I usually stay away in order not to be jealous of other people’s movie deals (most of which are inflated anyway). But Conscientious Objector has found a literal “comedy of errors” in the Hollywood Reporter that might make Dan Rather blush. [Couldn't you think of a more original analogy?-ed. I have to get back to my book.]
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.
That’s pretty funny. How do you put up with it, Roger?
I’m not in the entertainment business but the idiocy in many trade rags is similar. I don’t bother renewing even free subscriptions anymore. Once upon a time they were the only source for industry information, news, and analysis. It took me forever to realize that I could not count on any better reporting or analysis of those portions of the subject industry than I saw in the portions about which I actually knew stuff. It finally sunk through my thick skull that if they couldn’t get it right, or something better than uselessly shallow, in those areas I had some level of expertise, then there was no good reason to believe reading the stuff I didn’t know anything about, but wanted to learn, since it was surely equally shallow and/or incorrect.
Thank goodness for blogs! You gonna crank up and trade blograg, Roger?