Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

The president has turned himself into “A Shovel-Ready Punch Line,” which we all saw coming, Jonah Goldberg writes:

Back in October, when Obama admitted that he had to learn on the job that shovel-ready jobs don’t exist, then-governor Ed Rendell (D., Penn.)  — a leader in the push for the stimulus — told the New York Times it was all a terrible misunderstanding. “When we said ‘shovel ready’ we meant ‘shovel ready’ in the way we do things.” He added, “I don’t think we meant to be deceptive.”

You’ve got to love the “I don’t think” there.

Advertisement

The “way we do things” involves endless paperwork, union regulations, environmental red tape, and the like. That’s why it only took 410 days to build the Empire State building and 16 months to build the Pentagon but nearly 20 years to complete Boston’s Big Dig. Lord knows how long it will be for the government to finish work on Ground Zero.

The point is that the president and his team came into office insisting that they were on top of things and above mere ideological considerations. When confronted with skepticism about the existence of “shovel-ready” projects, they in effect rolled their eyes and scoffed at the backseat drivers.

But they were the ones who were blinded by ideology. One need not be an ideologue to understand that public-works contracting has become bloated and inefficient. Indeed, one must be an ideologue of a certain kind not to understand that. Or one has to be incredibly naive. Or both.

Perhaps that’s why Obama’s real economic agenda never changed to fit the economic crisis. During the campaign he promised to reform health care and fight for a green economy. After the financial crisis, the “pragmatist” stuck to his outdated agenda, saying — surprise! — what the economy needs is the same agenda he promised before. So while he kept saying he was obsessed with job creation, he spent all of his political capital on health-care reform and energy. All the while, the White House tries to spin its agenda as something it’s not.

For instance, you know where this jobs-council meeting took place? At Cree Inc., an LED lightbulb maker. Under the supposedly jobs-boosting stimulus, Cree received $5.2 million. According to Recovery.gov, that $5.2 million created 3.02 jobs. That’s $1,716,171 per job.

There’s a funny joke in there somewhere, but I don’t think Obama wants to tell it.

Between that and Obama’s gaffetastic ATM reference, the aloof, Carter-esque president is remarkably vulnerable to a challenger, but as the Professor is wont to say, don’t get cocky, GOP.

Update: Welcome Reason Hit & Run readers.

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

3 Comments, 2 Threads, 2 Trackbacks

  1. 1. GRUP

    Wow, from CETA’s estimated $300,000 per job to $1,700,000 per “stimulus” job, quite a healthy market rise ! Even adjusted for inflation, nice gig for those who can “get it”. Hope for massive change in 2012! GBUSA

  2. 2. GDI

    As an official cranky contrarian, I’ve been doing similar Investment Cost v. Job Return calculations for local projects. In round figures, it’s costing taxpayers roughly $100,000 to $150,000 at minimum for every job created. At. Minimum.

    Wouldn’t it be cheaper to just send $50K to every unemployed person and cut out the greedy middle-man, er, government recovery specialist (or whatever they’re called this week)?

    • Buck O'Fama

      Yeah, if it were about results, that would matter. But the Party of Weiners is really about putting as much money as possible in the pockets of as many cronies as possible. And all the while, frantically trying to maintain the illusion that it’s all about us.