Or at least one name. And it starts with O:
But here’s why I’m a little surprised my phone hasn’t rung. Your $1,000,000 donor Bill Maher has said reprehensible things about my family. He’s made fun of my brother because of his Down’s Syndrome. He’s said I was “f—-d so hard a baby fell out.” (In a classy move, he did this while his producers put up the cover of my book, which tells about the forgiveness and redemption I’ve found in God after my past – very public — mistakes.)
If Maher talked about Malia and Sasha that way, you’d return his dirty money and the Secret Service would probably have to restrain you. After all, I’ve always felt you understood my plight more than most because your mom was a teenager. That’s why you stood up for me when you were campaigning against Sen. McCain and my mom — you said vicious attacks on me should be off limits.
Yet I wonder if the Presidency has changed you. Now that you’re in office, it seems you’re only willing to defend certain women. You’re only willing to take a moral stand when you know your liberal supporters will stand behind you.
She’ll be all right, I’m thinking. What a tough girl!
outstanding.
I wonder who actually wrote it, but in any case, well done.
Who wrote your comment? Which left-wing group told you to go out and spit on this particular woman?
Leftists: hate-filled twerps, every one of them.
You haven’t been paying attention or you’re a fool.
But Odimwit can’t read – thus, pearls before swinne yet again.
An example of the application of Alinksy Rule 4. APPLYING ALINSKY RULE 4: MAKE THE ENEMY LIVE UP TO ITS OWN RULES. — A “tea party leech” is deemed a “tea party leader” in our local press after he is arrested for rape. This belies that fact that there have been 75 rapes in the Occupy camps, so examples of alternative headlines to suggest in the “Comments” sections of offending sites is offered. “Occupy” is a subsidiary of the “War in Women”: A Tea Party is one of the safest place for women in the world.
Josh, your slip is showing. . .
Did you click the link to Ms. Palin’s blog and read the post? Probably not.
Did you stop to wonder if what she says is true then the ideology you believe in is a perversion? Probably not.
Did you read Stanly Fish’s latest article in the NYT? The one where he states that the left is superior to all others and that they should have different laws and rules because they are superior to all others? Probably not.
Various ideologies have gone that route, Josh and it never ends without bloodshed and agony.
“After all, I’ve always felt you understood my plight more than most because your mom was a teenager.”
*snort*
As if Obama gave a rip about that typical white woman.
The young lady has far more class than most people commenting on blogs. She owns the high ground.
heh, what she said.
Bristol takes names and kicks ass with class, style and smarts.
Hmmmn. A young woman to watch, some real potential there.
Definitely takes after her mother. Go, Bristol!
Her first post writes itself. Whether or not she has anything meaningful to say about anything at all remains to be seen. Patheos is a religion site, so I guess she’ll be blogging about faith matters going forward. This post is just an attention-grabber (oh, there’s a shock…) and hasn’t anything to do with her faith. I suspect her posts will be ghost-written, or heavily edited by whoever at Patheos is using her for political purposes.
Because, after all, she couldn’t possibly have anything of interest to say on her own.
Interesting to whom? To me? I doubt it. She’s a young woman with very little education, a very narrow, odd, set of experiences, and no skill-set whatsoever.
If she’s writing about faith and religion, that’s nice, but it’s not going to be interesting to me.
As I said, whether or not she has an influential or relevant voice remains to be seen.
At least she isn’t a snob like you.
Oh, so now I _have_ to hang on every word some dimwitted pregnant teen spews forth just because her mother was famous once? Please.
I may be a snob, but at least I’m not perpetually stuck in high school where you force people to like all the people you like or hate all the people you hate.
I can think for myself, thankyouverymuch, and I’m not going to go all starry eyed over some girl who is famous for being the daughter of someone who was famous once.
If she has something to say all by herself, and on a topic not related to her mother’s short-lived ride on McCain’s ticket, fine. Until then, the jury’s still out AFAIC.
I don’t know, Nora, you sound EXACTLY like someone with narrow life-experiences who still relies on other people to tell her who she likes and doesn’t like this week. Referring to a 20-something mother as a “pregnant teenager”? Meow.
So, tell us about your amazing education and wide life-experiences.
That’s not the point. The point is that UNTIL she writes about something that doesn’t have to do with her mother, or that time in her life, we don’t even know who she is. She has to define herself outside her mother’s experience as McCain’s running mate.
UNTIL THEN, I’m withholding judgment. However, she opened with nothing new or original or interesting TO ME.
Am I allowed to have an opinion that is not exactly the same as yours?
But, no, as soon as someone whispers Palin, we must all fall to our knees and begin worshipping at the altar, right?
Knock yourself out, but I’ll pass, thanks.
“I suspect her posts will be ghost-written, or heavily edited…”
“If she’s writing about faith and religion, that’s nice, but it’s not going to be interesting to me.”
Well, make up your mind. Either she is writing nothin interesing or she isn’t writing anything. By your inability to remain consistent it is apparent you really couldn’t give two figs either way; BP is just an uneducated, ignorant, toothless hillbilly in your worldview and you will stand by that assertion no matter what. Anything coming from her blog will simply be taken as confirmation thereof.
And you wonder why people like you are dismissed with a snort on these pages.
Well, she’s not toothless, is she? As a matter of fact, she had quite a bit of plastic surgery, er, dental work done recently.
I’ve yet to see anything she’s “written” that wasn’t ghost-written and/or heavily edited. Why would I think otherwise? But let’s ask her, shall we? Let’s get her on record, then.
If she’s writing about faith and religion, no, I’m not going to be interested. I’m not interested in any of those faith/religion blogs, no matter who writes them. I’m sure I read things you’re not interested in. God forbid someone not think, speak and walk in lockstep with you, though…
Thing is, you’ve made up YOUR mind that anything and everything she writes will be brilliant, genius, enlightening and fascinating to everyone, everywhere, and if it isn’t, those people aren’t even really people at all.
I said we shall see…
At least I kept my mind open to the possibility that I might be wrong. You, however, have only reminded me why I avoid all things Palin — the Palin’s mindless, rabid fanz.
So snort away. You’ve proven my point for me.
SNORT!!! There, happy?
“If she’s writing about faith and religion, no, I’m not going to be interested. I’m not interested…”
And yet here you are, vomiting your bile. If you are not interested then this essay should not have caught your attention in the first place.
“I’ve yet to see anything she’s “written” that wasn’t ghost-written and/or heavily edited. Why would I think otherwise? But let’s ask her, shall we? Let’s get her on record, then. ”
And what we have here, boyz and grrlz, is an example of Begging The Question; a classic ad-hominem method of fallacious argument. You believe she has had her work “ghost-written and/or heavily edited”? Bring the evidence or Sierra-Tango-Foxtrot-Uniform.
“Thing is, you’ve made up YOUR mind that anything and everything she writes will be brilliant…”
Actually, I think her words speak for themselves. Whether they are “brilliant, genius, enlightening and fascinating” is solely in the eyes of the reader. I won’t bother mentioning what I think since, apparently, you already have read my mind.
“At least I kept my mind open to the possibility that I might be wrong.”
I fell off my chair reading that line. The totally smug, self-righteous Hurricane Nora might be wrong? That’s a howler!
And you know that how, Nora?
Ever since I started keeping the Palin Rumors lList in 2008, I’ve been amazed how many people know so many things about Palin and her family that ain’t so.
Well, Charlie, her second post is all about Dancing with the Stars. Ooh, and I’m SO glad she worked out the time zone thing for me. Math is hard!
I’ve seen enough. Waste of time, pathetic ploy by Patheos, a huge why-bother all around.
It invariably fascinates me how much fuss people can make about not wanted to read something.
Does the irony of showing up to say you’re not interested completely escape you? Truly uninterested people don’t show up.
Which means you and CR must be absolutely fascinated by my every word, since you only hopped into the thread to jump on me for not having a freaking orgasm over the notion that Bristol Palin has a blog. Or maybe you’re just a pewling little hypocrite…
Yes, the value of her words rests solely in the eyes of each reader. I find the first blog post to be worthless. Which bothers you for some silly reason. And then your next line proves that this was just a personal attack on your part from the get-go, so no matter what I would have written, you’d have found a reason to jump all over it. ~shrug~ Okay.
Don’t get the wrong ideas, please. I am just having fun whacking your piñata and watching the treats fall out. You don’t dissapoint.
Good God, but you must lead an exceptionally dull life…
Pointing out your arrogance and absurdity is about as challenging as pulling the wings off of flies, but on a slow day, that’s amusing enough.
You aren’t nearly as smart as you think you are and the Palins aren’t nearly as ignorant as you believe.
I don’t think I’m all that smart. And I don’t think that any particular Palin is necessarily ignorant.
Your point? Other than having such a pathetically empty life that you have to follow me around and personally attack me because I don’t hate all the same people you hate and worship all the same idols you worship?
Takes one to know one, apparently. In fact, pretty much all of your assertions about us “fanz” amount to one long textbook case of projection. Apparently, you are too self-centered and smug to notice.
Frankly, your own life must be seriously empty if you keep hanging around here for so much virtual @$$-kicking.
Well, except virtual arse-kicking isn’t real, dear, and your words have no effect on me whatsoever, unless your intent was to make me think you’re just sad and lonely and have a very small penis, in which case, good job!
“you’re just sad and lonely and have a very small penis”
Oooh! Now Hurricane Nora is trying to knock my cocksmanship. The hurt is just unbearable….
Talk about hate and personal attacks. You’ve got issues, darling and have clearly alienated everyone who ever tried to get close to you. Get professional help stat!
That’s going to be news to my husband of almost 30 years. You’ve made a horse’s arse out of yourself by deciding to get personal because ~gasp~ someone doesn’t agree with you about, um, the daughter of a celebrity. Really? Or is this still about me not worshiping your other idol, Rush Limbaugh?
This is what conservatism has been reduced to? This is the alternative to Obama? You troll conservative sites trashing anyone who doesn’t masturbate to the same computer images you do? Seriously?
And I’m now supposed to take this silly girl seriously because you really showed me, huh?
Sorry. Still think she’s a lightweight, still think you’re a douche. Nothing’s changed. And if you’re her audience I KNOW I couldn’t possibly be interested in anything she has to say.
Ooooh…what are you going to say now? I’m so scared….!!
Whatever. You’re on my permanent ignore list. Can’t even see your posts from now on. It’s great software. You should try it sometime.
One more whack at the piñata:
“That’s going to be news to my husband of almost 30 years.”
My sympathies to the poor guy. Sounds like a real winner.
“You’ve made a horse’s arse out of yourself by deciding to get personal because ~gasp~ someone doesn’t agree with you about, um, the daughter of a celebrity. Really?”
That’s a rich accusation considering who has been passing judgement about genitalia here. Believe me, you do not want that compliment returned.
“Or is this still about me not worshiping your other idol, Rush Limbaugh?”
Or, maybe it is about the rest of us not worshiping YOUR idols: Randi Rhodes, Rachel Mad-Cow, etc.
“This is what conservatism has been reduced to? This is the alternative to Obama?”
In your fevered mind, apparently, it is. In the real world that people actually live in, not so much. You really need to get out of the house more.
“You troll conservative sites…”
You better look in the mirror on this one.
“…trashing anyone who doesn’t masturbate to the same computer images you do? Seriously?”
Ewwww!!! There is not enough brain bleach in the world to remove that image.
“And I’m now supposed to take this silly girl seriously because you really showed me, huh?”
Nobody is telling you to do anything. Not yet anyways.
“Sorry. Still think she’s a lightweight, still think you’re a douche. Nothing’s changed. And if you’re her audience I KNOW I couldn’t possibly be interested in anything she has to say.”
And, yet, here you are puking your guts out about this “silly girl” who allegedly does not interest you. Frankly, I find your claim a bit less than credible. I think you find her a threat and you need to lash out.
“Ooooh…what are you going to say now? I’m so scared….!! ”
BOOOO!!!!
“Whatever. You’re on my permanent ignore list. Can’t even see your posts from now on. It’s great software. You should try it sometime.”
Hey, FYATHYRIO to you too! Come back again and you will quickly find yourself under another dog pile.
No, nice squirrelling though, Bristol understands full well that many who have spouted the most scurrilous insinuation s, about her and her mother, Louis CK, Wanda Sykes, David Letterman, and those are the publically known ones, rarely
receive any reproach in fact they are encouraged. Whereas Mrs. Fluke, was rewarded for being the abortion lobby’s favorite parrot, trying to dismantle
any semblance of a value system at GeorgeTown U.
Nora, not hanging on your words or whatever, just instalanched here.
Question: are you a Brit? If not, you’re a pompous ass trying to ape those she considers her betters, because that’s how we spell it here: ass, not arse. And since I detect no other Britticisms, I’ll stick with no, you’re not a Brit, you just wish you were.
As for Palin? Who knows what she has to offer? At least she’s punching up, not down. Nice of you to pretend objectivity, but to be fooled, well, what do you take us for?…Oh, right.
Since only the college-educated are human in your eyes, let me drop on you a word I picked up in Logic and Reason (Hume, IIRC): falsifiability. Are any of your political beliefs falsifiable? what would it take for you to say Oops, I was wrong?