The PJ Tatler

E.J. Dionne: Run for your lives, the GOP is rigging the 2012 election!

E. J. Dionne get paid well by the Washington Post to churn out columns (note the lack of “good” in the preceeding). Here’s Sunday’s effort. It reads like an attempt to smear the Republicans (big surprise, coming from Dionne) for passing laws that voters overwhelmingly support.

An attack on the right to vote is underway across the country through laws designed to make it more difficult to cast a ballot. If this were happening in an emerging democracy, we’d condemn it as election-rigging. But it’s happening here, so there’s barely a whimper.

Breathless! So what’s the conspiracy? Several states are passing laws requiring that voters prove who they are before they cast a vote. This, to E. J. Dionne, constitutes “rigging” elections. Making sure that every vote cast is cast by the person who claims to be casting it, is “rigging” elections in Dionne’s world. In the real world, voter ID laws protect the franchise by making sure that…every vote cast is cast by the person claiming to cast it.

Having ACORN and similar leftist groups screw up the works with thousands and thousands of fraudulent registrations? Not a problem, to E. J. Dionne. Rampant vote brokering, as has been repeatedly uncovered in South Texas? Not a problem. Having the Black Panthers stand around with weapons to intimidate voters right outside polling places? Not a problem in Dionne’s world.

But requiring the same level of ID it takes to get on an airplane, rent a car, cash a check and dozens of other things Americans routinely do, in order to cast a vote  — why, that’s downright un-American. It’s a “poll tax” even though voters can get the necessary ID for free. It’s “rigging” elections — to make sure we know that every vote cast is cast legally by actual voters.

Clearly, E. J. Dionne is laying the groundwork to turn the Democrats’ looming defeat in 2012 into yet another bloody shirt to rile up the left.

 

Advertisement
Posted at 8:25 am on June 20th, 2011 by

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

11 Comments, 11 Threads, 2 Trackbacks

  1. 1. Nanette

    E.J. is a loon. The best part of his columns are ALWAYS the reader comments, which can be pretty funny sometimes.

  2. 2. Buzzsawmonkey

    Anyone arguing against voter IDs is arguing for vote fraud.

    Nothing more, nothing less.

  3. 3. David W

    False charges of racism, false charges of “rigging” the vote to hurt blacks, hispanics, poor, and false charges of eliminating medicare/social security for retired and about to retire seniors are part of the game plan for the left. Stalin and Fidel would be proud of Dionne and the rest of the cadre….

  4. 4. Dial C For Cocktail Waitress

    I’d make a comment if I could.

    But I can’t.

    So I won’t.

  5. 5. daxypoo

    of course it is election fraud- not only voter-id but in a manner of other ways

    trying to persuade one’s neighbor and demonstrate the contrasts between “conservatism” and “liberalism” is totally against the rules

  6. 6. GDI

    Locally, we must sign in before we can vote and show photo ID if requested. In the fall 2010 elections, the sign-in line ground to a halt.

    A poll worker wanted to see one voter’s ID; it appeared she’d already voted and was attempting to vote again. The voter produced her ID without complaint, the poll worker examined it and spotted the problem. The voter and her husband had very similar first names (something like Patricia and Patrick). The sign-in book showed the husband had voted that morning, and the poll worker simply wasn’t seeing the blank sign-in spot behind “Patricia’s” name.

    This happened rapidly and cordially. No one in line complained. No one was disenfranchised. Legitimate voters were not blocked from voting. And I, for one, was pleased to see both poll workers and voters treating the voting process with the care and respect it deserves.

  7. 7. Bess Natch

    What!? Wose Wepubicans wigging ewecshuns?!

  8. 8. Insufficiently Sensitive

    get on an airplane, rent a car, cash a check

    You left out picking up the prescription drugs which the subsidized low-income medical care programs prescribe, but whose recipients must show ID to carry away.

  9. 9. Black Sabbath

    E.J. Dionne better have a hell of a conspiracy theory ready when Obama gets 41% or less of the vote next year.

  10. 10. garrettc

    Voter ID, while important, is only a part of the problem. Scrubbing the pols of invalid voters, and punishing voters who vote in more than one jurisidction (quite common for snowbirds and college students) is way overdue.

  11. 11. ErisGuy

    I haven’t read any thing as crazy as Dionne since the John Birch Society pamphlets and Chick publications.