Karl Rove makes mincemeat of Obama’s self-assessment that he’s some sort of policy wonk. I started to add this as an update to the previous “Betelgeuse!” post, but I think it’s worth breaking out separately:
“President Obama has himself backwards,” Rove says. “His problem is not that he was a policy wonk: it’s that he wasn’t. He refused to get his hands dirty writing a good stimulus bill, drafting bipartisan health-care reform, or negotiating with Republicans. He found it easier to tell them ‘I won, so get lost.’”
“The president is comfortable with a technocratic approach because he is an imperious, arrogant, know-it-all left wing technocrat who leaves the details to his congressional Democratic allies, like Congressman Dave Obey with the stimulus bill,” Rove adds. “He is content to check the box on his list of achievements and tour the country with his teleprompter giving speeches.”
Advertisement
And Obama’s aides disagree also:
“Enough was enough, [White House chief of staff] Rahm Emanuel decided. … He summoned the two competing super-egos, [economic adviser Larry] Summers and [budget director Peter] Orszag, and told them to make peace. After all, they were each responsible for huge swaths of the federal government. And they were fighting at every turn. After a bit of delicate negotiations, it was decided that they’d meet once a week for dinner and see how it worked. So, that night, Orszag settled into a white-clothed table at the Bombay Club, a posh Indian restaurant across Lafayette Park, a favorite of lobbyists and White House officials.
“Summers walked in, slightly late, but not impolitely so, and met Orszag at the table. And then it was the two of them. Orszag hoped that this time the White House would be less fraught with strife than the last go-round during the 1990s. Summers said it kind of came with the territory. This talk of their shared history seemed to thaw things out. They both grabbed for the plate of flatbreads … and tore corners at the discus-sized breads. ‘You know, Peter, we’re really home alone.’ Over the past few months, Summers had said this, in a stage whisper, to Orszag and others as they left the morning economic briefings in the Oval Office. … ‘I mean it,’ Summers stressed. ‘We’re home alone. There’s no adult in charge. Clinton would never have made these mistakes.’”
As one of the commenters at the Brothers Judd blog notes, the Home Alone analogy cuts both ways — Summers is admitting that there are no grown-ups in the Obadministration, and inadvertently including himself amongst the small-fry.
Obama’s image of himself is an airship like the Hindenberg, majestic and larger than life, filling the eyes of all who gaze upon him with awe and wonder.
Obama’s reality is a crappy little 5 cent balloon, nearly out of gas which makes a disgusting, annoying noise as it flops to the ground.
Somehow, your metaphor reminded me of THIS.
Maybe it’s the sound effects!
That’s the sound, although an old-fashioned whopee cushion would work, too.
You analogy is worse than you think, since the real Hindenberg crashed in flames, taking many lives.
As one of the commenters at the Brothers Judd blog notes, the Home Alone analogy cuts both ways — Summers is admitting that there are no grown-ups in the Obadministration, and inadvertently including himself amongst the small-fry.
The other option is that Summers and Orszag are grown-ups, but they’re Harry and Marv. Given the way they’ve handled the economy, Larry and Pete are just about as equally competent as those two guys.
Of course there are no adults in this Administration. An adult would look at a couple-three hundred years of history and know that none of these policies have ever worked.
“he is an imperious, arrogant, know-it-all left wing technocrat” The only part of that I disagree with is the technocrat. He may make himself seem to be a technocrat but that’s mimetic, as phony as the Greek column back drop for his acceptance speech.