Grand Oppositional Party?
“Good News,” spotted by Glenn Reynolds: “As of today, Barack Obama’s presidency is half over.” But The Won can still plenty more damage to the nation over the next four years — and will. With “The Republican Party in Opposition,” Bill Kristol, with assists from the late Pat Moynihan and Ronald Reagan, has some thoughts on how the GOP should respond:
Reagan dared to challenge an incumbent president of his own party. He dared to challenge the establishments of both parties. He thought big, acted boldly, and ultimately won.
So, as Republicans consider their situation halfway through the Obama presidency, they might want to turn for inspiration to Reagan’s impromptu remarks when President Ford invited his defeated rival to say a few words at the close of the 1976 Republican convention:
If I could just take a moment; I had an assignment the other day. Someone asked me to write a letter for a time capsule that is going to be opened in Los Angeles a hundred years from now, on our Tricentennial.
It sounded like an easy assignment. They suggested I write something about the problems and the issues today. I set out to do so, riding down the coast in an automobile, looking at the blue Pacific out on one side and the Santa Ynez Mountains on the other, and I couldn’t help but wonder if it was going to be that beautiful a hundred years from now as it was on that summer day.
Then as I tried to write—let your own minds turn to that task. You are going to write for people a hundred years from now, who know all about us. We know nothing about them. We don’t know what kind of a world they will be living in. . . .
And suddenly it dawned on me, those who would read this letter a hundred years from now will know . . . whether we met our challenge. Whether they have the freedoms that we have known up until now will depend on what we do here.
Will they look back with appreciation and say, “Thank God for those people in 1976 who headed off that loss of freedom, who kept us now a hundred years later free, who kept our world from nuclear destruction”?
And if we failed, they probably won’t get to read the letter at all because it spoke of individual freedom, and they won’t be allowed to talk of that or read of it.
This is our challenge; and this is why here in this hall tonight, better than we have ever done before, we have got to quit talking to each other and about each other and go out and communicate to the world that we may be fewer in numbers than we have ever been, but we carry the message they are waiting for.
We must go forth from here united, determined that what a great general said a few years ago is true: There is no substitute for victory, Mr. President.
Republicans are in opposition. This provides opportunities for clear speech and bold proposals. It implies also the responsibility to do what they can to mitigate the damage of the next four years. But, at the end of the day, there is no substitute for victory.
Which means, to some extent, playing for time rather than forcing the issue, Charles Krauthammer writes, in a column that counterbalances Kristol’s advice to some extent: “Want to save the republic? Win the next election. Don’t immolate yourself trying to save liberalism from itself. If your conservative philosophy is indeed right, winning will come. As Margaret Thatcher said serenely of the Labor Party socialists she later overthrew: ‘They always run out of other people’s money.’”
“Margaret Thatcher said serenely of the Labor Party socialists she later overthrew: ‘They always run out of other people’s money.’”
That belief unfortunately is not true about our socialistic Democratic Party. Obama raised far more money than any previous candidate for president. Democratic Party candidates for Congress also were wallowing in contributions. They’ve gotten funding from billionaires and (illegally) from foreign governments such as China. Democrats also have the benefits of cheerleading and heavily biased reporting from the mass media. They will be hard to beat.
Winning the next election is only a short term action.
To coin a collary to Lady Thatcher: “Eventually they always run out of other people’s birthrates.”
The Left simply does not reproduce enough to sustain itself (see blue states, Europe, birhtrate of). It relies almost totally on conversion to maintain and grow its electorate, i.e. pre-school-through-grad-school proselytization, the entertainment media 24/7 propaganda saturation, and to a far lesser extent, oikophobic-engineered immigration.
The immigration is something we can deal with with the short term action(winning the political process).
For the other two, we need a long term solution that isn’t as easy as simply flipping a ballot level. Conservatives are going to have to roll up their pant legs and wade into the cesspool that is the education system and the entertainment industry, not as critics, but as participants with the Long March outlook of becoming its movers and shakers.
Education will be the easier one. The coming educational bubble will make creating non-public for-profit alternatives easier. But conservatives are going to have to wade in and take those slots (both new model and conventional) and not leave them by default to the Left.
Entertainment will be the tough one, especially with the Left’s McCarthyite blacklist operations in full effect. This is where we’re really going to need some heroes to step up.
The stategy for the dinosaur media would be to buy out a major Hollywood studio, a major broadcast network (CBS most likely), and one or more movie theatre chains/distributors — and then bootstrap conservatives into scriptwriting, production, studio exec, and direction roles. Not talking AMERICAN CAROL agitprop here, just good solid popculture fare without the Left’s “sucker punches” as BigHollywood calls them.
Other art forms are more conducive to Long Tail strategies. The author-published indie book press revolution is a good example as are the various online music artist-direct-to-listener venues. Again, the goal is to produce not Ayn Rand knockoffs, but high quality art that stands on its own as art but that reflects the very conservative nature that lasting art always envinces.
Conservatives are going to have to become teachers, professors, media moguls, and artists if we are to have any prayer in regaining the culture (and thus the electorate).