Get PJ Media on your Apple

Ed Driscoll

Our Source was the New York Times

March 4th, 2014 - 12:33 am

What a difference a couple of decades make. Appearing in Sunday’s New York Times was the headline, “Democrats Try Wooing Ones Who Got Away: White Men”:

Frank Houston knows something about the longtime estrangement of white men from the Democratic Party. His family roots are in nearby Macomb County, the symbolic home of working-class Reagan Democrats who, distressed by economic and social tumult, decided a liberal Democratic Party had left them, not the other way around.

Mr. Houston grew up in the 1980s liking Ronald Reagan but idolizing Alex P. Keaton, the fictional Republican teenage son of former hippies who, played by Michael J. Fox on the television series “Family Ties,” comically captured the nation’s conservative shift. But over time, Mr. Houston left the Republican Party because “I started to realize that the party doesn’t represent the people I grew up with.”

Now, as chairman of the Democratic Party in Oakland County, Michigan’s second largest, Mr. Houston is finding out how difficult it can be to persuade other white men here to support Democrats, even among the 20 or so, mostly construction workers, who join him in a rotating poker game.

Mr. Houston is part of an internal debate at all levels of his party over how hard it should work to win over white men, especially working-class men without college degrees, at a time when Democrats are gaining support from growing numbers of female and minority voters.

It is a challenge that runs throughout the nation’s industrial heartland, in farm states and across the South, after a half-century of economic, demographic and cultural shifts that have reshaped the electorate. Even in places like Michigan, where it has been decades since union membership lists readily predicted Democratic votes, many in the party pay so little attention to white working-class men that it suggests they have effectively given up on converting them.

Starting of course with the man who publishes the Times himself. In 1992, New York Magazine reported:

Not long ago, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., the 41-year old publisher of the New York Times, was greeting people at a party in the Metropolitan Museum when a dignified older man confronted him. He told Sulzberger that he was unhappy about the jazzy, irreverent new “Styles of the Times” Sunday section. “It’s very”—the man—paused—“un-Times-ian”

“Thank you,” New York Magazine quoted Sulzberger as replying, adding that the Times’ publisher “later told a crowd of people that alienating older white male readers means ‘we’re doing something right.’”

At least until the bill came due for such racialist thinking, which has since become near universal amongst Pinch’s fellow “liberals,” including elite Obama voters such as late screenwriter-director Nora Ephron, who wrote a piece for the Huffington Post on the 2008 election misanthropically titled “White Men,” in 2008, and the wall-to-wall racialism of today’s MSNBC. Or Timesman David Carr’s rant on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher in 2011, in which he vilified midwesterners as “the dance of the low-sloping foreheads” — all the more ironic given that Carr grew up in Minnesota.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
The bizarre thing I'm seeing is that there is no questioning by the Democrats as to whether what they've done is beneficial for the country as a whole.

Marginalize a whole class of people, use them as the butt of jokes and blame all the country's problems AND your failures on them, and NOW they're going "Oh, we need you to maintain power!"?

We're supposed to trust them? To come back into the fold after decades of open hatred?

Hey, NYT - there's the horse you rode in on. You know what you can do with it.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
I beg to differ. Republicans have something to offer African-Americans that the Democrats never can to White men: fairness. In fact, the Republicans are for the most part already making that offer, it's merely not being accepted. I don't believe it's possible for the Democrats to do likewise.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
Liberals are by far the worst purveyors of racism as orthodoxy and institution in America. The fact they are completely convinced demonizing whites is some form of anti-discrimination shows what morons they are.

From "white privilege" to "cultural appropriation" to editing out any non-white slavery or colonialism from history to their sad stupidity called "micro-aggressions, they are very inventive about coming up with new racial slanders to fight racism.

This is the byproduct of letting the worst organized bigots in America basically write your campaign speeches and platforms, and from whose hate the Dems draw their "wisdom" from.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (42)
All Comments   (42)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
White men pretty much built the world we live in, and when the big crash comes, which it will, it will pretty much be white men who rebuild it. Except my phrase "white men" has nothing to do with skin colour or even gender, and everything to do with attitude: people who want to work hard at something useful, give more than they take, recognize reality, and give and demand respect. This includes millions of Asians, blacks, and Latinos, but excludes Wall St. bankers, Democrats, and the FSA.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
Love the Dr. Strangelove reference.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
Vernon Parrington. There it is, there it is. Our intellectual elite have always been pretenders.

People who grew up in small towns and rural areas (and more recently the dreaded suburbs) who had prodigious intellectual gifts -- "the smartest one of the crowd, mind you," as Mr. Potter said of George Bailey, of every George Bailey who has ever breathed -- but no common sense and were rightly disliked, dismissed and even despised by the neighbors, for their bad manners and disrespect and arrogance.

They couldn't wait to knock the dust of those places off their boots just as soon as they boarded the trains for those Ivy League colleges. And then off to the Big Cities, where they assumed they'd become the new aristocracy, founded on intellect, erudition and a certain je ne sais quoi attitude. But they made their names and reputations and earned their daily bread by running down everyone and everything that they remembered and despised in a place once called "home."
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
Esau, you've nailed it.

Ted Rall described this process nearly verbatim with reference to his own life. Of course, he framed it as his lofty self rising above the morass of the small town, instead of viewing as an adult might (he left because whatever his IQ might be, he was a lousy human being and nobody wanted to be around him or accord him the significance he arrogated to himself). His rendition of his life, while sickening, is at least honest, and as such you don't see it trumpeted at places like Huffpost. Wouldn't want to admit the real motivations, doncha know.

Other examples abound, and the thing is, the left actually uses these types to their advantage whenever they want to pretend that they represent regular people. The two best ones I can think of are Michael Moore and Molly Ivins.

Moore is continuously presented as an authentic voice of the "gritty industrial heartland" or some such nonsense, when in fact he is a poseur in that role and is just another wealthy urban leftist who despises the religious and political sensibilities of his supposed cohort. Ivins was always cast as bringing a dirt-farmer authenticity to the left of center cause, but the truth is that she was a drunk leftist malcontent who couldn't tell corn from wheat from a herd of cattle and had nothing but contempt for the real culture and values of Texans.

But their accents and a few of their mannerisms were employed to attempt to show some sort of universality to the leftist cause.

In the end nobody is fooled.

When the welfare recipients and public employees and grant/subsidy recipients in this country hold a rally to thank me for working and producing the money that funds their existence, I'll think about voting Democratic. When Democratic politicians vocally condemn the entertainment and advertising industries for using misandry and bigotry against white males and authentic Christians to appeal to other groups for their audience, I'll think about voting Democratic. Until then, I view Democrats as an existential threat, with all that that entails.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
This is funny. After years of ridiculing white males, the NYT wants to make nice and ask them to support Democrats. It brings to mind the classic error of dog training. Dog runs away. Owner calls dog and it returns. Owner then beats the snot out of the dog. Now owner cannot figure out why dog won't ever come when called. Enough said.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
What next, the Nazi party trying to recapture the Jewish vote?
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
Marxists abandoned European Christian Male Working Class a long, long time ago.

The Western Left has nothing but contempt for them and their culture.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
If the Democrats want to "win over" white males they might want to reflect upon the fact that they have "won over" all their other demographic groups by demonizing white males and making us out to be THE source of all that is wrong and evil in the world. I have been used as a straw man and stalking horse by the Democrats in their pursuit of political power for most of my 57 years; they are going to have one hell of a hard time winning my azz over; in all likelihood they will act upon their decades of stereotyping me and try to rile me up with stories of lazy blacks, car-stealing Mexicans and weak flighty females - the kind of racist/sexist red meat they're certain I really want.

Screw the Democrats.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
Your censors are super sensitive. White ey got kicked out?
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
One of us is going to die: old, white males or Times and by extension, Democrats. We regenerate, automatically. I predict old, white males has it sealed. No sense even trying to pull the wool over our eyes. I wouldn't believe a Democrat if he told me my mother never had kids.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
The author of the NY Times article is a woman named "Jackie Calmes". Yet another fish realizes there are a lot fewer bicycles are around.
33 weeks ago
33 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 Next View All