January 10, 2012 - 6:09 am
…& ronApaulogists that we should trade with state sponsors of terrorism once and for all, but only in a just, rational way. Ron Paul is not anti-war, he’s anti-defense. Check out my PJ Media piece “Commander-in-Chief Ron Paul?”
To see more of my work, please visit my blog.
Ron Paul introduced the September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001, which would have allowed the President to go after those involved with the attacks of 2001. Specifically the bill branded September 11 as air piracy and an act of War.
Ron Paul also introduced Air Piracy Reprisal and Capture Act of 2001 which would have put similar acts under the Piracy acts, imposition of the death penalty for such acts, and more.
Ron Paul is obviously not who you think he is.
So what you are saying is that Ron Paul would prefer to leave the defense of this country to hired mercenaries, a practice otherwise repudiated by treaty by Western nations, rather than trust the American armed forces to do their job under the direction of Congress and the President.
Ron Paul is absolutely who I think he is – a dangerous fool living under the delusion that it is 1712 rather than 2012.