A Poor Historian Tries to Make a Case for the US Breaking with Israel: Where He Goes Wrong
Writing at the Daily Beast, historian Thaddeus Russell tries to make the case for the United States breaking its special relationship with Israel, which until Barack Obama, has been maintained by all the American presidents since the days of Harry S. Truman and Israel’s creation. Under various administrations, differences over policy have occurred, and some administrations were more responsive to Israel’s needs than others. But no American president dared try to break completely with Israel and move U.S. policy into the orbit of the Arab states.
On the eve of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the White House, the Obama administration seems to be on the verge of casting Israel off to the hinterlands, or at least, upping the pressure upon it. As David Frum points out, Obama is about set to bail out on Israel.
By deciding to pressure Israel to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, while easing up pressure on Iran at the same time, the United States is making its new priorities quite clear. Over one year ago, the first rate correspondent Eli Lake wrote: “President Obama’s efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons threaten to expose and derail a 40-year-old secret U.S. agreement to shield Israel’s nuclear weapons from international scrutiny, former and current U.S. and Israeli officials and nuclear specialists say.”
Today, Lake reports that “the White House has declined to publicly affirm commitments made by President Bush to Israel in 2004 on the final borders of the Jewish state.” So that tomorrow, when PM Netanyahu finally gets to what was supposed to be a more cordial and productive meeting, he will face a president who is determined to do all he can to put the screws on Israel. The heart of the dispute is over land in Jerusalem. Lake explains: “The Arab League peace proposal says the border should be along the 1949 armistice lines and include the complete withdrawal of Israeli settlements in the territory that the Jewish state won in the 1967 war. The 2004 letter from Mr. Bush directly contradicts the Arab League position.” In that letter, President Bush assured Israel that “a final peace settlement between Israel and the Palestinians should reflect ‘new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli population centers,’ and that ‘it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949.’”
It is in this atmosphere that Prof. Russell, who teaches at Occidental College in California, has sought to explain why it was wrong for the Truman administration to recognize the Jewish State in the first place. First, Russell says no one ever asks what he says is the essential question: “Does the existence of Israel make Americans and Jews safer?”
Prof. Russell doesn’t do anyone a service by conflating so many different historical and contemporary issues. By “Jews” does he mean the Jews who live in Israel, or those who live in other countries? He certainly isn’t addressing the safety of the Jews living through the Inquisition, pogroms, or the Holocaust. He seems to be unaware of the desperate demand by the remnant of European Jewry in DP camps at the end of World War II to go to Palestine, because they knew they would not be safe in the countries of their homeland, like Poland. He might, for starters, read the op-ed that appeared a few weeks ago by Richard Cohen, who pointed out the following:
The mini-Holocaust that followed the Holocaust itself is not well-known anymore, but it played an outsize role in the establishment of the state of Israel. It was the plight of Jews consigned to Displaced Persons camps in Europe that both moved and outraged President Harry Truman, who supported Jewish immigration to Palestine and, when the time came, the new state itself. Something had to be done for the Jews of Europe. They were still being murdered…. For the surviving Jews of Eastern Europe, there was no going home — and no staying, either. Europe was hostile to them, not in the least appalled or sorry about what had just happened.
In our book, A Safe Haven: Harry S. Truman and the Founding of Israel, we cite in particular the moving testimony of one survivor, a woman named Branda Kalk. Asked what she wanted for herself by one of the many investigating committees sent by the UN to survey the situation among the DP’s, Kalk told them: “I want to go to Palestine. I know the conditions there. But where in the world is it good for the Jew? Sooner or later he is made to suffer. In Palestine, at least, the Jews fight together for their life and their country.” She learned that lesson the hard way. The Germans had killed her husband in1942, and she escaped to Russia. Returning to Poland after the war, her entire family — eight children and eighteen grandchildren — were killed by Poles in a pogrom.
I’d like to see the answers, from those who demonize Israel, to this question: Was Emile Zola, Clemenceau, and
all the rest who supported Dreyfus in the Dreyfus Affair wrong to have supported him?
For the Dreyfus affair was what set off Theodor Herzl’s efforts to establish Zionism.
I wanted to thank you for the excellent article.
It isn’t possible for me to say anything right now — it’s all too disturbing and evil.
In addition to Karsh’s and Radosh’s books which Ron noted, see Jeffrey Herf’s book, Nazi Propaganda for the Arab World which elaborates on the information Ron Radosh described above. A key figure in the war against the Jews in the Middle East was the Mufti Husseini who led pogroms against Jerusalem’s ancient Jewish community in 1920 and against the Jews of Hebron in 1929. Husseini supported the failed pro Nazi Iraqi coup (and pogrom against the Jews of Baghdad (a community going back to 586 BCE more than 1,000 years older than the religion of Islam). He fled to Berlin and met Hitler in November 1941. He established an SS brigade of Bosnian Muslims who murdered Jews and Serbs in Yugoslavia during World War II. He was the leader of the Arab Higher Committee that directed the efforts to convince Palestinian Arabs to leave Haifa and Tiberius so Arab state forces could destroy the new Jewish state. He was arrested as a war criminal but let go in Paris and lived out his life in Lebanon. On December 19, 1942 at the Islamic Institute in BERLIN Husseini (p. 153 in Herf’s book and broadcast on Dec 23 to the Arab world) said:”The Koran says that they [the Jews] heat the cauldron of war and bring corruption on the earth…The Jews have spread their influence over Britain. They dominate America. The Jews are behind…communism.” Herf notes elsewhere in his book that the Germans had another Einsattsgruppen brigade ready to come to Palestine to mass murder the 600,000 Jews there had Rommel won his battles in Egypt and would have gone on to murder the 750,000 Jews of North Africa, Yemen, Iraq, and Iran just as the Nazis had mass murdered (before the establishment of the death camps) Jews of Eastern Europe. Last, keep in mind that the Nazi loving Husseini maintained his leadership of the Palestinian Arabs by murdering Palestinian Arabs who opposed him. His legacy was adopted by Arafat who did the same to fellow Arabs along with perfecting terrorism. The combo of Husseini’s inspiration for the PLO/Fatah and al-Bana’s inspiration for Hamas with its teaching of “martyrdom” to kindergarten children and its murder of fellow Muslims who don’t toe its radical Islamist line and its Charter which calls for Israel’s destruction and follows the Nazis in its false claims of Jewish world domination (including claiming Rotary Clubs and Lion’s Clubs are part of a world wide plot) is a wicked brew that maintains the conflict to this day. Meanwhile Israel settled the Jewish refugees from Arab lands displaced post the 1948 war while the Arab states never gave the Palestinian Arabs a state between 1949 and 1967 nor did those states acknowledge the fact that 100,000 Arabs migrated into Palestine in the 1930s and 1940s due to what the Zionists did in industry and agriculture. Last, note that from the point of view of US interests Israel is the only Middle East nation that the US can depend on to land forces or military equipment in a crisis with the exception currently of Iraq due to our large military forces there. That’s why Alexander Haig called Israel our aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean. Israel is on front line of the war of radical Islam (little Satan (sic) Israel, great Satan (sic) US) against democracy. Time for the mainstream media to wake up and tell the facts of the real war we are in.
“Time for the mainstream media to wake up and tell the facts of the real war we are in.”
Don’t hold your breath!
It is dangerously naive to hope that the MSM will ever change its spots. We must instead encourage the abandonment of these legacy institutions. They should mostly go bankrupt and disappear. Those generally employed by the MSM are usually biased—and poorly educated. Our hopes should be invested almost entirely in the new media outlets like Pajamas Media.
Actually, I think we should engage the MSM. The pro-Israel community should pay for tours of MSM editor and managers. Would you be surprised to learn that while reporters visit Israel, their bosses, the editors and managers do not. Only exceptionally strange or bitter people can maintain their political correctness toward Israel once they see the vibrancy of its daily existence. It only takes a short helicopter ride to bring people to their full awareness of the circumstances withdrawal from Judea and Samaria would engender.
Can’t someone put together a package of documents that support Israel’s point of view. How many people have read the Hamas manifesto or the rantings of Ahmadinejad.
Let’s get a little creative!
Ronnie: As usual you have the detailed history spot on. Where I d
disagree is to claim that Obama’s policy is less on guard vis a vis
Iran, than heretofore. I think that Obama is paying more attention
to Iran, and not just responding in some reflex way. Moreover, I
don’t see an anti Israel sentitment being expressed within the
White House, nowadays.
Mr. Lifson,
I agree with your concurrence with Mr. Radosh’s short piece on Russel’s and others’ fabrications and misinterpretations, as well as Radosh’s short synopsis of Israel’s founding amid Islamist, Pan-Arabist nationalist, pro-Nazi and plain anti-Semitic oppposition on many fronts.
However, as to your later defense of Mr. Obama’s Iran poliicies and the supposed lack of anti Israel sentiment “nowadays” in the Obama White house, it prompts in me a rare reaction; I am literally too tired and too astounded by your ahistorical assertions to mount a properly documented response. I will have to let it suffice to say: “you’re kidding, right?” Otherwise, I regret to say that if, having Observed Mr. Obama’s conduct and pronouncements as President, as well as those of so many of the officials and advisers he has appointed to positions associated with Mid East policy formation, that you can say what you did with a straight face, then I believe that you are in need of a major realignment of your world view and understanding of reality.
the only way it’s possible not to see anti-Israeli sentiment in this White House is to wear blinders.
The really disheartening thing is that the atmosphere this adminstration is creating encourages these fools and knaves to come out of the woodwork. Fortunately, political calculations and the presence of Israel’s allies in the administration, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, will not allow Obama to make the complete “break” with Israel he seems to be leaning toward.
Hillary Clinton an ally of Israel? Are you kidding? She briefly put on that garb as part of her Senate and presidential campaigns, true. But the 45-minute harangue of Netanyahu speaks volumes as to her true feelings. Not to mention kissing Suha Arafat.
Now how could the U.S.A. possibly want to break relations with a country who aggressively spies on it, attempts false flag attacks on its navy (killing 38 sailors in the process), costs hundreds of billions of dollars in military and other aid, lobbies the government to instigate wars on its behalf, and transforms it into a fellow international pariah? Oh, and I almost forgot: turns it into a target for islamic terrorism (which was nonexistent in the U.S. prior to its arming of israel in 1968).
Shlomo,
After a fashion, I’d like to help you.
Despite the low irony of your assumed nom de post, your misguided and ignorant contribution tells us more about the flavor of anti-Israel propaganda that you prefer than anything else. Assuming for the moment that you are not a rabid anti-Semite who dresses up his feelings with the cover of “only criticizing” the policies of Israel and the U.S. defense for her, you need to study the actual and inconvenient history of the Middle East, Israel and the U.S.; the ongoing Islamic wars of Jihad; the root and branch “gentlemen’s” anti-Semitism and Arabist sentiment long prevalent in the U.S. State Department and a large part of the executive foreign policy establishment; and the paranoid style anti-Semitism of much of the left Progressives and their cousins, the very far “right” Fascists, in the U.S.
If, after learning a lot more about these things, with anything but a completely closed and bigotted mind, you can still assume the things you have stated in your post, I am afraid that I can do no more than simply assign you to the “hopeless bin” of haters or intentional liars.
I will hope for a positive outcome to your future education.
This has NOTHING whatever to do with islam?
Clark Clifford? Ah, the irony. I suggest you read the Life magazine article by Clark Clifford titled “Set A Date In Vietnam. Stick To It. And Get Out.” Needless to say, regardless of the cost to the South Vietnamese. The same arguments used by Clifford against continued American support of South Vietnam are basically the same arguments the left and “realists” make against Israel today, or Afghanistan for that matter. The problem, of course, is that Israel is a member of the United Nations while South Vietnam was not a member, so it was much easier to dump the South Vietnamese when the democrats no longer liked the cost benefit ratio–you know, when Johnson ended draft deferments for graduate schools, except for medical, divinity, and law schools. It also helped a democratic congress that republicans controlled the White House as they cut loose South Vietnam, leaving Saigon to fall in 75 under Ford. That was after the Arab oil embargo and subsequent severe recession. Yup, set a date certain–we can’t afford messy imperial entanglements during a major recession and continue to go to the moon on Apollo at the same time– and promise to help enforce the peace treaty after all the troops are out should the NVA, Taliban, or Palestinians violate the treaty. Yup, that ought to work. Promises, promises. Maybe NASA should have been tasked to increase North Vietnam’s self esteem instead of going to the moon and the Cambodian holocaust would never have occurred?
Um.. we left Vietnam under Nixon. We were not fighting a war to protect Vietman. it was awar against the Soviets, using Vietnam as a battle ground. from the Vietnamese perspective, it was more a mater of rididng themselves of any foreign control, whether it be the Chinese, French or Americans.
USA had chosen to betray its friend to please its enemies. I don’t think history would consider that as our finest hour.
Finally, someone looking at the basic realities underlying the real hostility of the USA’s government towards our Jewish entity here in Eretz Yisrael.
Yes or No, Israel should be strenghtend, reinforced and given full right for an existence in dignaty and respect. Israel ia a stability factor, for a western presence in the M-East. So neither the USA nor EU have real interest for a destabilised and weakened Israel. Without Israel in the region, Iran could have overwelmed the arab islamic countries with its Pasdarans. So let us keep supporting Israel by all our means.
Pleaee don’t forget that Israel is facing a greater security threat, a demographic nightmere. Israel should hold on to the West Bank forever.
Russell is a fool. He is apparently arguing that the United States should disavow its relationship with Israel, the only political democracy and the only country in the Middle East where muslims get to vote in regular and free elections, in favor of authoritarian regimes controlled by genocidal sociopaths who are hostile to western civilization and individual freedom. Is the alternative to have a special relationship with saudi arabia, a regime that funds jihadism again the United States? Or perhaps egypt, a known kleptocracy? How about syria where the regime occasionally slaughters thousands of political opponents to keep dissent in check? Yes, indeed, there are numerous alternatives available if we only look around.
The problem with giving a bully what he wants, is that bullies always want more.
To whom are you referring: IHH, Turkey, Hamas,
Hezbollah, ISM, FGM, or the hole loony left?
Lol Ron…
First, Russell says no one ever asks what he says is the essential question: “Does the existence of Israel make Americans and Jews safer?”Prof. Russell doesn’t do anyone a service by conflating so many different historical and contemporary issues. By “Jews” does he mean the Jews who live in Israel, or those who live in other countries?
As I’ve said so many times before, almost every argument on PJM concerning articles from other sources is based on the hope that the dumb readership here won’t actually go and look at the original:
The Question is never addressed by Israel’s supporters and rarely raised by Israel’s detractors. But for those of us who are taxpayers in a nation that has been the state of Israel’s chief benefactor for 42 years—or those of us with Jewish ancestry—it is becoming the only question to ask. It is simple, self-interested, and fundamental: Does the existence of Israel make Americans and Jews safer?
Russell’s mistake here seemed to be relying on his reader’s ability to understand simple English sentences.
Gould’s Ghost,
Did Churchill’s resistance to Hitler make the British safer? Did the Founders’ resistance to the British crown make Americans of the time safer? Is anyone ever safer for giving in to the bullies and despots of the world? To expect anything but the shortest reprieve for yourself from those wishing to control the world by giving over to them the object of their current demands is futile and ahistorical in the extreme. Read Orwell.
There is such a thing as the objective result of pacific responses to aggression amounting to actual support for aggression. Such would be, and is, such a pacific response (no state of Israel) to the aggression of Islamic Jihadi and Western anti-Semitism dressed up as anti-Israel sentiment. That pacific response is at the heart of your arguments here. I’m sure that you, naively or otherwise, believe that had we not supported the founding of Israel, that the probable death of millions of more Jews at the hands of either the Islamic Wahabbists and Nazi-leaning pan-Arab nationalists of the time, or the resentful citizens of the formerly Nazi or collaboratively proto- Nazi European populations that had recently enslaved and exterminated them, would have just magically not occurred. Sorry to tell you – belief in magic is for children and those not brave enough to squarely face the existence of the evil intentions of many among community of men.
Prof. Russell doesn’t do anyone a service by conflating so many different historical and contemporary issues. By “Jews” does he mean the Jews who live in Israel, or those who live in other countries? He certainly isn’t addressing the safety of the Jews living through the Inquisition, pogroms, or the Holocaust. He seems to be unaware of the desperate demand by the remnant of European Jewry in DP camps at the end of World War II to go to Palestine, because they knew they would not be safe in the countries of their homeland, like Poland. He might, for starters, read the op-ed that appeared a few weeks ago by Richard Cohen, who pointed out the following:
And yet, at this time and for the hundred years preceding it, there were no Jews escaping Palestine. It seems like your argument should be that Poland be made the homeland of the Jews. But, of course, the entire enterprise of Israel is to transfer the Western legacy of anti-Jewish acts and discourse, on to Arab parties. Its been successful. Now, when we speak of western pogroms, the next word out of our mouths is Arab “anti-semitism”.
Who wants to give them anything without concessions. i just say that Israel is facing a Demographic nightmere.
Pajamas Media is Tel Aviv West…. there is no debate
just bullying and complaints to the mods
“Why does everybody hate us??”"
well, because of threads like this
Gmark: dude go and see a shrink… no one hates you, but yourself
I think you have not been to Tel Aviv.
Maybe I am missing something here. Whom is “us” in your question? Jews perhaps. Why does everyone hate the Jews? Is that what you wanted to say?
Everyone doesn’t hate the Jews. Some people do. You give an answer to why you do,”because of posts like this” . Then some stuff about mods. Did you get deleted? I haven’t yet but tell me what you wanted to say. Maybe you want to unload all of this.
Were you ‘bullied’ Mr. Marks? I do not carry any weight here at PJM. Bring it out then and let the rest of us unwashed contributors see the evidence. I hereby call on PJM to bring forth the evidence as such. What has transpired let it be known.
Spindok
I await your reply.
look: you guys are getting upset over nothing. just hang in there for another 2 years and Obama will be out of office and everything will go back the way it was before
Because it was so good i the Bush years
I read Russell’s article. He asks “the Question” why no Arab attacks on the US prior to 1968? The US supported Israel’s creation in 1948 and the US was first an Arab terrorist target in 1968 (RFK assassination). Hijacking planes to Cuba started in the early 1960s and the Arabs copied it. Most creditable historians say the PLO went after the US and Western targets (in addition to Israel) after 1967, to get world support for their cause and also because the Arab States were incapable of defeating Israel and didn’t care about the Palestinian Arabs plight.
Though Israel received more military aid from the US after the 1967 war, so did Arab countries, such as Jordan, Saudi Arabia, etc. Real increases in US military and economic aid to Israel took place after the Yom Kippur War in 1973, well after Arab terrorists attacked US, European and Israeli airliners (copying Cuban hijackers).
I hope Mr. Russell will consider my “Answer.”
I wrote a response here:
Does supporting terrorism make America safer?
The unsinkable aircraft carrier in the middle east has done it’s job. The US has no better ally. Anywhere.
Billions of treasure and sacrifice of our finest sons and daughters in the wastelands of Afghanistan and Iraq have done what? The annual budget for Iraq and Pakistan this past year alone dwarfs the budget for Israel over the past decade. Yet we will never create another Israel in those places. When our brave troops depart it will be business as usual.
Even the Turks, for all the recent grandstanding, cannot get away from the fact that those Israeli drones they purchased and need cannot just sit. Right now Turkish military is in Israel learning how to fly the new devices.
The curious incident of the ‘dog in the night’ just happened. The flotilla movement is no longer a movement. Newswires are blank. No new ships out. What happened? In “Silver Blaze” Holmes deduced from the observation that that nothing occurred although the dog was out, as evidence that whomever approached the house was familiar to the dog.
Israel is familiar to many dogs in the ME.
Spin
This from Ron Radosh:
“…special relationship with Israel, which until Barack Obama, has been maintained by all the American presidents since the days of Harry S. Truman and Israel’s creation.”
This from Wikipedia (re: US-Israel relations in the ’50s):
“Eager to increase its influence in the region, and prevent Nasser from going over to the Soviet Bloc, U.S. policy was to remain neutral and not become too closely allied with Israel. In the early 1960s, the U.S. would begin to sell advanced, but defensive, weapons to Israel, Egypt and Jordan, including Hawk anti aircraft missiles.”
…and as part of BHO’s new world order, he will be giving back some of our confiscated mainland to Mexico and the Native Americans and some specks of land out in the South Pacific. Let’s not be hypocrites, right?
This idiot professor overlooks the obvious. If we abandon Israel, and Israel is destroyed, she takes the entire world down with her.
And will have every right to do it.
Israel and America’s common enemies.
“There appears to be no evidence that the American people themselves are even aware of the catastrophic events soon to overtake them.” — Steve LeFemine, independent candidate for Congress
“Our worst fears confirmed! We are suffering a coup d,etat in America. It is in the final stages of completion…the program to abrogate American Sovereignty…May God have mercy on America.” — Lawrence Patterson Criminal Politics (May-June 2006)
The evidence is overwhelming. There is absolutely a wicked and devastating plot and conspiracy to overthrow America. The traitors are now confident they will soon wash over 225 years of American tradition and history down a sinkhole. If their foul plan suceeds, the vision we as patriots once had of a strong, prosperous nation of liberty, freedom and prosperity will soon vanish beneath a cavernous cesspool of forgotten dreams.
Over the years I have personally withstood a torrent of abuse and ridicule over my assertion that a small clique of traitorously evil men and women were plotting to bring down the walls of history. Still, I soldiered on, enduring the cruel arrows of ignorant and malicious critics. I refused to play along and keep quiet, and I have done my best to expose their heinous plot to shutdown the fabled American experiment in freedom and self-government.
Among the evil culprits I fingered over the years were such anti-American globalist groups as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Bilderbergs. All play important roles in the on-going conspiracy. But behind them all is the satanic influence and power of antisemites and anti-zionists.
Stepping Out Of the Shadows
Now, finally, this traitorous clique of elitists has stepped out of the shadows into the light. No longer need they fear public disapproval. So effective has been their psychological brainwashing campaign and their dumbing down of the citizenry, the arrogant plotters believe they can finally come out and defiantly show themselves. Evidently, they think that no one is able to stop or even delay their bold plot to murder”yes, murder” America.
The CFR has even published its despicable plan in a book, entitled Building A North American Community. Authored by three elite members of the New York-based organization, the book calls for the ending of American sovereignty and the overthrow of the American Constitution and government.
The CFR’s membership of 4,275 conspirators, backed by the organization’s predominantly liberal, leftist leadership, demands that, by the year 2012, America as we once knew it will no longer exist. By that date, the Illuminati intends that the following be achieved:
(1) A new currency, called the Amero, replace the dollar.
(2) All borders between Mexico, the U.S.A., and Canada be erased and the Border Patrol retired.
(3) A North American Parliament Group, composed of Mexican politicians and U.S. quislings, take over legislative authority, superseding our own Senate and House.
(4) A North American Judicial Council, or Tribunal, take over the judicial function and demote the U.S. Supreme Court to an advisory only role.
(5) A joint Executive Authority be set up, possibly with its capitol in Mexico City or Toronto, to dictate to U.S. citizens the terms of surrender.
(6) The 106 million citizens of Mexico be given full rights by the defunct U.S.A. and be allowed to enter our territory, re-conquer and seize whatever lands and property they wish within the once sovereign U.S.A.
(7) The Bill of Rights be abolished and a new North American “Declaration of Rights” be drawn up. It will comprise a shrunken list of abridged, government granted privileges more suitable to the changed times.
(8) Over 100 million Mexicans living South of the Border, plus 20 million more Mexicans now residing illegally in the U.S.A., will be awarded full social security and medicare benefits and have full job, voting and other rights granted to them. American taxpayers will foot the bill.
(9) Mexican workers will be given affirmative action and preferential job quotas. Millions of Anglo-Americans will lose their jobs.
(10) Hispanic-owned corporations will be favored with government grants and contracts. The economies of Mexico, the former U.S.A., and Canada will be totally merged and a 4-football fields wide NAFTA super highway is already being built. Thousands of air-polluting Mexican trucks and vehicles will rumble up I-35 and disperse to the various states.
(11) The 50 existing American states will be formally dissolved and the former U.S.A. will be divided into ten weakened administrative regions. Some will have Mexican leaders appointed over the local, formerly American citizens.
(12) Spanish and English will both be recognized as joint official languages. Mexican textbooks critical of United States history and disrespectful of American “gringo” traditions will be required in all North American schools.
(13) The North American Union will join the European Community and the ASEAN (Asian) Union as the three major subdivisions of the planned global governance system, as envisioned by Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission.
This is Nothing Short of Treason!
As shocking as the CFR plot is, equally upsetting is tha former President George Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin met in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005, and signed a secret pact called the Security and Prosperity Partnership. That pact, prepared by CFR and Bilderberg administrators, sets forth step-by-step what each nation must do to insure the new, merged slave “nation,” the North American Union.
Forget about the fact that the U.S. Consitution requires the President to submit treaties such as this to the Senate for a vote. Imperial dictator Bush knows that no U.S. Senator dare utter one word of protest against the CFR Plot. That would be the kiss of death for his or her senatorial career.
Having disposed of American sovereignty, the “New World Order” forged by Bush and Gorbachev in the 80s and cemented by traitorous Clinton-Bush, Democrat-Republican alliances will finally become a reality. The fly in the ointment, of course, will be the small contingent of true American patriots that remain. This is why the Obama Administration gave Halliburton a $385 million contract to build new detention camps. It is also why NSA computers have all our names tagged in its “dissident” database list. If necessary, they will get rid of us”permanently.
American military forces will enforce the New World Order. Mexican and other foreign officers will no doubt be given high military commands to guard against mutiny by angry U.S. soldiers.
A few rogue nations”Venezuela, Cuba, etc.”must be dealt with.
The CFR is headed by Richard Haas, an outright one world advocate.
Also on the CFR’s rolls: Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve; Robert Rubin, Clinton’s former Secretary of the Treasury; and Madleine Albright, Clinton’s former Secretary of State.
Here are some other top names that dominate the CFR. Indeed, the CFR is nothing more than America’s premier antizionist Secret Society. other liberals on the membership rolls- Carla Hills, Henry Bienen, Kenneth Duberstein, Martin Feldman, Richard Salomon, Bart Friedman, Maurice Greenberg, Morton Janklow, Ira Lipman, Seymour Sternberg, Frank Wisner, Michael Moscow, Roger Altman, Jessica Einhorn, David Greenberg, Louis Perlmutter, Joshua Steiner, Anita Wien, Douglas Schoen, Malcolm Weiner, Charles Schumer, Nancy Soderberg, Peter Tannoff, Abraham Lowenthal, Marc Thiessen, Daniel Yergin, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, Carl Gershman, Peter Rosenblatt, Joseph Lieberman, Mortimer Zuckerman. All are globalists. As CFR conspirators and associates, all, in my opinion, are deceitful traitors, guilty of treason, enemies of the Constitution of the United States of America. They deserve to be arrested, indicted, and, if found guilty by a jury of 12 honest American Patriots, sent to prison or executed.
The Trap Has Been Set
Dear friends, the trap has been set. The media are not on our side. Neither are the leaders of the Christian religious establishment. They are owned by Wall Street corporation interests. Neither can we count on either of the two major political parties to rescue us. The Congress and the State Capital delegations are packed with CFR traitors who have already sold out the American Republic for a pot of porridge. Today in America, we have the best politicians and clergy that money can buy
Truth is DEAD
History is rewritten —a fable
Kahane was right
When (not IF) USA finishes it’s betrayal of ISRAEL and instead joins the Axis of Evil
they will have to depend upon G-d alone
and maybe then Israel will UNITE and fight instead of capitulate to human demands, will stop groveling hoping the world will suddenly love JEWS and fight for them, the will act like and be proud to be JEWS
Christians call this Armageddon
Muslims think they can make the time come sooner
Two death wish faiths
both desire to wipe out JEWS using the Jews own Messiah
wonder which people G-d will protect and save?
post 25- Belman’s ideas are what one may describe and there is a yiddish word that says it best..
M E S H U G A H.
We christians worship a jew; our Lord, Jesus Christ.
Do those of you who choose to hate jews hate Him, too?
Does the fact that He will determine your eternal fate have an influence on your attitude toward Him?
How about the fact that He became a man, and died horribly to pay the penalty for your sins, should you choose to repent? How about the fact that He is the only way anyone can get to heaven?
Mayor “Napoleon” Bloomberg
Mayor Bloomberg and his backstabbing cronies must have a $tupendou$ rea$on which they can’t reveal for wanting a sharia-hugging mosque near Ground Zero!
But the sharia “cobra” they’re toying with can quickly grow its fangs and then say “Smile, you’re on Candid Scimitar and will soon be buried in a scimitary, ha ha ha!” – proving that one good backstabbing deserves another!
God-haters and America-haters may not realize how high the collective temperature has now risen in the hearts of true American patriots – many of whom are now willing to die for America right here in America if they get pushed completely over the line!
Since the nation’s headquarters for treason is the White House, readers can enjoy related material if they Google “Obama Supports Public Depravity” and also Google “Sandra Bernhard, Larry David, Kathy Griffin, Bill Maher, Sarah Silverman” in addition to Googling “Obama…destined to become a black-slavery avenger.”
And by all means visit Googleland and type in “Government-Approved Illegals” and “Un-Americans Fight Franklin Graham.”
I hope Mayor Bloomberg, dressed as Napoleon, will thoroughly enjoy his mosquerade party!
PS – Interestingly, many conservative evangelicals have lately given up belief in a “pretribulation rapture” (the 180-year-old, fringe-British-invented, escapist-and-thus-subversive theological aberration behind the rapture bestsellers by Lindsey, LaHaye etc.) and now believe they will be on earth, standing against evil, during at least a portion of Antichrist’s diabolical reign. Widely read Google articles like “Pretrib Rapture – Hidden Facts,” “Pretrib Rapture Secrecy” and “Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty” have helped to bring about this “pretrib” mutiny.
A Kansas Patriot
[the above words recently seen on the web - Bernice]