Last week, the day that the Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski died, I posted a brief notice about his passing and mentioned that I would be writing at greater length elsewhere. That longer piece has just appeared in The Weekly Standard and is available on their web site. Here’s a taste:
A corollary of Kolakowski’s criticism of Marxism was his appreciation of the virtues of capitalism and the free market as indispensable enablers of freedom. “Capitalism,” he noted, in 1995,
developed spontaneously and organically from the spread of commerce. Nobody planned it, and it did not need an all-embracing ideology, whereas socialism was an ideological construction. Ultimately, capitalism is human nature at work–that is, man’s greed allowed to follow its course–whereas socialism is an attempt to institutionalize and enforce fraternity. It seems obvious by now that a society in which greed is the main motivation of human action, for all of its repugnant and deplorable aspects, is incomparably better than a society based on compulsory brotherhood, whether in national or international socialism.
Main Currents of Marxism is not of historical interest only. As Kolakowski reminded us in the preface to the 2004 edition, notwithstanding the collapse of the Soviet Union, Marxism remains eminently worth studying, not least because its aspirations continue to percolate in the dreams of various utopian planners. (You needn’t go to China or even Cuba: Just look at the increasingly pink and authoritarian complexion of the European Union.)
The whole piece is available on line here.
“……mankind can never get rid of the need for religious self-identification: who am I, where did I come from, where do I fit in, why am I responsible, what does my life mean, how will I face death? Religion is a paramount aspect of human culture. Religious need cannot be ex-communicated from culture by rationalist incantation. Man does not live by reason alone.” ….L. Kolakowski
——————————
As far as I am aware, Kolakowski never addressed the question of “Islam” in his writings. It would have been interesting to see what he would have said about resurgent Islam and its allomorphs (Islamism, militant Islam and so forth).
Undoubtedly, he would have remarked on the striking similarities between political Islam and Communism.
L. Kolakoski described Marxism as “the self-deification of mankind”, a description quite at odds with orthodox islam, so there are equally striking dissimilarities between the two ideologies/religions.
But he almost certainly would have concluded that one reason Western “liberals” tend to be apologetic towards Islamic intolerance and “terrorism” is that at base, they both want the same thing: the capitulation of the West and the rise of a new order ; a new order, I might add in which the winner would seek the extermination of the other as the first order of business.