Back in 2010, when Keith Olbermann was still on MSNBC, before he wore out his welcome at yet another cable network, we had a lot of fun comparing his fire and brimstone style to another hypocritical podium thumper, Sinclair Lewis’ 1920s Elmer Gantry character. But while Keith has since left MSNBC for even lower ratings, that old-time religion continues to emanate from the GE subsidiary’s studios:
MSNBC’s newest host, leftist professor Melissa Harris-Perry debuts Saturday morning, creating an actual four-hour block for the radicals at The Nation magazine. Harris-Perry is on the cover of this week’s Metro Weekly, a gay D.C. news magazine. At the end of the interview with Chris Geidner, there’s this whopper: her bible is written by Al Sharpton and Rachel Maddow.
Advertisement“Undoubtedly, a little bit of both. Look, I love Politics Nation with Al Sharpton and The Rachel Maddow Show. And, I can’t think of two shows on the same network that are more different in tone and content.” Then she said: “I see them as my Old Testament and New Testament. I really need them both. I need to smite my enemies, and I need to understand them. And then I need to smite them, and then understand them. I probably will do a little bit of both on my show.”
But how can MSNBC be the Old and New Testament, when there’s the New York Times, and Jill Abramson, its latest editor, who famously said last year:
Ms. Abramson said that as a born-and-raised New Yorker, she considered being named editor of The Times to be like “ascending to Valhalla.”
“In my house growing up, The Times substituted for religion,” she said. “If The Times said it, it was the absolute truth.”
The paper of “absolute truth” quickly airbrushed out the above uber-embarrassing quote from its then-incoming editor’s press release. But still, as Daniel J. Flynn wrote in 2008′s A Conservative History of the American Left:
Before the religious Right, there was a religious Left. The twentieth-century American Left got ideas from Karl Marx; the nineteenth-century American Left, from Jesus Christ.
“Religious Left” strikes contemporary ears as an oxymoron. Could Michael Moore, Bill Maher, or Susan Sarandon venture inside a church without melting? There are the reverends Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Barry Lynn, but they preach politics. The hostility to religion often associated with the Left was not always so pronounced. Indeed, Christianity once served as the primary influence upon American leftists. Its influence on early American leftists was so profound that it put its stamp on their decidedly irreligious offspring. Secular reformers admired the sacrifice and the communal unity of the early religious fanatics but not, generally, the religious beliefs. Religion and politics mixed in the Social Gospel, whose enthusiasts ultimately reached for more social, less gospel. What emerged was a political religion, or, perhaps more accurately, a religious politics. The secular kept the forms without the function. They promised salvation, exalted saints, pursued heretics, revered holy books, enforced dogma, viewed history teleologically, and acted with a self-righteousness generally confined to the elect and an ends-justifies-the-means mentality characteristic of millennial deliverers. They lost faith in God, but not faith itself.
Or to paraphrase Mark Knopfler, two women say their “news” organizations are Jesus. One of them must be wrong.
– about the like of Olby centuries before Olby was born.
Leftism manages to incorporate all of religion’s worst elements while retaining none of its better features. It is sheer self-worship. They worship at the shrine of their own ideas. Therein lies its worst flaw: when one sets out to define everything in life by being “against” everything else, the term “reactionary” can hardly be adequate to describe it.
I hope recent events have made people think harder about why freedom of speech and religion are intertwined in the First Amendment. We are really talking about freedom of thought (and the right to express those thoughts) in both cases. Leftism is a religion. It is faith, not reason-based. I don’t mind them practicing it, but, like other immature religions,they look upon apostacy as deserving of a death sentence, so they are not willing to allow me the same right.
Do we all see now why the Left can embrace Islam, even though Islam would have the NY Times’ and the Nation’s staff lined up for beheadings on Day Two of the Caliphate? The things we find utterly repugnant in both do not phase them in the least. The truly funny thing is that they both use lies and deceit to such an extent in dealing with each other that they never seem to appreciate that after they’ve done with us, they will have to slay one another in the end.
Americans have always believed that wackiness was the default human condition, but, if we just didn’t make an issue of our differences, we could still get along. No other country on Earth did this as well as we did. But now we have speech crimes and hate crimes and all manner of thought policing, instead of simple tolerance. “Mind your own business” was once a ubiquitous saying; now it only applies to sexual perversion or other embarrassing misconduct.
It is high time that we begin to look afresh, as detached anthropologists, at this mess. We have piled lies and untruths so high on top of one another, that we must enforce compliance with the lies to function. We need to begin to look at our world like we just arrived from another planet, and begin to call spades what they are, if we are to survive. When Whitney Houston is mourned like Mother Teresa (did New Jersey fly the flags at half mast for her?) and we name warships after crime victims, just how far are we from The End?
And perhaps outlaw the Liberal religion, because, like Islam, it cannot tolerate any others and survive. We need to get back to only extending tolerance to those who reciprocate with us. After all, we have a law against the KKK. How is what they were up to in the 1920s any different from what we’re seeing now? Funny how the membership of those two groups, Democrat/Liberals of today and the KKK of yore, overlap, no?