PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

May 13, 2014


Actually, the national percentage of “non-white and/or Hispanic” is below 30 percent, not “nearly 40 percent,” but Arana’s basic thesis is correct. But his list of categories is impoverished. “Whites” are assumed to be a single, uniformly “privileged” group, but of course this is not the case. My guess, based on decades of newsroom exposure, is that these liberal media outlets, and media outlets generally, tend to have disproportionately high percentages of Jews and of men and women from elite colleges and universities. I suspect that if you took a census of where their personnel went to high school, you would find disproportionately high numbers from elite private schools and from certain elite public high schools (Stuyvesant in New York, New Trier in the Chicago suburbs, etc.). I would bet considerable amounts of money that you won’t find many, if any, people who grew up in West Virginia or eastern Kentucky, in low-income rural counties in the South or farm counties in the Midwest.

Arana stumbles but gets close to a legitimate point: Journalists should make an effort to understand the nation and the world, to learn to look at life from the perspectives of others with different experiences. Hiring editors (to the extent there are some today) might be wise to look for new personnel in unlikely places, people not only from the South Bronx but also from West Virginia.

But to be fair, looking down on other white people from less-elite backgrounds is one of the ways these folks make up for their shrinking salaries and influence.