Get PJ Media on your Apple

Rubin Reports

Why the ‘Arab Peace Initiative’ Is Both a Good Thing and a Scam

April 30th, 2013 - 2:31 pm

There’s something very strange about this alleged new Arab League peace initiative and I find no serious addressing of these issues in the media coverage. A step toward efforts by Arab states to move toward proposing a possible peace with Israel is a good thing. Especially touted is an idea, mentioned by Qatar’s representative at the Washington meeting, to accept an agreement that small border modifications could be made to the pre-1967 lines.

Here’s how the Associated Press reported on this, with the headline, Arab League sweetens Israel-Palestinian peace plan“:

The Arab League’s decision to sweeten its decade-old proposal offering comprehensive peace with Israel has placed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a bind and swiftly exposed fissures in his new government.

In other words, you’d have to be a fool or a knave to reject this deal and the issue has divided Israel’s government. Yet chief negotiator Tzipi Livni was right to have reacted positively to the proposal and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be right to ultimately reject it.

After all, there are a lot of unaddressed points in the coverage that make me strongly suspect that this is a public relations stunt to convince America and Western opinion that the Arab states want peace with Israel when not all of them do.

And that’s one of the key questions. At the meeting with Secretary of State John Kerry there were representatives of the Arab League, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the Palestinian Authority.

But Arab League bureaucrats can’t agree on anything. Only a vote of the Arab League’s almost two dozen members can establish an official position. So this was not an Arab League plan at all. To represent it as an official Arab position is, then, untrue.

Indeed, we already know that the Palestinian Authority (PA) opposes this formula. At any rate, the United States cannot even get the PA to negotiate with Israel and yet fantasies of comprehensive peace are spread around by it. The mass media is cooperating in this theme, seeking to make Kerry look good at least.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (1)
All Comments   (1)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
This is very well argued - as usual. I'll add that there is a wealth of experience to be considered as well; the peace with Egypt e.g. It has been argued that the peace was made with the leadership but not the people; this then nullifes everything. Another argument is that as peace has not been achieved with the Palestinians - this was mentioned in the Accord - the Accord is null and Egypt is free to go to war with Israel.

Western leaders have seldom stood up to such barbarous logic and the leftist ones sometimes even espouse it.

I do not think peace is possible until the Muslim World undergoes a complete transformation. (I also think this could actually happen. I've seen the "West" become stupid in a short space of time and assume a reverse of the process is possible too.)
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All