Predicting that Democrat race baiters would play the race card in defense of Ambassador Susan Rice was the easiest prediction I’ve ever had to make. Even singling out Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina was easy. The race card is the only card Clyburn knows how to play. The media never calls him on it, which is the only thing that can make hacks like him knock it off.
President Obama hasn’t said whether he will nominate Susan Rice to be secretary of State, but the debate over her is already intense.
Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., told CNN on Tuesday that some Republican claims that Rice is “incompetent” may be racial in nature.
“These are code words,” Clyburn said, adding that “these kinds of terms that those of us — especially those of us who were born and raised in the South — we’ve been hearing these little words and phrases all of our lives and we get insulted by them.”
Rice, the current U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, has been criticized by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and other Republicans over comments she made following the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.
Rice has been criticized, for your information David Jackson of USA Today, because she said things about a deadly terrorist attack that were not true. The evidence assembled suggests strongly that she knew they were not true when she said them. Most people would adjudge her to have lied, if the mainstream media and hacks like David Jackson of USA Today bothered to do their jobs. But it’s now racist to point out the obvious. And the dishonest passive-voiced media, exemplified by David Jackson at USA Today, goes out of its way to avoid just laying out the facts.
Hacks. The lot of them.
An ambassador and three other Americans were brutally murdered in a terrorist attack on Sept 11, 2012. Dozens more had their lives put in grave peril. The President, his national security advisor, the Vice President, the Secretary of Defense, and several other high ranking officials all watched it happen in real time in the Whitehouse situation room. Days later the President specifically ordered our Amabassador to the United Nations to go out on national television and deliberatly lie to the American people as to the circumstances behind this horrid incident. Rep. Clyburn can go to hell.
What lie was that exactly?
You conveniently pretend to forget that Rice’s comments to the media has many caveats.
I was called a racist by my Inlaws last year. Why?
They were losing a Liberal talking points argument and I actually started laughing at them.
When they grew down the race card, I became quite angry. Then the next morning i realized this was the best Christams gift they could have given me.
Now we don’t talk.
Yay!
I’m no racist. I also want the incompetent James Clapper out of power. NOW.
Clyburn is a sweater-wearing, hockey-luvin’, James Stewart-watchin’ honky from Battlecreek.
Calling Clyburn incompetent would be a flattering exageration.
I wasn’t always a racist. In fact, I worked really hard at purging myself of anything remotely approximating it.
And then the race-card players came along and the Congressional Black Caucus came along and Obama came along and …
Well, let’s just say I’m having to work a lot harder these days.
No van Clyburn, that Clyburn! His “race-piano” ‘s no longer playing that sad ole tune. — Not to mention that if he knows it’s “code”, then he must be privy to the “code-book”. Himself a user? Really!
Much as it pains me to say, Clyburn is correct. As defined by the racial spoils system Blacks and Hispanics are inherently incompetent while Whites and Asians are inherently competent. Calling Rice “incompetent” is thus the same as calling her “Black”. All Clyburn is saying is that based on her skin color (and Holder’s, Obama’s and Clyburn’s) you cannot expect anything but sheer and utter incompetence. The beauty of Affirmative Action is the pride with which Clyburn professes his incompetence.
DFN.
Along those lines: http://www.creators.com/opinion/walter-williams/black-and-white-standards.html
There’s no cure for that kind of stupid.
I really need a racist/tolerant liberal dictionary so I know which words I can use and which I can’t.
For instance, using the word “incompetent” liar is a racist term when referring to a U.N. Ambassador lying about the murder of four Americans. So what is the accepted terminology to refer to such a person? Is it ok to just call her a liar without referring to competency? Or is liar a racist term when referring to a person of African descent that is lying?
See what I mean?
I am shocked, truly shocked that Repr. Clyburn has been called incompetent going as far back as he can remember.
Here, I’ll explain it to you.
When you call someone of another race incompetent when they are clearly not incompetent; racism is the only coherent explanation.
I’m not sure if this was intended to be satire. But, Susan Rice clearly was, and remains, incompetent. It has nothing to do with her race, it has to do with her abilities (or rather, her lack thereof).
But in the postmodern world of the left, incompetencs is .
“Clyburn: ‘Incompetent’ is Racist Code Language Now.”
We should all listen closely to old Jimmy! If anybody can define and entail what a racist is — its a racist! Jimmy and his ilk represent the largest block of racists in america today.
To paraphease the most honorable Reverend Wright ” I am sick and tired of negros, who are down with the struggle”.
– Jackie Robinson?
Add Hank Johnson to the incompetent list. He was worried that Guam would tip over into the Pacific if we added some Marines to the island’s heavy load. Stupid. Is that a code word too?
If the shoe fits…