Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

Nidal Hasan: Conservative?

November 17, 2009 - 12:31 pm - by Ed Driscoll

Huh — I must have missed him on the National Review Cruise last November. But as Allie Duzett of Accuracy In Media writes, America’s fourth-ranked cable news channel “is now claiming that Nidal Malik Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter, is a conservative”:

On November 10, 2009, CNN Special Investigations Correspondent Drew Griffin called Hasan “conservative,” and now that talking point is being spewed again on today’s front page online story.  The story, about Hasan’s search for a wife, discusses how two imams told CNN “about [Hasan’s] conservatism.”  The story also mentions Hasan’s “conservative” clothing choices.

However—what exactly about Hasan is conservative?

Fact: Islamofascism is not conservative, in any way.  Hating America is not conservative—conservatives tend to love their country.  Wanting to blow up America is not conservative—again, conservatives tend to love their country.  Hating people for their religion (or lack thereof) is not conservative—conservatives are not the ones trying to remove other people’s religions from the public sphere.

What Hasan did was not conservative.  Murdering men and women in the armed forces is not conservative—conservatives are traditionally the ones most supportive of our men and women in the armed forces.  Murdering fetuses is absolutely not conservative—conservatives tend to oppose abortion, and Hasan murdered a pregnant woman and her unborn child. And of course, wearing traditional clothing—even Islamic clothing—does not make you a conservative.  While I don’t believe the story meant to imply that Hasan’s clothing linked him to a conservative ideology, I believe the writer could have picked a better word for it.  Hasan may have been religious, but religiosity never makes one conservative, even if that person is a traditionalist within the religion.

This is just another case of CNN’s reporters creating a link to conservatism where there really is none.

Meanwhile, as Kathy Shaidle notes, for a “conservative”, Hasan sure knew his leftwing psychobabble.

Update: Karol Sheinin of the Alaming News blog notes that Wolf Blitzer has also taken to calling Hasan “conservative”:

Wolf Blitzer just described Ft. Hood shooter as “Conservative Muslim Major”. Was he for low taxes? Smaller govt? Tell me more, Wolf.

And of course, CNN is the go-to source for expert opinion regarding conservatism in general. Just ask Anderson Cooper and Rick Sanchez.

Update: Meanwhile, over at MSNBC, it’s Maddow at Most Orwellian: Murder of Abortion Doctor ‘Terrorism’ — But Not Ft. Hood Massacre by Jihadist.”

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

2 Comments, 2 Threads

  1. As far as lefties are concerned, conservatives are as a whole gun toting militaristic religious fanatics so, you know, three for three. Nidal Hassan must be a conservative. Progressive logic in action.

  2. 2. Jack

    Once again Iowahawk is ahead of the curve

    http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/11/headline-roundup-1.html

    What’s that you say about how hard it is for satire to beat reality?