Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

Old Testament or New?

May 3, 2011 - 12:43 pm - by Ed Driscoll

In 2009, Evan Thomas, then an editor at Newsweek, declared that President Obama, then less than five months in office, was “sort of God.” Yesterday, Newsweek-alumnus Howard Fineman concurs — “in almost Biblical terms.” At Newsbusters, Noel Sheppard writes:

As we watched President Obama tell us Sunday evening of Osama bin Laden’s death, we knew the media would be starting the Mother of all victory laps.

Not surprisingly out ahead of the cheering throngs was Huffington Post’s senior politics editor Howard Fineman with his Monday love letter “Obama Gets Osama: Goodbye Vietnam“:

Advertisement

By calmly and meticulously overseeing the successful targeting of Osama bin Laden, President Barack Obama just proved himself — vividly, in almost Biblical terms — to be an effective commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the United States.

Good night, Vietnam. Goodbye, George McGovern’s anti-war campaign of 1972. Goodbye, Jimmy Carter’s pathetically inept hostage-rescue mission in 1980. Goodbye, Bill Clinton and the draft.

Or so Democrats have at least some reason to hope.

“This is a definitional moment for voters,” said Democratic polltaker and strategist Geoffrey Garin. “There’s no question that the Republicans will make a ‘national security’ run at the president in 2012,” he said. “But the most tangible thing for voters will be that Obama got the central job done. A lot of people were involved in baking the cake, going back years, but the cake turned out well and voters will notice.”

In Fineman’s view, the murder of bin Laden Sunday erased decades of failed military strategies and policies by Democrat presidents going back to Lyndon Baines Johnson, and voters can now rest assured that a liberal Commander-in-Chief can be just as strong on national defense as a conservative one.

Wow, the once pacifistic-sounding Obama morphed into General Patton so quickly, I hardly even noticed. But let’s take it a bit slower on such war-mongering language. George Orwell noted in World War II that British intellectuals tended to assume that whomever was winning the war at any particularly time, their gains would be permanent. (See also: Kent Brockman immediately volunteering to join the League of Gentlemen Space Ants.) But that sort of thinking in the age of new media got the MSM into much trouble over the past decade. Or to put it another way:

A political party is dying before our eyes — and I don’t mean the Democrats. I’m talking about the “mainstream media,” which is being destroyed by the opposition (or worse, the casual disdain) of George Bush’s Republican Party; by competition from other news outlets (led by the internet and Fox’s canny Roger Ailes); and by its own fraying journalistic standards.

Howard Fineman in Newsweek, January 13, 2005.

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

2 Comments, 2 Threads, 2 Trackbacks

  1. 1. Buck O'Fama

    Casual disdain? I’d say it’s more like lip-curling eye-rolling sarcasm-laden contempt.

  2. 2. Steven H.

    “There, he did that fascist warmongering stuff you flyover people like so much. So vote for Obama, you morons! Gas prices? Oh, you people are never happy.”

2 Trackbacks to “Old Testament or New?”