A NICE STORY FROM KNOXVILLE: MooYah’s reopens after accident; staff got paid during 12-day shutdown.

Nick DeVore lost 12 days of business during the height of the Christmas shopping season at his MooYah Burgers-Fries-Shakes restaurant on Kingston Pike, all because of a suspected drunken driver who slammed her car through the eatery’s front wall on Dec. 18, then drove away before anyone could get her name or license plate number.

It took that long for DeVore to get insurance adjusters, a contractor, and a repair crew out to the store, and get a temporary wall built so he could reopen.

Even though DeVore will take a big financial hit from the incident, none of his 15 employees will. They came back to work Wednesday morning with smiles on their faces after a nearly two-week, unplanned paid vacation that included Christmas Day.

That’s because DeVore, the store’s owner and operator, decided to keep paying them even while MooYah’s was closed.

A nice gesture, and I’m glad he could afford it.

SHOCKER: New Classified Email Contradicts Hillary’s Claims.

IS THERE NOTHING HE CAN’T DO? Documentary: Chuck Norris Helped Open Communist Romania to West.

ULTIMATE RUBE SELF-IDENTIFIES: Clinton emails: Billionaire Soros said he regretted backing Obama.

Still though, he must have found the chaos he financed over the last eight years to be awfully exhilarating.

“DEMOCRACY IS LIKE A STREETCAR. WHEN YOU COME TO YOUR STOP, YOU GET OFF,” TURKEY’S Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan once said — and now we know which stop he chose for his final destination: Berlin.

Berlin in 1933: “Turkey’s Erdogan, Seeking a More Powerful Presidency, Cites Hitler’s System,” the New York Times reports:

ISTANBUL — President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, who is pushing to imbue the largely ceremonial presidency with sweeping executive powers akin to the United States or France, gave a new example of an effective presidential system late Thursday: Hitler’s Germany.

After returning from a trip to Saudi Arabia, Mr. Erdogan was asked by the Turkish news media whether a presidential system was possible given that the government is now organized under a prime minister.

“There are already examples in the world,” Mr. Erdogan said. “You can see it when you look at Hitler’s Germany.”

Hitler, who became chancellor of Germany in 1933, assumed the presidency in 1934, a move that allowed him to consolidate power to become the Führer.

While Mr. Erdogan did not elaborate, his comment is bound to raise concern among critics who view him as increasingly authoritarian.

Despite the Times’ early Pollyanna-ish dismissal of the post-Weimar socialist leader as a totally cool and dreamy “New Popular Idol,” whose “anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded,” I’m guessing this doesn’t bode well for Turkey — on the plus-side though, Obama promised voters plenty of change in the Middle East…

QUOTE OF THE DAY:

Disney right now: “George Lucas doesn’t like the new Star Wars movie. Do we have room for that in the promotional material?”

—James Lileks on Twitter, yesterday.

Related:

The hourlong interview, broadcast on Dec. 25 and released online this week, focused on Mr. Lucas’s legacy, which was celebrated at the Kennedy Center Honors this month. But he was harsh in criticizing the film industry for focusing on profit over storytelling.

At one point he said that filmmakers in the Soviet Union had more freedom than their counterparts in Hollywood, who, he maintained, “have to adhere to a very narrow line of commercialism.”

Nahh — Stalin always kept the final cut. In more ways than one.

(And as Stephen Miller tweets, “Name the Soviet Union filmmaker who is now a billionaire several times over.”)

GQ PUTS HILLARY AT #5 ON ITS LIST OF 2015′S WORST PEOPLE — AHEAD OF BILL COSBY AND JARED FOGLE.

Remember Cool Hillary Clinton, back when she was checking her phone with her sunglasses on like a BAWSE and getting drunk with foreign dignitaries on Instagram and shit? Yeah, that Hillary Clinton is gone, kids. Hopelessly corrupt pander-bot 2008 Hillary is back! And remarkably, she seems to believe—yet again—that her lengthy history of cynical, bought-and-paid-for leadership somehow entitles her to the presidency, as if her entire campaign strategy is “I didn’t betray my principles and sell out every last one of my constituents NOT to be president, you guys!” I hope she keeps that Gmail account open. She’s gonna need it after blowing this election.

Consolation: She beat Jeb, too.

TNR ON DONALD TRUMP AND THE POLITICS OF DISGUST:

Last week, Donald Trump was once again disgusted. Commenting on Hillary Clinton’s awkward bathroom break during the last Democratic debate, he said, “I know where she went, it’s disgusting, I don’t want to talk about it. No, it’s too disgusting. Don’t say it, it’s disgusting, let’s not talk.”

It’s not the first time that Trump has been perturbed by a bodily function. As Frank Bruni noted in his New York Times column, Trump has been publicly disgusted by Marco Rubio’s sweat and by the idea of pumping breast milk. Then there was his notorious comment about Fox News host Megyn Kelly, in which he conveyed an almost visceral revulsion: “You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.”

The Trump campaign has stunned bemused pundits by growing in strength with every controversy and outrageous policy proposal, like banning foreign Muslims from entering the United States. It has finally forced them to admit that his success comes not despite these things, but because of them.

What if disgust is a distinct part of that?

It’s an interesting angle, though I’m not sure if a magazine which in 2013 advised President Obama to roll the tanks in and start shelling the GOP-controlled Congress during the fall budget sequester is the best publication to be proffering it.

Related: David Gelernter asks “What Explains the Vicious Left? When politics becomes a religion, nonbelievers must be punished.”

TNR apparently prefers the T-34 tank to get the job done.

THEY CAN’T VET TERRORISTS, BUT THEY’VE GOT TIME FOR THIS: FBI offers $5,000 reward after bacon found at Vegas mosque.

Put a crucifix in urine, meanwhile, and you can get an NEA grant.

WHY ARE DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES SUCH HELLHOLES OF CORRUPTION, RACISM, AND VIOLENCE?

• “District Of Columbia Ends 2015 With A 54 Percent Spike In Homicides.”
• “Chicago Rings in New Year With First Homicide.”
• “How bad is Rahm Emanuel? He makes Bill De Blasio look good.”
• “In Denial About Crime — The Brennan Center and other liberal groups pretend that murders and shootings aren’t spiking in many cities.”

Perhaps a change in management is long overdue:

OBAMA’S “STREISAND EFFECT” PRESIDENCY, as diagnosed by Mark Hemingway of the Weekly Standard. “When you say there’s peace and security in Syria, you’re not convincing anyone that’s the case…Recall that Obama told Bill O’Reilly in his Super Bowl interview a few years back that there was ‘not a smidgen of corruption’ at the IRS…What about ‘Obamacare is working’?”

Unless you’re already on Team Obama, this kind of denial is polarizing at best and infuriating at worst. So why do they do it? Well, the general rule in Washington is never assume malice when incompetence and arrogance will suffice. It’s more than possible that Obama and those in his administration are in a bubble. Indeed, that was heavily suggested by the recent fracas when The New York Times reported—then memory-holed—a report where Obama said he underestimated how much the recent ISIS attack in San Bernardino had spooked Americans because he didn’t watch cable news.

The more sinister reading would be that this is the Obama administration brazenly lying because that’s how their theory of “stray voltage” works:

Read the whole thing, which helps to explain, as Bill Whittle noted in one of his Firewall videos in 2014, why it often feels to Americans as if they’re being gaslighted by the Obama administration:

NEWS YOU CAN USE: Strap on Those Sidearms: Open Carry Arrives in Texas.

AT AMAZON, up to 30% off Levi’s.

Also, big savings on Transcend memory products.

HAPPY NEW YEAR! Space: The Visionaries Take Over. “Today future directions are being set by private companies with growing technical experience and competing visions.”

CIVIL RIGHTS UPDATE: Washington state top court: some knives are likely constitutionally protected ‘arms,’ but paring knives aren’t.

CHECK OUT AMAZON PRIME VIDEO with a 30-day Free Trial.

TRUE: “What stands out to me after reading the whole article, however, is that Trump obviously has a lot of support among a wide range of people, including many that you wouldn’t expect if you’ve been relying on mainstream media for information: women, well-educated people, Hispanics. There needs to be much more serious analysis of what is going on. American politics is outrunning the pundit class.”

Well, most of it.

Related: “Trump is Al Czervik bringing the hoi polloi to the Bushwood Country Club.”

Plus, confidential Trump video.

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE: We spend more and more time assessing what we do, and fewer and fewer hours doing it – just to give administrators something to do for their gold-plated salaries.

STAR WARS’ TROUBLING UNASKED MORAL QUESTIONS: Are Droids Slaves? “In the Star Wars universe, droids are slaves. Once you see this truth, it’s difficult to look at Star Wars the way you did as a child. . . . Droids are clearly sentient life forms.”

CROWDFUNDED STAR TREK MOVIE DRAWS LAWSUIT FROM PARAMOUNT, CBS: As the Hollywood Reporter notes, Star Trek: Axanar, “the subject of a lawsuit filed on Friday in California federal court, is no ordinary Star Trek film. The forthcoming feature film (preceded by a short film) is the source of more than $1 million in crowdfunding on Kickstarter and Indiegogo.”

Perhaps the crowdfunding aspect of this production and the amount of money raised so far sent up a giant red flag with Paramount’s lawyers, who in the past have been remarkably laissez-faire when it comes to the prolific amount of video Star Trek fan fiction, such as Starship Exeter, Star Trek Continues and the long-running Star Trek: Phase II series. The latter two productions have featured a number of actors who’ve appeared on the various real, Paramount-produced Star Trek TV series and movies, sometimes playing their original characters.

I hope the filmmakers and the studio come to a mutually amicable arrangement, as the trailer looked pretty awesome:

IN THE MAIL: From Newt Gingrich & William R. Forstchen, To Make Men Free: A Novel of the Civil War.

Plus, today only at Amazon: 50% off Saucony Running Shoes.

And, also today only: 44% off FitDesk v2.0 Desk Exercise Bike with Massage Bar. We have the earlier model FitDesk and like it.

Plus: Up to 67% Off Featured “The Twilight Zone” Collections.

And: Up to 80% Off Kindle Books to Jump-Start the New Year.

TAXPROF ROUNDUP: The IRS Scandal, Day 965.

MEGAN MCARDLE: Sanders’s and Clinton’s Fake Middle Class.

Is $250,000 a year in household income “middle class”?

That sort of income puts a family in the top 5 percent of American earners, which seems like an overgenerous definition of “middle class.” Why, then, are Democrats so allergic to raising taxes on people who make less than this fabled cutoff? Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders want to spend money on a lot of stuff: single-payer health care, more generous Social Security benefits, universal preschool, free college, worker training. They are probably not going to be able to pay for it with the piddly sums one can raise from even large tax hikes on the very highest earners. Yet both of them seem wedded to the idea that taxes should not rise significantly for anyone who makes less than $250,000 a year.

In the New York Times, Bryce Covert of ThinkProgress argues that this is a mistake. The middle class is suffering, she says, and it’s time to tap the merely affluent as well as the fantastically well off. She does a good job of making the case that Democratic priorities can’t be funded without broader-based taxes. What she does not do, however, is explain why Democrats are avoiding this obvious arithmetic.

One answer is that they get a lot of their support in high-cost states where, say, $125,000 a year does not feel like riches beyond dreams of avarice. Over the past five years or so, the commentariat has been periodically convulsed by arguments over whether high earners have any right to feel pinched because their “basics” — a decently sized home in a good school district, a diet filled with lean protein and fresh produce, and an amenity-filled coastal city nearby in which to enjoy their hard-won socioeconomic status — are very expensive.

Living in a coastal city is actually not a civil right; it is a consumption good, and therefore, yes, you are still very affluent if you make $250,000 a year and choose to spend it on living near Manhattan. But this is neither here nor there; most people do not feel this way, in part because they compare themselves with people they know, and their own expectations from growing up, not everyone in the country. Those people are going to freak out if you tell them that they have to pay higher taxes.

And Democratic priorities, particularly Sanders’ plans, would cost a great deal of money.

Heh. If I were a GOP candidate, I’d ride the populist wave by going after these folks, and call it a “Yuppie tax,” because everybody hates yuppies. And then I’d go farther and target all the well-off Democratic constituencies: Push an outright ban on private jets — they’re bad for the planet! — an excise tax on homes over 4000 square feet, a punitive tariff on imported automobiles, and so on. You want class warfare, baby? You got it! Make the Democrats defend the rich!

Oh, and end the Hollywood tax cuts, while taxing the blue zones!

HAPPY NEW YEAR IN 2016? MAYBE NOT IF YOUR STATE IS DEEP IN DEBT: If California’s debts all come due this year, residents will have to cough up an additional $32,600 in taxes. Only 11 states have more assets than debts. Check out the spreadsheet to see how your state fares, courtesy of the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group. But be forewarned: If you celebrated a bit too much last night, maybe you should wait to check until that throbbing in your head eases.

YES. Texas’ big new gun law: Is the state a model for modern open carry? Of course, Tennessee has had open carry for years — a carry permit in Tennessee is just a carry permit, open or concealed is up to you — without any particular incident.

I think what gun-controllers hate about open carry is that it undercuts their efforts to denormalize firearms ownership.

AT AMAZON, fresh deals on bestselling products, updated every hour.

Also, coupons galore in Grocery & Gourmet Food.

Plus, Kindle Daily Deals.

And, Today’s Featured Digital Deal. The deals are brand new every day, so browse and save!

FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORMED: Pew: Huge surge in single parent homes, 26% now vs. 9% in 1960.

I THOUGHT THE SCIENCE WAS SETTLED: Scientific Journal Publishes Fake Study On Whether Mommy Boo-Boo Kisses Really Work.

In their study, the authors claim to be members of the Study of Maternal and Child Kissing (SMACK) Working Group, which they say is a subsidiary of Procter and Johnson, Inc., the maker of “Bac-Be-Gone ointment and Steri-Aids self-adhesive bandages.” Procter and Johnson, which is not a real consumer goods company, is an obvious mash-up of Procter & Gamble and Johnson & Johnson, two consumer packaged goods companies which sell health care items like bandages and ointments. The only contact information for the study’s authors disclosed in the research paper is a Gmail address. Bac-Be-Gone ointment and Steri-Aids also do not appear to be actual products available for sale. Additionally, many of the academic research references listed at the end of the study–including one article entitled “So what the hell is going on here?”–also appear to be fake.

The research article was published online on December 29, 2015. A manuscript of the paper was accepted by the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, a real publication owned by John Wiley & Sons, on December 10. John Wiley & Sons is a well-respected publisher of multiple academic and medical research journals.

After reading an abstract of the study on the website of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), a federal health agency that funds academic and medical research, The Federalist purchased a full copy of the study from the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice in order to confirm that it was actually published by a peer-reviewed academic journal. According to the journal’s website, articles that are published online prior to being published in a full edition of the journal “have been fully copy-edited and peer reviewed[.]”

None of our institutions seems to be covering itself with glory these days.

ANALYSIS: TRUE. Katherine Timpf: Hillary Clinton Is Not A Feminist.

Since Hillary announced that her husband would be joining her on the campaign trail, people have been debating whether or not it’s fair for the GOP to attack Bill’s sexual misdeeds in order to indirectly attack her.

This makes sense. After all, we’re talking about a guy who has been accused of the sexual assault of more than ten women. Think about it: How is her appointing him really any different than if she’d appointed Bill Cosby?

But here’s the thing: The real issue isn’t whether or not to attack Bill to indirectly attack Hillary — it’s about directly attacking Hillary for how she herself treated the women involved. Hillary Clinton claims to be pro-women, yet has actively worked to ruin lives of so many of them. She’s running on a “feminist platform” — she’s even dared to say that sexual-assault survivors have a “right to be believed” — despite the fact that what she did to the women who accused Bill went far beyond not believing them. She attacked them. When allegations of sexual misconduct emerged during Bill’s 1992 presidential run, she’s reported to have said “Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobody’s going to believe them.” Multiple people also report that she called the women “sluts” and “whores” — you know, for daring to be raped. A private investigator named Ivan Duda claims that, after Bill lost his second governor’s race, Hillary told him: “I want you to get rid of all these b****** he’s seeing . . . I want you to give me the names and addresses and phone numbers, and we can get them under control.”

She’s a real charmer, that one.

HAPPY NEW YEAR! White House Delays Imposing New Sanctions on Iran for Missile Program.

OH HEY RAHM — NICE NEWS DUMP.

MILO YIANNOPOULOS: Coming For 2016: All-Out War On So-Called ‘Social Justice.’

In 2016, battle lines will be drawn. On one side, people of all colours, genders and orientations are rallying around the flag of freedom of speech. On the other, a nasty set of authoritarians are rallying around a flag that identifies as a flag only on Mondays, uses they/them pronouns and will try to get you fired or expelled from school if you forget it.

Let me explain. In 2015, I saw the seeds of a movement begin to sprout. Across the internet, and even in fear-gripped halls on campuses, young people began to stand up and challenge the humourless, divisive, identity-obsessed elites that have taken over our cultural discourse. People of seemingly disparate interests and politics — gamers, pundits, metalheads, comic book and science fiction fans, atheists, Catholics, conservatives, libertarians and even many disaffected liberals — came together to agree on only one thing: art and culture should be left alone.

That movement is called cultural libertarianism. It stands against any authoritarian, from the right or the left, who suck fun and freedom from the world like some kind of vampire without the cool factor, and who use faux grievances and exaggerated victimhood to get what they want. Cultural libertarianism rejects the fainting-couch feminism and race-baiting of the Left in favour of deliberately provocative joyfulness and exuberance. It also predicates facts over hurt feelings, turning anecdotes into “lived experience” — which we are then expected to treat like scientific data.

While college campuses retreat into safe spaces, emotional coddling and treating the leaders of tomorrow like primary school children, cultural libertarians think of new ways to provoke and offend people. In a culture of control, conformity, and coddling, cultural libertarians are the true counterculture. . . . It’s now clear that progressives, lecturing the rest of us on how we ought to live from their bully pulpits in the media, academia and the entertainment industry, are terrified of the internet and don’t want to know what we have to say. Well, tough. In 2016, it’s time for that counterculture to go to war.

Read the whole thing.

HAPPY NEW YEAR! Five Keys to Make 2016 Your Best Year Ever.

FREE FROM SARAH HOYT: Three Fantastic Surprises.

Also: Three Tales Of The Usaians.

AT AMAZON, up to 85% off on Kindle books.

Plus, Year-end Deals.

And a reminder: InstaPundit is an Amazon affiliate. When you do your shopping through the Amazon links on this page, including the “Shop Amazon” tab at the top or the searchbox in the right sidebar, you support this blog at no cost to yourself. Just click on the Amazon link, then shop as usual. I very much appreciate it when you do.

HEH: Ohio State Republican Law Faculty Holiday Party Enjoyed By Both.

HAPPY NEW YEAR: Two Munich Train Stations Evacuated Over Potential ISIS Threat. Contained.

MARK JUDGE: Star Wars and the Crisis of Masculinity.

GEORGE WILL: Goodbye to 2015, The Year American Institutions Became Parodies of Themselves. Fundamentally transformed!

FIVE WORDS? NEXT YEAR WILL BE WORSE.

Related: “President Obama is preparing to unleash a wave of new regulations in 2016 as he looks to shore up his legacy on public protection issues during his final year in office.”

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE, JAPANESE LEGAL EDUCATION EDITION: Japanese Law Schools Facing ‘Unprecedented Crisis’ Amidst 84% Applicant Decline.

What if that happened here? The horror.

JON GABRIEL: IS NEW YEAR’S EVE THE WORST HOLIDAY?

Eventually I figured out why I didn’t care for New Year’s celebrations: They’re filled with people who shout “Wooo!” I don’t like being in places where people shout “Wooo!” It’s like the partiers are trying to convince themselves (and everyone around them) that they they’re having fun, but failing.

As Gabriel asks his readers, “What do you think: Is New Year’s Eve overrated or do you have a celebration planned that will change my mind?”

GEORGE LUCAS APOLOGIZES FOR ‘WHITE SLAVERS’ REMARK ABOUT DISNEY:

Lucas has expressed conflicting feelings about selling the “Star Wars” franchise to Disney for $4 billion in 2012.

He and Disney had different visions for the future of the franchise, which helped him make the decision to move on, though he still refers to the “Star Wars” movies as his “kids.”

“I loved them, I created them, I am very intimately involved in them,” Lucas told [Charlie Rose] about the franchise.

Lucas then quipped: “I sold them to the white slavers that takes these things, and…” Lucas trailed off with a laugh and didn’t finish his sentence.

Gee, as opposed to your kids being conscripted into the Vietcong, the inspiration for the original Star Wars?

Related: Man who pockets four billion dollar golden parachute bemoans evils of “capitalist society.”

MILO YIANNOPOULOS: “I can’t help but share this amazing anonymous smackdown of the odious cult of social justice with readers. It’s currently doing the rounds on Twitter and reddit.”

AMAZON PRIME VIDEO ADDS THE WORLD AT WAR: I’m not sure when the 26-part 1973 series was added to the free programming available to those with an Amazon Prime account, but I noticed it on the roster for the first time while clicking through the Amazon video applet on the Roku box earlier this month. 20 years before the launch of the History Channel, the World At War played frequently on American TV in the mid-to-late 1970s. But for those who’ve never seen it, it’s arguably the best video introduction to World War II that’s ever been released. Produced by Thames Television beginning in 1969, the series featured the sonorous narration of Lawrence Olivier, powerful background music, loads of newsreel footage, and most importantly, interviews with all sides — soldiers who were still only in their 40s, and surviving former world leaders and politicians. (Contrast that with today’s History Channel documentaries, which struggle to find surviving WWII infantrymen who are now in their late 80s and 90s.

We’re very lucky that the World At War has been grandfathered into today’s world of PC history — just imagine how today’s SJWs and their love of both the airbrush and Black Armband History would have told the story of WWII. As I wrote back in 2013 in my introduction to Civilisation, another landmark British TV documentary series produced shortly before The World At War (and equally impossible for the left to make today):

The World At War was made at the perfect time — television documentary techniques were sufficiently developed by 1969 when production on the series began to tell the story properly, and it was only a quarter century after WWII concluded, and enough survivors were still around, still sharp, and able to appear on camera. But of equal importance is that it was made before political correctness had sapped the cultural confidence of the West. If the BBC or Thames’ successor network were to remake the The World at War today, it would have a very different tone to it, probably far closer to Oliver Stone’s “Springtime for Hitler and Stalin” Showtime series than the BBC would care to admit.

Also, the interviews and the contemporary non-newsreel footage were shot in color. We take that entirely for granted now, but when the show first went into production, color TV was still a new phenomenon to many English viewers; BBC2 had only begun broadcasting in color in 1967, and BBC1 not until 1969. It’s tough to conceive of something like Monty Python‘s Flying Circus as being shot in black and white, but as late as 1967, its immediate predecessor, a show with the classic title of At Last, the 1948 Show, was a monochrome production.

Of course, the one problem with The World At War is that those who need to see the series the most will likely never watch it:

I ASKED STEPHEN GREEN ABOUT THIS AND HE SAID, “WATER?” Should You Filter Your Water? “Using the right water filter can help further reduce pollutants like lead from old water pipes, pesticide runoff in rural areas and byproducts of chemicals like chlorine that are used to treat drinking water. Radon, arsenic and nitrates are common pollutants in drinking water, and trace amounts of drugs including antibiotics and hormones have also been found. Certain filters may help remove these impurities as well.”

IT’S ABOUT JUSTICE DON WILLETT, NATCH: Tweeter Laureate rocks social media from judicial post.

DISPATCHES FROM THE PARENTHESES STATES: California, Leading from Behind, Victor Davis Hanson writes:

California somehow has managed to have the fourth-highest gas taxes in the nation, yet its roads are rated 44th among the 50 states. Nearly 70 percent of California roads are considered to be in poor or mediocre condition by the state senate. In response, the state legislature naturally wants to raise gas taxes, with one proposal calling for an increase of 12 cents per gallon, which would give California the highest gas taxes in the nation.

Because oil prices have crashed, state bureaucrats apparently believe that the public won’t notice the tax increase in their fill-up costs* – even though special California fuel mandates already help make gas prices 25 percent higher than the national average.

Consider California’s upside-down logic.

The state wanted to discourage driving and promote hybrid vehicles by upping taxes on carbon fuels. It worked, though it cost the public dearly. People drove less and bought more fuel-efficient cars. But now, because less gas is burned, fewer taxes are collected. So the state wants to reward motorists for their green sacrifices by raising their taxes even higher to make up for missing revenue. If state motorists drive even less and cram into two-seat commuter cars, will California further reward them with even higher gas taxes?

Meanwhile, in the other big blue parenthesis state, “Cigarette tax revenue plunges as smokers buy outside New York:”

New York state cigarette tax collections have plunged by about $400 million over the past five years…sales of taxed cigs in New York are off by 54 percent in the past decade, which is also cutting into the profits of local store owners peddling smokes. In that same period, about 19 percent of New Yorkers stopped smoking, a pace well below the huge sales dip.

“The Germans call it ‘schadenfreude’ when you take pleasure from another person’s misfortune,” noted Dan Mitchell, a tax expert at the Washington DC-based Cato Institute, commenting on the New York smoking tax fiasco.

Mitchell added, “I confess that I get a certain joy from this story because politicians are being punished for their greed. I like the fact that they have less money to waste.”

To paraphrase VDH’s conclusion, both states have governments that ultimately serve one purpose — reminding Americans what not to do.

*And they’re counting on their Democrat operatives with bylines not to point that out — who are all too eager to follow their marching orders.

YESTERDAY’S POST ON EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS BROUGHT THIS RECOMMENDATION FROM A READER: Peace of Mind in Earthquake Country: How to Save Your Home, Business, and Life.

QUESTION ASKED AND ANSWERED:

● “Obama: Nihilist or Just Incompetent?”

—Victor Davis Hanson, October 4th, 2015.

● “Obama to Seinfeld: ‘I Always Wanted To Be In a Show About Nothing.’”

—Tammy Bruce.com, yesterday.

“IT’S TIME TO SAY NO TO OUR PAMPERED STUDENT EMPERORS* — The Rhodes statue row can be blamed on a generation raised to believe that their feelings are all that matter,” British columnist Harry Mount writes in the London Telegraph:

The little emperors have grown up. The babies of the late 90s – mollycoddled by their parents, spoon-fed by their teachers, indulged by society – have now reached university. Some of the brighter ones are now at Oxford, demanding that the Cecil Rhodes statue at Oriel should be torn down, because of his imperialist, racist views.

We shouldn’t be so surprised. If you’ve had a lifetime of people saying “yes” to you, of never being told off, you remain frozen in a permanent state of supersensitivity. I wasn’t offended by the Rhodes statue when I was at Oxford 20 years ago. But, even if I had been, I wouldn’t have thought my wounded feelings should be cured by tearing apart the delicate fabric of a beautiful university.

Universities are reaping the whirlwind of two decades of child-centred education. That whirlwind has imported imbecilic trigger warnings – when academics have to warn students that western European literature, from the Iliad on, is full of sex and violence. It has also brought the pernicious idea of “no-platforming” – when students refuse to give a stage to anyone who doesn’t fit with their narrow view of the world.

Read the whole thing.

Related: “Remy: Students United! Collegians everywhere are asking tough questions: Why is our tuition so high? Where are our jobs? Can’t you see your words hurt me, you dumb piece of sh*t?”

* Personally, I prefer Iowahawk’s “Screaming Campus Garbage Babies” description, but perhaps that’s too provocative a characterization for the Telegraph.

“THAT’S NICE [SINCE] SHE HELPED DESTROY THEIR COUNTRY:” “Samantha Power, United States ambassador to the United Nations, wants to welcome refugees into the country with open arms. The next time you think you’re being clever by asking Power how many Syrian refugee families she’s taken in, keep in mind that she’s taken in one family more than you have — for dinner and a photo-op — and just might have them back for her Super Bowl party.”

DUBAI INFERNO: FLAMES SHOOT UP 63-STORY HOTEL. “As some million people packed Dubai for the emirate’s notoriously spectacular New Year’s fireworks displays, an inferno lit up a 63-story luxury hotel downtown,” Bridget Johnson writes at PJM. “Witnesses said the fire broke out at about 9:30 p.m. local time on the lower third of the building and spread quickly. The hotel was evacuated and there were no immediate reports of injuries.”

No victims? Well, that’s what they want you to think, Allahpundit conjectures. “From what I saw, the blown-out parts ran around 10 stories high and a good 10 or so windows across. (The hotel is 63 stories tall and not quite 1,000 feet high.) Unless literally everyone inside the hotel was out on the streets celebrating New Year’s Eve, there are victims.”

So what caused it? “One Twitter user captured an image showing only a very small fire at the start; local authorities tell CNN that it started on the exterior of the 20th floor. Could fireworks from the ground have misfired? Stay tuned,” he writes, adding in an update, “One reason to think this might be accidental rather than arson is that the hotel is near the Burj Khalifa, the world’s tallest building. If you were a terrorist or pyromaniac looking to maximize the impact of your crime, wouldn’t you target the Burj instead?”

In February, a fire devastated another Dubai skyscraper, a 79-story residential structure with 676 apartments carrying an unfortunate moniker — “The Torch.”

As Nathan Wurtzel remarked on Twitter concerning the two fires, “We can make one assumption, but don’t rule out the sh**ty construction assumption.”

SPACE: Speculation on Spacex Mars Colonization Transport.

I DON’T WANT YOU DYING IN A FIRE: At Amazon, Deals on Kidde Products. I have, by the way, a CO₂ fire extinguisher for my kitchen, because the dry-chemical kind make a mess.

Also, New Year, New You.

REMEMBER THE 1990s? IT WAS IN ALL THE PAPERS:

Shot: Hewitt Schools [CNN's Don Lemon] on Need for Trump, GOP to Educate Millenials on Bill Clinton Sex Scandals.

—Headline, NewsBusters, Tuesday.

Chaser: “‘Is that right? Fourteen??’ That’s Alisyn Camerota, 1:21 into the video clip. The shock and incredulity in the voice of the CNN host is stupendous! Yes, who could possibly imagine that, as CNN commentator Errol Louis stated, there are 14 women who could potentially make allegations of improprieties against Bill Clinton.”

—NewsBusters, today.

MARK RIPPETOE: The First Three Questions.

TWO STEPS CLOSER TO A QUANTUM INTERNET.

I WON’T SAY THAT BIOETHICS IS AN ENTIRELY USELESS FIELD, BUT THE EVIDENCE LEANS THAT WAY: Standing Athwart Science, Yelling ‘Whoa’: I’m a bioethicist, and I am here to help slow down scientific and medical progress.

21ST CENTURY RESEARCH: Sex in the name of science: what we can learn from studying intercourse. “Who volunteers to have sex in a laboratory? I was struck by this question when reading about an experimental study of ideal sexual positions for men with back pain. For the purpose of the research, couples were filmed using motion capture and infra-red technology while they had sex.”

MY USA TODAY COLUMN: Playing the ‘Bill card’ against Hillary: It’s what she gets for playing the ‘war on women card’ against Trump.

AN INTERVIEW WITH THE EDITORS OF STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS. “The thing about having so many characters with masks on, is that even without re-shooting, you can change the content of the scenes with new lines [recorded after the original shoot and dubbed in]. And with characters who are CG or motion capture, you can change what they’re saying.”

IN THE MAIL: The Pioneer Woman Cooks: Dinnertime: Comfort Classics, Freezer Food, 16-Minute Meals, and Other Delicious Ways to Solve Supper!

Plus, today only at Amazon: Save 64% on P90X Base Kit.

And, also today only: $5 Magazines: As Low as $.50/Issue.

Plus: Save 35% on these Sony Noise-Canceling Wired Headphones.

And: 100 Books to Read in a Lifetime, Up to 80% Off Select Titles on Kindle.

TAXPROF ROUNDUP: The IRS Scandal, Day 966.

PRIORITIES: Just after worst terror attack on American soil since 9/11, Obama tapes show with comedian. “The two taped the segment at the White House on Dec. 7 — the day after Obama delivered a televised prime-time address on terrorism. Though Seinfeld taped footage around Washington for two days, the president never actually left the grounds of the White House with him.”

RACISM: From NYC to Harvard: the war on Asian success.

The outrage is that instead of embracing the example of these Asian families, school authorities and non-Asian parents want to rig the system to hold them back. It’s happening here in New York City, in suburban New Jersey and across the nation.

As a group, Americans need to take a page from the Asian parents’ playbook. American teens rank a dismal 28th in math and science knowledge, compared with teens in other countries — even poor countries. Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan are at the top.

We’ve slumped. For the first time in 25 years, US scores on the main test for elementary and middle school education fell. And SAT scores for college-bound students dropped significantly.

Could changes in these tests be to blame? That convenient excuse was torpedoed by the stellar performances of Asian-American students. Even though many come from poor or immigrant families, they outscore all other students by large margins on both tests, and their lead keeps widening.

Here in New York City, Asian-Americans make up 13 percent of students, yet they win more than half of the coveted places each year at the city’s selective public high schools, such as Bronx Science and Stuyvesant.

What’s at play here? It’s not a difference in IQ; it’s parenting. That’s confirmed by a recent study by sociologists from City University of New York and the University of Michigan, which showed that parental oversight enabled Asian-American students to far outperform the others.

No wonder many successful charter schools require parents to sign a pledge that they’ll supervise their children’s homework and encourage a strong work ethic.

That formula is under fire at the West Windsor-Plainsboro Regional School District in New Jersey. The district, which is 65 percent Asian, routinely produces seniors with perfect SAT scores, admissions to MIT and top prizes in international science competitions.

Why are Democrat-run institutions and cities such hotbeds of anti-Asian racism?

THE COUNTRY’S IN THE VERY BEST OF HANDS: IRS Employee Whose Job Was Assisting Victims Of Identity Theft Charged In $1 Million Identity Theft Tax Fraud.

AT AMAZON, fresh deals on bestselling products, updated every hour.

Also, coupons galore in Grocery & Gourmet Food.

Plus, Kindle Daily Deals.

And, Today’s Featured Digital Deal. The deals are brand new every day, so browse and save!

THERE IS NO RACIST LIKE AN ANTIRACIST, writes Theodore Dalrymple. “That is because he is obsessed by race, whose actual existence as often as not he denies. He looks at the world through race-tinted spectacles, interprets every event or social phenomenon as a manifestation of racism either implicit or explicit, and in general has the soul of a born inquisitor.”

Read the whole thing.

(Via Ace of Spades.)

THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS “TRULY TOOK A VILLAGE:” New York magazine interviews Michael Burry, “the economic soothsayer portrayed by Christian Bale” in the film adaptation of Michael Lewis’s book The Big Short. Kate McMillan of Small Dead Animals linked to his interview via the sentence we’re also quoting above in the headline:

The postcrisis perception, at least in the media, appears to be one of Americans being held down by Wall Street, by big companies in the private sector, and by the wealthy. Capitalism is on trial. I see it a little differently. If a lender offers me free money, I do not have to take it. And if I take it, I better understand all the terms, because there is no such thing as free money. That is just basic personal responsibility and common sense. The enablers for this crisis were varied, and it starts not with the bank but with decisions by individuals to borrow to finance a better life, and that is one very loaded decision. This crisis was such a bona fide 100-year flood that the entire world is still trying to dig out of the mud seven years later. Yet so few took responsibility for having any part in it, and the reason is simple: All these people found others to blame, and to that extent, an unhelpful narrative was created. Whether it’s the one percent or hedge funds or Wall Street, I do not think society is well served by failing to encourage every last American to look within. This crisis truly took a village, and most of the villagers themselves are not without some personal responsibility for the circumstances in which they found themselves.

Was that last sentence a Freudian slip, or a deliberately underplayed comment referencing both the administration who gave the dominoes the biggest push and the woman who is now running for her husband’s old office?

Add the 2008 crisis to Clinton letting Osama bin Laden go a decade earlier and ABC doing its damnedest to bury this story, and much of the past 14 years can be seen as a hangover from the excesses of the Clinton administration — or at least it would be, if the MSM had any desire whatsoever to craft that narrative.

COLLEGE SPORTS BOOM, MINORITIES HARDEST HIT: Mother Jones: Racists Hate the Idea of Paying College Athletes.

I’m in favor of paying them, but I’m in more favor of simply abolishing college athletics. If the NFL and NBA want farm teams let the build their own.

TOP 6 MILITARY MISSTEPS OF 2015: “The U.S. military rightly remains one of the most respected of American institutions — our armed forces are as professional as they come. But let’s be honest, over the last year, the stewardship of the service has had its share of missteps.”

Read the whole thing.

CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: In Dallas, Armed Libertarians Openly Defy Law To Feed, Clothe Homeless.

TRUMP AND SANDERS BREAK THE MOLD FOR POPULIST POLITICIANS, Jonah Goldberg writes. “Populism is typically born in places like Nebraska, Louisiana, Kansas, and the other places given short shrift in that famous Saul Steinberg New Yorker cartoon showing the view of the world from Ninth Avenue. It’s not supposed to hail from Brooklyn or Queens, never mind Burlington, Vermont, or midtown Manhattan. But that’s where the two reigning populists of the 2016 cycle call home.”

But there is some overlap in the two men, who share a few of leitmotifs sounded by the left-leaning “Progressive” populists of old:

If you can ignore the fact that he’s a billionaire who brags about having been part of the corrupt political system he promises to overthrow, Trump resembles some of the great populists of yesteryear. He’s a nationalist who promises to restore the country to the greatness his followers nostalgically desire. He’s a nativist whose one core issue is stopping illegal immigration — and now any immigration of Muslims, “temporarily.” And he’s a consummate panderer — or, if you prefer, “fighter” — who channels and validates his supporters’ frustrations. As the fictionalized Huey Long character Willie Stark says in the novel All the King’s Men: “Your will is my strength. Your need is my justice.” Long promised to make “every man a king.” Trump promises to make everyone a winner.

Sanders, meanwhile, is all about populist economics — literally. With the exception of his pacifism, he is almost incapable of talking about anything else. But his worldview would be totally recognizable to William Jennings Bryan or Long or even Father Charles Coughlin. According to populist economics, the rich exploit the poor and the middle class intentionally. They leech off their hard work, and they send them to war.

The proper role for populist-run government is to make the puppet masters pay, literally and figuratively. Our economy is “designed by the wealthiest people in this country to benefit the wealthiest people in this country at the expense of everybody else,” Sanders insists. The “billionaire class” has rigged it all, and he’s so angry about it, he often seems more interested in tearing down the rich than building up the poor. (To borrow a Seinfeldian phrase, Sanders sounds like an old man sending back soup at a deli.)

This is one place where Sanders and Trump overlap. They want to make the people ruining this country pay. Sanders wants to impose a cartoonish “speculation” tax on Wall Street; Trump wants to make the Mexicans pay for the wall that will keep them out.

But as Glenn has written in USA Today, as with the rise of the populists of the late 19th and the first half of the 20th century, “Trump and Sanders are just symptoms. The real disease is in the ruling class that takes such important subjects out of political play, in its own interest.”

BUT IT PROBABLY WON’T BE, UNTIL 2017 AT THE EARLIEST: Why ISIS Needs to Be Destroyed Now.

JESSE SINGAL: Why Some of the Worst Attacks on Social Science Have Come From Liberals:

This should stand as a wake-up call, as a rebuke to the smugness that sometimes infects progressive beliefs about who “respects” science more. After all, what both the Bailey and Chagnon cases have in common — alongside some of the others in Galileo’s Middle Finger — is the extent to which groups of progressive self-appointed defenders of social justice banded together to launch full-throated assaults on legitimate science, and the extent to which these attacks were abetted by left-leaning academic institutions and activists too scared to stand up to the attackers, often out of a fear of being lumped in with those being attacked, or of being accused of wobbly allyship.

Everyone, of any political leaning, is vulnerable to such pressures. But lefties seem to care more about belonging.

The book is Galileo’s Middle Finger: Heretics, Activists, and the Search for Justice in Science, by Alice Dreger.

CLAUDIA ROSETT IS DESPERATELY SEEKING U.S. FOREIGN POLICY TRIUMPHS in her year-in-review article: “It sounds like a simple assignment: list 10 U.S. foreign policy triumphs of 2015. OK, make that five. Can we maybe find three? Two? After all, President Obama has pivoted to foreign policy as the centerpiece of his second term, and Secretary of State John Kerry has logged a gazillion miles of diplomatic travel, punctuated by marathon talks, capped by ‘historic’ deals. So, how’s that working out?”

Just swimmingly, if you ask Kerry or others at the State Department. Those of us in the real world though have a far grimmer view of this administration’s “accomplishments,” sadly.

A TALE OF TWO BILLS: Funny how well today’s New York Daily News cover on Bill Cosby would work just as well, by simply replacing the photo:

Related: The Professor’s latest USA Today column on “Playing the ‘Bill card’ against Hillary — It’s what she gets for playing the ‘war on women card’ against Trump.” And “Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?”

THE YEAR IN BIOMEDICINE.

WHERE THERE’S LIGHT, THERE IS CIVILIZATION: Tokyo Illuminations.

WHITE PRIVILEGE IN ACTION: From NYC to Harvard: the war on Asian success.

WHAT DO YOU KNOW? THERE IS CONSENSUS AFTER ALL: Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis.

JUXTAPOSITION FOR THE WIN: Feds will ring in 2016 buried in debt of $58,000 per person.
AND: Mele Kalikimaka: Taxpayer’s gift to Obama is $470,000 a day Hawaiian vacation.

AND WHAT WAS IT?  OH YEAH:

WHAT THE PUBLIC THINKS THEY KNOW: The public thinks the average company makes a 36% profit margin, which is about 5X too high.

OF COURSE, THERE IS NO CHANCE: Why Team Obama’s Israel spying should be a major scandal.

DO YOU THINK CLINTON WILL BE GENTLE? This is just the bloodletting the Republican Party needs.

FOR THE GENUINE ONES, THANK POLITICS: Thank Kim Kardashian for all the fake asses out there.

NO LONGER LOST: How a Near-Pristine 35mm Print of Orson Welles’ ‘Chimes at Midnight’ Was Found.

THIS IS GOOD TO SEE: “Mom said no,” “Only if there’s free pizza”: Muslims hilariously respond to ISIL leader’s call for recruits.

THOSE GALS OUT IN ALASKA: First female Caterpillar field mechanic in Alaska.

IS IT ME OR IS THE ATLANTIC BLAMING PRESERVATIONISTS FOR SKY HIGH RENTS IN SAN FRAN? San Francisco’s Self-Defeating Housing Activists.

BEYOND OBAMA’S FLAWED ANALOGIES: Assassin’s Screed.

WORTH CONSIDERING: I can tell you from reading my sons’ books through high school and college, that a theme throughout was “aspire to just enough.  Don’t reach for the stars.” Gaslighting the Middle Class. Of course, partly is how you look at it.  The very technology makes the world interconnected and there’s going to be a painful time of equalizing compensation throughout the world. At the same time the rising ability to work on anything anywhere does represent more individual freedom.

THE ERROR WAS ASSUMING OBAMA WANTED US TO WIN: What It Takes to Win in Afghanistan.

THIS IS MY SHOCKED FACE FOR THE EVENING: Seventy-Five Percent of Americans Dissatisfied with Washington, D.C.

NAOMI SCHAEFER RILEY: The secret of ‘Joy’ — how imaginary play can lead to genius.

It’s true that Joy, who is based on Joy Mangano (now a multimillionaire inventor of a variety of bestselling household products) does have a kind of “special power.” Nothing supernatural, though — just a great imagination and the tenacity to harness it.

But if the movie is accurate, she had access to some things that many kids today do not. She had time to herself to daydream and play and the ability to live in a world largely free of electronic distractions.

Though her mother is constantly watching soap operas, Joy is more interested in using household items — paper, tape, crayons — to invent things. Her first invention was a glow-in-the-dark flea collar to make pets more visible to cars at night.

Though Joy came from an ordinary working-class household, it turns out that her childhood shares some elements with many of the world’s creative geniuses.

In their book “Imagination and Play in the Electronic Age,” Yale researchers Dorothy Singer and Jerome Singer note, “Autobiographical reports or direct interviews conducted with eminent writers, inventors and scientists demonstrate that their early experiences with play in childhood . . . are important features of their creative process.”

They describe how we all have fleeting thoughts or daydreams, but the people later regarded as geniuses are able to pay close attention to those fantasies and harness them for innovation.

Unfortunately, it’s increasingly difficult for children to be able to engage in the kind of pretend play that previous generations enjoyed.

In an article in the January issue of The Atlantic, Yale’s Erika Christakis describes how we’re forcing kids to perform academic exercises at earlier ages and taking time away from free-form imaginative play.

Play is work for children. It’s as important as any academic work. But letting kids play on their own doesn’t generate jobs, unionized workers, or self-importance for adults, so it gets short shrift.

CARRIE LUKAS: The Bill Clinton Effect: Why Liberals Treat Women Worse.

Young progressives may only know a whitewashed version of the Clinton scandals, in which rabid conservatives tried to make a mountain out of a consensual-affair molehill. Yet the undisputed facts of the Lewinsky affair reveal a clear and classic example of a powerful man abusing women under his power and creating a hostile work environment: Clinton was a powerful executive having sexual relations with a 22-year-old intern working in his office, whom he rewarded with a taxpayer-financed job and other special treatment. None of the interns working alongside Monica got cushy job offers post-internship. That alone is supposed to be a giant red flag for those concerned about equal treatment and a harassment-free workplace.

But, of course, that was just the tip of the iceberg; Clinton was having his affair with Monica in the midst of an ongoing investigation into his alleged sexual harassment of a state employee (Paula Jones) during his time as Governor of Arkansas. Other women also came forward with allegations of harassment and even assault. Clinton lied about his affair with Lewinsky, at first suggesting she was delusional, both to the public and then when testifying under oath as a part of that sexual harassment suit.

Liberal women’s groups are supposed to frown on men who smear women and undermine the legal process of sexual harassment suits, and take accusations of sexual assault seriously. Yet President Clinton—a good Democrat who supported abortion rights and other feminist sacraments—was largely given a pass. Sure, some feminists murmured their disappointment with Clinton’s behavior and mouthed platitudes about Paula Jones deserving her day in court. But their criticisms were perfunctory at best. Mostly, they stood by Clinton’s side, defending him and remaining silent as he lied and slandered the women who accused him.

Compare this to the treatment of Justice Clarence Thomas. Even if one assumes that every accusation made by Anita Hill is true, Justice Thomas would at most be crass and a little boorish, but very minor-league in terms of sexual harassment compared to Clinton. Yet women’s groups and the liberal media pounded Thomas, almost derailing his Supreme Court nomination, and to this day ensure that his name is synonymous with sexual harassment.

It’s as if this is all about political advantage, not women’s equality.

FLASHBACK: Coulter Lambastes Media Over Epstein Rape Case: This Is What Media Thought UVA Rape Case Was.

SGT. PEPPER’S LONELY VICTIMS CLUB — or Maxwell’s Silver Microaggressions? “When Beatlemania Is a Microaggression…It is time to rejoice, for all our troubles are so far away…,” Nick Gillespie quips at Reason.

Gillespie spots psychology professor Adam J. Rodriguez of California’s Notre Dame de Namaur University, who takes to the Huffington Post* to whine that “My friend, caught in his ethnocentric blindness, could not grasp that somebody would have a different experience and values from him:”

For him, there was a given. The given was that everybody would love the Beatles. My lack of interest in their music could only be understood by him as psychopathology. I was flawed. It could not be understood as a cultural difference. Of course, he has no idea who Oscar Hernandez is, and believes that Carlos Santana wrote Oye Como Va (he didn’t, by the way). But that’s okay. How should I expect him to know these things when they are so outside of his cultural experience?

As always, life imitates Bill Murray in Stripes, who said to his girlfriend at the start of the movie, “Someday, Tito Puente’s gonna be dead, and you’re gonna say, ‘Oh, I’ve been listening to him for years, and I think he’s fabulous.’” But then, as Gillespie — himself no fan of the Beatles** — responds, lighten up, Adam:

There has never been less of a dominant monoculture than ever before and there has never been as open a standing invitation to open people’s minds to what you like, care about, and think is totally fab and gear. Without a doubt, there are people who are convinced and terrified that the world they grew up is in its death throes (watch this if you don’t believe me), which only underscores the point that the mainstream has shrunk since the mid-’90s when we talked with Rodriguez, much less 1970, when the Beatles broke up (thank you for that, Yoko Ono, thank you, thank you, thank you). From that 1994 interview again:

Most people tend to use culture in a static sense—he represents this culture and I represent this culture. I think culture is much more fluid and experiential. I belong to many cultures. I’ve had many cultural experiences. And the notion that I’ve lost my culture is ludicrous. because you can’t lose a culture. You can change a culture in your lifetime. as in fact most of us do. I’m not my father. I didn’t grow up in the state of Colima in Western Mexico. I grew up in California in the 1950s. The notion that I’ve lost his culture is, of course, at some level true, but not interesting. The interesting thing is that my culture is I Love Lucy.

For the perpetually aggrieved, time has stood still as it did for Miss Havisham and they mistake the current moment, which has different problems and advantages and contexts, for a past whose issues and indignities no longer pertain in the same way. The hunt is always afoot not for moving to a future that is open-ended, inclusive, and far more interesting and innovative than the present but for reviving and maintaining grievances, no matter how trivial and inconsequential.

Read the whole thing; no word yet if Rodriguez has any strong opinions on the Rutles.

* In an age when so many global warming experts insist, as they have for the last 45 years, that Mother Gaia only has five years to live, is this really the best use of the Huffington Post’s giant air conditioned server farm to hasten her demise?

** No seriously, how can anyone not love the Beatles?

NEWS YOU CAN USE: Is your home earthquake-ready? How to prepare for the Big One.

Thoughts on earthquake preparation, here. Plus, an earthquake preparedness list. But everyone, everywhere, should be prepared for disasters.