Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

Spin of the Day

September 13, 2011 - 10:14 pm - by Ed Driscoll

Spin Debbie Wasserman Schultz! Spin like there’s no tomorrow!

Even before the votes were counted, Republicans said the closeness of the contest showed Democrats are abandoning Mr. Obama heading into the 2012 election season.

Democratic party leaders insisted the loss wasn’t a harbinger of things to come. “It’s a very difficult district for Democrats,” said Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, noting its Democratic margins there tend to be the second lowest of all the districts in New York City.

Advertisement

House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio), dismissed that idea.

“This is a very seriously Democrat district,” Mr. Boehner said. “This is not a district that Republicans have any right to believe we could win.”

Meanwhile, DWS chats up the NYT:

But Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, said the district’s large concentration of Orthodox Jews made it unusual and meant the race had few national ramifications.

“In this district, there is a large number of people who went to the polls tonight who didn’t support the president to begin with and don’t support Democrats — and it’s nothing more than that,” she said in a telephone interview.

According to the Washington Post, NY-9 has been held by a Democrat since the 1920s,  back when Ty Cobb hit .401 for the Tigers, blogger Dale Franks adds on Twitter. Making it previously a very difficult district for Democrats in much the same way that “Texas has always been a pretty Republican state, for, you know, historic reasons.”

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

4 Comments, 4 Threads

  1. This is going to be fun to watch. How do you spin this even positively? I think we can all agree that Shultz’s attempt is a swing and a miss.

  2. 2. TexasMom2012

    They can spin but they can’t hide! Seriously, they are trying to say that a seat the Dems have held exclusively for nearly 90 years is not reliably Democrat! Excuse me, just what do they consider reliable? And just what has changed? Oh yeah, Obaminomics!

  3. 3. Buck O'Fama

    “In this district, there is a large number of people who went to the polls tonight who didn’t support the president to begin with and don’t support Democrats — and it’s nothing more than that,” she said in a telephone interview.

    Frankly, there are a large number of people who VOTED FOR OBAMA in 2008 and either didn’t vote or voted Republican this time. The Dems had such a registration advantage in NY-9, that almost HAD to happen for the Dem to lose by 6 points. Not a “reliable” Dem district? Come on, Joe Stalin was hard pressed to find more reliable districts.

    After reading this spin, I now know how Debbie gets her hair to look like that.

  4. 4. OCBill

    That should be a winning slogan for the DNC going into 2012, “We would have won if it weren’t for those darned Jews!” I guess rocket science was never an option for Whatsername-Schulz.