Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bryan Preston

Bio

March 18, 2013 - 3:12 pm

Jennifer Rubin begins her latest on the RNC’s report in this way:

The reaction to the Republican National Committee’s after-action report has been telling. Anti-immigration activists don’t like the suggestion that comprehensive reform is needed, even if the content of that reform is left entirely blank in its report. In other words, whatever might lessen the barrier to minorities they oppose. Okey-dokey.

So, opposing what we’ve all seen pushed as “comprehensive immigration reform” over the years, which generally involves putting people who’ve broken the law ahead of those who haven’t while never addressing real border security, makes you a racist? Okey-dokey.

Actually, not. “Comprehensive immigration reform” generally includes two things: Some form of slow or fast amnesty with a pathway to full citizenship for those who have broken our laws, and promises for security that are never delivered. That in mind, Rubin’s paragraph is a disgraceful smear of well-meaning folk who do not trust the Democrats based on their rhetoric and record, and have been burned by the GOP’s establishment in the past, on this issue and others. It’s not difficult at all to see why the Washington Post keeps her around. After that paragraph, designed to stir up anger, the rest of her article is useless except as a weapon for the left, who will use it to say “See, even the Post’s token Republican agrees that her own party is full of racists!” Thanks for that…

Setting the smear aside, it’s awful politics. “Alienating what’s left of your dispirited base is great politics,” said no one, ever, who has any idea what they’re talking about or has ever contemplated what it really takes to build a winning coalition. If you want to persuade someone to your point of view, it’s unhelpful to insult them right off the top.

So, no, I’m not trying to persuade Rubin of anything here. I’m offering an alternative point of view.

My second take on the GOP’s Opportunity report is that it’s as unserious on immigration policy as Rubin is. It discusses strategies and math, but buzzes over the former and never does the latter. For instance, as Ramesh Ponnuru points out, the authors never contemplate what impact embracing “comprehensive immigration reform,” in whatever form, will have on the party’s grassroots and turnout. Will more of them stick with the party, or stay home, if the party moves in a direction that they do not support? Will they become more fervent activists, stay the same, or offer less of their services, if the party does something that they consider to be unwise? The report never makes any attempt to figure that out. It never examines the trade-offs involved. Isn’t that kind of important — not just the content of the policy, but its political impact? The report’s authors seem willing to trade sure-thing base votes for iffy votes from independents and soft Democrats based on an unwritten policy. Whether this can really be a winning strategy is very debatable. You don’t generally destroy the foundation of a house before you add onto it, at least not if you want it to remain standing for very long. You certainly don’t start the project without a plan, unless you’re either a savant or an idiot. Which of the two tend to dominate Washington?

Political parties are, fundamentally, vehicles for enacting some policies and resisting others. Membership and activism are optional. People can always find something better to do that listen to yet another speech or go out knocking on doors. If Republican base voters see their party as surrendering on an issue that they believe will damage the country and the party, based on how that policy has been crafted and offered in the past, and choose to withdraw their support for the party based on its choice, they are not racists. They’re making a choice based on the party’s performance as a vehicle for policies they prefer.

If Jennifer Rubin thinks that calling people racists over serious policy differences helps, then she’ll find herself well-liked in certain elite circles within the Beltway. If those same elites follow her advice, the GOP will stand for nothing and become a rump party in short order.

 

 

Bryan Preston has been a leading conservative blogger and opinionator since founding his first blog in 2001. Bryan is a military veteran, worked for NASA, was a founding blogger and producer at Hot Air, was producer of the Laura Ingraham Show and, most recently before joining PJM, was Communications Director of the Republican Party of Texas.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (5)
All Comments   (5)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
The only reason to read Ms. Rubin's work is because the writing is at least palatable usually ( though there are off days and she is certainly no more than a moderate) and then to read the comments of the hateful left who will brook no rationality on what they feel is "their" newspaper. The wailing and gnashing of teeth over "the WaPo becoming just another FauxNews"(and that is a fairly direct quote that has appeared multiple times.) renews my faith in my own sanity.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
If Rubin is a conservative, I'm a Rosicrucian. She's no conservative. Her articles recently have been taking the from, "What's the matter with you disgusting stupid right-wing extremists?! Oh, and please vote Republican. Thank you."
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I hate that you can't edit these things. Typos-R-Us.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I used to look forward to Jennifer Rubin's columns in Commentary Contentions. They were spot-on and always had a very conservative tilt. Her move to the Post has been a lose-lose-lose situation for all.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"If those same elites follow her advice, the GOP will stand for nothing and become a rump party in short order."

But they will be able to engage in some sparkling rump-partee at all the right rump parties...
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “The Post’s ‘Conservative’ Blogger Jennifer Rubin Calls Other Conservatives Racists”