As Hugh Hewitt writes, “Susan Roesgen Brands CNN.” Though they earned the sobriquet in the headline of Hugh’s post (and quoted above) long before the crossfire train wrecks involving Roesgen and Anderson Cooper:
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.
Journalism 101: Be hyper-efficient. Argue with the public, because this advanced method allows you to trump courtesy, professionalism, humility and reason at the same time, what a deal!
Are we allowed to speculate about whether this woman has a boss, somewhere in the CNN ranks, and this boss also has a boss, etc…, or is responsibility an obsolete concept, a distraction to be eliminated?
Come on folks…CNN didn’t want its viewers to know what tea parties were all about…and they don’t have much regard for Ms Roesgen either or they wouldn’t have put her in so much right-wing-extremist danger. And she nailed when she said her short fair and balanced blurb wasn’t
“really family viewing”!