Get PJ Media on your Apple

Roger L. Simon

rand_paul_founding_father_big_10-21-13-1

Rand Paul is pushing for a new Constitutional amendment stating “Congress shall make no law applicable to a citizen of the United States that is not equally applicable to Congress.” The amendment “also contains two provisions that apply that same principle to the Executive Branch and Judicial Branch of the federal government,” according to a press release put out by the office of the Kentucky senator on Monday.

Paul is of course responding to the unconscionable opting-out from the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, by the members of the U.S. Congress. Our elected officials — in an orgy of let-them-eat-cake selfishness that would do Marie Antoinette proud — voted themselves exempt from the bureaucratic mess of a health insurance plan currently driving the rest of the country crazy.

This is the kind of behavior common to officials of totalitarian states and we should all get behind Paul for his attempt, even though such an amendment should already be implied by the Constitution itself. Indeed, one assumes that the Founders would have been horrified, or at least hugely dismayed, to find our modern Congress exempting themselves in such a disgustingly greedy manner. It goes against the very essence of what the Founders regarded as the equal rights of citizenship in our republic.

Paul is correct too in covering the executive and judicial branches in any such new amendment. Why should Chief Justice Roberts be able to escape the strictures of a law he bent over backwards in a remarkable display of legal gymnastics not to declare unconstitutional? The same is obviously true for Barack Obama himself, who should, of all people, by subject to his eponymous law. He is, after all, the great devotee of “fairness,” is he not? Or is congressional elitism and noblesse oblige what he really meant by “hope” and “change”?

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
I agree that all Americans should get behind this.

I predict, however, that the Dems and the media will trash this, or at least marginalize it to the point of irrelevance in the next few weeks.

It isn't cynicism (well, maybe a little). It's this: if someone had told me 7 years ago that America would elect to the Presidency TWICE a man with no experience, who's never held a real job, who would work to deliberately weaken our economy and make our foreign policy the world's laughingstock, who associated freely with racists and terrorists and would actively incite one half of the population to vilify and demean the other half, I would have told that person he or she was crazy.

But that's what's happened.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
I expect tremendous opposition from both houses of Congress. Nonetheless, it's a fight that needs to be fought -- and if, as I expect, it is lost, it then needs to be fought again.

As has been pointed out many times, it is not absolute power that corrupts; it is immunity from the consequences of that power that corrupts.

If Congress gets used to passing laws that don't apply to them, then there is NOTHING they cannot do. They must feel the pain they inflict, unwittingly or not, on the rest of us.

Bravo, Sen. Paul.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
There's a simple problem with this. Obamacare itself outlaws the Congressional subsidies, but the Prez decided (after a lot of whining by Dems in Congress) to interpret the law to exclude Congress, even though everyone on both sides of the aisle thought it applied to them. He simply decided to ignore how the law was written and read it the way he wanted to.

This goes on a lot. The landmark Civil Rights legislation of the '60s famously included language specifically outlawing the use of quotas in hiring, promotion, and firing, but eventually it was seen to require them--exactly the opposite of what the law says.

I'm not opposed to the Constitutional Amendment. I am however dubious as to its changing anything. If the Republicans do *anything* the Dems don't like, there are howls of racism and homophobia and sexism and anything else they can throw at the Evil Party, or alternatively there's what we're getting now on the subject--nothing at all in the news, so that the issue is just ignored.

No one can support it if they never hear about it in the first place.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (79)
All Comments   (79)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
The US Federal Government has literally become a mirror image of George Orwell's "Animal Farm". Orwell was a sympathetic Socialist who found the truth and failures of the ideology.
22 weeks ago
22 weeks ago Link To Comment
Shocking Facts About US Veterans: 1 Suicide Every 65 Minutes By Global Research News Global Research, September 27, 2013

http://www.globalresearch.ca/shocking-facts-about-us-veterans-1-suicide-every-65-minutes/5351745
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
Last I heard the oath of office states that a Congressman vows to "protect and defend the Constitution"? So, the Constitution as interpreted by the by the Supreme Court is not good enough for this guy?
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
What matters if all these laws are just ignored anyway? I am reminded of the old question, "How many divisions has the Pope?". Even if Congress were motivated to act, what could they do, short of Impeachment? Don't see that as likely...
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
One set of rules for them, another for "us." And yet, they still get reelected 93% of the time.

Now who's fault is that?
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
I don't think that it is true to say that the founders did not anticipate greedy elected politicians. They thought power corrupted and wanted to separate powers. They put as many checks and balances as they thought they could at the time, one power jealously guarding their own v. encroachment. The weak link was that the public needed to jealously guard their own power, and not allow the branches of the federal government to "exercise rights on their behalf". We must demand that they actually follow the Constitution and Amendments for this to mean anything.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
As many have already said it would seem to be an easy bill to pass. It is sad that we even need this one.

However, my prediction is that this will never see the light of day because very few in congress will stand up for it. Even if they do it will be reversed IN THE DARK OF NIGHT by the same people.

Remember the Grassley amendment that requires all of congress take Obamacare? It passed and became law. Look at it now.

None of these people are the least bit honest and trustworthy.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
How about a personal responsibility amendment. An amendment such as this is especially important since most Americans lack any modicum of common sense.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
Obama nominates drone program proponent to lead DHS October 18, 2013

http://rt.com/usa/obama-jeh-johnson-dhs-378/
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 4 5 Next View All