Get PJ Media on your Apple

VodkaPundit

How Not to Do It

June 20th, 2010 - 11:04 am

George Will recounts a letter from an NCO serving in Afghanistan:

Receiving mortar fire during an overnight mission, his unit called for a 155mm howitzer illumination round to be fired to reveal the enemy’s location. The request was rejected “on the grounds that it may cause collateral damage.” The NCO says that the only thing that comes down from an illumination round is a canister, and the likelihood of it hitting someone or something was akin to that of being struck by lightning.

Returning from a mission, his unit took casualties from an improvised explosive device that the unit knew had been placed no more than an hour earlier. “There were villagers laughing at the U.S. casualties” and “two suspicious individuals were seen fleeing the scene and entering a home.” U.S. forces “are no longer allowed to search homes without Afghan National Security Forces personnel present.” But when his unit asked Afghan police to search the house, the police refused on the grounds that the people in the house “are good people.”

On another mission, some Afghan adults ran off with their children immediately before the NCO’s unit came under heavy small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), and the unit asked for artillery fire on the enemy position. The response was a question: Where is the nearest civilian structure? “Judging distances,” the NCO writes dryly, “can be difficult when bullets and RPGs are flying over your head.” When the artillery support was denied because of fear of collateral damage, the unit asked for a “smoke mission” — like an illumination round; only the canister falls to earth — “to conceal our movement as we planned to flank and destroy the enemy.” This request was granted — but because of fear of collateral damage, the round was deliberately fired one kilometer off the requested site, making “the smoke mission useless and leaving us to fend for ourselves.”

I’ve said all along that I don’t think the President’s “surge” in Afghanistan is likely to achieve successes commensurate with its risks and costs — in treasure and blood. I’ve also said all along that I still wish Obama — and the military, and the country — success. Winning a war is far more important than any partisan advantage, even though that but of wisdom is too often lost on the Left.

All that aside, I no longer think that upping the Afghan ante is unlikely to work. Right I’m damn sure it’s doomed.

Please, Mr. President, if you’re going to commit, then commit. Lives are on the line.

Click here to view the 14 legacy comments

Comments are closed.