Defining Deviancy — and Pretty Much Everything Else — Down
At the American Thinker, Glenn Fairman flashes back to his days as a substitute high school teacher. Needless to say, it’s not a pretty picture, if you have sense of what education used to be like before the days of PC and black armband history:
In a dusty corner shelf of the room was a set of thirty-year-old textbooks from the mid-1960s, and although my memory cannot now relinquish their title, their contents burned themselves into my brain. As I flipped through the pages, I was astonished to find what I would now consider an upper-level college textbook under color of what in the high schools used to be termed “civics.” This text contained a very detailed understanding of political theory, constitutional law, macroeconomics, American history, and comparative political systems. I spent the rest of the day in slack-jawed amazement, perusing what a student in a working-class town was expected to know before the mavens of education began tinkering with the curricula of our schools.
When the instructor returned at the end of the day, I revealed my astonishment to him, and he informed me that he had used those texts when he first hired on. Now, however, could not do so, since they would be incomprehensible to nearly every student — especially considering that the nature of history and American government had been changed in the current texts. The teacher related to me that the current texts had been scaled down to what used to be a grammar-school understanding, and they carried within them a jaundiced view of America, preferring to accentuate the warts and blemishes rather than the achievements of our political system.
I then made it my business, when finding an older teacher, to ask if education had been “dumbed down.” To a person, I found that this question unleashed volatile diatribes on how dull children had become since the responders had begun as idealistic young men and women in the field. Algebra teachers informed me that every year they were forced to eliminate problem sets that previous years had mastered. English teachers who once taught Shakespeare and Dante were now reduced to leading seniors through Orwell’s Animal Farm or postmodern novels featuring teens in existential moral dilemmas. Moreover, the analysis of themes in book reports had been deconstructed into not what the author was attempting to portray, but what personal emotions were elicited in the reader.
Teachers, who are part and parcel the products of our New Education, can never be fully aware of what diminution has been wrought subsequent to the Great Divide. From elementary school and into the colleges, disciplines of objective knowledge have been either discounted or leveled, and critical thinking has been pushed aside for the subtle indoctrination of a specific worldview. Students are deemed to be merely clever animals, and the slow, simmering replacement of a spiritual for a biological self-definition is therefore woven into the fabric of how they are taught life and the world.
Read the whole thing. But as for “the slow, simmering replacement of a spiritual for a biological self-definition,” I blame “the cultural para-stimuli.”
(H/T: SDA.)







My wife, who just retired as a high school teacher, says the same thing. Kids cannot do without calculators – don’t know the multiplication tables, can’t do reality checks (4×4 = 160? Sure!) They need calculators to compute 10% of a number, and often have no clue that the result must be SMALLER than the original. Convert 1/4 to a percent or vice versa? You gotta be kidding. What’s 1/2 minus 2/4? Duh. Maybe it’s social promotion in grammar schools, maybe it’s too much time in front of the TV, maybe it’s No Child Left Behind, but whatever it is, it’s gettin’ dumber. BTW, she taught in a well-to-do suburban area so that’s not the problem.
My youngest graduated high school in 2010. The curriculum definitely is dumbed-down compared to 1970. There are many reasons for this, but, in my opinion, the biggest culprit was the elimination of tracking by ability. Tracking organized classes by student ability: the smartest class-sized bunch were in one class, the next smartest in another, etc. In my school, tracking was implemented by second grade. It was easier on the teachers because all the students in a class had approximately equal learning abilities. It was easier on the students because the smart kids didn’t get bored and the below-average kids didn’t fall behind. However, the professional educators called this policy elitist and racist and got rid of it almost everywhere.
The second culprit in the dumbing-down process was the elimination of non-academic tracks in high school combined with the idiotic idea that all students should try for a college education. How on earth could professional educators be so stupid? How do they expect a student with a 75 IQ to handle college? This idiocy is why the true drop-out rate exceeds 25% (unchanged since the 1960s). High school courses are dumbed-down so that the below 85 IQ students don’t fail.
The education profession is filled with idiots who don’t want to differentiate among students and want them all the have the same experience of the same watered-down classes.