had not seen the first movie in a few years. Then came VCRs and the storytelling became further compressed. Now with ubiquitous media storytelling is compressed further still. Watching older movies with my children is almost painful with the slow pace of the story. Even Merlin from 1998 is too slow for them.
Now we interact with the story instead of being passive recipients of the stories.
I would love to read a Rodger Kimball essay on this subject.
I’ve always enjoyed the Halo franchise, even if I can’t play the games at a setting higher than normal.
I’m really interested to see where this Reclaimer Trilogy goes. The Flood was a bad enough threat, but an insane Forerunner like the Didact? This is going to get complicated, I suspect.
Progressivism, communism, socialism fail wherever they’ve been tried. But the Alfred E. Neumann’s currently running the US government aren’t a bit worried. Their true inspiration comes from Europe. But they fail to internalize that its socialism was built on the belief that the US would never allow it to fall into the hands of the hyper-progressives of the USSR. But the Alfred Es—geniuses all—will gut US defense anyway in the belief that the Euros somehow got it wrong and they, the true believers, know better. The real joke in all of this is that the Bamster really seeks to harm the US and take us down a peg or two in the name of world fairness—maybe he’ll get another Nobel for trying.
We’ll survive Obama’s depredations against the US economy. By are Republicans in Congress still not aware that all they will never get from O is the phony bonhomie of a good ole boy pat on the back?