LIMITED TIME DEAL: Toniiq Ultra High Strength 1500mg NAD+ Supplement. #CommissionEarned
April 26, 2025
TROLLING? MAYBE. AMAZING TROLLING: Maybe Trump Does Deserve a Third Term.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROPHECY:
Heh, indeed. Here’s the underlying article by the Bee:
The young man had previously had his sights set on earning a degree from a prestigious educational institution before coming to the realization that he could save a fortune by teaching himself how to hate Israel at home.
“I was all set to go to university, but I realized I could just learn all about hating Jews from people on the Internet,” Doulton said. “It’s really saved me a lot of time and let me start hating Jews faster than all my friends.”
For those who followed Candace Owens’ many zigs and zags through conspiracy theory land, the last sentence of the Bee’s article is a hoot.
NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW? WATCH: Scott Jennings Brings Reality Check to Judge Dugan’s Arrest.
AS WITH HUMANS, DIFFERENT STRATEGIES: Some male mice fiercely guard females within their territories, while others seek out quick flings.
PURE HOSS: Theodore Roosevelt Championed Individual Virtue And Adventure.
Roosevelt’s politics and political thought are bounded by the twin principles of promise and performance. For individual and country alike, promise is bound to an understanding of civilization and virtue. The educated, civilized individual has a duty to engage in public service for the advancement of society toward greater development of its civilized life. This requires individual virtue, or character, as Roosevelt would often refer to it, and the premier virtue was courage. It is courage that inspires the individual to throw his hat in the ring to do his duty, and which supports him through the challenges that such public service presents. Likewise, the country is also to fulfill its duty in the service of civilization or else suffer the justifiable and deserved reprobation of those countries made of sterner stuff. The country, like the individual, brings to its task the fruits of its ancestry. The race characteristics, as Roosevelt termed them, of any country, are of great importance to its effort to fulfill its duty and to shoulder its share of worldly burdens. The dissolute individual and country will both face the prospect of losing ground absolutely as well as in relation to those that strenuously pursue their duty to civilization.
Roosevelt believed that the United States of his time was abundantly endowed with the attributes of promise: an energetic, free, and virtuous citizenry dedicated to noble Anglo-Saxon ideals and principles. Fulfillment of its promise, however, required prudence in selecting the means through which the country could perform at a level commensurate with its promise. Domestically, the country had to maintain, if not improve, its level of virtue, which required opposition to political tendencies toward either utopianism or plutocracy. Roosevelt consistently pursued policies intended to improve education and virtue while at the same time restricting anarchist and socialist pursuit of utopian ideals, and regulating the plutocratic influences of wealth and big business.
Teddy was the definitive Great Man of history. So it wasn’t much of a surprise that the eunuchs of the 2020-era left wanted to cancel him and tear down his statues: Adieu, Teddy Roosevelt.
I think it is a pity that the Traveling Racism Outrage Mob (TROM) has it in for Teddy Roosevelt. I agree with President Trump who, when he heard the news, tweeted “Ridiculous, don’t do it!” Quite right. For one thing, TROM could learn some useful life lessons from Teddy Roosevelt. Although there is much in his progressive politics with which I disagree, I greatly admire him for his character and determination. A sickly boy, plagued by asthma, he nonetheless devoted himself to the “strenuous life” and achieved great things. Above all, he did not whine.
That is one thing our professional anti-racists and identity-politics ideologues — especially feminists — could learn with profit: stop whining about how unfair life is to you and do something to improve your lot. You would thus make everyone around you happier, and you would be happier yourself.
Teddy Roosevelt also had a deep social-political message that our generation, especially paid-up members of TROM, should rediscover. “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin,’ he wrote in his autobiography, ‘would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.”
He was thinking of the habit of calling recent immigrants Italian-American or Irish-Americans or German-Americans. He was dead set against this practice of coining “hyphenated Americans.” He would not have been surprised to discover that the lowly hyphen was a potent weapon in the divisive armory of multiculturalism and identity politics. When we speak of an African-American or Mexican-American or Asian-American these days, the aim is not descriptive but deconstructive. There is a polemical edge to it, a provocation. The hyphen does not mean “American, but hailing at some point in the past from someplace else.” It means “only provisionally American: my allegiance is divided at best.”
And of course, no “Progressive” journalist ever confronted Hillary Clinton about her longtime allegiance to the man the Year Zero far left attempted to toss down the memory hole in 202o-2021:
● Shot: “I think that Teddy Roosevelt was a great American.”
—Hillary Clinton in a May 1, 2008 interview with Bill O’Reilly.
● Double-Shot: “It’s time to take a page from Teddy Roosevelt’s book and get our economy working for Americans again. That’s what I’ll do as president.”
—Hillary, as quoted in an October 28, 2015 Dow Jones Marketwatch.com article titled “Hillary Clinton wants to be Teddy Roosevelt.”
● Hangover:
I’M NO EXPERT BUT THAT SEEMS LIKE BAD POLITICS TO ME:
When you call Trump Hitler, you're calling the majority of Americans making under $100K a year Nazis—for the crime of refusing to cosign their disinheritance. Multi-millionaire liberals sneer at and smear the working class for wanting a future for their kids. It's disgusting. pic.twitter.com/qduGTBygYp
— Batya Ungar-Sargon (@bungarsargon) April 25, 2025
MILE MARKERS ON THE ROAD TO TRUMP: Why Democrats Should Hate (And Republicans Should Love) Barack Obama, the Foundational MAGA Warrior.
Obama was reportedly telling people that it “made the most sense” for Biden to only serve one term rather than “test fate again at eighty-one years old,” according to Allen and Parnes. As president, Biden was obsessed with outshining his former boss. He would celebrate perceived accomplishments by saying, “Obama would be jealous.” Biden was hardly alone in his resentment of Obama and his minions. His inner circle, including Dr. Jill, was just as driven by their spite. According to Whipple, by the time Biden was forced out of the race in July of last year, “almost everyone” in the president’s camp “blamed Barack Obama.” Perhaps the main reason why Biden decided to quickly endorse Kamala Harris after dropping out was because he knew how much it would annoy Obama, who had “deep misgivings” about the VP and favored a “mini-primary” he was sure Harris would lose. “[T]he most satisfying aspect of his decision to endorse had little to do with Harris,” Allen and Parnes report. “‘It was a fuck-you to Obama’s plan,’ said one person close to both men. ‘At that moment, you have very few things you control, and that’s the one thing he had control over, and he chose to stick it to Obama.'”
As a result, Democrats were stuck with a candidate who was arguably even worse than Hillary Clinton. Trump sailed to victory and even won the popular vote, paving the way for America’s restoration and a new Golden Age. Thanks, Obama. Few have done more to ensure Trump’s success, which is also America’s success. He might never have run if Obama had been more respectful in 2011. He might not have won in 2016 if Obama hadn’t picked such a terrible successor, and he might not have won so easily in 2024 if not for the petty feud between Obama and Biden, a pair of raging narcissists. This turned out great for America, so perhaps it’s time for Republicans to start appreciating Obama’s contributions to the cause. On the other hand, if you are an obnoxious Democrat who despises this country and thinks Donald Trump is Adolf Hitler, you should probably hate the guy.
In his classic 1993 American Spectator article, P.J. O’Rourke explored “100 Reasons Why Jimmy Carter Was a Better President than Bill Clinton:” before concluding, “100. And let us not forget that Jimmy Carter gave us one thing Bill Clinton can never possibly give us—Ronald Reagan.”
Our 21st century Jimmy Carter concluded his second and third terms by securing the presidency of Donal Trump. Perhaps Barry sees him as much more of a kindred spirit and showman than either Hillary or Sundown Joe:
UNDER THE RADAR, SIGNIFICANT CHANGE:
For the past 7 weeks, @SocialSecurity has been executing a major cleanup of their records. Approximately 11 million numberholders, all listed age 120+, have now been marked deceased. Another ~1.4 million to go with expected completion in 2 weeks. https://t.co/wtfYvYNg4u pic.twitter.com/LBWRge9pzu
— Department of Government Efficiency (@DOGE) April 24, 2025
IT’S COME TO THIS: How Did Having Babies Become Right-Wing?
I suspect it was because I’m visibly pregnant.
On my way into the hall, I encountered ten protesters wearing surgical masks, all apparently in their early 20s. They were holding signs that declared, “NO Nazis in Austin!” and “Natalism Nazism,” and when they saw me approaching, several members screamed at me: “Nazi!”
When I clarified that I was not a Nazi, but a reporter, they calmed down, but I did wonder if it was my bump that had riled them up. I asked what they were doing here, and they identified themselves as members of Austin Students for a Democratic Society. The organizer of the protest, Arishia Papri, 20, was dressed in a fedora, purple suit, and bow tie; I asked him, “Is it fair to shout at attendees who have young children with them?”
“I think everyone who came to this, who’s coming to this, knows what they are here for,” he replied. “This is a conference of neo-Nazi, eugenic, racist, pseudoscientific ideologies.”
This was not, as it turned out, an accurate description of NatalCon, though it was certainly representative of the left’s reaction to it.
Established in 2023 by Kevin Dolan, a Mormon father of six and a conservative influencer, NatalCon is a response to the fact that, in America—as in dozens of nations across the world—the birth rate has fallen well below the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman. In 2023, U.S. fertility hit a historical low of 1.62. The strange thing is, it’s not that Americans don’t want babies: Men and women, of all demographics, consistently report wanting more kids than they ultimately have.
Isn’t everything right-wing these days?
According to the Grauniad, fitness is definitely right-wing:
THIS IS NOT A RANDOM CONSEQUENCE, BUT THE PREDICTABLE — AND PREDICTED — RESULT OF TERRIBLE POLICIES: Cancer prevention not fully recovered from pandemic era declines, study says.
WATCH: Scott Jennings Delivers Perfect Response to CNN Hand-Wringing Over Judge Dugan’s Arrest:
JENNINGS: Why wouldn’t you want to make a spectacle of it? I mean, the fact of the matter is, there are Liberal Democrat elected officials, not all are judges, some are mayors and others, all over this country who have said repeatedly since Donald Trump became the president that they would like to obstruct his principles and his program when it comes to deporting illegal immigrants. Here, you have this person, if these facts are proven true, obviously that’s exactly what she’s trying to do here.
(Crosstalk and arguing)
JENNINGS: Let me tell you my view. The spectacle is important because the message has to be sent to everybody else, “We are not going to put up…you have been elected by people to uphold the law, and some of the laws that have been most flagrantly violated in his country are immigraiton laws. You’ve got to get on board with upholding all the laws.
To be fair, legal nullification has long been an important Democratic Party trademark.
UPDATE NEWSPEAK DICTIONARIES ACCORDINGLY, COMRADE! Liberal Media Ditching “Food Deserts” Term For Far More Inflammatory-Sounding “Food Apartheid.”
Having worn out the use of ‘Hitler’ over the last decade, the liberal media is searching for its next sensationalist descriptor for an otherwise innocuous “injustice” deserving of unlimited taxpayer dollars.
This go-round, the media is replacing their loaded “food desert” term with “food apartheid”. Because, hey, when there isn’t a World War II or full blown civil rights style crisis on the media’s hands to all them to argue their ideologies…why not just invent one?
“The Associated Press periodically tweaks its style guide—often to make its left‑wing activism more subtle. Progressive activists do the same, inventing controversies out of thin air. Where we once spoke of “food deserts,” the Radical Left now insists on “food apartheid”—and expects us to pretend this contrived concept is happening in Seattle,” Jason Rantz of 770 KTTH argues.
Rantz points out in an article out this morning that Seattle Times columnist Naomi Ishisaka pushes the idea that racism is behind the lack of quality grocery stores in areas like south Seattle compared to whiter neighborhoods.
“While ‘food desert’ might lead people to think there’s something inevitable… ‘food apartheid’ argues that these inequities are the result of intentional choices, and can be changed,” she writes.
To be fair, she’s got a point on that one, albeit possibly not the one she thinks she’s making: Defund The Police + Decriminalize Shoplifting = “Food Deserts.” And “pharmacy deserts” as well. And where the drugstore is still open in an urban area, everything behind locked shelving, encased in plastic anti-theft containers, or both:
UPDATE: Speaking of blue state theft and everything being locked in plastic:
😂😂😂 feel good story of today. https://t.co/LaKEe66K7P
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) April 26, 2025
VIRGINIA GIUFFRE’S DEATH SPARKS OUTRAGE… AND DOUBT.
It didn’t take long for speculation to explode online, with many suggesting Virginia Giuffre’s death was no accident at all. Given her role in exposing powerful figures tied to Jeffrey Epstein, plenty of users floated the idea that she was silenced to protect the elites. Some posts went even further, bluntly calling it a “planned murder” and blasting authorities for what they described as a “state-sanctioned” cover-up.
The sad reality is, her death leaves behind more questions than answers—and a legacy that won’t be easily scrubbed away. Whether you believe the official story or see something darker at work, one thing is clear: Giuffre had the courage to stand up against some of the most powerful and protected people on Earth. And if the forces she fought against think her death buries the truth, they’re sorely mistaken. The fight she helped spark is still raging—and the reckoning isn’t over yet.
Earlier: Virginia Giuffre, Prince Andrew Accuser, Dies By Suicide Aged 41.
SEE AT NIGHT: Night Vision Goggles. #CommissionEarned
WHAT A SURPRISE: Yikes! John Kerry Blew a Gasket on MSNBC.
SETH BARRETT TILLMAN: How Soon They Forget: Arresting State Judges. With the left, history always began three weeks ago. “What is described above happened under President Obama and under President Lincoln. Judges are not above the law; judges cannot interpose their courthouse and personal rules and policies against federal officers. And when state judges violate the law, they must be arrested . . . like you and me and anyone else. We all know that—or, at least, we should.”
No one is above the law, as everyone was saying until, well, yesterday.
IT’S UNWISE TO GO TO THE MATTRESSES WHEN YOU DON’T HAVE MANY MATTRESSES: Coequal Branches? It’s Time for Trump to Stick It to the Judiciary.
LIMITED TIME DEAL: eufy X10 Pro Omni Robot Vacuum and Mop Combo. #CommissionEarned
SELF-MARGINALIZATION: The Ivy League Is Being Hoist on Its Own Petard. “Trump’s ‘trump card’ against these institutions is not their use of federal dollars to preach and teach hatred against America, and especially conservatives, but rather their open violation of federal law in promoting ‘social justice.'”
DID THE LEFT’S CLOWARD-PIVEN STRATEGY FAIL? Depends on the numbers and the strategic assumptions you make, as I demonstrate on PJ Media this morning. If success is defined as eliminating poverty, the answer clearly is no. But even more clear is that Cloward-Piven has been a roaring success if it’s real purpose was moving America toward a substantially socialist model.
