GZ Expat has a fascinating and knowledgeable article on Spielberg’s withdrawal from the Beijing Olympics on PJM today. I don’t agree with GZ Expat’s conclusion… or more specifically I doubt Spielberg really cares that his movies may now be banned in China – he’ll do just find in other markets… but GZ Expat’s insider view is worth reading. (He’s writing from Guangzhou).
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.
Roger,
With Mr. Spielberg’s recent “embarrassment” to the government, look for the government to begin “banning” his movies and turning a blind eye to the counterfeits (of his movies particularly) as well.
Whatever else he may be, I think Spielberg is no fool as a businessman, and he was quite aware of the possible business consequences of his actions.
For that reason, I very much admire what he did here. It wasn’t, for once, mere empty moral posturing by a Hollywood celebrity.
Jamie Irons
I completely agree, Jamie. Spielberg was perfectly aware of the implications. And he won’t starve!
At risk of derail, let’s also understand that possibly Spielberg was well aware that even if the Chinese government loved him, the piracy would still continue, just not to as large an extent as it would if the government turned a blind eye.
Roger, I know Cebu City Philippines isn’t China, but the phenomenon is still the same, and I wish I had a picture of the open air market where pirated movies were being sold. It was blocks long, and totally out in the open. Piracy is simply not worried about in many parts of Asia. Harsh but true reality.
Anyway, back to the topic: I actually agree with a good portion of Expat’s article there, but at the same time, I’m not sure why the focus is on Spielberg’s “resonance” with the Chinese people. Simply put, I don’t see that act as being aimed at the Chinese people. Nor at his domestic audience. Either you have a principle, and you act by it, or you don’t. He’s simply acting according to an internal principle (I hope!), and let the consequences fall as they may. Am I worried that I fail to resonate with (cliched example here) trailer denizens because I shun the meth dealer in their park? Should I be? Or should I act according to my principles?