Video:
THIS IS A RUSH, UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT
MITT ROMNEY: good morning. americans woke up this morning with tragic news and felt heavy hearts as they considered that individuals who have served in our diplomatic core were brutally murdered across the world.this attack on american individuals and embassies is outrageous, it’s disgusting, it breaks the hearts of all of us who think of these people whohave served during their lives for the cause of freedom, and justice and honor. we mourn their loss and join together in prayer that the spirit of the all mighty might comfort the families of those who have been so brutally slain.four diplomats lost their life, including the u.s. ambassador j. christopher stevens in the attack on our embassy at benghazi libya. and of course with these words i extend my condolances to the grieving loved ones who have been left behind as a result of these who have lost their lives in the service of our nation. and i know that the people across america are grateful for their service, and we mourn their sacrifice. america will not tolerate attacks against our citizens and against our embassies, we’ll defend also our constitutional rights of speech, and assembly, and religion. we have confidence in our cause in america. we respect our constitution. we stand for the principles our constitution protects. we encourage other nations to understand and respect the principles of our constitution, because we recognize that these principles are the ultimate source of freedom for individuals around the world. possibly the administration was wrong to standby a statement sympathizing with those who had breached our embassy in egypt instead of condemning their actions. its never too early for the united states government to condemn attacks on americans and to defend our values. the white house distanced itself last night from the statement saying it wasn’t cleared by washington. that reflects the mixed signals they are sending to the world. the attacks in libya and egypt under score that the world remains a dangerous place and that american leadership is still sorely needed. in the face of this violence america cannot shrink from the responsibility to lead. american leadership is necessary to insure that events in the region don’t spin out of control. wecannot hesitate to use our influence in the region to support those who share our values and our interests. over the last several years we’ve stood witness to an arab spring that presents an opportunity for a more peaceful and prosperous region but also poses the potential for perfectly if the forces of extremism and violence are allowed to control the course of events. we muststrive to insure that the arab spring does not become an arab winter. with that i’m happy to take any questions you may have. steve.
REPORTER: the statement you referred to was a a tough lee worded statement last night. do you regret the tone at all given what we know
ROMNEY: the embassy in cairo put out a statement after their grounds had been breached, protestors were inside the grounds, they reiterated that statement after the breach. i think heights a terrible course for america to stand in apology for our values, that instead when our ground are being attacked and being breached that the first response of the united states must be outrage at the breach of the sovereignty of our nation. and apology for america’s values is never the right course.
REPORTER: governor romney do you think, though, coming so soon after the events really had unfolded overnight was appropriate, to be weighing on this as this crisis is unfolding in realtime?
ROMNEY: the white house also issued a statement saying it tried to distance itself from those comments and said they were not reflecting of their views. i had the exact same reaction. these views were inappropriate. they were the wrong course to take when our embassy has been breached by protestors. the first response should not be to say, yes, we standby our comments that suggest that there is something wrong with the right of free speech.
REPORTER: what did the white house do wrong, then, governor romney if they put out a statement saying they disagreed witness?
ROMNEY: their administration spoke. the president takes responsibility not just for the words that come from his mouth but also for the words that come from his ambassadors from his administration, from his embassies, from the state department. they clearly sent mixed messages to the world, and the statement that came from the administration, and the embassy is the administration. the statement that came from the administration was a statement which is akin to apology and i think was a severe miscalculation.
REPORTER: you talk about mixed signals. the world was watching, isn’t this assault a mixed stph-ls when you criticize the president when americans are being killed shouldn’t politics stop.
ROMNEY: we were speaking about the different courses we could take with regard to the challenges the world faces. the president and i have differences of opinion with regard to israel and our policies there, with regards to iran, with regards tow afghanistan, with regards to syria we have many distinctions and differences. we join together in the condemnation of attacks on the american embassies and the loss of american life and join insympathy for these people. it’s also important for me just as it was for the white house last night by the way to say that the statements were inappropriate, and in my view a disgraceful statement on the part of our administration to apologize for american values.
REPORTER: governor some people have said that you jumped the gun a little in putting that statement out last night and you should have waited until more details were available. do you regret having that statement come out so early before we learned about all the things that were happening?
ROMNEY: i don’t think we ever hesitate when we see something which is a violation of our principles. we express immediately when we feelthat the president and his administration have done something which is thanconsistent with the principles of america. simply put, having an embassy which has been breached and has protestors on its grounds. having violated the sovereignty of the united states. having to embassy reiterating a statementapologizing for the right of free speech is not the right course for an administration.
REPORTER: if you had known last night that the ambassador had died, i’m gathering you did not know. hat came later. if you had known that the ambassador had died.
ROMNEY: i’m not going to take hypothetical what would have been known when and so forth. we responded last night in the events that happened in egypt.
REPORTER: now that foreign policy and the situation in the middle east has been thrust into the presidential campaign can you talk about why specifically you’re better qualified than president obama to handle these specific issues.
ROMNEY: i think president obama has demonstrated a lack a car a tee as to a foreign policy. my foreign policy has three fundamental branches. first, confidence in our cause, a recognition that the principlesamerica is based upon is not something we shrink from or apologize for. that we stand for those principles. the second is clarity in our purpose which is when we have a foreign policy objective we describe it uponness lee and clearly to the american people, to congress, and to the people of the world. and number three, is resolve in our might. that in those rare circumstances, those rare circumstances where we decide it’s essential for us to apply military mite,that we do so with force and with clarity of mission and with the u.s. mission involved and understand when it will be complete, what will be left behind us when that mission has been terminated. these elements i believe are essential to our foreign policy and i haven’t seen them from the president. as i’ve watched over the past three and a half years the president has had some successes, he’s had some failures, it’s a hit-or-miss approach but it has not based upon sound foreign policy.
REPORTER: how specifically governor romney would a president romney have handled this situation differently than president obama. you spoke out before midnight when all the facts weren’t known, how would you have handled this differently than the president did.
ROMNEY: i spoke out when the key fact was known, which was that the embassy of the united states issued what appeared to be a policy for american principles. that was a mistake. i believe when a mistake is made of that significance you speak out.
As I read the transcript, it appears that neither Romney nor the reporter know about the weasal words from the US State Department (in particular from Clinton). Apparently the Administration cannot get its act together, or maybe it prefers dissonance (the President gives Americans one message, the Secretary of State gives the world another).
While I applaud Mr. Romney’s words, I can’t help but wonder what he would have done as President?
He would not have apologized for our constitutional right to free speech. That in itself is a huge difference.
I can’t help but notice the hostile tone of questions for Romney compared to the fellatio Obama and Carney usually get.
The MSM is circling the wagons around Obama and attempting to make the story about how inappropriate it is for Romney to criticize Obama (funny how that was never an issue while Bush was in office) instead of the incompetence in the White House and their pathetic response to unfolding events.
Speech recognition software?
Part of this was carried live on my local Fox station – and not on ABC, NBC, or CBS. Romney froze for five or six seconds, was very hesitant, and was not fully prepared for the kind of stupid, rude questions he got.
It is of course “difficult” for a candidate to make a foreign policy statement like this, is MUST be seen as a campaign act, otherwise it would be somewhere between illegal and immoral.
The written statement is tolerable but wordy. Romney’s performance was awkward. If he is that awkward in the debates, he may well lose.
That’s laughable. You are aware, of course, that this wasn’t an episode of The West Wing. Aren’t you? Romney did just fine.
I don’t require a candidate to be Reagan, I can live with awkward, and Obambus without his teleprompter might be reduced to howling or reciting the protocols of the elders of zion.
But this was a *campaign* appearance, Mitt is NOT president and CANNOT speak for the nation at this time. It had to look good. It did not. It was passable. But a GOOD performance at this time, would have been HUGE. Mitt blew an opportunity, and I’m sure he knows it.
No he didn’t “blow it.” The responses I’ve been seeing are very positive. My reaction to it is positive. As I said, this wasn’t a scripted episode with several “takes” to get it right. Which leads me to question your apparent need to tear it down. But your attempt at a critique is absurd. I’m sure you won’t like to hear that since you want to be taken seriously. But you’re the one who “blew it.”
You are liable to see Mit’s six-second freeze played on Obama campaign ads.
Are you not familiar with the role of media in modern politics? Are you really posting on an Internet blog through a time-warp from 1890? I’m not saying it’s logical, but it’s certainly the way things are.
Dubya was often weak in front of the camera – but when it was absolutely crucial, like after 9/11, he came through like a champ. Still, the weak performances are a problem on their own, and they miss an opportunity to *communicate* to the vast unwashed who may be tuning in and aren’t at all familiar with the situation. That’s why it matters some, and isn’t entirely crazy that it matters how well it is done.
He did, and it was the substance of what he said that was important, not the delivery. This isn’t a debate, this is real life.
Romney is absolutely right, and must not back down on this. Already the media is carrying his remarks, or an edit of his remarks, without mentioning the early statements by the Egyptian embassy to which he is referring.
My God, someone has to stand up for freedom of speech! Hell, if a mayor in little Corvallis, OR is better briefed on that than our embassy staff, I don’t have much hope for our foreign policy.
The failure to defend our embassies is tragic, and will have repercussions. I wouldn’t be surprised if all of the embassies in the ME came under attack, with no real intervention by the host countries to stop it. Foreign leaders may like Obama more than Romney, but they do not respect him. I don’t believe they ever have. And it is simply a fact that being liked is not a requirement for world leadership- being respected is. We have lost world respect- this is Obama’s hostage crisis, only it ended more quickly and badly than Carter’s.
To clarify, I mean the US Embassy in Egypt, not the Egyptian Embassy.
It should also be pointed out that Obama wouldn’t even take questions.
I’ll speak for him: It was all Bush’s fault, so we should declare war on Israel today.
That’s funny. Almost as funny as your failed attempt to critique Romney’s press conference.
As the transcript was unedited enough to be difficult to follow, I tracked this down.
I like how Romney, after stating what he wanted to state, and answering the questions he was going to, left without a word when the last reporter simply repeated a question that had already been answered twice.
The Media is not Mitt Romney’s friend. The paranoia of Richard Nixon is uncalled for and unhealthy, but this is reminiscent of Reagan’s polite but open disdain for THE NEW YORK TIMES, and is most welcome.
http://www.therightscoop.com/full-press-conference-mitt-romneys-statement-on-libya-and-egypt/
It’s not paranoia if they’re actually out to get you. We call that self-preservation.
That’s the same NYT “reporter” who heckled Romney in Poland, isn’t it?
At 6:22, that is the NYT “reporter” who heckled Romney in Poland. I can tell right away from the irritating, grating voice.
It’s a type, you can tell from the tone of voice on any political call-in show, there’s a million of them out there.
Wouldn’t surprise me though in this case if it was the same person – nothing too wrong with that, “keep your friends close and your enemies closer”.
First off let’s get our timeline right. Romney stated that this comment was issued when the walls were breached and that is FALSE: “The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims — as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions,”
The above comment was issued before the walls were breached. Romney is going to get skewered for this as well he should.
No. It’s a PC comment and offensive to all patriotic Americans, whenever it was issued. It’s even worse in some ways that it was issued first.
Besides, the leftist line was originally that the apology was issued when the embassy staff was in fear for their lives, so make up your mind.
Josh baby – First off get off your high horse and quit misrepresenting what the timeline was ok. This seems to be the standard response from the State Department (see the Bush State Department response below). Second what Romney has done is will hurt him no matter how hard you are anyone here tries to spin it. He got his timeline wrong and no one apologized for anything. Now let’s not confuse tweets with the official embassy statement. Romney is going to get roasted and he will be twisting slowly in the wind over this and the POTUS will let him be hoisted on his own petard. But nice try
The Muslim world erupted in anger on Friday over caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad published in Europe while the Bush administration offered the protesters support, saying of the cartoons, ”We find them offensive, and we certainly understand why Muslims would find these images offensive.”
… The State Department spokesman, Sean McCormack, reading the government’s statement on the controversy, said, ”Anti-Muslim images are as unacceptable as anti-Semitic images,” which are routinely published in the Arab press, ”as anti-Christian images, or any other religious belief.”
Still, the United States defended the right of the Danish and French newspapers to publish the cartoons. ”We vigorously defend the right of individuals to express points of view,” Mr. McCormack added.
This President is a disgrace. Heis a treasonous POS and should hang.
It’s times like this that even every weak-kneed uninformed moderate, every knee-jerk evangelical Mormon hater, and even every Paulistinian whackjob can see the stark difference between That F*****g Guy and a real American President.
What more does anybody here need to know about Romney and Obama, that won’t get them off the couch working for Romney for the next 55 days?