The Other in Literature, Life, and Politics
How could so many believe an obvious satire about Republicans wanting to ban tampons?
October 9, 2012 - 1:30 pm
“The other” was any character of a different color/culture/sexual orientation. Weirdly, sometimes “the other” was a woman. (For some reason right now the only “other” I can remember was the dead Chinese in Effi Briest.) On cue, as instructed, we could spill rivers of ink on the “exclusion” denoted by this and that passage, on the ignorance of the individual of a certain race/culture/sexual orientation.
We learned from our professors that the objectification of the other and making it into something strange and wonderful or else threatening and dangerous were all part of the xenophobia of our forebears. Of course, the way to respond to this lack of enlightenment was as codified as the sounds of disgust we were supposed to make at the idea of objectifying “the other.” The response was, in fact, supposed to be the putting down of our own culture and the elevating of this “other” because he WAS other.
[As far as indoctrination goes, I preferred the times in elementary school when our teacher would solemnly instruct us to deface the pictures of the three Filipes (the three Spanish Kings of Portugal) in the history book. It was more open and honest and not supposed to make us hate ourselves.]
I hadn’t given this concept of The Other much thought – like other things from undergrad (and grad) humanities, I let it pass from me with no regret and perhaps a little relief – until yesterday.
You see, yesterday I read Charlie Martin’s post on the rumor that Republicans want to ban tampons. Now, the rumor started in a satire post, but here’s the thing: PEOPLE BELIEVE IT. They believe anyone in their right mind, much less anyone writing the Republican platform, would include phrases like “because it is unnatural for women’s bodies to be penetrated by objects.”
It brought to mind all the trolls I have met at every conservative blog I’ve ever been part of. Most of the blogs I take part in are of a Republican/Libertarian bend, which means basically that if you were to come in and try to discuss incest, we tie ourselves in knots, not wanting to deny anyone their liberty to do as they please, but suggesting that perhaps the power imbalance between parent and child would make the relationship problematic. Or if you bring up drug use you find yourself in an earnest argument over whether people should be allowed to snort cocaine during class, and would it make a difference if it were a private college.
(It’s not that we libertarians don’t have morals: a lot of us are religious and have iron clad morals FOR OURSELVES, we just honestly don’t believe we have the right to impose them on others, unless the cost of forbidding something is greater than the cost of allowing it. I can, have, and do argue both ends against the middle on why murder probably shouldn’t be a crime.)
HOWEVER we vote Republican (usually… Unless it’s a really safe year and we decide it’s a good year for a statement vote, and—stop it. I live in CO. My vote for Harry Brown did NOT almost make Al Gore president. Particularly not in the district I was in which went for Gore big time, anyway.) And we want a smaller government and a withering of the welfare state.
This makes us The Other because in many fields from entertainment to education, from art to government, people have never been exposed to anyone like us. Or rather, they have but they don’t know it, as no one is willing to commit career suicide by uncloaking and revealing beliefs that aren’t exactly like the group’s.
So in blog after blog, we would get trolls coming in who would yell at us for being homophobic (even when the main blogger is GAY,) for being racist, and, more importantly for having all this … I’d like to say “outdated fifties morality” but it’s not even that, it’s outdated fifties morality as seen by Saturday Night Live.
As any culture which has frozen and ossified and become incapable of seeing the contradictions in themselves, Liberals view Republicans part as they might have been sometime, maybe, in the twenties, and part as a chimera – something that never was.
We’re supposed to be robber barons twirling our mustaches (I’m going to wax tomorrow, swear to G-d) while we kick widows and orphans out into the cold, AND incredibly pious and “moral” hypocrites, who talk about what is natural and unnatural and wax mealy-mouthed about white superiority. Oh, we’re also supposed to work overtime to keep minorities down, even when we are minorities, because… I don’t know. It’s inherent in us, evil people that we are.
Guys, I have a lot of socially conservative, evangelical friends and even they never expressed any disgust at women using tampons. In fact, the most social conservative thing I ever saw relating to tampons was the note in some of the bigger models in Portugal that this might pierce your hymen. And even then (in the ’70s) in a culture more socially conservative than the US, we laughed at it.
But that’s all the liberals HAVE. All they have to defend themselves against the horrible vision of a government that doesn’t control all of society (well, it must be horrible in their eyes, right?) and every individual from birth to death, is this boogeyman creature, this “Other” waved like a threat, like the barbarians at the gates.
Thus did the ancient Romans speak of the people beyond the Pillars of Hercules. Thus did medieval Europe imagine the inhabitants of the interior of Africa. Thus did the Chinese speak of everyone outside their sphere.
The liberals have made us The Other because if they found out we were human their entire vision of the world would shatter.
Meanwhile, while doing so, they strut and pose, and talk about how their ancestors were ignorant and fearful and phobic of The Other.
If civilization survives this, future students of literature and history will laugh themselves sick over the irony.
Shutterstock image courtesy OLJ Studio
Related at PJ Lifestyle: