May 25, 2005
JON HENKE writes that 2006 might be the Democrats’ 1994, as the Republican Congress grows less popular while not accomplishing much.
JON HENKE writes that 2006 might be the Democrats’ 1994, as the Republican Congress grows less popular while not accomplishing much.
MICHAEL YOUNG: “Those who accuse the Bush administration of incompetence in the Middle East because of events in Iraq may soon have to temper that with an assessment of its shrewder behavior in Lebanon.” Of course, the latter was made possible by the former.
RON BAILEY REPORTS on the Kansas Intelligent Design hearings:
Who needs to make monkeys out of the Kansas Board of Education when its members are doing such a good job of it themselves? . . .
The anti-evolutionists affect not to know who or what the “intelligent designer” of their theory might be. He, she, it, or they could be little green men or purple space squid or a race of intelligent supercomputers—or maybe, just maybe, an omnipotent God. Who knows? We’re all just innocently asking “scientific” questions here.
But away from the glare of media attention, this pose of scientific objectivity cracks. “ID has theological implications. ID is not strictly Christian, but it is theistic,” admitted board member Martin. The intelligent design proponents in Kansas ask: Why not let children in public schools hear arguments for intelligent design in biology classes? Schools could “teach the controversy.”
Biologists retort by asking, “So it’s OK then for high schools to teach astrology, phrenology, mesmerism, tarot card reading, crystal healing, astral projection and water witching, too?”
Personally, I’m a Tiplerite.
MORE CRUSHING OF DISSENT:
ROME (Reuters) – A judge has ordered best-selling writer and journalist Oriana Fallaci to stand trial in her native Italy on charges she defamed Islam in a recent book.
Fabrizio Quattrochi was unavailable for comment. However, Jeff Goldstein sees this as a “velvet insurgency.”
Basically, where people warn about theocracy in the United States, we’re seeing what amounts to a trial for blasphemy in Italy.
Tom Wolfe once said that Fascism is forever descending on the United States, but that somehow it always lands on Europe. Perhaps the same is true with theocracy?
HERE’S AN INTERESTING PASSAGE from the filibuster-compromise memo:
We believe that, under Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the word “Advice” speaks to consultation between the Senate and the President with regard to the use of the President’s power to make nominations. We encourage the Executive branch of government to consult with members of the Senate, both Democratic and Republican, prior to submitting a judicial nomination to the Senate for consideration.
I suppose that I should see this as a sort of vindication, since I recommended just that approach in an article entitled Taking Advice Seriously: An Immodest Proposal for Reforming the Confirmation Process, published in the Southern California Law Review some years back, though I suspect that they’re not willing to go quite as far as I suggested..
I guess that makes me a member of the Coalition of the Chillin’.
GATEWAY PUNDIT has more on Uzbekistan. Karimov is cozying up to China, whose leaders are understandably disturbed by the spread of democracy in the region, and untroubled by Karimov’s Tiananmen-like massacre.
PARTY LIKE IT’S 1999: Reader Clark Ghitis sends this from the WSJ (subscription only):
The number of millionaires in the U.S. increased to a record last year, boosted by gains in stocks and global financial markets, according to two new studies.
The number of U.S. households with a net worth of $1 million or more rose 21% in 2004, according to a survey released yesterday by Spectrem Group, a wealth-research firm in Chicago. It is the largest increase since 1998, according to the study, which was based on data from more than 450 qualified respondents. There now are 7.5 million millionaire households in the U.S., breaking the record set in 1999 of 7.1 million. The study excluded the value of primary residences, but included second homes and other real estate.
The InstaPundit household isn’t among those new millionaires, though.
UPDATE: No, sadly, we’re not among those old millionaires, either.
The American chestnut, prized for its timber and its crop of glossy dark nuts, once dominated Eastern forests from Maine to Georgia. The graceful trees were virtually wiped out by blight starting at the turn of the 20th century.
That loss, Case said, “was the greatest environmental disaster in the Western Hemisphere since the Ice Age.”
Now, after years of breeding, cloning and crossbreeding, the U.S. Department of Agriculture is ready to reintroduce disease-resistant chestnuts to Eastern forests next year.
Maybe we’ll get the elms back, too.
UPDATE: Reader Greg Hlatky sends this link to elm-restoration efforts.
ZARQAWI, AL QAEDA, AND SADDAM: Austin Bay has some observations.
HOWARD FINEMAN SUGGESTS — perhaps a bit hopefully — that the filibuster compromise represents a political turning point:
A generation ago, voters turned against the Democrats for the excesses of their welfare-state, big-government thinking. Washington WASN’T the answer to everything.
But, voters may conclude, the Bible isn’t either. They could turn against the GOP if they think the party is sacrificing the American tradition of pragmatism and respect for scientific progress – on, say, stem-cell research – in favor of religious fundamentalism, however sincere. Take a look at some of the key supporters of stem-cell research: Nancy Reagan, to name one – not to mention corporate executives who don’t want to see research money and energy drift away to other countries. Two religions are in collision, one of them secular and scientific, the other Biblical.
I’ve been warning of this for a while, and I think it bears repeating: Americans, for the most part, don’t share in the reflexive hostility to religion found in the upper reaches of journalism and the academy. On the other hand, Americans don’t like self-righteous busybodies — whether of the PC left or the religious right — telling them how to live, either.
There’s a relatively small group — under 20% of the electorate, I’d guess — that would really like to recast American society under far more religiously determined lines. That’s enough to steer the Republican party to disaster, as a similar group has done for the Democrats, but not enough to win elections much. The Democrats’ problem, of course, is that they’re even more dominated by their fringe than the Republicans, and the fact that the media establishment tends to share those views will make it harder for them to extricate themselves from this fix.
FUTURES MARKETS ELICIT INSIDER INFORMATION: I mentioned earlier that London bookmakers are giving odds on which character will be killed off in the next Harry Potter book. Now — spoiler alert — it seems that this has caused information to leak out. Tom Maguire has more, and notes that this supports the “futures on terror” idea.
I’ve got a modest proposal to Ted Koppel and “Nightline”: why don’t you read one day the names and show the pictures of the 170,000 or so American servicemen and women stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan who every day are working their hardest to ensure that democracy takes root, terrorists are defeated, and these two countries have a chance to build a better future for their people. That might convince a cynic such as myself that you really care for the troops generally, and not just only when they can be cynically used to embarrass the Bush Administration.
It would take more than that to convince me, but this would be a start.
THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE IN BOLIVIA: I blame Hugo Chavez.
PRODUCT DESIGN MEETS VERSION FATIGUE: My TechCentralStation column for tomorrow addresses this subject — but for you, as InstaPundit PremiumTM subscribers (the only kind there are), it’s available now!
BLOG ENTRY solves murder.
DEMOCRACY, WHISKEY — can “sexy” be far behind?
EASONGATE II CONTINUES, with this observation:
At the Communications Workers of America, Candice Johnson said she could not provide any evidence for Foley’s revival of the Eason Jordan charges. Linda Foley refused requests for an interview.
Retired Air Force General Thomas McInerney, a Fox News military consultant, was “frankly astonished.”
“It may be legitimate to investigate whether there may or may not have been an incident in which U.S. troops have targeted journalists, but there is no question at this point that major media figures are targeting the men and women of the United States military in Iraq, repeatedly and with no evidence,” he said.
MICHAEL TOTTEN says the Washington Post is misreporting on Lebanon.
A PARTY-VOTE ANALYSIS of the House stem-cell research vote.
BILL MAHER CAN RELAX, because Rob Smith is defending him against charges of treason.
THIS WEEK’S CARNIVAL OF REVOLUTIONS is up.
ALPHECCA’S WEEKLY ROUNDUP OF BIAS in media reporting on guns is up.
WHILE I’M WISHING GAS GANGRENE ON ZARQAWI, I’m about ready to wish it on the bastards from “The Bullseye Network” whose miserable adware is on my daughter’s computer.
UPDATE: Ran the MS antispyware beta and seem to have gotten rid of it, along with a bunch of other crap — but I had to do manual surgery before I could even access the Internet to download the program from MS. (I’ve used AdAware for this before, but wanted to give the MS version a try; seemed fine.)
Kids’ sites seem to be especially infested with this crap, which is particularly unforgivable.
UPDATE: Yep, reader Ben Cooper sends a link to this report confirming my suspicion that even reputable kids’ sites are adware nightmares:
Mainstream children’s Web sites host a glut of adware, a security firm said this week, proof that spyware makers are targeting kids in an attempt to slip by parents and get their software onto home computers.
Over a three-month period, said Kraig Lane, a group product manager in Symantec’s consumer division, his lab took new PCs out of the box, connected them to the Internet without monkeying with any of the default settings in Windows XP SP2, then surfed well-known sites in several categories, ranging from kids and sports to news and shopping.
“Our testers went to name-brand Web sites, and spent 30 minutes to an hour reading or interacting with sites,” said Lane. Testers tried to emulate real-world browser by reading articles, interacting with the site’s features, but not explicitly looking to accumulate files by downloading. “Then they ran spyware detection software and counted up what kind of security risks and how many files had been installed on the machines,” Lane said.
Children were the biggest target for spyware makers, by far. The trip to several kids’ sites installed a whopping 359 pieces of adware on Symantec’s PCs, five times more than the nearest category rival, travel. Popup ads proliferated on the machines after that, making them virtually unusable.
Message to the folks at NeoPets: Clean up your act.
AUSTIN BAY POINTS TO a useful article on security in Iraq.
IN A HOLE, NEWSWEEK keeps digging. “We retracted, but we didn’t really mean it!”
CAN WE-DIA SAVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT FROM MEDIA? Some thoughts over at GlennReynolds.com.
BILL QUICK ASKS:
What was the last “big one” that secular, small-government, constitutionalist conservatives won under the GWB administration?
If you give me a week, I might think of something.
UPDATE: Interesting discussion in Bill’s comments. Reader Thomas Manning sends this link to a post by Virginia Postrel on the Bush Administration’s regulatory philosophy, which is better than its predecessor’s.
Meanwhile, reader James De Benedetti answers Bill’s question: “That would be Social Security privatization, which you don’t seem too thrilled about.”
Er, we’ve “won” that one? I’d be thrilled if we did, but I don’t think it’s ready to go into the victory column.
CHUCK SIMMINS has a report, with photos, from an anti-Bush protest over Social Security.
MICROMEDIA challenging dictatorship in North Korea.
A REUTERS-ERROR FISKING: On Hummingbirds!
ARABS ARE DOING MUCH BETTER IN AMERICA than anywhere else. This raises questions:
This census data should prompt soul-searching in many quarters. Cultural determinists may want to revise their theories of Arab backwardness. Arab leaders should be ashamed when they see their emigrants prospering in the United States while their own people are miserable. And Europe should wake up to the possibility that it may have less of an “Arab problem” than a “European problem.” Then again, maybe the cultural determinists have an explanation for why Europeans are so predisposed against Arab success.
(Via Daniel Drezner, who advises “read the whole thing” — good phrase! — and who has some interesting stuff in his comments, too).
IF THE SAUDIS DON’T LIKE HIM, I’m inclined to think he might be OK.
NOAM SCHEIBER on the filibuster deal:
So a deal has been struck on the filibuster. Republicans will allow Democrats to keep the filibuster as long as Democrats never use it. This way, both sides win (except for the Democrats).
Once again, the Republicans have shown their skillfulness when it comes to resetting parameters. Until recently, the perception had been that Bush had consistently filled the courts with extreme conservatives, with only a handful of truly batty nominees failing to meet the standards of Democrats. Now, facing the threat of the “nuclear option,” Democrats have backed down on these as well.
Well, the compromise certainly seems to have produced bipartisan unhappiness. I don’t know if that’s a mark in its favor or not.
UPDATE: Josh Trevino is unhappy, too, but for different reasons.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Oops, my mistake. That’s not Noam Scheiber, but T.A. Frank, who’s filling in for him at &c.
FORENSIC ACCOUNTANTS are testifying on the Canadian scandals. Newsbeat 1 is covering it.
AL QAEDA SAYS ZARQAWI IS WOUNDED, and asks for prayers.
Is it unChristian to pray for gas gangrene?
UPDATE: Reader David Cushing emails:
Of course it is un-Christian to pray that Zarqawi gets gas gangrene. The correct thing to pray for is that he is captured immediately, so that he has the resources of modern western medicine available to him to assist in his speedy recovery. After all, we want him healthy for his trial.
Well, OK, I guess.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Another prayer from LT Smash.
WANT HEALTH-CARE BLOGGING? This week’s Grand Rounds is up!
DEATH BY A THOUSAND BLOGS: Nick Kristof writes on the impact of citizen media:
The Chinese Communist Party survived a brutal civil war with the Nationalists, battles with American forces in Korea and massive pro-democracy demonstrations at Tiananmen Square. But now it may finally have met its match – the Internet. . . .
Mr. Li travels around China with an I.B.M. laptop and a digital camera, investigating cases of official wrongdoing. Then he writes about them on his Web site and skips town before the local authorities can arrest him.
His biggest case so far involved a deputy mayor of Jining who is accused of stealing more than $400,000 and operating like a warlord. One of the deputy mayor’s victims was a businesswoman whom he allegedly harassed and tried to kidnap.
Mr. Li’s Web site published an investigative report, including a series of photos showing the deputy mayor kneeling and crying, apparently begging not to be reported to the police. The photos caused a sensation, and the deputy mayor was soon arrested.
Heh. Tim Worstall thinks that this is an argument for PJ Media. So do I.
UPDATE: Mark Daniels has a somewhat less sunny take.
THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE IN ZIMBABWE, hard as that might be to believe. It’s the Cambodia of Africa.
GARY FARBER POSTS the inevitable Sith post-mortem, including a rather detailed look at the script.
ARTHUR CHRENKOFF ROUNDS UP more underreported news from Iraq.
THE ARAB STREET EXPLODES: In laughter.
THERE’S A FILIBUSTER COMPROMISE, but John Hinderaker is deeply disappointed.
As I’ve said before, I’d probably care more about this issue if Bush looked likely to appoint some small-government libertarian types to the bench. Since he doesn’t, I don’t.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Some people are saying I told you so. “I said they didn’t have the votes on 29 April. The hard core Republicans need to be nicer to the RINOs. They aren’t going anywhere without them.”
EUGENE VOLOKH CRITICIZES people who are undermining trust in the judicial system.
BILL ARDOLINO notes some shady photo-cropping at the Washington Post. This wasn’t in the Web version, so I missed it.
Maybe this is part of some devious plan to boost print circulation . . . .
JEFF GOLDSTEIN has a rare serious post on where South Park Republicans really stand. Not being one of those myself, I can’t say, but he seems to hit the right note — though the first commenter expresses disappointment at a lack of “dick jokes.”
UPDATE: Related thoughts here, with a thought on how the blogosphere needs to develop:
However, while the pure number of bloggers might actually rival the number of individuals making up the MSM, their disadvantage has more to do with organization and resources than pure number.
Fox News has not realized its significant growth because it riffs on CNN and ABC fodder everyday. It has developed into a MSM organization with its own view and brand while market dynamics have revealed a vast audience for its content. I suspect the same would or will be true when blogs finally get around to generating original news content, as opposed to a rehash of the day’s MSM offerings.
I’m not faulting Goldstein or Cole, there’s more right than wrong in both their essays. But until blogs develop into a form capable of genuinely reporting news, as well as standing for and not just against something, they’re destined to occupy a compartmentalized fringe on both sides of the political equation.
There’s a lot of truth to that, which is why I’ve been boosting the idea of original blog-reporting. Call it news without newspapers.
UPDATE: Bill Quick discovers that in-progress crime reporting is harder than he thought. Don’t feel bad, Bill — even Big Media folks have problems with this. But never be shy about shoving a camera in people’s faces.
ANOTHER UPDATE: BlackFive joins the conversation.
UZBEKISTAN’S NOT-SO-GREAT GAME:
If the United States reacts to the Uzbek uprising based upon its articulated principle of supporting democracy, is it not repeating the mistakes of the Carter era, undermining an ally, and potentially paving the way for something worse?
Though there is some legitimacy to this concern, casting 2005 Uzbekistan in the role of 1979 Iran is an error. First, though Uzbekistan has been a meaningful ally in the War on Terror, Uzbekistan cannot be considered a staunch, long-term ally of the United States. Over the past several years, Uzbekistan has actively moved away from the West, towards an alliance of authoritarian states. Second, not all revolutions in Islamic countries are alike. The uprising in Uzbekistan is part of a larger international trend. The Iranian revolution was not. It inspired no imitators. No government outside of Iran has been toppled by a revolution based on the Iranian model. Uzbeks, on the other hand, have been observing a string of revolutions in countries with which they share a common history. . . .
China and Russia are standing behind their Shanghai Cooperation Organization partner. The foreign ministries of both countries have expressed support for Uzbekistan’s methods of maintaining order. Those who believe that the word “multilateral” automatically legitimizes any international action need to consider the situation in Uzbekistan very carefully. Uzbekistan is now the focal point of a multilateral effort of authoritarian powers trying to stop the international wave of democratization from progressing any further.
I can understand why they’d feel that way.
ROGER SIMON: Only the red know Brooklyn.
JULIE FIDLER HAS A BLOG, and now her first book is coming out. It’s called Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or For Absolute Worst, and I gather it’s based on firsthand experience.
I think we’ll be seeing more books by bloggers. Which will probably range from better, to absolute worst . . . . Just like the rest of ’em.
MORE ETHIOPIA ELECTION WOES, from Gateway Pundit.
IT’S MEDIA-VS.-BLOGS in Frank J.’s latest.
UPDATE: On a more serious note, Ann Althouse observes:
Is anyone counting the number of articles in the NYT that assert that bloggers aren’t as influential as you might think? They can’t stop looking at us and talking about us, but they always conclude that we aren’t really worth much.
JOHN LEO: “[T]he biggest flaw in mainstream journalism today is the lack of diversity.”
THE BLOGOSPHERE: “Half forensic lab and half tavern.”
I like that.
FUTUREPUNDIT LOOKS AT PROSPECTS FOR HYBRID CARS: I’m deeply skeptical of the claim that most increases in fuel economy are simply “consumed” as people drive more miles. Most people I know drive as much as they want to already, and I don’t think a decline in fuel prices would make much of a difference. I’m sure it would make some difference overall, but I doubt it’s as substantial as claimed.
To venture into the Arab world, as I did recently over four weeks in Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan and Iraq, is to travel into Bush Country. I was to encounter people from practically all Arab lands, to listen in on a great debate about the possibility of freedom and liberty. I met Lebanese giddy with the Cedar Revolution that liberated their country from the Syrian prison that had seemed an unalterable curse. They were under no illusions about the change that had come their way. They knew that this new history was the gift of an American president who had put the Syrian rulers on notice. The speed with which Syria quit Lebanon was astonishing, a race to the border to forestall an American strike that the regime could not discount. I met Syrians in the know who admitted that the fear of American power, and the example of American forces flushing Saddam Hussein out of his spider hole, now drive Syrian policy. They hang on George Bush’s words in Damascus, I was told: the rulers wondering if Iraq was a crystal ball in which they could glimpse their future.
Read the whole thing.
SADDAM, OSAMA: What’s the difference?
UPDATE: Yeah, it’s a minor slip — but if Bush had made it, it would be a bigger slip than most of what makes Slate’s “Bushism of the Day” feature. I mean, come on: This is, basically, the only talking point he’s got on the war, and he blows it completely.
It’s not as good as Ted Kennedy’s confusion of Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama, though.
THIS WEEK’S Carnival of the Capitalists is up!
Is a country really like a family? Isn’t that an idea with a … checkered history? A family is a relationship between inherently unequal, not-completely-free people–parents and children. A country, at least in one American conception, is the relationship of equal, autonomous people. Using the family as the template for politics stacks the deck against social equality (the value I’d suggest as the liberal touchstone). For one thing, it lends itself all too easily to the condescending liberal notion of compassion, an anti-populist idea if there ever was one. . . . Aren’t there values that aren’t family values?
Yes, there are.
AIDS AND INDIA: An interesting grassroots Internet journalism project, organized by Sandeep Junnarkar.
PHOTO-FOALBLOGGING: Here’s my sister’s new foal, a lovely female who is, as of yet, un-named. She was born last night without incident, much to my sister’s relief.
MARK TAPSCOTT says that some media folks still don’t get it, and probably never will.
And, while not directly related, this column by Keith Thompson is relevant, and is also a must-read.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reacting to the latest Newsweek story, reader C.J. Burch emails:
The media machine is turning out debacles so quickly that it’s hard to react to them all. Maybe that’s their strategy. Simply overwhelm the rest of us with the sheer scope of their bias, dishonesty and incompetence.
That’s so crazy it just might work!
MEG KREIKEMEIER WRITES IN THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE on the uses and abuses of polls:
In early October 2004, Newsweek released a poll immediately after the first presidential debate, which showed a dramatic shift in public opinion in favor of John Kerry.
Did Kerry narrow the gap with his debate performance? Was he really the closer that many in the media had suggested he was? Newsweek was basing its headline “The Race is On” and accompanying story on a comparison between its two most recent polls. The problem, though, was that the polling data was inconsistent.
The October Newsweek poll sampled more Democrats than it did Republicans.
And the first poll, conducted in September 2004, sampled more Republicans than Democrats, not at all reflective of the historical composition of registered voters. . . .
Given the swing in demographics between the two Newsweek polls, of course Kerry saw improvement in his results. In fact, if he hadn’t he would have been in deep trouble.
And while President Bush’s support among Republicans eroded a bit between the polls, his support among Democrats actually increased. Kerry’s support among Republicans went up slightly, and his support among Democrats remained flat.
So why the breathless headlines?
Why did the news media report the data without first thoroughly reviewing it?
Why did the change in poll results pique the curiosity of a stay-at-home mom like me but not the much-ballyhooed investigative instincts of the reporters covering the election?
Read the whole thing. And congratulations to the Tribune for addressing the issue.
CHRIS NOLAN is calling Bush’s stance on stem cells “UnAmerican.”
I’m not sure that applies, but I do think that it’s wrong, and counterproductive.
MORE PROBLEMS AT THE HUFFINGTON POST, this time with their blogroll. I guess the “shakedown” period is still underway. . . .
EXCELLENT ADVICE: “So, in the conclusion, please be kind to our internet friends. The sphere of the blogs it is big enough for all.”
NEWSWEEK puts the American flag in a trash can? And yet they’re complaining about Koran-in-the-toilet reports.
I suspect that they’re going to hear about this now. But there probably won’t be, you know, riots or anything.
UPDATE: Ed Driscoll notes, correctly, that many American journalistic enterprises engage in more America-bashing abroad than at home. I suspect that the Internet will make that much harder, as people are starting to pay attention, and to compare this stuff.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Brian Dunn has more thoughts.
MORE: Some readers wonder if it’s a photoshop. Well, you’re always right to acknowledge the possibility, but I doubt it. First, the blog it’s on has been around a while. Second, I got this email from Hong Kong reader Mac Overton:
Yep, the American flag in the garbage can showed up here as well. They asked me to “resubscribe” a couple of months ago, but I’ve refused. I’m simply exhausted from all the negativity. I used to like Fareed Zakaria, but I’ve found him to be annoying, self-righteous, and downright unpleasant of late.
Funny enough, they still send me a copy of Newsweek every week even though I’m no longer paying for it. I wonder if there are enough others like me reading the International edition who are now simply “fed up.” Yet, they continue to mail copies simply to keep up their “circulation” figures? Just another wild conspiracy theory in my little backyard….
A lot of newspapers seem to be doing that last, as I’ve noted before. Meanwhile, reader Jason Davis emails from Jakarta:
I’m an American living in Jakarta, Indonesia. On the whole Indonesia is a very friendly, moderate country where Muslims, Christians, and Hindus generally get along far better than news reports (from the left and right) would lead you to believe.
However, since the Newsweek story I have been worried for the first time since I’ve been here. The crazies now have an issue (true or not does not matter). I don’t mind America having to answer for things we ACTUALLY did but this is ridiculous. What really worries us the additional stories that will come in effort to defend Newsweek.
We have receieved a large number of official warnings over the last week from our corporate security group and our working group’s various embassies. [Warning emails from the Embassy and reports of Americans being stalked and harassed omitted.]
We are sitting here hoping the MSM in the U.S. will learn some small lesson from all of this and stop lobbing bomb shells our way. Stories like this are nothing more than toxic by product not very different from a 1930’s factory belching smoke. Back then the factory operators ignored all the external effects of their actions in the name of profit. The factories eventually cleaned up their act, will the reporters?
And a note to the journalists: Davis’s email is a reminder that “free enterprise” and “freedom of contract” once seemed just as sacrosanct as “freedom of the press” does today.
MALAYSIAN TEX-MEX CHEF RAJAN RISHYAKARAN WRITES: “BTW, the cooking side of me doesn’t mean that I’m gay or (I wish) metrosexual. It just means I’m perpetually fat.”
Actually, I think you do a lot better cooking at home than eating out. I made shrimp provencal last night, and it was delicious and (relatively) low fat — certainly much healthier than it would have been at a restaurant.
VIOLENCE IN AZERBAIJAN: Gateway Pundit has a roundup on the pro-democracy protests, and what happened.
SISSY WILLIS blogs on commencement speeches, successful and otherwise.
REVEALING COMMENTS AT THE NEW YORK TIMES:
For a certain segment of the population, Nascar’s raid on American culture — its logo festoons everything from cellphones to honey jars to post office walls to panties; race coverage, it can seem, has bumped everything else off television; and, most piercingly, Nascar dads now get to pick our presidents — triggers the kind of fearful trembling the citizens of Gaul felt as the Huns came thundering over the hills. To these people, stock-car racing represents all that’s unsavory about red-state America: fossil-fuel bingeing; lust for violence; racial segregation; run-away Republicanism; anti-intellectualism (how much brain matter is required to go fast and turn left, ad infinitum?); the corn-pone memes of God and guns and guts; crass corporatization; Toby Keith anthems; and, of course, exquisitely bad fashion sense. What’s more, they simply don’t get it. What’s the appeal of watching . . . traffic? It’s as if ”Hee Haw” reruns were dominating prime time, and the Republic was slapping its collective knee at Grandpa Jones’s ”What’s for supper?” routine. With Nascar’s recent purchase of a swath of real estate on Staten Island, where it intends to plop down an 80,000-seat racetrack and retail center for the untapped New York City market, the onslaught seems poised on the brink of full-out conquest. Cover your ears, blue America. The Huns are revving their engines.
As a reader suggests, “Replace ‘NASCAR’ with ‘Hip-hop,’ and then ask yourself whether this would have run in the Times.” Certainly the editors would have objected to the condescension and stereotyping that run throughout.
On the other hand, perhaps this NASCAR stuff has gone a bit too far. . .
UPDATE: My race-car-driving brother notes that if you want real diversity, you should forget NASCAR and check out drag racing. Note the very cool photos. Meanwhile, reader Tom Carter emails:
Wow – what an article. Jonathan Miles has it all wrong. I’m having a hard time accepting the fact that a contributing writer for what is typically held as a good paper would fall into such blantant prejudices. Once again this smacks of the “blues” having a free pass at throwing stones. I wonder if Miles has ever been to a NASCAR function or even driven a stock car.
“The cars the drivers pilot — modified Chevy Monte Carlos, Ford Tauruses, Pontiac Grand Prix — are not so different from the cars Nascar fans use daily to pick up their groceries, shuttle their kids and get themselves to work.”
Statements like that are just an indicator that this man has absolutey no idea of what he’s writing about, and this just fuels the granishing disatisfaction with traditional media and their inability to effectively research their material.
Yeah. There’s not much overlap between a NASCAR “stock” car and the actual stock vehicle of the same name, and hasn’t been in ages.
I don’t mind these articles in which the Times tries to explain red states to its readership (and unlike my brother, I don’t care much for racing as a spectator sport) but I’d like them to do a better, and less-condescending, job of it.
ANOTHER UPDATE: SSgt J.P. Dawson emails:
In the Air Force (I’m active duty) I encounter a small group of hip-hop fans and a couple of Nascar fans every night at work on the midnight shift. There are conversations about Jay-Z and Nelly, as well as Dale, Jr. and Jeff Gordon. I tease both crowds, as we all tease each other about something. My New Yawk accent and thinning hair are the targets for them.
I’d never be so condescending of either group. Perhaps those of us in the military are just much more tolerant than the staff at the NY Times.
I think so, actually.
ELECTIONS IN MONGOLIA: Publius reports that things are going pretty well. That’s excellent news.
COMING SOON, new research on the health benefits of whiskey and cigars:
The vitamin is D, nicknamed the “sunshine vitamin” because the skin makes it from ultraviolet rays. Sunscreen blocks its production, but dermatologists and health agencies have long preached that such lotions are needed to prevent skin cancer. Now some scientists are questioning that advice. The reason is that vitamin D increasingly seems important for preventing and even treating many types of cancer.
In the last three months alone, four separate studies found it helped protect against lymphoma and cancers of the prostate, lung and, ironically, the skin. The strongest evidence is for colon cancer. . . .
So the thinking is this: Even if too much sun leads to skin cancer, which is rarely deadly, too little sun may be worse.
No one is suggesting that people fry on a beach. But many scientists believe that “safe sun” – 15 minutes or so a few times a week without sunscreen – is not only possible but helpful to health.
One is Dr. Edward Giovannucci, a Harvard University professor of medicine and nutrition who laid out his case in a keynote lecture at a recent American Association for Cancer Research meeting in Anaheim, Calif.
His research suggests that vitamin D might help prevent 30 deaths for each one caused by skin cancer.
“I would challenge anyone to find an area or nutrient or any factor that has such consistent anti-cancer benefits as vitamin D,” Giovannucci told the cancer scientists. “The data are really quite remarkable.”
It’s actually no surprise. Indeed, I’ve long been suspicious of the “all sun is bad for your” attitude of dermatologists, which has always seemed way over the top.
UPDATE: Bill Ardolino has a much longer post on dermatologists and sun from last year.
I AM A CITIZEN JOURNALIST.
Here is my pie.
UPDATE: It was strawberry. Yum. No wonder some people are jealous.
READER JAMES MCCORMICK EMAILS:
Does the latest NYT articles on deaths-in-custody in Afghanistan smack of diversion to take the heat off Newsweek? Set a fire somewhere else so Newsweek never has to acknowledge any responsibility for its acts. Newsweek can return the favour during the next NYT scandal. The MSM guild is all about authority without responsibility. Can’t have that change …
And it’s not just the NYT, as I’ve seen other examples of this phenomenon in quite a few outlets. As Martin Peretz noted, they’re circling the wagons. But by doing so, they’re only making things worse for themselves, as people are noticing. As The Mudville Gazette notes, people actually do more than just look at the pictures.
UPDATE: Reader Richard McEnroe emails: “Circling the wagons worked better in the days before blogging mortars and digital smart bombs. These days we call that a ‘bull’s-eye.'”
CATHY YOUNG looks at when it’s politically correct to beat gays and kill women.
TODAY IS ARMED FORCES DAY: BlackFive has a roundup.
GATEWAY PUNDIT HAS MORE on the pro-democracy rally in Cuba, complete with video.
REDSTATE BUSTS THE HUFFINGTON POST for hotlinking. Give the newbies a break: They’ll catch on.
AUSTIN BAY plans his stint as guest editor at Newsweek.
TREY JACKSON is hosting the first-ever Carnival of the Videos. It’s quite cool, but I hope that we’ll see more original video shot by bloggers.
A FEW DAYS AGO, I wondered if we were going to see dirty tricks against the Blogosphere.
The answer is yes, and sooner than I realized. In fact, I was behind the curve, because earlier this week, gun-control proponents sent fake threatening emails under Joel Rosenberg’s name in an effort to stop passage of gun-rights legislation in Minnesota.
And for those who will inevitably ask, yes, this is the same Joel Rosenberg who is well-known for his fantasy novels.
LARRY KUDLOW SAYS IT’S A DREARY POLITICAL SPRING for small-government types:
Which leads us to a difficult question: Is the White House and its congressional allies selling policy reforms that voters simply are not buying? The seemingly more popular issue of tax reform is not even on the table. But will tax-reform commissioners Connie Mack and John Breaux ever get their proposals to see the light of day in the current obstructionist congressional climate? . . .
All senators have dirt on their hands these days. The Senate, if you can believe it, just delivered a budget-busting pork-laden $295 billion highway bill, featuring several thousand special-interest earmarks and a phony tax-transfer from general revenues to the trust fund. Where was the allegedly conservative Republican-controlled Senate? This bill was voted through 89 to 11, opening the door for President Bush’s very first veto.
Oh, and let’s not forget a potential trade and currency war with China and perhaps Europe as well. But at least this is backed by a bipartisan coalition anchored by Sen. Smoot Schumer and Sen. Hawley Graham.
Well, that’s cheerful. But he’s basically right. And I hope Bush vetoes the highway bill, but I’m not counting on it.
LEBANON UPDATE: Was Hezbollah involved in the Hariri assassination? “The news item may never be confirmed simply because no one wants it to be.”
UNSCAM UPDATE: The Weekly Standard has put oil-for-food on its cover. You may want to read this piece on Saddam’s business partners by Stephen F. Hayes, and this piece by Christopher Hitchens on George Galloway:
I knew a bit about Galloway. He had had to resign as the head of a charity called “War on Want,” after repaying some disputed expenses for living the high life in dirt-poor countries. Indeed, he was a type well known in the Labour movement. Prolier than thou, and ostentatiously radical, but a bit too fond of the cigars and limos and always looking a bit odd in a suit that was slightly too expensive. By turns aggressive and unctuous, either at your feet or at your throat; a bit of a backslapper, nothing’s too good for the working class: what the English call a “wide boy.” . . . Galloway says that the worst day of his entire life was the day the Soviet Union fell. His existence since that dreadful event has involved the pathetic search for an alternative fatherland. He has recently written that, “just as Stalin industrialised the Soviet Union, so on a different scale Saddam plotted Iraq’s own Great Leap Forward.” I love the word “scale” in that sentence. I also admire the use of the word “plotted.” . . .
Perhaps I may be allowed a closing moment of sentiment here? To the left, the old East End of London was once near-sacred ground. It was here in 1936 that a massive demonstration of longshoremen, artisans, and Jewish refugees and migrants made a human wall and drove back a determined attempt by Sir Oswald Mosley’s Blackshirts to mount a march of intimidation. The event is still remembered locally as “The Battle of Cable Street.” That part of London, in fact, was one of the few place in Europe where the attempt to raise the emblems of fascism was defeated by force.
And now, on the same turf, there struts a little popinjay who defends dictatorship abroad and who trades on religious sectarianism at home. Within a month of his triumph in a British election, he has flown to Washington and spat full in the face of the Senate. A megaphone media in London, and a hysterical fan-club of fundamentalists and political thugs, saw to it that he returned as a conquering hero and all-round celeb. If only the supporters of regime change, and the friends of the Afghan and Iraqi and Kurdish peoples, could manifest anything like the same resolve and determination.
Read the whole thing.
DEMOCRACY IN CUBA takes another small step:
HAVANA, Cuba (CNN) — In what organizers called an unprecedented event, dissidents from groups opposed to Fidel Castro’s communist regime gathered publicly Friday and chanted “Down with Fidel.”
“Freedom! Freedom!” the group of more than 100 delegates cheered in the yard of Felix Bonne, a veteran dissident, in a working-class section of Havana. Castro’s regime would not allow the use of a theater or hotel for the assembly.
Participants included members of dissident groups that are sometimes at odds but share the goal of driving Castro from power.
JEFF JARVIS IS CHANGING JOBS for something a bit, er, bloggier. Congratulations, Jeff!
YOU KNOW IT’S THE 21ST CENTURY when you read headlines like this:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) — The U.S. government does not want billboards in space.
The Federal Aviation Administration proposed Thursday to amend its regulations to ensure that it can enforce a law that prohibits “obtrusive” advertising in zero gravity.
Though actually this issue first came up back in the 1990s.
CHESTER CHARTS some odd coincidences in the Madrid bombing.
Setting up a showdown with Congress over the thorny issue of embryonic stem cell research, President Bush vowed today to veto any measure that would expand federal funding for the studies – an extremely rare personal threat from a president who has never exercised his veto power.
All the other lousy bills they’ve passed, and this is the first one he’ll veto?
UPDATE: He’s losing ’em in Georgia!
MORE: “The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.”
QUESTIONS ABOUT SPIRIT OF AMERICA: Michael Ubaldi addresses questions here, and arrives at a conclusion here. “Omar and Mohammed Fadhil have answered questions about their brother’s accusations against the Spirit of America, their observations confirming my supposition that Jim Hake’s charity has accomplished what is possible in an often difficult environment. Additional criticism of the Spirit of America echoed Ali’s complaints that the organization did not acknowledge offers or requests for other works projects from individual Iraqis; but such ‘shortcomings’ in the field of charity are best explained by limited time and money, and the wisdom of confining a scope of operations to what is practical rather than expanding out of sentiment.”
I’ve given them money, and free ads, so I’m glad to hear that. I hope they’ll work the kinks out.
One dissident who spent years in prison and who preferred to stay anonymous told Koring that, “If the outside pressure continues, then the barriers of fear will be broken . . . The regime is losing its grip because of outside pressure, but that pressure must be maintained.”
So let’s keep it up.