January 7, 2016

MR. PRESIDENT, YOU’RE NOT THE BOSS OF US: Presidents aren’t supposed to just “act” anytime Congress doesn’t agree with their desires.

A PHRASE BOOK FOR TOURISTS IN HELL: Common SJW Phrases Translated into English.

ROGER SIMON: Hillary’s Watergate Looms.

THE COLOGNE SEX ASSAULTS: A Failure By Germany’s Elite.

What is apparent is that, during and since, there has been a widespread failure on the part of German authorities and elite institutions. The police failed to protect its citizens, the press dawdled in holding anyone to account (and see, too, those unanswered questions just above), and at least one politician even now seems to struggle to address the issue without suggesting that young women must somehow accommodate the possibility of assaults and “confusion.”
This all carries echoes of the Rotherham scandal, in which British authorities had for years turned a blind eye to a child abuse ring among Pakistani men in the north of England, seemingly at least in part for fear of looking racist. By the time anyone put a stop to it, an estimated 1,400 kids had been abused, often horrifically. Like the German police and politicians in this case—albeit on a much longer and larger scale—the British authorities may have put the need to appear sensitive over the need to enforce core values and basic human rights.

Western liberal elites see themselves both as feminists and as advocates for refugees, immigrants, and minorities. (As a sign at a protest in Cologne on Wednesday, photographed by Reuters, read, “Gegen Sexismus, Gegen Rassismus”—or, “Against Sexism, Against Racism.”) As principles, all of those are fine sentiments. But in the real world, Europe has just admitted large numbers of young men from cultures with aggressively different attitudes towards women. Authorities in Germany and elsewhere, as well as politicians, feminists, and other elites, are going to have to figure out, fast, how to talk and act about the clash of Western absolutes (the ability of women, dressed as they wish, to walk wherever they wish without fear is not up for debate) with immigrant cultures, or many more problems may lie ahead.

The problem is that these “elites” — not just in Germany, but throughout the West — are, for the most part, horrible human beings who must cover up their horribleness with virtue-signalling. And virtue-signalling is inconsistent with constructive action.

UPDATE: How out of touch are they? This out of touch: Germany springs to action over hate speech against migrants.

January 6, 2016

AT AMAZON, coupons galore on Household Supplies.

Plus, 50% or more off on Men’s Clothing.

DO ANDROID WAITRESSES DREAM OF ELECTRIC SOUVLAKI? N.Y. Restaurant Owners Plead for Mercy as Gov. Cuomo Tightens Screws on Wages.

Related! Protesters Aren’t Going to Like How McDonald’s is Reacting to Their Minimum Wage Concerns.

As William Gibson once said, “The future is already here — it’s just not very evenly distributed.” And Gov. Cuomo is doing his part to make this November 2014 AP photo of robot waitresses serving customers in a China’s Zhejiang province restaurant a reality in New York as well.

china_robot_waitresses_1-6-16-1

UNREALITY ALL THE WAY DOWN: Shaun King tries to salvage Daily News piece based on fake Ammon Bundy tweet.

RIP, FLORENCE KING: “Can a non-believing misanthrope rest in peace? I hope so.”

To be fair, that sounds like it would be far too boring an afterlife for someone like her.

UPDATE: From 2012, the American Thinker’s salute to King: “While Miss King’s political thoughts will be missed, her disgust with a world gone mad will be more so.”

CLAY AALDERS: Blade-wielding bad-ass from history: Lieutenant Colonel John Malcolm Thorpe Fleming “Mad-Jack” Churchill. “Upon coming to a halt onshore, the soldier jumped from the craft, hucked a grenade at the Germans, then drew a full sword and ran screaming into the fray. That maniacally fierce soldier was 35-year-old Lieutenant Colonel John Malcolm Thorpe Fleming Churchill, and his stunts at this battle, known as Operation Archery, were hardly the most bizarre and semi-suicidal of his life. Over the course of World War II, ‘Mad Jack,’ as he came to be known, survived multiple explosions, escaped a couple of POW camps, captured more than 40 Germans at sword point in just one raid, and in 1940 scored the last recorded longbow kill in history.”

But today’s not entirely decadent: Woman Uses Knife To Fight Off 3 Home Invaders.

WELL, WE DID IN THE 1970s, BUT WE DIDN’T LIKE IT: Can Americans Accept a Tiny Engine in a Medium Car?

MY USA TODAY COLUMN: Should The Navy Go To A Big Fleet / Small Ships Doctrine?

THIS JUST IN. NBC’s Parks and Recreation Was Not Popular:

In other words, Parks and Rec was not a “popular” show as the word is commonly understood (“The Big Bang Theory” is “popular”; NCIS is “popular”), but it was “popular with younger, urban, professional, mostly liberal types.” Yuppies, in other words. Parks and Rec was a show beloved by a narrow slice of yuppies, and not really anyone else.

Hence the URL of Sonny Bunch’s article at the Washington Free Beacon: “you-live-in-a-bubble-you-precious-things-you.” But why was it beloved within its tiny leftwing urban bubble?

Leslie Knope, the tinpot dictator of Pawnee who thought it was her business to tell the people what size sodas they should drink and successfully turned a vacant lot into useless park land where a job-creating burger franchise could have gone. Parks and Rec (which I enjoyed quite a bit!) was always an ad for bigger and better government. The show’s final insult was turning hardcore libertarian Ron Swanson into an employee of the federal government, closing his run with a shot of his smiling face as he worked his new gig on federal land. Some might think this outcome absurd. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Sister.*

How politically correct did TV become over the past decade? It’s so bad that even Norman Lear, who arguably did more than anyone in Hollywood to drive the industry to the left in the 1970s, can now see it.

WE KINDA FIGURED THAT ABOUT YOU, JOY. The View’s Joy Behar: I’d Vote for a Rapist as Long as They’re Liberal.

Shades of Nina Burleigh.

BUILDING BRIDGES: Lesbians touch a penis for the first time in hilarious video.

HARD-HITTING DISPATCHES FROM THE FRONT LINES OF THE WAR ON TERROR: The Washington Post squees giddily over “The subversive feminism of two Obama staffers’ Secret Service codenames:”

Secret Service code names tend toward the masculine, if for no other reason than the majority of people who need them are of the dude persuasion. President Obama is “Renegade.” President George W. Bush is “Trailblazer.”  Even many women’s names, though typically far less aggressive, skew androgynous. For example, Michelle Obama is “Renaissance,” while Laura Bush is “Tempo.”

So the decision by two top Obama staffers to go by names that sound more like twee kittens than the latest SUV models was a departure from the norm. Nancy-Ann DeParle and Alyssa Mastromonaco, who served together as deputy chiefs of staff from 2011-2013, intentionally went for the ultra-feminine when selecting their monikers: Peaches and Popsicle, respectively.

As revealed in “Broad Influence: How Women Are Changing The Way America Works,” the just-out book by Time correspondent Jay Newton-Small, the duo eschewed their male predecessors’ presumably alpha-male-appropriate code names and picked ones that poked the patriarchy. The women “delighted in watching the mostly male, macho Secret Service agents announce the arrival of Popsicle and Peaches,” Newton-Small writes.

Related: “SecNav Bans Marine Job Titles With Term ‘Man’ to Ensure Gender Neutrality.”

Meanwhile, as the White House continues to fight hard on the the language front, ISIS’ “jihadi technical college” in Raqqa is teaching eager students how to build surface-to-air missiles.

Don’t worry — I’m sure the correct gender-neutral pronouns will protect us.

NEW YOU CAN USE: How You Pronounce ‘Muslim’ Says A Lot About Your Politics:

Those on the Left pronounce these two words the way a native Arabic speaker would, as a way of signaling their sympathy for the American-Muslim population. They are indicating they identify with this population and they have their backs.

In other words, they aren’t like those nasty, Muslim-hating Republicans. They understand Islam and respect it, and they know it has nothing to do with jihad and terrorism. This pronunciation is code for “I’m not Islamaphobic.” The Left is making their opinions and politics known with the simple shift in pronunciation of these two key words.

So leftwing virtue-signaling, to coin a phrase. But then, the left has been in this habit long before BHO began uttering words like Pock-eeee-staaaahhhhn; recall how the earlier, funnier Saturday Night Live used to mock the media for endlessly drawing out words like Nicaragggggggggua and Sandooooooneeeeeeesta back in the late 1980s:

NEW BLACK PANTHERS WITH GUNS, LOTS OF THEM: “President Obama claimed he was very concerned about the wrong people having guns,” Christian Adams writes. “He wasn’t always so concerned about the wrong people having guns.”

Of course, that all depends on your definition of “the wrong people.”

THE REAL REASON AMERICANS OPPOSE GUN CONTROL: Obama, Pelosi, Boxer, and the rest have no right to strip us of our last line of defense from their incompetence.

SENIOR WRITER FOR NEWSWEEK SMEARS TED CRUZ AS HITLER, IOWA VOTERS AS NAZIS:

newsweek_smears_ted_cruz_1-6-16-1

When called on his Godwin’s Law violation, Twitchy notes that Newsweek’s Alexander Nazaryan then deleted his tweet, of course. But I’m not sure why Nazaryan chose that particular angle, or got upset when at Twitter users questioning it, considering the magazine that employs him gave their blessings to socialism on a nationalistic scale in 2009

2009_socialist_newsweek_cover_5-5-13-1

At NewsBusters, Tim Graham notes that “yesterday, Nazaryan also tweeted ‘Ted Cruz is an atrocity of a human being,’” adding that “before joining Newsweek the monthly, Nazaryan was an editorial-page staffer at the New York Daily News, the NRA-are-terrorists paper, so the acorn didn’t fall far from the tree.”

SPEAKING OF NEWT, “Obama needs a Gingrich,” Kevin D. Williamson writes, in much the same way that the pro-Clinton media demonized Newt on his behalf in the mid-1990s:

If you are wondering why the president is, at the eleventh hour, using probably illegal executive fiats to start a national fight over gun control — a fight that will do nothing to reduce ordinary crime, terrorism, or mass shootings — it’s because he’s still looking for his Gingrich, and he believes that the NRA may be it. That is a grave and uncharacteristic political miscalculation for a man whose only documentable talent is for political calculation, and one suspects that his administration and his party will suffer for it between now and November.

Read the whole thing.

NEWT GINGRICH: “We are at the end of the 70 year strategy of attempting to contain the spread of nuclear weapons:”

The sobering reality is that we are at the end of the 70 year strategy of attempting to contain the spread of nuclear weapons and at the beginning of a dangerous new era of coping with the threat of nuclear weapons. The gap between the new dangers and the old thinking can be seen in the totally inadequate design of the Department of Homeland Security. As originally proposed in the Hart-Rudman Commission’s work in 2000 this department should be sized to handle simultaneous nuclear events in three different cities. Today, 15 years later, it could not adequately handle one nuclear event. Yet the spread of nuclear capability to North Korea, Pakistan, Iran and elsewhere virtually guarantees weapons could be used in the near future. We now have to develop a two prong strategy which both focuses diplomatically on minimizing their spread and the danger of their use and focuses national security and homeland security assets on surviving nuclear events if diplomacy fails.

Read the whole thing.

“MOST TRANSPARENT ADMINISTRATION EVER” IS ALSO THE MOST SUED FOR FOIA GAMES: An analysis of court records between 2001 and 2015 by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University found that a record number of Freedom of Information Act lawsuits were filed against federal agencies during 2015. The combined total of 421 in 2014 and 498 in 2015 represents a 54 percent increase over the two-year total for 2009 and 2010. Such suits are typically only filed after months of delays, dickering, threats and negotiations between federal officials and requesters seeking government documents the FOIA says are owned by taxpayers.

NEWS YOU CAN USE: Why half of the life you experience is over by age 7. I remember in law school, the first three weeks of my first year seemed subjectively about as long as the rest of the three years.

But as for age, I think that time is actually going faster every year — probably because of cosmic inflation — but you don’t notice that until you’re older because it takes a while to have enough years of experience to have perspective. I eagerly await my vindication by physicists.

AT AMAZON, Up To 85% off Kindle Books.

MY USA TODAY COLUMN: Should The Navy Go To A Big Fleet / Small Ships Doctrine?

NEW YORK TIMES WHITEWASHES TERROR-SUPPORTERS AS ‘HIPSTER PALESTINIANS:’ Haifa Arab who publicly called for Israel’s destruction complains Times misrepresented him as a ‘cool yay hipster.’

NEWS YOU CAN USE: How Panama and Mexico Help Potential Terrorists Reach the U.S. Border.

SOLAR STILL NOT COMPETITIVE WITHOUT SUBSIDIES:

Solar power installer SolarCity, the country’s largest provider of rooftop panels, has exited the Nevada market in the wake of the state’s rollback of the net metering fees paid to residential solar owners. The departure marks an escalation in the war over net metering that is roiling the industry.

One of the fastest-growing markets for residential solar, Nevada is the first state to drastically revise its policies on net metering—wherein owners of residential solar arrays are compensated for the power they send onto the utility power grid, usually at retail rates. All but a handful of states have instituted net metering. Claiming that these fees represent an unfair transfer of costs to the utilities and non-solar customers, utilities have mounted a well-funded campaign to reduce or eliminate the payments. The Nevada Public Utilities Commission concurred, calling on utilities to cut the compensation for solar providers from retail to wholesale rates.

Not surprisingly, the solar industry disagrees. Calling the net metering decision “unethical, unprecedented, and possibly unlawful,” SolarCity CEO Lyndon Rive predicted that it will “destroy the rooftop solar industry in one of the states with the most sunshine.”

Seems fair to me. You’re selling power at wholesale here, not a retail. Why should you get the retail price, except as a subsidy?

21ST CENTURY HEADLINES: Paraplegic Man Trains for the Cyborg Olympics.

AT AMAZON, Trade In Your Old Stuff, Get New Stuff.

GIVING THAT WARMING’S BEEN “PAUSED” FOR NEARLY 20 YEARS, CAN THIS REALLY BE DUE TO “CLIMATE CHANGE?” U.S. Becomes More Vulnerable to Tropical Diseases Like Zika. “Until May, Zika had never touched this hemisphere except on Easter Island, 2,200 miles off the Chilean coast. Now it circulates in 14 Latin American or Caribbean countries and Puerto Rico.”

Bring back DDT.

MY USA TODAY COLUMN: Should The Navy Go To A Big Fleet / Small Ships Doctrine?

THE OBAMA ERA IN ONE SENTENCE: “We have a Democrat who is allowed by the press to fail quietly, discreetly, and off center stage.”

GERMAN WOMEN, WELCOME TO SHARIA: Germany shocked by Cologne New Year (Muslim) gang assaults on women.

The mayor of Cologne has summoned police for crisis talks after about 80 women reported sexual assaults and muggings by men on New Year’s Eve.

The scale of the attacks on women at the city’s central railway station has shocked Germany. About 1,000 drunk and aggressive young men were involved.

City police chief Wolfgang Albers called it “a completely new dimension of crime”. The men were of Arab or North African appearance, he said.

Women were also targeted in Hamburg. . . .

What is particularly disturbing is that the attacks appear to have been organised. Around 1,000 young men arrived in large groups, seemingly with the specific intention of carrying out attacks on women.

Police in Hamburg are now reporting similar incidents on New Year’s Eve in the party area of St Pauli. One politician says this is just the tip of the iceberg.

And there are real concerns about what will happen in February when the drunken street-parties of carnival season kick off.

And this gem from the New York Slimes Times:

Calls came from the Bavarian Christian Social Union on Tuesday to deport any asylum-seekers found to be among the perpetrators in Cologne, a sentiment echoed by the left-leaning Süddeutsche-Zeitung in a commentary that noted that German law provides for such action.

Yet the commentary, by Heribert Prantl, also warned about the risks of the debate’s taking on a poisonous tone that would only make integration of the many young refugees and immigrants legitimately in the country that much more difficult.

“The young men who come to Germany must begin working as quickly as possible,” he wrote. “Work socializes. It is about our national peace, which is threatened by the excesses in Cologne and the excesses in the Internet.”

Yeah, I’m sure that’s it: Give these men a job–and/or rich taxpayer-funded benefits–and all of this violence and sexism will magically disappear. I mean, it’s not like Islam considers women to be objects or anything. And a sovereign nation can’t deny entry to non-citizens because of such dangerous beliefs or kick them out; that would be a violation of their “human rights.” 

muslim world cartoon

IN THE MAIL: From John Ringo, Strands of Sorrow (Black Tide Rising)

Plus, today only at Amazon: 25% off Best-Selling Multivitamins.

And, also today only: Up to 65% off Mee Audio Sport-Fi Headphones.

TAXPROF ROUNDUP: The IRS Scandal, Day 972.

ROGER KIMBALL: Epiphany: What was Cruz or Rubio is Now Cruz or Trump.

DON SURBER: FBI Headed For A Showdown Over Hillary. Money quote, from Joseph DiGenova: “I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that, unless [Lynch] agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an attorney general. It will be like Watergate. It will be unbelievable.” Well, stay tuned.

MORE LIKE THIS, PLEASE: Libertarian public-interest lawyer Clint Bolick nominated to Arizona Supreme Court.

WISCONSIN’S SECRET WAR: Bad Santa: John Doe prosecutor delivers letters to the people he spied on.

He walked into work Tuesday morning to find he had received an “unbelievable” notice.

Opening the manila envelope, the Wisconsin conservative learned that government agents had secretly seized his emails – professional and personal – sent and received over a two-year period beginning Jan. 1, 2009.

He found out he had, without his knowledge, been dragged into Wisconsin’s notorious John Doe investigation, one of perhaps dozens of individuals who in recent days have received similar notices from former John Doe special prosecutor Francis D. Schmitz.

Some, like the conservative who spoke to Wisconsin Watchdog on Tuesday, had no idea they had been under surveillance in a massive, politically driven spy operation.

“Just unbelievable,” said the conservative, who asked not to be identified. He remains active in Wisconsin politics. “It feels like a different country. It feels like something that shouldn’t be done in the United States of America.”

It’s increasingly the Democrats’ dream, though.

IT’S A POOR REFLECTION ON THE TAX SYSTEM THAT IT LENDS ITSELF TO THIS: How I Fell Face First Into An Epic IRS Scam.

Related: Why We Fear The IRS:

What’s interesting about this scam is that it’s a departure from classic confidence schemes. Think about something like the Nigerian e-mail scams, and how they draw their victims in: greed for a lucrative finder’s fee in exchange for doing something that sounds maybe a little bit shady, but maybe sort of noble too. The victim is then strung along by playing to the greed, and kept from talking to others who might point out the scam by because they think they are complicit in something legally questionable.

The IRS scam, on the other hand, works entirely by fear. It takes people who haven’t done anything wrong, and makes them afraid that they have. That’s a pretty hefty achievement. Imagine trying to extort money from someone by, say, claiming that they had murdered someone. You might elicit laughter, or bewilderment, but you’d rarely elicit much cash.

Which raises the obvious question: How did we get into a situation where it’s so easy for people to believe that the IRS is about to arrest them for a crime they weren’t even aware of having committed?

You guessed it: The IRS is incredibly powerful, and the tax code is incredibly opaque.

It’s a scam in itself.

ONLY 13 PERCENT OF VA’S TOP 300 HOSPITAL EXECS ARE VETERANS: Wait a minute! The Veterans Preference Act became law in 1944 and ever since then returning veterans are supposed to have a leg up for good government jobs, right? So why are there so few veterans running the key facilities of the agency whose sole reason for being is caring for veterans?

Luke Rosiak of the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group analyzed the bios and talked to highly educated, skilled veterans who were repeatedly rejected by VA. How can this be? I don’t know, maybe the first priority of the career bureaucrats running VA is protecting themselves rather caring for veterans???

YOUR CHILDREN BELONG TO THE STATE: Federal government tells parents they are inferior.

In a draft policy statement jointly issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Education, federal bureaucrats have — on their own initiative — subordinated parents to a secondary role in the rearing of their children. While the draft is neither finalized nor binding (yet), it serves as a clear shot across the bow of every freedom-loving parent who naively believes that his parenting principles, priorities and practices will be protected and respected by government.

The entire purpose of the 18-page statement is to explain, promote and bureaucratically implement what the departments call “family engagement.” This term sounds like something every good parent would inherently want, but here’s how the government defines it: “the systematic inclusion of families as partners in children’s development, learning and wellness.”

That’s right: the government is going to include you, the parent, as a partner in rearing your child. Are we supposed to thank it for this privilege?

Thank, tar-and-feather, it’s up to you.

AT AMAZON, fresh deals on bestselling products, updated every hour.

Also, coupons galore in Grocery & Gourmet Food.

Plus, Kindle Daily Deals.

And, Today’s Featured Digital Deal. The deals are brand new every day, so browse and save!

QUESTION FOR HILLARY, AND HER ANSWER: “Somebody’s lying. Who is it?” Interview with Hillary Clinton About Benghazi.

JONATHAN TOBIN: Hey, why does nobody want to talk about how every place that has Muslim immigration experiences an explosion of rape? “Western journalists may have reported the epidemic of rape that took place during mass protests in Cairo’s Tahir Square as Egypt lurched from the Arab Spring to Muslim Brotherhood tyranny and now to the return of a military government. That was especially true since some of their own, including a prominent CBS correspondent, were among the victims. What happens in Egypt can be dismissed as exotica even if it is horrifying. But when Western societies find themselves dealing with similar instances of sexual assault on this scale, it is time to realize that integrating large numbers of immigrants from the Middle East can bring it with problems that are not merely a function of poverty, prejudice or a lack of a welcoming spirit on the part of the host countries.”

DAVID SOLWAY ON ISLAMIC SCHOOL PROJECTS:

What we are observing are the effects of a macropolitical strategy, reinforced not only by curricular structures and testing practices, but by the ostensibly innocent maneuvers that feature on the mirco-tier of educational procedures. The nexus between sectarian politics and partisan education is now firmly entrenched in the American cultural mindscape, and we can see how this plays out on the level of primary and high school “learning projects.” We have read accounts of elementary and high school students pledging allegiance in Arabic, observing Muslim holy days, being drilled in Islamic vocabulary, prayers and culture, being taught the five pillars of Islam and world history from an Islamic perspective, reciting the Shahada (“There is no God but Allah and Mohammed is the messenger of Allah”) and being taken on field trips to mosques (but not to churches, synagogues or Hindu temples).

A recent controversy illustrating this tendency involves high school students in Blaine, Minnesota, instructed to perform a song in their Christmas concert that includes the Arabic phrase Allahu Akbar, which CBS considerately explains in its report on the event “means God is Great.” No, not quite. As Carol Brown comments in American Thinker, it means “Allah is supreme. As in Islamic supremacy.” It is also the cry uttered by legions of jihadists as they commit their acts of terror, slaughtering innocents at will. But students, to the detriment of all of us, are not informed about the implications of the phrase.

Read the whole thing.

ANGELO CODEVILLA: Romancing the Sunni: A US policy tragedy in three acts; Act I.

Here’s Act II.

And here’s Act III.

RANDY BARNETT: The Significance Of Lysander Spooner. “Spooner’s approach to constitutional interpretation, construction, and legitimacy is as fresh today as it was in 1845. Indeed, it is more sophisticated and persuasive than the theorizing of most contemporary legal academics.”

CBS HYPES EARTH’S ‘CHRONIC FEVER’ IN EXTREME WEATHER SEGMENT: “Even when NASA states a weather pattern has not been caused by climate change, the media still can’t help bringing it up.”

Although perhaps things are getting worse, if CBS is saying that the earth has a “fever.”* I can remember when CBS said it merely had a cold:

* Does it need more cowbell? No, that’s NBC’s shtick.

HILLARY CLINTON WILL NOT SAY WHAT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A DEMOCRAT AND A SOCIALIST IS, when asked by Chris Matthews.

She knows — of course she knows — but the truth would be far too uncomfortable for her to admit.

RICHARD POSNER: How To Fix Law School.

The first year of law school, usually so different from the student’s previous educational experiences, is bound to make a lasting, indeed a lifelong, impression.The first-year program at most law schools is demanding, though less than it used to be; current tuition levels tend to induce law schools to treat students more as customers than as plebes. I felt changed after my first year (1959–1960) as a student at the Harvard Law School—I felt that I had become more intelligent.The basic training was in learning how to extract holdings from judicial opinions in common law fields and how to apply those holdings to novel factual situations—in other words how to determine the scope and meaning of a legal doctrine.The courses were very difficult because the legal vocabulary was unfamiliar; the professors asked incessant, difficult questions, usually cold calling; the casebooks had very little explanatory material; and we were told not to waste our time reading secondary materials—and most of us were docile and so obeyed.That first year of Harvard Law School was active learning at its best.

We learned to be careful and imaginative readers; we learned that American law is malleable and relatedly that notions of public policy, and sheer common sense, were legitimate and important considerations in interpreting and applying legal doctrines.There were no references to systematic bodies of thought outside law, however, and statutes were rarely encountered and the Constitution never.The canvas broadened in the second and third years. But the courses in those years had much less impact on me, in part because the school tended to stack its best teachers in the first year, in part because a certain freshness had worn off, and in part because I devoted most of my time in my second and third years to the law review, which I found more interesting than most of the second- and third-year courses. But as I think back on those years I realize that another factor was that the common law really is the most commonsensical, intelligible, politically neutral body of American law, compared to which most of constitutional law, and most statutory law, are a muddle.

True.

ROGER SIMON SPOTS THE HIDDEN MESSAGE BEHIND OBAMA’S GUN CONTROL PROPOSALS:

But buried beneath the tracks of Obama’s tears was something much more significant than his paltry partisan fiddling with the gun laws.  Take a look at the following excerpt from his speech and let’s play the old Sesame Street game, “Some of these things are not like the others.”

“Fort Hood, Binghamton, Aurora, Oak Creek, Newtown, the Navy Yard, Santa Barbara, Charleston, San Bernardino. Too many,” Obama said, ticking through a list of mass shootings since the 2011 Tucson shooting that killed six and injured more than a dozen more, including former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), who was in attendance in the East Room.

No doubt you got it in one. Two of those mass shootings (Fort Hood and San Bernardino) were perpetrated by jihadis motivated by fundamentalist Islamic ideology — while the others (not all very mass) were the work of common criminals and/or (to be blunt) nutcases.

Why is this important?  It should be obvious that gun control legislation of any sort is absolutely irrelevant to jihadis. As has been demonstrated, they have had no trouble getting arms even in societies like Canada, Australia and France where the gun laws are far more stringent than ours.  Indeed, they are able to obtain weapons of all sorts all across the globe. (Of course, criminals in general don’t have much trouble getting guns, but jihadis have a world-wide network of the sympathetic at their disposal.)

Read the whole thing.

obama_seseme_street_family_tv_article_banner_1-5-16

IS THIS THE HOPE, OR THE CHANGE? NORTH KOREA SAYS IT SUCCESSFULLY CONDUCTS HYDROGEN BOMB TEST:

North Korea says it has successfully carried out a hydrogen bomb test, which if confirmed, will be a first for the reclusive regime and a significant advancement for its military ambitions.

A hydrogen bomb is more powerful than plutonium weapons, which is what North Korea used in its three previous underground nuclear tests.

“If there’s no invasion on our sovereignty we will not use nuclear weapon,” the North Korean state news agency said. “This H-bomb test brings us to a higher level of nuclear power.”

If true, the symmetry of the Norks announcing they’ve armed themselves with the H-bomb on the same day that Obama went full-Boehner while proposing disarming innocent Americans of their firearms is truly staggering. But then, when it comes to generating absurdity, there’s no way any satirist can compete with reality.

Or with the Obama administration, for that matter.

Speaking of which, in response to the State Department urging “North Korea to exercise restraint and refrain from further threatening actions,” James Taranto quips, “#YoureGonnaNeedABiggerHashtag.”

And you’re going to have move that red line yet again. “Today, President Park and I are reaffirming that our nations will never accept North Korea as a nuclear weapons state,” President Boehner tweeted with a tear in his eye 80 days ago back in October.

In lighter news from the intersection of DC and the Hermit State, would-be Washington Post “fact checker” Glenn Kessler blindly retweets parody North Korean news agency account weighing on Donald Trump’s “Ted Cruise” birther shtick.

Layers and layers of fact-checkers and editors…

MICHAEL BARONE: Actually, Economist, the First Amendment does give people ‘a free pass to go round saying hateful things’.

The Economist’s writers and editors are mostly citizens of the United Kingdom, which doesn’t have a First Amendment, but as members of the press — and employees of a publication which has more readers in the United States than in Britain — they ought to be aware of American First Amendment law. It’s pretty astonishing and dismaying that with the use of the verb “points out” they indicate a complacent acceptance of the notion that speech repugnant to some people may be prohibited and with the phrase “self-styled defenders of the First Amendment” they suggest disapproval of those seeking to uphold the right of free speech. It’s particularly odd since the web version links to another Economist article decrying the new Polish government’s “purging the country’s public media.”

Why is it acceptable for a state university to prohibit free speech while it is unacceptable, or at least disreputable, for a government to shape the content of government-subsidized media? Does The Economist believe that freedom of speech only applies to ideas it approves of?

Actually, it’s even more disturbing that an American law professor would say what the Economist is agreeing with.

THE COMING BACKLASH: Migrants Molested Women In Cologne On New Year’s Eve.

It’s worth taking a moment, in light of the luridness of these allegations, to note that Deutsche Welle is an impeccably mainstream source, the German state-owned international broadcaster—the equivalent of BBC World Service or VOA. DW has an explicit mission to portray Germany as a “liberal, democratic state based on the rule of law.” Meanwhile, Henriette Reker, the Mayor, is an independent supported by the Greens as well as the CDU, and she has previously been stabbed by an anti-immigration extremist. In other words, these serious allegations are not coming from far-Right sources, but from the center of the German establishment.

These kinds of stories could well change the face of refugee politics in Germany. Thus far, Angela Merkel has been successfully playing “good cop” to her partner Horst Seehofer’s “bad cop“—a dance meant to secure the sensible center from the rise of fringe actors in Germany’s politics. That little dance may not be sustainable in the face of these kinds of reports.

Reality eventually asserts itself, ideology notwithstanding.

RICHARD EPSTEIN ON THE SUPREME COURT AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEE UNIONS: End The “Agency Shop.”

As a matter of first principle, unions are the source of two evils: unified, they wreak harm on public services; divided, they offer shabby treatment to their dissident members. In an ideal world, the Supreme Court would use Friedrichs to dismantle mandatory collective bargaining root and branch. But short of that, what the Court should do, and do unanimously, is set dissenting workers free from union domination by striking down all agency shop provisions.

I agree with FDR that public-employee unions are an inherent conflict of interest. I hope that under President Cruz, the GOP Congress will abolish them.

APPARENTLY 2015 WAS A GOOD YEAR FOR PATENTS: Here They Are, the Craziest Patents of 2015.

SOUND AND TEARS SIGNIFYING NOTHING: Comedians in Cars Getting Teary.

NO QUESTION SHOULD EVER BE UNMENTIONABLE: An Unmentionable Refugee Question.

GEEKS’ CUP RUNNETH OVER: Netflix and DreamWorks Animation Are Resurrecting ‘Voltron’.

JOY IS NOT THE ABSENCE OF ADVERSITY: How Globetrotter Meadowlark Lemon Made a Career out of Joy.

IS SHARING THIS VIRTUE SIGNALING? Are You Guilty of “Virtue-Signaling?”

HE’S BEEN LIGHTING MATCHES, IN SEARCH OF A GAS LEAK: Iran-Saudi crisis is the bitter fruit of Obama’s inept diplomacy.

HOW CHINA BUILT PROCRUSTES’ BED: Sterilization, abortion, fines: How China brutally enforced its 1-child policy.

BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, SUPER GENIUS: Iran crosses another line — and Obama blinks again.

I’M MORE AFRAID OF NATURAL STUPIDITY: Fear, Loathing, and Artificial Intelligence.

I’LL BELIEVE IT WHEN I SEE IT: Former U.S. attorney: Clinton could face criminal indictment.

POSSIBLY BECAUSE IF THEY EXIST THEY ARE VANISHINGLY SMALL? Clinton can’t explain the difference between Democrats, socialists. To be fair to her, I couldn’t either.

IF THIS GOES ON, I’M GOING TO NEED A NEW SHOCKED FACE: US Expert: Hamas, not Israel, Killed Boys on Beach in Gaza War.

WHEN YOU CAN’T TRUST ANY ECONOMIC REPORTS: Inside Wall Street’s disastrous start to 2016.

WHEN BILL NEEDED A WAR ON WOMEN AND HILLARY WAS HIS AIDE-DE-CAMP: The Clintons are in denial about Bill’s sex scandals

HASN’T HARRY REID DONE ENOUGH FOR TO AMERICA: Harry Reid demands retirement ‘slush fund,’ FEC defers.

RAISE UP THE CHILD AS YOU INTEND HIM TO GO: Strangling the free mind.

TO QUOTE LARRY CORREIA:  Things are about to get massively stupider. Meet the new gun control – same as the old gun control, but with more dumb.

WHY IT’S IMPORTANT TO FIGHT THE NARRATIVE: How Stories Deceive.

MY SHOCKED FACE IS GETTING SHOP WORN:Progressives are actually the barrier to fighting homelessness.

January 5, 2016

THE GENERAL ELECTION in two photos. “Donald Trump in a packed 7,300-seat arena in Lowell, Massachusetts on Monday. Bill Clinton at a 720-seat gym in Nashua, New Hampshire, on Monday.”

AT AMAZON, 70% off Clothing, Shoes and More.

KEN WHITE: President Obama And The Rhetoric of Rights. “Today the President of the United States gave a speech about gun control measures. I don’t intend to critique those measures. Nor do I mean to critique his rhetoric about gun violence. I do intend to critique his language about rights, because how our leaders discuss rights can have a powerful impact on how Americans understand rights. . . . I think the right to have the government do things to other people for you is made up.”

But to Obamaites, using the government to do things to other people is the whole point.

TO BE FAIR, EVEN WHEN YOU DO GO TO PLANET FITNESS, YOU’RE NOT REALLY GOING TO THE GYM: “Half of the Planet Fitness members don’t ever go to their gyms, Planet Money says.”

NEWS YOU CAN USE: What I learned not drinking for two years.

PUSHBACK: Missouri legislators to Mizzou: Fire professor who tried to “muscle” reporter. “Legit sanction for abuse of authority, or an infringement on academic freedom? Missouri state legislators want Melissa Click canned for her actions in a protest at the University of Missouri, in which she threatened a student journalist by calling for ‘some muscle’ when he insisted on covering the demonstration. The letter sent to Mizzou has the signatures of a majority in both chambers of the state’s assembly.”

I’m not sure how it will turn out, but it’s definitely sent a message, one that I suspect will be reinforced at budget time. As Ed Morrissey writes: “I suspect Mizzou’s going to feel a lot of adultism in the coming months, most of it directed at the supposed adults in charge. And they will deserve every bit of it.”

GERMAN ANTI-ISLAMIC GROUP PEGIDA expands to the UK.

MARCO RUBIO: Writes in today’s NRO, “Iran Thumbs Its Nose at America and Obama Does Nothing.

Last week, the White House hailed Iran for shipping most of its low-enriched uranium stockpile to Russia. Secretary of State John Kerry called it “one of the most significant steps Iran has taken” under the nuclear deal signed this past summer. But the real news happened several days earlier: Even as the administration heaped praise on the mullahs in Tehran, Iranian Revolutionary Guard ships fired unguided rockets near a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Strait of Hormuz.

This provocation is just the latest in a series of dangerous acts committed by Iran that belie President Obama’s rosy promises of putting pressure on Iran for its aggressive actions. . . .

Iran has already stretched the terms of Obama’s deal. Iran is now trying to claim that a U.S. law aimed at protecting Americans from terrorists trying to come to the United States is an American violation of the agreement. This is a blatant attempt to pressure the Obama administration not to seek or enforce any new sanctions whatsoever, even those targeting human-rights abuses and support for terrorism, which are allowed under the deal. It has twice tested ballistic missiles — violating a U.N. Security Council resolution. On December 31 the supposed moderate Iranian president Hassan Rouhani even stated that Iran would be expanding its ballistic missile program. This comes just weeks after the Obama administration joined with its diplomatic partners to sweep Iran’s past illicit nuclear-weapons activities under the rug. . . .

That is why as president I will scrap this fundamentally flawed deal. Instead, I will reimpose the sanctions that President Obama waives and will impose crushing new measures targeting all of Iran’s illicit behavior.

It’s almost as if President Obama is an apologist for Iran. Rubio at least tried to insert a “poison pill” into Corker-Cardin (which effectively approved of the Iran deal as an ordinary statute rather than a treaty) to condition the deal on Iran’s explicit recognition of Israel.

But as Bruce Ackerman and David Golove recently argued in The Atlantic liberals/progressive (ironically) assert that repudiation by a Republican President would violate Article II, section three’s command that the President “take care that laws be faithfully executed.”

This argument is specious, as Corker-Cardin was not an expression of approval of the Iran deal, but instead a decision by Congress not to approve of the Iran deal as a treaty (as it should, constitutionally, have been handled). Since Congress has never “approved” of the Iran deal by majority vote, a future President that chooses to repudiate the deal could hardly be characterized as failing to “faithfully execute” a law enacted by Congress.

MAYOR OF COLOGNE TELLS RAPE VICTIMS THEY HAD IT COMING: Mayor Henriette Reker “said today that women should adopt a ‘code of conduct’ to prevent future assault at a crisis meeting following the sexual attack of women by 1000 men on New Year’s eve,” the London Independent reports:

The crisis management team said prevention measures should include a code of conduct for young women and girls, and Mayor Reker said the existing code of conduct will be updated online.

The suggested code of conduct includes maintaining an arm’s length distance from strangers, to stick within your own group, to ask bystanders for help or to intervene as a witness, or to inform the police if you are the victim of such an assault.

Buried 11 paragraphs and three quoted tweets deep into the Independent’s article is this minor detail:

The attackers were described as North African and Arab appearance by the police. The Mayor has said that not all of the attackers were newly-arrived refugees and had already been known to the police, as reported by The Local.

Perhaps the Independent buried this detail not just because of the usual PC “better dead than rude” mindset, but with Rotherham also on their mind. And it may have been on Mayor Reker’s mind as well, as Allahpundit writes. “The possibility of a (failed) cover-up by authorities in the name of racial harmony recalls the infamous Rotherham sex abuse cover-up in the UK (which lasted years, it should be noted, not just one evening). The idea of sexual assaults happening out in the open in a mass gathering place recalls what Lara Logan went through when she was attacked in Tahrir Square in 2011.”

11 years ago, then-UN Secretary Kofi “Can I trust Saddam Hussein? I think I can do business with him” Annan said, “In many countries of Christian tradition, large Muslim communities are a relatively new phenomenon.  Integration is a two-way street.  Immigrants must adjust to their new societies — and societies must adjust, too.”

Europe can’t say it wasn’t warned that more than a little behavior modification would be in order to placate its large — and ever-expanding “Muslim communities.”

And they’re not alone — “Remember that viral video of Canadian children singing a Muslim ‘welcome’ song? Learn the sick TRUE STORY behind the music,” proffers Ezra Levant today.

TEACH WOMEN NOT TO RAPE! (CONT’D): Mother-of-three “takes 15-year-old boy and his friend to bed for threesome.”

WELL, THAT’S CERTAINLY TRUE IF YOU RELY ON PRESS ACCOUNTS: You Know Less Than You Think About Guns: The misleading uses, flagrant abuses, and shoddy statistics of social science about gun violence.

Social “science” on pretty much any contested public issue is generally result-oriented crap, peddled by dishonest shills.

IT’S THE SAME PHENOMENON THAT LEADS THE GOVERNMENT TO TARGET LEGITIMATE GUN OWNERS INSTEAD OF FOCUSING ON CRIMINALS: Govt should be targeting problem drinkers, not moderate sippers.

The USDA bases its recommendations on the large volume of research showing moderate drinking can have health benefits. Studies published in the last year have linked low levels of alcohol consumption by some populations to lower heart disease risks, better control of diabetes, improved memory, and fewer instances of certain cancers.

The CDC considers drinking “excessive” if a woman consumes more than eight drinks per week or a man consumes more than 15. So while one drink per day is healthy, a woman who indulges in a second glass of wine some nights finds herself suddenly in the CDC’s “excessive” drinking category.

Government agencies contradicting one another isn’t a new phenomenon. And the CDC’s extremely conservative definition of binge drinking might not be so disconcerting if it weren’t being used by anti-alcohol activist groups to justify the elimination of alcohol advertising and raising alcohol taxes.. . .

Those who are addicted to alcohol — the ones who should be the focus of these large government agencies’ policies — are the least sensitive to price increases. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism reports that alcohol tax increases did not affect the 5 percent of consumers who are the heaviest drinkers. Instead, higher prices encourage abusive drinkers to switch to cheaper brands.

In other words, government agencies and anti-alcohol activists pursue policies that would disproportionately affect regular social drinkers having a couple of beers at a barbecue, a couple of glasses of wine at dinner, or indulging a bit on New Year’s Eve.

It’s always the normals who get the shaft.

JOURNALISM: “In 2008, the mainstream press shilled for Obama. The infamous ‘Journ-o-list’ moderated what the talking points would be. Since then, the major legacy media organizations have established something of a Soviet-style interlocking directorate between themselves and the White House through marriage and family ties, and by shuttling back and forth between press and government positions.”

*/ ?>