Shhh — Nobody Tell Obama He’s High-Diving in the Kiddie Pool
Yet another “War on…” narrative fail:
More voters think Mitt Romney and the Republican Party respect women who work outside the home than think President Obama and the Democrats respect women who stay at home, according to the latest The Hill Poll.
Forty-nine percent of likely voters said the presumptive GOP presidential nominee respects women who have independent careers, while 27 percent said he doesn’t and 24 percent weren’t sure.
When asked if President Obama respects women who stay at home rather than pursue a career, 37 percent of likely voters said he doesn’t and 35 percent said he does. Twenty-nine percent were unsure.
And if you think those numbers are bad, wait until the general public realizes that young Obama recorded the song, “I Ate A Dog (And I Liked It).” After the Osama bin Laden killing, I called the Obama crew “The gang that could shoot straight — but not much else” Did any regular reader here know I was capable of such understatement? See, these aren’t tiny little margin-of-error differences. These are differences which, if carried through to the general election, would lead to a Mitt Romney landslide.
So here’s what I think went on, and is going on.
During the primary of 2008, Senator Obama read the field perfectly. There were tons of delegates to be had in caucus states, where his community organizer skills would allow him to rack up wins. He could count on those wins being lopsided ones, too, because he’d also perfectly read his opponent. Hillary Clinton was running a very traditional Big Money/Big States campaign focused on the headliner primary wins. She all-but-ignored the caucus states, until it was all-but-too late.
Now let’s revisit the Democratic National Convention late that summer in Denver, where Obama was all-but-crowned as “Black Jesus” in front of those presumptuous Roman columns.
The convention buzz was all about two questions. The first was, “Will PUMAs bolt?” And I think everybody remembers that well enough. But the other one was, “What is McCain going to run tonight?”
Huh? Am I the only one here who remembers? Let me refresh your drink. Er, memory.
The night of Obama’s acceptance speech, the McCain camp let it leak that he would run an ad earlier in the evening. The content was the big mystery. McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin had energized the GOP base, and Obama’s selection of Joe Biden had… well, let’s be kind and say it had somewhat confused folks. McCain was hot out of the gate, and Obama appeared to have stumbled in his first major act as his party’s standard-bearer.
So we all sat in rapt attention in front of the tube at the appointed hour of the McCain ad.
What did we get? A folksy little congratulations from McCain. Speaking directly at the camera, to Obama, he said something like, “Tonight is your night. You earned it. Enjoy it. The campaign begins tomorrow.”
McCain came across as the older and wiser gentleman, the firmer hand, reminding the upstart who’d really been around and gotten stuff done. And he did it gently, kindly. It was a helluva ad.
And remember that McCain/Palin was ahead or tied in every major poll after that — right up until McCain suspended his campaign to deal with the banking crisis. “Deal,” in this case meaning, “Sit at a table and get rolled by Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama.” His campaign was finished.
Why do I tell you all this?






Obama supporters will need to decide that Obama is either impotent or incompetent. The rest of the world has already decided that he is combination of both.
Yeah, a while back I described Obama as a “Type B busybody.” Just because it sounds impossible doesn’t mean it isn’t true.
Obama has created his own category. He is ‘Omniincompetent’ There is simply nothing that he cannot screw up by believing he is the bestest evah at it (while being cheered on by the lemming stream media).
Omni-incompetent? Great new word for Webster’s Unabridged…
Barry is just doing what he has been trained to do from birth. Use his natural advantage in affirmative action he had to fake it to make it.
Unfortunately, he has made it and can no longer fake it. Those outside of his circle now see his incompetence exposed to the world. Those in his circle can’t break through his delusions to tell him he is toast. Those who have tried are no longer part of his inner circle as he continues to seek synchophants to affirm his superiority. Even his beard is ineffectual no matter how hard she tries.
Is Obama mentally defective?
Ya think?
And we’ve now achieved the (insert fancy French euphemism signifying “Ultimate”. The French have lots of those. Pick one) Alinsky reverse: make him an object of comedy and derision. It shouldn’t be too hard. Romney did something 30 years ago to his dog (who probably loved it)? OBAMA ATE A DOG AND WAS PROUD OF IT! I guar-own-frikkin’-tee Fido wasn’t happy anout it!
If you can’t make fun of a guy who walks around TRYING, for God’s sake, to look like Mussolini, you have no business running for anything.
Oh, and good luck making “Father Knows Best” into Gordon Gekko. Romney is so damn folksy and awe shucks it makes you sick. My only fear is he’s not Gordon Gekko enough! Rescuing drowning victims (including another dog)? Obama can’t even rescue his foot from his mouth!
This is what it’s going to take. Logical arguments don’t target the white male WWF afficionados we need to get angry. Eating dogs will!
Stephen, I really like when you actually write something. It’s always great (and funny).
So y`all are going to go with the “Dogeater in charge” slur as the base for your negative campaigning? Thats kind of funny, because I think a lot of independents may actually want a president who ahs been abroad and tried different customs. (Its also a sly reference to him understanding China). But go ahead, make lots of ugly ads shouting “The president is a dogeater” and lets see how it works for ya…
“A sly reference to him understanding China”?
Put aside for a moment how little evidence there is that he understands China. The argument here, that you expect to resonate with voters, is that eating foreign food makes you “understand” a foreign culture?
In that case, I’m apparently an expert on Thailand. Sweet.
When are” y’all” gonna get yer vd treated Fnord? The only slur here was the Ohole’s attempt at demonizing Romneys improvised dog transporter. BTW:drop the faux” Aw shucks I’m a libtard red stater” act;it’s as false asthe Obama recovery . It’s that the Southern Law Poverty Center is recruiting trolls at VD clinics.
Correction :last sentence should read:It’s obvious,etc.
You are so right. McCain was on track to win until he bizarly tracked left and supported the Wall Street/bank bailout. To be overly charitable, maybe he actually believed the sky-is-falling BS, but it cost him the election. A populist, “Too big to fail? Let ‘em fail!” would have guaranteed his election.
I was afraid that Team Romney would just be more Dole-McCain gracious losers that can deliver a good concession speech, but I am pleasantly surprised to find that Mitt (or his people) have a backbone and appear to actually want to win.
Jeebus, the mysteries we mere citizens and voters have to live with. HAS Romney rejected the failed tactics of the McCain campaign? WILL he talk about the crimes of the Odministration? All we can do is hope, which is infuriating (as Democrats should have learned, but haven’t).
No, McCain lost it when he proclaimed Monday morning that “the fundamentals of the economy are still strong”. That sound bite started the decline.
However, he never stood a chance, anyway. Why not? McCain-Feingold.
In late August, McCain had a decision to make. Does he forgo the public money and choose to use only private money, or does he eschew private funding and take the public money ($81mil?)?
Well, if he took the public money, Obama would take the private money and have twice the money or more. He would get spent to death. If he eschewed the public money and went private, then Obama would beat him over the head every day with his hypocrisy for ignoring his own law.
So, he took the public money. In the last month, he was reduced to playing defense in the Red States, except desperately trying to win PA. He was outspent 4 or 5:1 in the last month. In the last week before the election, he was broke and could run no ads before the election.
The Dems set him up. They knew he was “next in line”. The bill was a trap for stupid Republicans, specifically for McCain. The Dems had no intention ever of taking the public money. It was trap for McCain, one which he himself helped set for himself! How monumentally stupid is that?!?
McCain never stood a chance. The terrible thing is, he was able to beat the other Republicans. How do you lose to that guy?
Republicans: the Stupid Party.
And unless we all get really lucky we are going to do it again. What is Romney except McCain 2.0? They are going to beat him to death with Romneycare and outspend him too.
They will only beat him to death if wimps like you won’t go to the mat with them. The faint heart never won the fair lady and pessimism never won an election. ABO2012
Amen!
Oh, there were so many incidents where McCain either “lost it” or showed he didn’t really care if he lost. One standout moment was when both McCain and Obama appeared at a celebration of “service” where McCain exclaimed that Obama’s work as a community organizer was “outstanding”. Uh, what? In contrast, Palin’s mock wonderment about just what a community organizer did during her convention speech showed, unlike McCain, she *was* prepared to challenge her opponent.
Come on, folks. McCain didn’t lose it. The economy lost it for him. He was tied or ahead of Bama up until September, when the Lehman crisis hit and America plunged into recession. Voters, (aided and abetted by MSM) who in any case had no love lost for Bush or the Republicans, reacted in horror.
McCain going back to Washington (and suspending his campaign) was his way of signalling to Americans that danger lies ahead and that campaigning meant less important than averting this incoming. He couldn’t pull it off. It was a dumb thing to do that close to November. But then, crises wait for no man’s convenience. It’s like Hillary’s 3 a.m. phone call. Obama didn’t even try to warn Americans. He knew recession was good for him.
McCain was Thomas Payne. Obama is the Ugly American.
Your missing the point- the point is that it shouldn’t have even been McCain in there, and it was a mistake for the party to vote for him (I won’t say “us,” because I didn’t vote for him). There is no way Obama could have beat Huckabee under those circumstances, but the party fell for and continues to fall for this “next in line” nonsense.
I do agree that Republicans have this ‘next in line’ mind-set. However, McCain did run against Bush in 2000 primaries. Given that Bush had become so unpopular with Republicans, not just with Democrats, it seemed (only seemed, at the time) to be a smart move to nominate McCain. But then, 2008 was a freak election. Obama was the Black Jesus. The real Jesus had the Jewish clergy ranged against him. The Black Jesus, Obama, had his clergy, the media, standing four-square behind him. What chance did any poor mortal stand?
Only to people who care nothing for principles, and operate only in the realm of expediency.
Oddly enough, those people are the ones who lose elections.
I do believe Obama was poised to win no matter who ran against him. Even if you dug up Reagan, hoisted him on a stake and ran that against Obama in 2008, he still would have won. It was just too novel and “time has come” to pass up. But I also think that the very forces that brushed him into the White House will play against him this time. The Affirmative Action vote will attempt to self-correct this time.
Exactly, that election was lost the moment McCain gained sufficient delegates.
You read a lot of Conservatives coming to similar conclusions and saying similar things over the months leading up, but clearly they are only speaking for some online activists, not this supposed “center-right America” we brag about. When election days roll around, it looks like Republican voters make up their minds at the last minute and grade the candidates according to their smiles and whatever breeze blows into their head that morning.
I agree. I remember putting a “We’re Screwed – ’08″ bumper sticker I got from Michelle Malkin’s site on my car right around then.
It’s still there…
I had one on the back of my Jeep that said, “F*** It, McCain — He’s the Least Offensive Democrat in the Race.”
And who was primarily responsible for the meltdown? Why, it was Barney Frank (and Obama), Chris Dodd (and Obama), Maxine Watters (and Obama), Franklin Raines (and Obama), and Obama, of course!
And the timing could not have been better – for Obama.
Well, one should never let a good crisis go to waste.
Actually Bush gave us Obama. Straight up fact. Simple and to the point.
Now that we have your opinion, some facts to back it up might be nice and helpful.
I have to agree with nueces. For 8 years, Bush failed to stand up for himself or explain anything he did. I recall Clinton attacking like a junkyard dog any time anyone said anything even slightly negative about him. I recall Bush ignoring all negative attacks (the gentleman? above it all? Americans are too smart to buy it all?). Not even a word of Republican efforts to rein in Fannie & Freddie, the two greatest contributors to the financial meltdown.
So Obama just had to latch onto 8 years of negativity, then apply it to McCain, the ex-love of the media, who quickly abandoned him when adoring him was no longer useful.
I also can’t help but think lots of Dems crossed over to help McCain win the nomination. As king of cross-the-aisle and anti-free-speech, he was a pushover.
McCain still could have won if he had really beleived in repub small gov and personal responsibility values, and said hell no to the bailouts. It would have clearly seperated him from his main liability, Bush hangover, and endeared him to both libertarians and anti wall street populists. And it would have put Obama in the embarassing position of agreeing with Bush, and Wall Street, and the bailouts, while McCain opposed them.
But no, McCain had to be the “responsible statesman” and lose with class, while the bailouts established the precedent for Obama to get any big gov handout he asked for. The repubs lost in 2008 because they stopped beleiving in basic repub values. Fortunately Romney is still adhering to the small gov line, partly because he knows the tea party will crucify him if he doesn’t, and partly because I think his business background really makes him a beleiver in the free market. If he continues to support small gov values he will win, because in todays environment big gov has been discredited as it has never been before, with obamas cronyisn and failures.
romney didn’t make bain capital what it was under him by playing mr. “niceguy”. He plays to win.
This column is exemplary, except for one thing (which incidentally has driven me nuts for years in every place encountered):
There is no such word as “coronated,” damn it! The word is “crowned!” That’s it! Just “crowned!” And by Elvis dead on the can in Graceland, I will break the crown of the next jerk who gets this one wrong…
Thank you for your indulgence. We now return you to Vodkapundit’s comments section…
I stand — bit? blog? commented? — corrected.
Let me go get that fixed.
the verb ‘coronate’: first known use, 1623.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coronate
Cool. Did the triple-finger-double-tap in OS X and nothing came up in the dictionary. I stand informed, as well.
Apparently the fact that we now live in the age of Verbization of Nouns is completely lost on you.
Did I just Verbize the Noun Verb?
I like Rush’s word: Immaculated
Is that werewife as in werewolf as in “beware of the dog”? Or is it that one was a wife once but is now free at last? You see I’ve kinda taken quite a likens to ya. I mean language rigidity aside.
I take it you had a hard time understanding his meaning. From your post I am not sure you understand the point of the article. Your post adds nothing to the discussion. Please try to focus.
I moderate the comments on this forum, thanks.
I’m heartily sick of politicians who know how to spend but not how to earn.
Hmm. Isn’t that the very definition of politician, though?
If it were otherwise, they’d be known as “businessmen.”
Argh. Brilliant point. Sick and tired of it.
“Excited” about Romney may not be the correct expression.Rather an earnest longing for a competent businessman you can put your confidence in.I also like that he has a somewhat “square” and boring image, I don´t trust slick constantly talking men. I see him as a real American man with a charming, well spoken wife. I am sure many women feel like I do about him, He is a man you can trust. I agree with Jon J that it must be easy to make a person like Obama an object of ridicule and derision. He tries a new persona every other day ( JFK, Reagan, even Bush ) but he has kept that Mussolini look. He is just an actor I think. And I would not buy a used car from him.
I agree. I was anti-Romney. I would like to have a true libertarian conservative, but there aren’t any available to us at the moment.
I will crawl over busted glass to vote against the current CIC.
Given his actions of the past couple weeks, my vote for Romney is still a vote against Obama, but more and more also becoming a vote for Mitt.
He’s fighting. We haven’t seen that in quite a long time.
The primary is behind us. He’s my guy now. I will not stay home because Mitt isn’t conservative enough. The alternative is four more years of what we’ve got. Sorry, can’t do that.
I don’t know that I’ll be extremely excited about Mitt. But then, I don’t really want to get excited about politicians anyway.
That’s me too. I’m not looking for the ‘man-on-a-horse’ to come save us. Politicians are necessary in the same way we need mosquitoes. I believe it’s slightly possible that Romney will become a real leader when the time comes (as I pray it will, the alternative is too gruesome to contemplate). This idea that in the present world you’re going to find a perfect candidate with all the best qualities of Sir Galahad, William Marshal, Edward III, Ivan the Terrible, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, Timoleon and Cincinnatus, and oh, you know, Moses or Elijah mixed together is simply not happening. Not even Reagan could match such a wish list. If we ever got a choice between perfect good and perfect evil, you might see a landslide of about 70% of the voters. Otherwise we’re looking at a max of 55%. It’s just the way it is, and we have to deal with it.
Yup.
My dream candidate isn’t running this time around. Romney gets my vote because his background suggests he’s competent, and he appears to have a low scandal quotient (the upside to picking an R from a D state- if he was dirty, it’d be public knowledge by now).
Honestly, he’d get the vote just on the competence thing. I’m very tired of Obama and the Bernak mis-managing the economy and chasing the ‘green jobs’ unicorn.
Um, I supported Rick Santorum….he had a lot of faults. Reagan had a lot of faults.
You’re going to a great deal of hyperbole to make this straw man. We don’t want Super Prez 2012, what we want is Half-decent Conservative.
What we got is Slicker Obama vs. Obama vs. Third Party.
he’s no actor – he’d never make it in hollywood. no one viewing him in a role could ever suspend disblief that what they were watching was poorly scripted and poorly cast tripe.
Dear Dr. Bones,
A just taste will prefer Dr. Limbaugh’s neoverb “to immaculate” over his freelordship’s “to coronate.”
Descending from Form to matter, Paddy and Eye agree that we have seen an ideoproduct similar to this one before, a whightist Peruna labelled “Silent Majority” or “Moral Majority.” Probably there were other lead trial balloons as well.
It would appear that all the Master of Seamus requires at this juncture is an adjective to accompany the substantive. So, then, ¿How about “Firin’ Majority”?
(( ¿Did Eye tell you the one about the newspaper headline MANCHILD BITES DOG? ))
Happy days.
–JHM
I frankly don’t like the tone of this article. As far as I’m concerned, Obama *picked* the Republican he wanted to run against. The rich white guy with the blow-dried perm who looks like the Central Casting version of an insincere politician. Frankly, I’ll be confident of the outcome when Romney’s sworn into office, and Obama is back in Chicago writing his memoirs for a multi-million dollar advance, and not a minute before.
Trust me, these guys are going to take every opportunity to mention race, point out Romney’s wealth, discuss the weird religion Romney belongs to, and anything else they can come up with. Snide “Mad Men” references are the least of it. If they have to they’ll stalk his kids and try and find them drinking alcohol underage (remember when they did that with the Bush daughter?), see if they can find less than perfect grades, wonder if the wife is faking her MS, anything they can think of. When that doesn’t work there will be rumors of corruption, profanity or worse racist or misogynist language…anything to turn a voter or 3 in favor of Obama.
Like I said, I’ll be confident Romney’s won when Obama’s writing his book, and not a second before.
Or has Obama picked the Republican that he thought that he wanted to run against, only to discover that his choice was not the best?
I frankly don’t like the tone of this article. As far as I’m concerned, Obama *picked* the Republican he wanted to run against.
Nope. Romney is the last person Obama wanted to face in the general. Those methods of attacking Romney that you mentioned will not work. The only reason that kind of attack might seem credible is because we’re still in primary stage and Romney’s fellow Republicans are giving that kind of superficial nonsense some “credibility.” Just like you did now. But ultimately, making fun of Romney’s hair is not what the Obama campaign has in mind. And Gingrich and Santorum and Perry are all just as “white” as Romney.
No, the primary message is that Romney – and the GOP in general – is too extreme to be trusted. Obama is going to try and scare voters by painting Romney as the most dangerous GOP candidate since Goldwater. Obama can’t run on his record or on “hope and change.” He has nothing left but extreme negativity. And they know that the extreme negativity – the “my GOP opponent is too dangerous to be given the launch codes” type of thing – would work much better against a Gingrich (lots of historical political baggage) or Santorum (lots of social issue distraction baggage) than against Romney, who everybody has been screaming isn’t “conservative enough.” The Obama campaign was hoping that Romney wouldn’t survive the primaries and so they did everything they could to fuel the narrative of Romney being hardly different than Obama. It didn’t work. And so now they’re faced with the impossible task of completely switching gears and trying to portray Romney as the next Goldwater? Think about that.
The bottom line is that Romney is much, much less vulnerable to the inevitable smears and the strategery of the Obama machine than the others. Which doesn’t mean it’s going to be an easy ride. Of course not. But don’t for a moment kid yourself into thinking that Obama wanted Romney as his general election opponent.
Agreed. It will take quite the Reality Distortion Field to turn a former governor of one of the blueist states in all creation into some right wing nut job. I’m not saying it can’t be done, it just won’t be easy. Now that Romney is no longer having to watch his right flank, turning him into Goldwater seems even less likely.
But don’t for a moment kid yourself into thinking that Obama wanted Romney as his general election opponent.
No – Huntsman or Paul would have been the ideal candidate for a 57-state landslide for the Won. But Romney – the creator of RomneyCare and godfather of ObamaCare, the until recently global warming disciple and rabid abortion supporter, the failed one-term governor of a deep-blue state who left office with an approval rating in the low 30s – is a nice consolation prize. Honestly, the GOP might as well have nominated Arlen Specter or Dede Scozzofava.
Get ready for another four years of America’s version of Hugo Chavez. We are so screwed.
Ron Paul is the only one who can beat Obama. What’s Romney and Obama going to disagree on during a debate anyway? Both love their TARP, Patriot Act, NDAA indefinite detention, war, bailouts, banks, Goldman Sachs, mandated health care, gun grabbing… hell, both even don’t like dogs.
my thoughts too. and axelrod and the number of his gaffes the last week or so – hilarious. the puppetiers are scared. And all the ultra-conservative screams about how “liberal” romeny is, it also makes him more attractive to the middle – and they really are the ones who decide elections.
I concur with your assessment. Romney’s weakest point is Romneycare, and Obama can’t attack him on that without collateral damage to Obamacare, as well as starting a discussion of the 10th Amendment and why State govt’s get to do some things the Federal gov’t can’t.
Besides that, I’ve been hearing that Romneycare-as-implemented was due to the D legislature overriding a veto. Not sure what the original version looked like, but we’re pretty likely to find out.
November can’t come soon enough.
Who is more mockable? The Mormon, or the guy who sat in Jeremiah “G-d D**m America” Wright’s pew for 20 years, and professed to hear nothing? The guy whose great grandfather practiced polygamy, or the guy whose FATHER practiced polygamy? The guy who vacationed in France, or the guy who vacations in Hawaii, and France, and Spain, and and and? The guy who let his dog ride on the car in a crate (I defy you to find a large dog who does not like his head out the window barking into the 70 mph wind with his lips and ears flapping), or the guy whose ghostwriter thought talking about eating dog meat would give him that International Man Of Mystery vibe?
I think Obama has stepped in it. If Romney takes it to Obama like he did to Gingrich and Perry, well…Dude!
or the guy whose ghostwriter thought talking about eating dog meat would give him that International Man Of Mystery vibe?
I just love the irony of this doggone story coming back to bite Obama given that he told Ayers to insert the dog eating sentence into Dreams in order to burnish his credentials as a non-Muslim.
I dunno about that. Something just seems odd about that story… from what I’ve heard, getting dog meat takes some doing in most areas of Indonesia, tiger even more so.
If Obama’s stepather was feeding the kid this stuff out of some archaic you-are-what-you-eat animist tradition, what qualities are dogs and tigers known for that he would want to instill in the kid?
I dunno about you, but most of the dogs I’ve known were loyal to their ‘pack’ and ferocious if they sensed a threat to a packmate. Tigers are one of the few predators who will attack humans.
To me, feeding a kid dog and tiger meat suggests that his stepdad may have thought the kid was a wuss and was trying to help him overcome it.
The irony came to me yesterday … they are straining at gnats about what happened to Romney and his family on a twelve-hour trip in a Chevy station wagon … even as the Progressive glitterati “care” from their limos and private jets.
Now, who has the silver spoon in their mouth … who has a better understanding of the life of the ordinary American … and WHO wants to jam their socio-economic morality down our throats, telling us they know better than we do how to run our lives?
Obama2012 … a puppy on your plate … a leash around your neck.
Love your last line: “Obama2012 … a puppy on your plate … a leash around your neck” This should be part of the Romney campaign.
Vote for Obama ! Two puppies in every pot!
Rope and Chains.
Never tested – precisely.
The sort of test to which he’ll be put was quietly signaled yesterday, when Romney effectively neutralized a Democrat trap that was quite some time in the making. This move reduces the degree to which Obama can run against the GOP, which has been his basic strategy.
It gets harder for Obama from here on, not easier. And he’s already demonstrated that he doesn’t have the stamina, poise or moxie for a real contest. He never has.
Several commenters have suggested that Mitt’s Mormon faith will be attacked by the Obama crowd. I sincerely hope so. I believe that most Americans regard an attack on another person’s religious faith as repulsive. It is said that Mormonism is considered “weird” by many folks. So what? For most of the Obama crowd the simple belief in a divine creator (God, not Obama) is considered to be “weird”. An attack on Romney’s faith will be seen as an attack on all faith generally. The tactic will blow-up in their faces. Go for it!
How can someone named B. Hussein O. or Barry Soetero who has professed to be both a Muslim and an Liberationist Christian, while acting like an Atheistic communist, question the normalcy of someone else’s faith? The response just rolls off the tongue, and I for one can’t think of a rational response. McCain according to Obama never thought to question “my Muslim faith” (reporter “Christian! Christian!”)but given an opening Romney should gently remind the country concerning what we know about Obama’s faith, which is a mixed message at best. He just should not use the phrase “That’s like the pot calling the kettle black.”
The fact that any discussion about Romney’s case being a Mormon can be answered with Obama’s love for Wright notwithstanding, the fact that Romney doesn’t wear his religion on his sleeve is a point in Romney’s favor.
Yooper, I guess Mr. Obama is a uniter … he is uniting Catholics, Jews, Protestants, and LDS in opposition to him and his One True Faith of Human Omniscience.
“Excited about Romney”.
Romney was not my first choice or even my second, but his recent one-two has made me a convert. I loved the “Ann Romney for First Lady” stickers in response to Hillary Rosen’s attacks. And causing the dog issue to backfire on Little Zero was delightful to watch.
Romney himself is making a point of staying on message and focusing on Obama’s record, while the foot soldiers engage in the dog warfare. Masterful.
My one worry about Romney has been removed.
I’m with you. I don’t love Mitt Romney, but the more he talks, the better he sounds. Unlike our president.
Yeah, the “war on dogs” narrative has been reminding me of this. It really has been pretty hard to get excited about Romney. But then the Democrats tried hard to sell the “Romney hates dogs” story line, and all of the “concerned” pundits try to show how this means Romney is callous and cruel.
For myself, the dog on the roof story evoked my own childhood: family vacations with us kids packed in a station wagon in, around, and under all the camping gear; fixing flat tires on the side of the highway; jerry-rigged car repairs just so we could get home; stopping in nameless towns for ice cream. All that good nostalgia stuff. A dog on the roof would have fit right in with those childhood adventures. Heck, it wouldn’t even been that shocking back in those days, not when kids never even wore seat belts.
In other words, that whole story was the first time that I really felt that I could relate to Romney. Despite his wealth, and his stiff manner, he and his family are good all-American folk, and now I can see it. I have actually achieved feeling a real affection for him.
And I heard it from the Democrats.
The whole hilarious “Obama the dog eater” pushback has just been icing on the cake.
Concur.
Having grown up in a family of Mom & Dad + 5 kids, I almost immediately responded strongly and happily at the normalcy of the kids in the wagon and the dog on the roof.
That was the world I grew up in. (and am ever grateful for the experience…)
Life is much more rambunctious in a large family. Messy, even.
And the Romneys seemed to have thoroughly enjoyed it.
As do I.
Let’s load up our station wagons and greet the fools with a happy reality check.
YES! My Dad’s jury-rigged house was not a one off. The kids I related most closely back then had houses just like mine: “What channel is Popeye?…..”Spin Dry!”
Who is the ordinary American going to relate to better … someone taking his family on a 12-hour trip in a Chevy station wagon … or someone who jets off to vacation after vacation on a 747, when he’s not raising funds from glitterati who “care” from their limos and private jets as they denigrate the guy in the Chevy?
Looking back on my own family trips when I was a kid, I wish we had been able to keep our dog outside the passenger cabin of the car.
Because she always got carsick.
Dogs LOVE to have fresh air blowing past them. Most dogs hang their heads and much of their bodies out the car window if you let them. Also, fresh air helps to combat motion sickness in both dogs and humans (and being a human thus afflicted, I know whereof I speak).
These “dog eater” jokes sure do have legs!
Everybody paying attention has already made up their mind between taking free money from Obama in a dead and dying economy and getting soaked by Obama in a dead and dying economy. Those who do not yet know which side of the trillion dollar money flow they sit on are either brain dead or simply not that interested in politics, not feeling that it affects them more than which Housewives show to watch tonight. The uninformed will make their decision in October based on whatever obvious media firestorm is roiling the waters then. Will they be motivated enough to make a difference? I don’t know but fraud in the swing states will probably be more important since no Republican that I know controls those levers. The only thing that can overcome the expected level of fraud is voter motivation. I don’t expect the failed Obama supporters to be motivated, or as motivated by those who fear 4 more years of Chicago corruption being run out of Washington on a national level. My bet is on the motivation of the right, but October surprises, and the levers of fraud are at play as well, and I just can’t predict those right now. Nor can we predict if Romney can strike sparks. Over 12 years of campaigning he has not, but maybe he will figure out a way. Exposing the amatuer as a poseur might just do it.
If you don’t think you should vote against 0b0z0:
Supreme Court Of The United States
Political Futures
“If Mitt wins the nomination, as seems very likely, I will enthusiastically support his candidacy. For my friends who have hesitation on that score, I’d just ask you to keep four things in mind: Justice Scalia just turned 78, Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year, Justice Breyer will be 76 in August, and Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago. We wish them all well, of course, but the brute fact is that whoever we elect as president in November is almost certainly going to choose at least one and maybe more new members of the Supreme Court — in addition to hundreds of other life-tenured federal judges, all of whom will be making momentous decisions about our lives for decades to come. If you don’t think it matters whether the guy making those calls is Mitt Romney or Barack Hussien Obama, I think you’re smokin’ something funky.” –columnist Andrew McCarthy
Maybe the pendulum will finally swing. I dunno. Been waiting for my baby boomer generation to wake the F up for about thirty years now. I’m not really hopeful. It is truly amazing how fast a people can degenerate. Makes one suspect some great hidden spiritual force is at work. Maybe C.S. Lewis was on to something.
I started believing that the only hope for this land was a real secession movement about ten years ago but now I think I have a better idea. Let’s just expel New England from the US. The western half of Califonicate, Oregon and Washington need to go too but maybe we can slowly reform them after we get rid of DC and the vast majority of the bureaucracy that rules us. We could put the new capitol in Wichita or Oklahoma City. It would be a wonderful country again.
Of course this isn’t going to happen. There is no actual hope for a nation this debauched. This generation shall not pass away before total conflagration descends upon us. We asked for it.
Me too (waiting for my generation to achieve sanity). “We” thought life would be skittles if we could just throw away all those old repressive rules, but we didn’t take the time to wonder why the rules existed. So we tossed out faith, morals, work ethic, and look what we got in return.
It will not be the Left and Obama who defeats Romney, it will be the Right. Everyday there are endless articles on the Left about Romney and why he Cannot Cannot win! There are also endless articles on the Right about how Romney is doing everything wrong – Malkin: He just won’t call Obama names like Muslim, Socialist, Marxist, Criminal Kristol and Daniels: He shouldn’t be negative or mean about Obama but stay above the fray. He went to France on vacation and said he and Anne loved it – “He can’t be a conservative and like France!” The Right will do the doing in not the Left, the Left can’t seem to figure out where they are going from one day to the next. Those on the Right who cannot abide Romney, please be quiet for now, after Romney is elected you can whine and cry over everything you may perceive to be boring, not conservative enough, how unexcited you are about his speeches to the country. Surely, you can find something to do between now and the Election. It would nice if you could find something good about him but if not just let him defeat Obama without your assistance to Obama. Old saying – “Lead, Follow, Get Out of the Way” – your choice. Romney 2012
Let’s review.
Obama thinks it’s a winning strategy to back the Black Panthers at every criminal turn. To back an attorney general who looks the other way every time the Panthers commit a federal crime.
To make up out of thin air every awful thing his lawyers can think up and accuse Mitt Romney of doing it.
He thinks it’s a winning strategy to admit to voting for late term abortions, not to mention the day in out slaughter of the unborn.
To leave drilling oil out of his energy plan, killing Keystone like it’s some reincarnation of Osama Bin Laden.
To run a campaign of divisiveness, disunity, dissension and disingenuousness, not to mention class warfare. I guess nobody ever accused President Obama of having even an ounce of class.
To lay low about the second amendment until he wins a second term when he can reduce it to a choice of sling shots.
To sell missile defense to the highest bidder in his second term when he has the flexibility to hand it over to the Russians on a silver platter.
To ignore the fact that he went to every school growing up that kids born with silver spoons go to.
To assume his ministries of propaganda (the mainstream press) will never have a come to Jesus meeting and realize they’ve been played for fools.
To devalue the U.S. dollar until it’s indistinguishable from the money of the Confederacy.
To allow the nation’s school’s in the poorest areas to go to pot while sending his future Marxists to the best private schools money can buy.
To do nothing that would open himself to criticism (like creating a real budget) while criticizing the adults in the Republican party who created a real one and made tough decisions doing it.
To ignore the fact that Medicare is a financial time bomb.
To possess every conspiratorial intent on earth to run this great nation right into the ground.
To wait till his second term to do away with the federal tax mortgage deduction.
To wait till his second term to put a new hefty tax on presently non-taxed 401K retirement savings plans.
To lower our standards of living till they’re ground level.
To ignore his Constitutional duty to stop the drug traffic running across Texas and Arizona borders willy-nilly.
To blame Supreme Court judges for Obama’s signing into law ObamaCare; an unconstitutional plan of ultra-expensive junk insurance designed to bankrupt the nation and put every private insurance company out of business.
To speak in halftruths and full fledged lies, while committing the kinds of traitorous acts that should come with radical punishment; acts that, to me, come with the daily frequency of the 7:15 AM out of Manhasset.
To depend on a press that fails to recognize that the Obama administration is comprised of the scum of the earth; traitors, liars, misfit hypocrites all who love money and power and hate the freedoms this country stands for; Barack and his despicable bunch find themselves occupying the most sacred address in this nation: 1600 Pennsylvania. And every day they desecrate it.
I could go on and on, but I hope you get the idea.
This nation is being led by bandits. And they want a second term so bad they can taste it. And they’ll say and do anything they have to, to obtain it.
This nation is currently being ruled by the scum of the earth; traitors, liars, misfit, Marxist hypocrites all who worship money and power and aggrandizement while reacting to freedom and liberty like the Devil reacts to a cross and holy water.
The Obama administration, along with their Joseph Goebbels type ministers of propaganda (the mainstream media) are out to tear freedom’s fabric asunder; the U.S. Constitution to shreds.
I see Barack Obama as evil incarnate. His actions scream it. If I could, I’d scream it from the mountaintops.
I guess there’s a little Howard Beale in all of us.
Barack Hussein Obama is a card carrying Communist, I have said many times. This is obviously my opinion because how can I ever prove it? But, if it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck, and flies like a duck, it is probably a duck.
** “To run a campaign of divisiveness, disunity, dissension and disingenuousness, not to mention class warfare.” **
It’s the class warfare that makes me the angriest. First, I’m SICK of hearing O, dems, libs, progs, etc. whine about things not being “fair”. Grow the hell up & stop sounding like 3rd graders. Life ISN’T fair! Get used to it, get over it, get a life already.
Hand-in-hand with the fairness issue is the fact that we can have equality, or we can have freedom — but not both. They’re mutually exclusive. (I’m not talking about basic freedoms b/c one is alive & walking around w/o artificial barriers put in the way, i.e. “You can’t have this job/house/etc. b/c you’re black/female/etc.) If equality is the biggest thing, you will necessarily intrude on others’ freedom, by taking things from those who “have” to give to the “have nots”.
However, those who would be “helped” (but made dependent!) evidently haven’t yet realized that a huge, centralized govn’t that GIVES everything can just as easily TAKE everything. Since “O & Comp.” have shown they’re not real big proponents of following the law, those benefits could disappear on a whim, or decision from the flavor-of-the-month.
I would sell an organ (no mention of WHICH organ) to hear Romney forcefully and theatrically deliver the following lines in a live debate with Oba-Mao:
“You talk a lot about Fairness. Well I have a news flash for you…LIFE ISN’T FAIR, and until we are all born looking exactly the same, with identical IQ’s, status and heritage….that notion is simply a FANTASY. The very best that we can do as a society and to guarantee though sound government, is to foster an environment where all people are granted the ability to nurture and magnify their disparate God-given talents, care for their families, and volunteer their resources to the needy without coercion or interference driven by envy, greed, and need to control others for personal gain. Our differences are what make us unique and special and they should be celebrated, not regulated out of existence.”
It is even worse than that …
Many of the “have not’s” have not, because they outsourced control of their future to their deep-pocketed employer, union boss, or Best and Brightest in government … expecting them to guarantee for them the same job in the same town for a lifetime, with raise after raise without regard to actual productivity or competition … or expecting them to create an environment where they can pursue a career with a degree in Underwater Basketweaving.
They unplugged themselves from the grunt work of planning for the future/saving for that rainy day/maintaining their value in the marketplace. And in the process, unplugged themselves from wealth creation.
These are the ones ALREADY suffering the most today … even before the government takes from them, as you describe.
Those that have not bought into it, and kept control of their future … even if it meant buying less $tarbuck$ and iThingys and instead saved/planned/managed their value in the marketplace actively … are the ones better off today. And they are the ones who have both the freedom, and the personal initiative, to capitalize on “random” chance and/or bring forth the innovation that makes life better for themselves and others.
This mal-distribution of responsibility and authority is the central problem we are facing today — everything else … the debt, the spending, the financial crisis, the health care issues … is a symptom.
It is far more significant, IMO, than the distribution of wealth Progressives get all twitterpated about … in fact, the wealthy have very little power over us, EXCEPT except in areas where they can collude with government to leverage the law through crony capitalism, the 21st-century refuge of the robber baron.
The more we look to government to make things “fair”, the more opportunities we create for these robber barons to oppress and exploit us, even as the nattering nannies who collude with them try to jam their socio-economic morality down all our throats with fundamentalist zeal.
And millions of us look to government for just that, because we believe the message they have been told again and again and again …
All you need to do is show up for work or go to school; we have experts who have the answers to your housing needs, your health care needs, your financial needs … no need to plan for your future or actively manage your career, since we can do a better job than you can; just trust us to solve those problems FOR you.
Show me a leader who will expose this Biggest Lie of All for what it is, tell us straight up that we need to take back responsibility for our lives … and I’ll show you a leader I can vote for, instead of merely using him to defeat his opponent.
Well said, Rachel. I do believe you have it all in there. To Jim Baker, the old song “Faith of our Fathers” is good enough for me tells the story of Obama pretty well. Those who accept the faith of their fathers without question or change are the intellectually lazy, sad to say. Most of us Americans who trace back our roots over a hundred years on these shores, accept the faith of our fathers as being Christian and Constitutionalism, even if we can’t exactly express what those principles stand for. Obama’s parents and grandparents were Muslims and Communists. For all his smooth talents, Obama is neither intellectually energetic, studious, well-read or curious. He has bought the faith of his Father and Mother all too well, even if we include the charlatan Reverend Wright. Obama describes Christian doctrine once in a while, but it always sounds like it comes through a Marxist lens darkly. You are right, and the pieces of the puzzle all fit together. Sadly, we will never get a main stream commentator or politician, Romney included, to try to put those pieces together. Brietbart had plans to. Let’s hope his heirs have the ability to do so. Their first foray, about Rev. Bell, was a little too esoteric and did not make too big a splash. Let’s hope they have something better for later. But as I said elsewhere, I do not believe there are too many engaged, intelligent minds that are still available to be persuaded. Everyone who has an attentive mind has already made it up, I would think. What possible votes are left to swing?
“What I worry about would be that you essentially have two chambers, the House and the Senate, but you have simply, majoritarian, absolute power on either side. And that’s just not what the founders intended.”
- Barack Obama
versus
“[T]he powers of the federal government are enumerated; it can only operate in certain cases; it has legislative powers on defined and limited objects, beyond which it cannot extend its jurisdiction.”
- James Madison, Speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention [June 6, 1788]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Does this not illustrate what utter disrespect Obama has for the Constitution and Founding Fathers ? They knew damn good and well what they intended and one of the other things they intended was for the people not to allow totalitarian ideologues like Obama to screw things up beyond repair !!!!!
I seem to remember Palin was picked as McCain’s running mate the day after the Immaculation ended. If memory serves, all the cable news chatter the next morning was about Obama’s Nuremberg Rally until the news broke about Palin, then everyone switched to that, and for the next few weeks Obama was Old Hat, until the knives came out for Mrs. Palin.
I wouldn’t be a Mormon because of my historic Christian ties but since I spent some time in Salt Lake City on business, I have nothing but praise for what the Mormons represent in the areas of family, education, and patriotism. They are uncommonly friendly and helpful. Conversely, I have serious reservations about Black Liberation Theology (The One’s Church) composed of elements of Marxism, Racism, and Hatred of our Country. All that aside, one’s religion shouldn’t be a campaign issue IAW the Sixth Amendment. I like Romney and will vote for him. If he wins, hopefully, there won’t be riots since according to MSNBC, only racists would not vote for the One.
“The fresh-faced challenger is now the dour incumbent with a crappy record.”
That about sums it up for Obama and this election. I think right now a can of soup could beat Obama. And if you ask an Obama supporter WHY they support Obama, they can’t really tell you why. You’ll never convince these people otherwise because they would never vote Republican anyway. But for those people on the fence (and for the life of me I can’t imagine WHY they would even be on the fence given Obama’s horrible record), all I would do is show a big picture of Obama and Biden and say, “You want four more years of this???”
Slainte, Mr. Green! A Romney landslide (actually, an ABO landslide) is my fondest dream.
The War on Women, Martin/Zimmerman, Keystone Pipeline – that all tells me that Obama is trying to shore up his base. These three groups – Left (Environmental), Left (Women), and African Americans – are always solid for the Democrats. That they have to be given this sort of attention tells of problems.
Why am I the only one to think that the housing/banking crisis, which began in 2007, was generated at precisely the right time in 2008 to launch Obama into the WH? You take away the banking crisis and McCain’s maverick dunderheaded suspension of his campaign, and Obama doesn’t win.
You’re far from the only one to think that. We essentially had a coup d’etat in ’08 when a Soros-led cabal of homegrown billionaires, leftist foundations and endowments, and, maybe, some sovereign wealth as well did their best to cripple the US economy with the aim of installing their communist, muslim puppet. So far, it’s working pretty well for them.
Hey, Art –
Here’s an article on Obama’s past you may not have seen:
http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1852/article_detail.asp
You had the red diaper baby right, but may have missed the CIA connection.
Thank you for that link. I have saved it in my “New World Order” favorites.
The CIA has been compromised by the NKVD/GRU/KGB since its Oh, So, Social days. I knew how intertwined CIA was with the foundations etc, but didn’t know the explicit links to the Dunhams. I have the Dunhams down for either card-carrying CPUSA or very close and trusted fellow travellers, but in reality, they could have been doubles for either side or both sides. The first thing that cued me was what brought you from KS to Harry Bridges’ Seattle and then to Harry Bridges’ Honolulu? And since ol’ Harry was last seen on the Kremlin balcony, the rest started to fall into place.
The short selling that prompted the crash was a cyber attack pure an simple.
McCain didn’t have a choice re suspending his campaign. He made the strategic error of accepting public funds, while Obama didn’t, and he was being massively outspent. Suspending the campaign was (IMO) an attempt to generate free publicity by being at the forefront of the crisis in the Senate while saving funds for a final push closer to election day.
Didn’t work- the D’s ran the Senate in 2008, and there was no way they were going to let McCain look effective.
McCain made a lot of mistakes in 2008.
No danger giving the game away, Steve. The Obama crew checked out your site long ago looking for vodka recipes. They haven’t been back since.
Many of Comrade Obama’s minions profess to admire Chairman Mao, Obama probably does too, but hasn’t said so out loud – yet. Mao once said that the peasantry is the sea in which the revolutionaries swim. Anybody in leftist politics knows where it is safe for leftists to swim. You might see the OWSers trying to camp out in the biggest city of a Red state, but they aren’t going to stray far. Comrade Obama and, more importantly, his storm troopers are creatures of the Blue states and, specifically of the Blue cities. The cities are the only sea in which they’ve ever swum. Take them out of their comfortable Blue sea and they flop around awhile gasping for breath and they die.
Hopefully, John McCain was the last Republican candidate who’ll think of and address Democrats as “my friends,” and think of them as just regular people who just have some differences with actual humans. Leftists are not human. They don’t think like humans, and you can’t treat them like they’re human. Dealing with them is constant whack a mole; until they’re dead, they’ll keep popping up and trying to do something to you, so you have to be vigilant and hit them in the head everytime they pop up.
The fact that leftists can only live and breathe in the Blue places means that they’ve never really had any opposition. I learned this in learning to deal with The American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (AFSCME) when they took over our largest unit of employees from an independent association in the late ’80s. Alaska is one of only a handful of states that is heavily unionized but which also pretty consistently has either the Legislature or the Governor or both controlled by Republicans. Alaska politics is basically Big Labor vs. Big Oil and when I was head of labor relations I often felt like I had Saul Alinsky on one side of me and the Governor General of British India on the other, often an uncomfortable position.
When they got the unit, they sent out DC staff to deal with us rubes in flyover country, Hell, Alaska isn’t even flyover country unless you’re going over the Pole. I’ll admit that we were more than a little intimidated. But, we were also all ‘Boomers, all college educated, though not all degreed, and most of us had more than a passing familiarity with the leftist tactics of the ’60s and early ’70s, so it didn’t take us long to brush up on our communists, read or re-read “Rules for Radicals” and go toe to toe with them. We learned quickly that they simply didn’t know how to deal with actual opposition and didn’t know jack about true adversarial collective bargaining. They kept howling at us to send somebody with the authority to bargain to the table, even filed a ULP against us over it, but we won, because we did have the authority to bargain even though we had principals whose directives we had to follow. But what we figured out was what they meant was they wanted somebody they could bribe or make a personal or poltical deal with because that was all they understood. They didn’t know what to do, didn’t know how to even protect their jurisdiction in actual collective bargaining and we came to mess with them just because we could. Only when the Democrat governor decided that he wasn’t going to seek re-election and didn’t want to leave all the labor strife for his successor, did he tell us to relent and give them something to shut them up. They’d have never gotten it on their own and basically were ripe for decertification. But, they bought themselves a governor in ’94 who with the help of an open primary and Republican fratricide was re-elected in ’98, so they had a good run of pretty much getting anything they wanted that didn’t require legislative approval. All the old labor relations hands had left the Executive Branch so they had the usual Democrat assortment of kids and hacks. I was working for the Republican Legislature to make sure they couldn’t get any money, but we couldn’t control what the Administration was giving them in terms of power. But, being lefties, they overplayed their hand and even a Democrat administration got tired of being messed with by them and hired me back to restore some order.
What I found when I returned is that six years of just being able to make a phone call to get what they wanted had made them even worse at actual collective bargaining and I simply unleashed Hell on them against which they were almost defenseless because they’d lost the ability to make the phone call that made things right for them. My mission was both to bankrupt them and humiliate them by taking every grievance that we had a hope of winning to arbitration. Arbitration ain’t cheap, and in a loser pays system as ours was, you can really, really rack up some bills. We were also laying for any misbehavior by any union activists in our workforce with the full intention of firing any that we could and going to the wall with the union if they tried to defend them. That campaign resulted in three fired shop stewards, which resulted in the union firing the business agent who caused the stewards to get fired. Things got very quiet after that. By the time we got a Republican Administration in ’02 and I was the appointee in charge rather than just a working supervisor, they didn’t much want to fight any more. They formed a “Solidarity Coalition” to seek comfort with the other unions, none of which liked them any more than the State did, but we broke that up the way you break up any coalition of dogs; you throw a bone to one and rocks at the rest. They’ll be so busy fighting over the bone and trying to take it from the dog that has it that you can just pick them off at your leisure.
So, the moral of the story is that Lefties using Alinsky tactics expect you to be nice and to do what they’ve predicted that you will do. Everything is about trying to provoke sane, moderate, rational people to do something stupid. Then, when you’ve done something stupid, they personalize the issue to you, mock you, deride you, embarrass you, call for your removal, the whole gamut that we’ve seen so many times. Well, all you have to do is be unpredictable because they never have a Plan B. If you’re going to have a public meeting, expect the lefties to have had a big bean dinner before they all come to the hot stuffy room where you’re meeting. Yes, Alinsky did that. So, when they start doing what they’d planned, you do something they hadn’t planned for and turn on the big fans. If you don’t do what they planned and don’t do something stupid, they’ll do ever crazier things trying to get you to react, meanwhile looking crazier and crazier and shedding support from the rank and file and the public. When they’ve done something suitably outrageous, like eat a dog, you smash them with it. They’re one trick ponies and they are convinced to the core that they’re vastly superior to you, so they never even think about what you might do. All you have to do is hit them in the head really hard a few times and they sit down, shut up, and leave you alone. I hope some of Romney’s people have a copy of Rules for Radicals handy.
As someone already mentioned, all Romney has to do is go after O the same way he went after Newt Gingrich & it will all be over but the shouting. Romney, IMO, has already embarked on a pattern that appears to not be that of a McCain.
I don’t like McCain for a variety of reasons, most of them about his “maverick” thing, but I think that when the Soros Cabal pulled the plug on the US economy, they also whispered something in McCain’s ear that caused him to basically strike his colors. He had a near-miss with the Keating Five thing, so maybe there’s something there that they had on him. His wife is quite wealthy, so maybe they threatened her. Whatever it was, McCain’s campaign for the Presidency just stopped. Maybe they were afraid to tell Palin and let her stay out there taking the slings and arrows. Maybe they told her and she refused to go along. That would explain why the McCain people unleashed Hell on her, though I know better than most how easy it is to NOT get along with Sarah Palin.
I don’t put a thing past Soros; he might as well be the devil himself. I just hope that he & his minions won’t be able to pull something like that (the coup d’etat) off again this year.
And this , dear republicans, is why you will loose, and loose big. When you go to an election with the focus that half of the population are not human and should be exterminated if possible, then you will loose. This and the promise of a war with Iran. Now you can all scream at me til youre blue in the face, and beat your chests and make grunting noises.
Well, highly educated lefty idiot, most of us can spell both lose and loose and know the difference. But we know, for the most educated generations evah, it’s not spelled wrong, it’s just spelled your way. You mind-numbed lefty robots have been educated to a system of thought that defies human history; post-modernist, multiculturalist, diversity worshipping foolishness has driven Western Civilization to the precipice and you fools want to dive on over because you don’t accept the lessons of humanity that teach us how your stupid systems of thought don’t work. So, yes, fundamentally we on the right live in the learning traditions of 10,000 years of western societal organization and thought; you on the left are aliens.
Like a Mummy during the “Cycle of the Full Moon”, the Tea Party Now Arises during each Election Cycle!Specific examples of Tea Party activism mixed in with some great Universal horror movie clips.
Its never been Obama vs. Romney. Romney is a smarter (obviously), more polished (again obviously), and more experienced (my mailman is more experienced than Obama) version of Obama. So, right there, Obama is in trouble, although he has the advantage of being incumbent, and the Conservatives disdaining (justly) Romney.
If it was that, it’d be a tough race.
But the real race is the MSM vs. Romney with Obama as the MSM’s proxy.
Now suddenly the experience and intelligence gap is on the other foot. There are decades of experience going after Romney, no centuries of experience. And while, let us be frank, many MSM folk are not that bright, there are more than a few that are.
Romney is facing an uphill battle. But it is nice to see that the moderates finally listen to the conservatives, and tell their guy to Fight (and not just fight the Conservatives). Too bad the moderates didn’t listen to the conservatives when it mattered, and thus supported a candidate that mattered. We can hope for a floor fight tho’. Perhaps Gingrich/Santorum or Paul can save us from the Race That Doesn’t Matter.
So, you buy the Romney-is-no-different-than-Obama nonsense too. A shame. I hope you don’t allow it to spoil your plans to support the Republican nominee this November, regardless.
I think I will steal a line from Instapundit about enviromentalists jetting to global warming conferences…..
I will believe the GOP Establishment that the crowning of King Barak the Bad to his second term is a real crisis, when they, the GOP Establishment start acting like it is.
When they nominate a real conservative rather than a look-alike abortion supporting, gun rights hating moderate, then I can believe them. But their actions say this is just another attempt at getting them to the pig troughs, and I frankly don’t care that much which set of politicians gorges on the public, and stomps all over liberty and virtue.
In fact, there is a case to be made that its better to have Obama, because then we have a chance of turning right when the inevitable crash comes.
Bobcatt, look beyond the election of the moment to the trends. Ask yourself if the actual conservatives out there might be right.
The entitlement mentality serves to drive voting patterns, IMO. It is so entrenched in people these days that pols who talk about austerity measures don’t get much traction. Couple that with conservative pols’ predilection for focusing too much on the social issues & one has the perfect recipe for political marginalization. It really is no small wonder moderates like the candidacies of the Bushes, McCain & Romney have resonated so well. Sure, the MSM helps along the way but what about all those folks who don’t pay all that much attention to tne news? Again, those who swing too far to the right, generally speaking, don’t fare as well in the general elections. It’s a pattern that is just as plain to see as the nose on one’s face.
So Ronald Reagan was a leftie? Hmmm imagine that!
“So Ronald Reagan was a leftie? Hmmm imagine that!”
In some ways he was with the ways he expanded the scope of gov’t. Look it up.
Thank you, Steve Demarcus.
Bobbcat, um no for two reasons. One…yours is a loser strategy. Two…even if you win, it doesn’t matter.
G. Bush Sr.’s 2nd Term (when he did not run as the third term of Reagan); Robert Dole; John McCain all have several things in common.
1. War heroes.
2. Old Republican hands.
3. RINOS.
4. Losers at the Presidency, although supported by moderates in the GOP.
Now, one could draw the conclusion from this that America hates war heroes, but I think it more likely that RINO=Lose Presidency.
What needs to happen is for the Base to be enthused by an actual Conservative, and then the Base gets the swing voters enthused. But the problem with this from the POV of the RINOS in the GOP is that they then have to share power with the Conservatives, and actually start limiting gov’t and supporting virtue instead of feathering their nests.
And GOP pols could actually start doing something about social issues instead of running from them like madmen despite social issues being vastly popular with the American people (border control has 70% popularity forex). Now why, in the name of simple electoral mathematics, are Republicans running from border control when its massively popular? Or Abortion which is popular with those who actually vote Republican? Gun Rights?
Now if the GOP is not willing to carry the banner for Conservatism, then the GOP can go the way of the WHIG, which had pretty much the same idea.
Tennwriter. If the immigration issues, prolife, etc. were as popular as you say, then the Republicans would not have to worry so much about the Indie vote. History shows that this just isn’t the case. Most people don’t have a problem with choice during the first trimester. Neither party demonstrates a very strong stance against amnesty; it’s a practical matter, really. How to deport them all, & there is the matter that illegals fill many jobs (albeit many have gone home during Obama’s job-killing reign). The second amendment is still intact AFA I can tell but I do wonder what’s up with all this ammo (hollow points) the feds have been buying up. Domestic terrorism (where is it)?
There is much that is very wrong with our gov’t as it’s being run by Obama & Co. that I just cannot imagine would ever be such under a Romney administration, no matter how left of center he may be. You apparently see little difference between Romney & Obama based on a few issues. But they are quite different. Maybe someday you will see it.
You seem to know where the fight needs to go. Nothing wrong with you taking the fight to them. You could just make a real difference if you will get into the fight. I’m just saying, I will fight in Colorado. Where will you fight? We will all have to fight if we want our country back.
Even if ABO is as bad as BO, BO should still be fired for his incompetence. A re-election is a reward for a job well-done.
Those who still believe a so-called conservative – Gingrich: a Fannie Freddie lobbyist, Santorumn: Spectre’s spectre, would be better and sulk at home in Nov. to give the election to BO are worse than the HopeAndChangers. The HopeAndChangers were naive, the “conservatives” are stuck-on-stupid.
“If I wanted America to fail”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CZ-4gnNz0vc
Why do you think Holder is fighting Voter ID laws all over the place? Why do you think Trayvon Martin is elevated to a national tragedy, with the explicit threat of a race war if Zimmerman is aquitted? Why do you think OWS is coming back out?
The Democrats know it will be a tough election. They are planning on cheating, again. Massive voter fraud, plus the threat of race riots will allow Obama a second term.
You want to initiate a race war when you are about 16% of the population and knowing that there are gun sales going through the roof, people are arming them selves and more going to the gun range, hell I have to sign a waiting list now-days when I used to just go and shoot all I wanted to and then go home the only part of the economy that has had a boom is the firearms industry.
There was also a time when even getting ammunition was almost impossible and 9mm is sold out a lot of the times but I also have other calibers so I bought them like .357SIG and 40, 45 and have plenty on hand.
I always carry at least two weapons with at least 40 rounds each fully ready to go, you want a race war then think again, you are gonna lose, I might die trying but I lived through the Vietnam Era mess and will probably make it through a smaller mess of about one in ten trying to kill me!
The economy was ultimately what lost the election for McCain, but he definitely ran an AWFUL campaign. It was clear he just sort of gave up and was terrified to campaign against a black person.
Romney actually seems to understand that politics is a blood sport, with the backdrop of this economy, I see him winning a solid victory over Obama.
Since the 2010 election cycle, I have thought there would be a landslide in 2012, but being slightly paranoid and a little bit superstitious, I’m loathe to say it aloud.
Just as your American press developed and delivered falsified information re George Zimmerman in the Tryvon Martin case, expect the same in the polls. They will use them to drive–not report–public opinion. They believe you are all stupid and therefore easily led. Please prove them wrong; the world depends upon you.
Thank you for that last bit.
We are still here and we are still strong, Esteban. Those of us who know our history know that we are the best remaining hope for humanity. Obama will try to enlist world opinion to win this and we hope you will help us where you can. There has to be liberty somewhere! Thanks for the post. We need to feel that at least some people in the rest of the world get it.
If anything, Obama is making Joe “BiteMe” Biden look relevant, if that could possibly happen! The resurgence in learning the Constitution has been Obama’s greatest accomplishment, if only for the wrong reasons.
The irony is Obama is going to have to run a big money big states campaign as Hillary did in the 2008 primaries… which given his war chest seems daunting. However throwing money at a problem does not always work either.
I think he’s not only untested politically. He’s untested in life.
I ask my liberal friends why they believed Barack Obama was to one American who deserved to be elected President of the United States? None of them could offer a single positive accomplishment.
His resume would not earn an interview for president of a $100M company. His tenure as an executive in the Chicago Annenberg Challenge was a disaster. He was a lecturer at Chicago, teaching the only thing he knows – Rules For Radicals. He had zero experience in diplomacy. He wouldn’t have been qualified to serve as an officer in the US military. For the first six of his seven years in the Illinois State Senate, he accomplished nothing. Emil Jones, Jr., the senate president, pushed Obama out in front giving him credit for other peoples’ work to grease the skids for his US Senate run. Oh yes, he read a nice speech from a telepromptor’
Before anyone trots out Osama bin Laden, when SEAL Team 6 popped Osama, Barack was on the back nine at Andrews AFB. If you were president and you knew the military was ready to snatch & grab the world’s most wanted terrorist, wouldn’t you be in the Oval Office in a suit and tie ready to thank the military who risked their lives to accomplish a mission impossible? Of course, without saying so, you accept their credit as Commander-in-Chief. Look at the picture in the situation room. Obama is a deer in the headlights.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/5680724572/in/photostream
If, as I expect will happen, ObamaCare is struck down by the Supreme Court, there will be nothing to his administration except massive debt and racial strife.
The Failed President is both a liar, loser, and is destroying America. He is a very dangerous man and ignores the law in general, the will of the American people, Congress, and the Constitution. There are no longer massive adoring crowds to deceive. For the first time in Barack Obama’s life, he is accountable.
Obama has never stood for individualism, capitalism, or liberty. The White House has been marginalized and he has proven himself to be the most inept president in modern history. He is symbolic of a man who has downgraded the White House, the Constitution, human life, foreign policy, race relations, and America herself.
The majority of Americans are sick of his condescension, his policies, his racist bigotry, and his incompetence. Obama is “the most disastrous president in our history.”
This is the most corrupt, incompetent, dangerous tyrannical administration in American history. He is an arrogant, hyper-partisan, race-baiting, and a committed Black Liberation Socialist.
What’s Obama and Romney going to disagree on during a debate, anyway? Guns, war, TARP, Patriot Act, NDAA, mandated health care, The Fed… they’re basically the same guy.
Ron Paul is the only one who can beat Obama. All the naysayers and media who dismissed him outright from the start, all the big-government fake conservatives pushing Romney and Santorum… hey, guess what happened this weekend…
RON PAUL WON IOWA. And Minnesota.
He’s be doing even better if the media would do their jobs and not been posting fake delegate counts the entire election and would give his Massive Rallies of 8,500 people some coverage and would cover things like the blatant caucus corruption in Athens, GA, St. Charles, MO, and now GOP tricks in Alaska (changing the date required to pay the delegate fee and then not accepting various forms of payment) and in King County, Washington where a Paul supporter gets elected caucus chair and suddenly everyone has to leave the building “because the GOP paid the building insurance.”
The media and establishment fake conservatives this election have been a ridiculous embarrassment. But, congratulations to the shills, they may have held Honest Ron and the truth off long enough for Romney to lose to Obama. More NDAA and big government for everyone! yay.
I have a new theory on the postings of alleged PaulBots in non-left wing comment sections. These are the people that the administration is paying to muddy the waters. They don’t support Paul or anyone else, except Obama. Their goal is to get as many people to stay home on election day, so The One can win by default. I like Ron Paul, and agree with a lot of what he says. But anyone who favors individualism, the free market, and smaller government owes it to themselves and the rest of America to vote for the Republican nominee, even if you hold your nose while doing it.
So the Obama administration is paying people to promote The Constitution and promote the elimination of things like the NDAA, deficit spending, policing the world, etc? What a bewildering thing for you to say.
Did I say write in Paul’s name if Romney gets the nomination? Nope. Did I even say to vote for Gary Johnson or someone in a third party if Romney gets the nomination? Nope. And yet people like yourself still have to bring out the “if he’s calling out the fake conservatives, he must be paid by the Obama administration” schtick. Gimme a break.
The most constitutional guy in the race, and thus the most truly conservative guy in the race, the most HONEST guy in the race, could have easily been the next President. Now time is running out, even after he’s now won the vaunted Iowa delegates.
I hope all the big-government fake conservatives enjoy their continued erosion of freedom, erosion of The Constitution, more wars, more debt, more inflation, more indefinite detention. You’ve earned it.
Hmm, Obama or Romney… I think I’ll vote for the one against gun grabbing, TARP, bailouts, the Patriot Act, and NDAA indefinite detention. Which one is that again?
In reading most of the posts on this thread, one thing is inescapable: the pattern of 2008 is being woven again. Once again, the GOP has barfed up a weak, flawed lefty nominee all in the holy name of electability (as defined by the MSM). Once again, there is a lot of nervous, sappy-happy talk about how the Won cannot possible stand against the GOP’s Great Moderate Hope. Once again, conservatives (who never seem to learn their lesson) are talking about how pleasantly surprised they are by
McCainRomney.But there is worse to come. In a moribund economy, with sky-high gas prices and ObamaCare as popular as HIV/AIDS, Romney is tied or trailing nationwide. This is the best the GOP could do – a failed one-term governor from a deep-blue state he has no hope of winning in November? Don’t kid yourself with excuses like “polls don’t matter at this point” – if all Romney can manage at this point is a tie, what do you think will happen in November when the Democrat Party mud machine goes into warp drive? And just wait until the Won starts talking about RomneyCare, which is (for once) a legitimate issue Romney cannot run away from.
In 2008 Senator Maverick got his clock cleaned by the Marxist community organizer from Chicago. What will GOP “moderates” do when Romney also goes down in flames this November? Blame the “fundies” and nominate Dede Scozzofava in 2016?
Yeah, if we’d just listen to the “TRUE CONSERVATIVES” and nominate somebody who could only carry a lilly-white district in the rural South, we’d win every election, or if we wanted to rule the whole World, we’d nominate RonPaul/RonPaul/RonPaul, and we could all be as crazy as a sh*thouse rat.
How is the McCain administration working out for ya?
Attacking the messenger with the bad news may make you feel better, but it does not make the bad news go away. Yet at some point even the “moderates” will learn that demanding absolute moderate purity in a Republican candidate is a loser for the GOP. Maybe.
Actually, I’ve long despised McCain mostly because he was so damned stupid about his “friends” across the aisle. I’m no moderate, but I’m no idiot, and unlike most “true conservatives,” I actually know something about running a government and winning an election. Back in ’08, I was a Guiliani supporter, first because he actually knows how to run a big government in a corrupt and demanding environment, and, second, because I’m not a So-Con as that is usually defined as making all issues subordinate to abortion and gay marriage. This time around I would have preferred Gingrich because he actually knows something about the federal government, but I had no illusions about his baggage. My second choice was Romney simply because he’d been a governor again in a corrupt and demanding environment. The rest of them had no business even pretending to run for the Presidency. And Ron Paul is as crazy as a sh*thouse rat.
I wish we had nominated a conservative this time around – but one didn’t run. There is no Ronald Reagan to save us this time. And BTW, back then Ronald Reagan was considered a radical and someone who could NEVER get the nomination let alone win the presidency. He won in a landslide both times and his message was one of American Exceptionalism when the country was down in the dumps from Carter’s post-American, “our best years are behind us,” presidency.
Ron Paul is probably the most conservative guy in all of Congress, much less just in the presidential race.
That is, unless someone thinks “conservative” means the newer brand of “big-government conservative” that includes policing the world, indefinite detention, and “conservative” budget plans that add trillions to the debt and don’t balance the budget for 30 years.
I know, I know, “but Ron Paul is for legalizing drugs.” Actually he’s for letting states decide the legalization of drugs. You know, that whole States’ Rights thing conservatives like to talk about.
In favor of my optimism, I point out that this election is not about Romney or the Republicans. It is about Obama. Most votes will be either for or against Obama. If Romney remembers that and focuses like a laser on exposing Obama for what he is and isn’t, essentially the lazy product of Affirmative Action applied to “Leftists Gone Wild” then he has a shot to get in through the Electoral College, if he plays the swing states intelligently, and ignores the Blue hell holes he cannot win. Obama is his own worst enemy.
So that is that is the lesson for Romney. Just be the “Not Obama” guy and keep talking about the future for yourself and the past for Obama. Ignore the MSM and the polls, and keep what is important in mind at all times. That is my message to Romney.
Sadly, he is the ultimate example of “It’s my turn.” But sadly also, nobody else that was better stepped up. The GOP has a deep bench, but for 2012, they are too young, or like Palin, already scorched and understandably fearful for her family. If the MSM learned anything useful for themselves, it was how to scare the bejesus out of the Best we have to Offer. Sad. That’s why Christie was so refreshing for a while. He did not give a hoot for those partisan yaps. But he was not ready to step up either. We’ll see if the second spot can help at all. But the better He/She is, the more heat will be turned on them. Example: Palin.
The problem, as was mentioned by earlier posts above, is that Romney is not running against Obama. If you put the two of them together, alone, in a room without any outside influence or assistance, Romney would clean O’s clock in a 57-State landslide.
No, the problem is that Romney is running against ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, UCLA, SEIU, Soros Inc, The NYT, The WaPO, Harvard, Yale, The State of Illinois, The Actors Guild, Teamsters, 4/9 of the Supreme Court, The View, France, The Nobel Committee, Journolist, NAACP, Mexico, The Daily Show, anybody on welfare and happy about it, Move-On, Acorn, The Black Panthers, Satan….
If Christie is an example of the best the GOP has to offer, then the GOP truly is a lost cause. Aside from union budgets and some good soundbites, Christie is a pretty big lefty. He may be what passes for a small-government conservative in the northeast, but that’s the same area that thinks Romney is far right.
Never, ever underestimate the immense power of the MSM in its capacity to mold & shape public opinion. The Republicans are at a constant & consistent disadvantage at every turn. This is why the best & the brightest from our side don’t run! I recall how little respect Reagan had back when he was running (for the 2nd time AWA the 1st). Albeit Romney has his particular brand of baggage, he may well turn out to be the very thing that will serve to turn the country around. Only time will tell, of course. Meantime this is hardly the time to be gnashing teeth over how pathetic our nominee is for whatever reason all the while it’s up to us to defeat the worst POTUS of our country’s history.
What could we do, when the GOP’s stars all decided not to run?
Yes, Ryan, Thune, Rubio, Christie, Daniels all offered significant advantages over Romney. BUT THEY DID NOT RUN.
Didn’t you watch the early debates? THOSE were the announced candidates we had to choose from. Those were the ones who actually entered the race. Which of them would you have wanted the GOP to nominate, to go up against Obama?
The GOP can’t just pull a dark horse candidate out of thin air and nominate him. He would have just two months before Election Day to pull the entire party together AND introduce himself to the voters. (That scenario hasn’t produced a winning candidate in 80 years.) And that’s assuming that this totally unvetted candidate didn’t have any skeletons in his closet like Herman Cain did, skeletons that would be revealed just 3 weeks before Election Day.
Paul Ryan is the poster boy for everything that is wrong with the Republican Party. He’s a big government guy and makes no bones about it. Patriot Act, TARP, NDAA, “conservative” budget proposals that add trillions to the debt and don’t balance the budget for 30 years, has no problem with the freedom to go fight wars and police the world but if that same soldier comes home and wants the freedom to play poker on the internet forget it.
Paul Ryan: just another big-government fake conservative.
face it…
in general, single women/mothers are the epitome of low information voters, that can still be swayed by anecdotes.
the ‘dog on the roof’ resonates, almost exclusively, for them.
but ditto for dog touching ‘roof of obama’s mouth’.
80% of americans have a good idea on how they will vote, but the remaining ‘wishy washy vote’ is still up for grabs.
given the mecurical nature of the remaining votes available, we are about to embark on the most bizarre election, evah.
The opposing dog stories, silly as they are, have indeed brought something into focus.
One dog story is about an American solving one of life’s little annoyances – too many people and things to cram into a car – with an American solution – straightforward, mildly imaginative, successful. The other dog story is about a foreigner and his disgusting eating habits. I’m almost starting to like Romney (though “like” has little to do with how I vote).
I just love the Obama dog-story thing because it’s yet more evidence to show how un-American he really is. (I sure wish some reporter would have the courage to ask him what dog tastes like).
It tastes like chicken which I don’t really like, it sure don’t taste like possum or turtle or even quail or pheasant or goose perhaps even duck but I have talked to some that have eaten dog meat and they say it tastes like chicken so if you want to eat chicken then eat it not dogmeat!
LOL!
I wish I could believe he’ll be tested this fall. I’m just not convinced the GOP has nominated a candidate willing to do it.
Maybe he won’t – but his 501c3s will.
What I would stand in line for days to get a ticket for is the navel gazing, self-pyschoanalysis, gnawing of tongue, knashing of teeth of the MSM when Obama loses. The realization that their days of kingmaking are over, their worldview rejected and pink slips about to flow like a bad menstrual period is going to make for a spectacular display. Maddow and Schultz, Olberman and Brazaille, Steisand and Whoopie, O’Donnel and Griffith, Sharpton and Jackson and Farrakan, Reid and Pelosi and Frank; oh the agony of defeat.
Either that or as soon as the realization sets in that its game over they will turn on Obama and each other like starved cannibals (I’d have said dogs but that’s geting lame) in a desperate attempt to get in front of the crowd to appear relevant. I doubt they are that nimble.
I would have agreed with you in 2006. Sorry, dude, you don’t attempt to kill the king…you either do it or you don’t. The MSM is still the king.
One of the ironies of this whole thing is that had Gail Collins not obsessed over Seamus, the “Obama eats dog” meme wouldn’t have had traction.
And yes you remember the rollouts of VP’s correctly. And remember Obama promised his at 3 AM. After getting hit with the 3 AM ad by Hillary, that really wasn’t the brightest idea and it wasn’t even handled well.
I’ve been pleasantly surprised by Romney and I think he will pick a good, professional running mate that will be a good contrast with whomever Obama picks. Biden would be a heap of laughs against someone competent and if its Hilary it will be easy to find plenty of material wherein her supporters complained about Team Obama’s goon tactics in the last election. Besides Hilary herself isn’t exactly a bundle of charm on the campaign trail.
I’m also wondering if the opposition in the Republican primaries saw Romney as we are starting to see him now. Someone who doesn’t look spectacular but is hard to shake and can handle a crisis and a national campaign. Maybe its more accurate to think of him as kind of a junkball pitcher that doesn’t give up home runs turns scary looking line drives into double plays and keeps his team in the game.
Mah Buddy Barry aka Barack (Part One)
Ah ain’t used to writin much but ah tries and dats da main thing right? Ah gots lotsa help with dis so don’t complane bout my speling, ok? I jest wanna share mah o-pinions an complaints about our most awesomest president.
Most people call him Barack Obama or mebbe include his middle name, Hussein, but dat just be too Muslim, if yo catch mah drift. Anyways, to me he’s just plain ol’ “Barry,” the name he used fo years befo he got uppity and went to Columbia and Hahvard with a little help from his friends and learnt about his roots like Kunta Kinte.
I can call him Barry since him, Mishelle, and his honky veep an his dago campaign manager adress me by the name mah momma gave me when they email me once or twicet a week.
Ah signed up to be on Barry’s emailing list years ago and, since den ah be most proud to say I been invited to the White House a buncha times. Well, dey wasn’t invitations, dey was “opportunitys” to be invited if ah sent him money but ah consider them pretty real, specially dose extra-special invites to Barry’s and Mishelles birthday blasts.
Ah didn’t go because ah couldnt buy presents after we spend all our food stamps on some goodies, Ha, Ha, ya know wut ah mean. Ahm a responsibble person. Ah needed what was left to feed all my kids.
Yep, ahm what dey call a forty-seven percenter cuz 47% of Amerika is on food stamps and Barry is da food stamp prez and whats wrong with dat? They ain’t stamps no more, anyway. Now dey give us a credit card thing that makes us look like we’re acshully payin for our food!
Now, I can unnerstand the prez’s Wall Street friends like Goodman Sax are pissed at him for calling dem ”fat cats” but, c’mon, dey are fat, but why is it all about the green alla time, man? The Obama emails always go back to money like when ah was sorta invited to a party jest yesterday by some beatch, Ann Marie Habershaw.
She was nice tho and she gave me some good advise. She told me to ”Choose your guest wisely” when ah send her three my bucks–which i didn’t–to enter a raffle “to go to a party for the President at George Clooney’s house.” He’s dat actor that everyone thinks is gay but ah think he’s a lyin’ hypocrit for tryin to say he’s a ninety-nine percenter and we all know he’s a stinkin zillionire!
Just today, ah gots anudder emails what sez dey will pays mah aeroplane fair, dat is if ah coughs up dat tree bucks an ah wins da contest. Ahm not gonna tho. Ah jest don’t think no grate man like Barry shoud be rafflin hisself off like dat for 3 lousy bucks!
They all seem to have this thing about dat three number. My buddy hisself sent me an email last week. He sez, “The other side thinks they can win by trashing me” and axed me to give him three to help stop that damn trashing.
Ah couldn’t figger whose been trashing . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=22350)
I believe we have a fighting chance of winning this election, under normal conditions. However, we are living in times that call for extra vigilance and savvy on the part of each and every one of us. I don’t think it’s the visible we have to worry about. This is an article posted yesterday by Michelle Malkin. And just imagine, what’s going on that we DON’T know about?? Pay attention. Watch. Listen. Report.
http://michellemalkin.com/2012/04/23/democratic-activist-arrested-charged-with-illegally-stealing-220000-medicaid-patient-records/
I call Obama’s fictional world, ObamaLand. He’s still in it, despite the cracks. Obama’s world is coming apart, yet he doesn’t see it.
He got a shot and blew it badly, so take or leave it he will lose worse than Carter…what a putz GOOD EVIDENCE it available to all that can still hear and see!
No there won’t be exclusive book offers, cause he can not write and only read and not lead, WTF is leading from behind, nothing at all just another excuse for more failure, this is the worst presidency ever, and hey goofball it is time to go somewhere else, like a Federal prison along with Eric Holder and even Janet Napalitano ( the Ice-cream Lady) she will melt like her wares along with her ill-convinced policies.
I am a proud American that said I would stand against enemies both foreign and domestic, and all the above are enemies according to 1970′s war in Viet Nam which I was part of and home and still able as a matter of fact most that I work with have no clue that I am 59 years old and I have even had to show my concealed carry permit or drivers license to prove it!
On a trip to Washington DC a couple of years ago, I had the phenomenal luck to see Obama walking outside the White House one crisp cool Sunday morning with a couple of secret service guys by his side. While I don’t know whether this has anything to do with Obama’s taste for dog meat, all of a sudden, Obama bolted away. I heard when of the secret service guys yell on his collar radio, “the boss is chasing another parked car.”
On a trip to Washington DC a couple of years ago, I had the phenomenal luck to see Obama walking outside the White House one crisp cool Sunday morning with a couple of secret service guys by his side. While I don’t know whether this has anything to do with Obama’s taste for dog meat, all of a sudden, Obama bolted away. I heard one of the secret service guys yell on his collar radio, “the boss is chasing another parked car.”
Oops. No, I won’t. Since the selection is over, there will be no need for you to cover the process. Sometimes, I forget to make sense. Sorry.
Requested Comment:
You do speak in such a way as to minimize objection to your nominee prediction.
I’ll see you from the floor in Tampa.