Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

Yet another New York Times veteran is stepping off the bridge of the Gray Lady; this time it’s Bill Keller, Pinch’s lefthand man:

In a surprise announcement, Bill Keller is resigning as New York Times executive editor as of September 6. He will be replaced by Jill Abramson, the paper’s managing editor, Jeremy Peters reported on nytimes.com Thursday morning.

Keller will still write for the paper: “As for Mr. Keller’s plans, he said he was still working out the details of a column he will write for the paper’s new Sunday opinion section, which will be introduced later this month.”

Advertisement

Abramson will be the first woman to run the Times newsroom in the paper’s 160-year history. For Abramson, the Times is holy writ:

Ms. Abramson said that as a born-and-raised New Yorker, she considered being named editor of The Times to be like “ascending to Valhalla.”

“In my house growing up, The Times substituted for religion,” she said. “If The Times said it, it was the absolute truth.”

Yes, there’s an attitude for a newspaper person to have — not just the idea of one source of news being the absolute truth (paging Messrs. Duranty, Blair and Krugman to the blue courtesy phone please), but as a substitute religion, to boot.

But then, isn’t everything on the left a substitute religion these days?

Incidentally, Newsbusters calls this a “surprise announcement,” but it’s not unexpectedly unexpected, as Keller is but the latest high-profile Timesman to step down since the start of the year. Back in March, Aaron Goldstein at the American Spectator wrote:

There’s a lot of moving and shaking at The New York Times since announcing back in February that it would be overhauling its editorial pages.

Yesterday, Bob Herbert announced he was leaving The New York Times after 18 years to “write a book and expand my efforts on behalf of working people, the poor and others who are struggling in our society.”

Earlier this month, Frank Rich wrote his last column after more than thirty years with The Gray Lady. He will be joining New York Magazine in June.

Does this mean Paul Krugman and Maureen Dowd will soon also be leaving for greener pastures? And by greener I don’t mean more environmentally friendly.

Paul and Maureen are still there for now, but who will be the next veteran Timesperson to bail, as the Gray Lady continues her descent?

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

3 Comments, 3 Threads, 1 Trackbacks

  1. 1. Buck O'Fama

    “In my house growing up, The Times substituted for religion,” she said. “If The Times said it, it was the absolute truth.”

    So it’s NOT stupid to believe in stuff for which there is no empirical proof, it’s the STUFF one believes in that makes the belief stupid or not? Yeah, that makes TOTAL sense….

  2. 2. 1389AD

    People still READ that tired old rag?

    *facepalm*

  3. 3. unibummer

    I can hear Jill’s parents now,”Aw…Just look at those apple-cheeked kids in the Ukraine! Duranty says here that Joe Stalin is the ‘kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being he’s ever known in his life.”

One Trackback to “Life Among the Faithful: The Gray Lady as Substitute Religion”