Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

Black And Whitewashing History

February 15, 2009 - 11:50 am - by Ed Driscoll

To get a sense of just how far movie attempting to recreate true-to-life events can distort the truth, check out this post by frequent Pajamas-contributor Kathy Shaidle. It’s primary subject is a film about the “Montreal Massacre”, which Mark Steyn describes thusly:

Every December 6th, my own unmanned Dominion lowers its flags to half-mast and tries to saddle Canadian manhood in general with the blame for the “Montreal massacre,” the 14 female students of the Ecole Polytechnique murdered by Marc Lepine (born Gamil Gharbi, the son of an Algerian Muslim wife-beater, though you’d never know that from the press coverage). As I wrote up north a few years ago:

Yet the defining image of contemporary Canadian maleness is not M Lepine/Gharbi but the professors and the men in that classroom, who, ordered to leave by the lone gunman, meekly did so, and abandoned their female classmates to their fate — an act of abdication that would have been unthinkable in almost any other culture throughout human history. The “men” stood outside in the corridor and, even as they heard the first shots, they did nothing. And, when it was over and Gharbi walked out of the room and past them, they still did nothing. Whatever its other defects, Canadian manhood does not suffer from an excess of testosterone.

Advertisement

As Kathy explains, perhaps the least of the problems with the purported docudrama is that it’s shot in black and white, even though the shooter’s rampage took place in 1989. (“Yeah, the 80s were totally in black and white”, she jokes. “Remember that? It made laundry so much easier…”). But in addition to deconstructing this black and whitewashed movie, she also deconstructs an unintentionally absurd newspaper article about it, filled with dozens of classic bobos-in-paradise hyper-sentimental buzzwords.

One quibble–Kathy writes:

Somebody put this article in a time capsule for posterity — this precious example of brainless, default progressive “thinking” must be preserved.

Because it is the default mode of thinking, particularly within the legacy media, it seems likely that the florid emotionalism that drives that mindset will be around for an extremely long period time.

Related: Of course, film is far from the only medium which distorts history–Robert Stacy McCain explores “‘The ransom note method’ of quotation”, here.

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

2 Comments, 2 Threads

  1. I thought that leftist orthodoxy was that when citizens were threatened, they were supposed to rely on police and other authorities to take care of miscreants, and not to fight back on their own.

    Sounds like exactly what those men are claimed to have done. Doesn’t that make them examples of good obedient citizens which we should honor and imitate?

  2. 2. Micha Elyi

    Steven Den Beste makes a good point.

    Still, no committed feminist woman would ever call the police for help. They’re so male-dominated, you know. We must ask why the campus Take Back the Night marchers failed to respond.

    (Sheesh, feminists!)